Urbanization dramatically changes the composition and diversity of biotic communities. The characteristics distinguishing species that persist in urban environments, however, are poorly understood. Here we test the hypothesis that broadly adapted organisms are better able to tolerate urbanization, using a phylogenetically controlled, global comparison of birds. We compared elevational and latitudinal distributions of 217 urban birds found in 73 of the world's largest cities with distributions of 247 rural congeners to test the hypothesis that urban birds possess broader environmental tolerance. Urban birds had markedly broader environmental tolerance than rural congeners, as estimated by elevational and latitudinal distributions. Our results suggest that broad environmental tolerance may predispose some birds to thrive in urban habitats. The mechanisms mediating such environmental tolerance warrant further investigation, but probably include greater behavioural, physiological and ecological flexibility.

Footnotes

†Present address: Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6.

References

Bonier F, Martin P.R, Sheldon K.S, Jensen J.P, Foltz S.L& Wingfield J.C. 2007 Sex-specific consequences of life in the city. Behav. Ecol 18, 121–129.doi:10.1093/beheco/arl050. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Clergeau P, Savard J.-P.L, Mennechez G& Falardeau G. 1998 Bird abundance and diversity along an urban–rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100, 413–425.doi:10.2307/1369707. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Cofre H.L, Böhning-Gaese K& Marquet P.A. 2007 Rarity in Chilean forest birds: which ecological and life-history traits matter? Divers. Distrib 13, 203–212. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Dickinson, E. C. (ed.) 2003 The Howard and Moore complete checklist of the birds of the world, 3rd edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Glazier D.S. 1980 Ecological shifts and the evolution of geographically restricted species of North American Peromyscus (mice). J. Biogeogr 7, 63–83.doi:10.2307/2844547. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Glazier D.S. 1986 Temporal variability of abundance and the distribution of species. Oikos 47, 309–314.doi:10.2307/3565442. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Harcourt A.H, Coppeto S.A& Parks S.A. 2002 Rarity, specialization and extinction in primates. J. Biogeogr 29, 445–456.doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00685.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Ishitami M, Kotze D.J& Niemelä J. 2003 Changes in carabid beetle assemblages across an urban–rural gradient in Japan. Ecography 26, 481–489.doi:10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03436.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Kitahara M, Sei K& Fujii K. 2000 Patterns in the structure of grassland butterfly communities along a gradient of human disturbance: further analysis based on the generalist/specialist concept. Popul. Ecol 42, 135–144.doi:10.1007/PL00011992. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Lepczyk C.A. 2005 Integrating published data and citizen science to describe bird diversity across a landscape. J. Appl. Ecol 42, 672–677.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01059.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Partecke J, Schwabl I& Gwinner E. 2006 Stress and the city: urbanization and its effects on the stress physiology in European blackbirds. Ecology 87, 1945–1952.doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1945:SATCUA]2.0.CO;2. Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Purvis A, Gittleman J.L, Cowlishaw G& Mace G.M. 2000 Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 1947–1952.doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1234. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Pyron M. 1999 Relationships between geographical range size, body size, local abundance, and habitat breadth in North American suckers and sunfishes. J. Biogeogr 26, 549–558.doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00303.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Quinn R, Gaston K, Blackburn T& Eversham B. 1997 Abundance–range size relationships of macrolepidoptera in Britain: the effects of taxonomy and life history variables. Ecol. Entomol 22, 453–461.doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.1997.00090.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Ricklefs R.E& Cox G.W. 1972 Taxon cycles in the West Indian avifauna. Am. Nat 106, 195 doi:10.1086/282762. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Schoech S.J, Bowman R& Reynolds S.J. 2004 Food supplementation and possible mechanisms underlying early breeding in the Florida Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens). Horm. Behav 46, 565–573.doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.06.005. Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Slabbekoorn H& Peet M. 2003 Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424, 267 doi:10.1038/424267a. Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Sol D, Timmermans S& Lefebvre L. 2002 Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Anim. Behav 63, 495–502.doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1953. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Sol D, Duncan R.P, Blackburn T.M, Cassey P& Lefebvre L. 2005 Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5460–5465.doi:10.1073/pnas.0408145102. Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Swihart R.K, Gehring T.M, Kolozsvary M.B& Nupp T.E. 2003 Responses of ‘resistant’ vertebrates to habitat loss and fragmentation: the importance of niche breadth and range boundaries. Divers. Distrib 9, 1–18.doi:10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00158.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Symonds M.R.E& Johnson C.N. 2006 Determinants of local abundance in a major radiation of Australian passerines (Aves: Meliphagoidea). J. Biogeogr 33, 794–802.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01432.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Thompson K, Hodgson J.G& Gaston K.J. 1998 Abundance–range size relationships in the herbaceous flora of central England. J. Ecol 86, 439–448.doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00264.x. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Vitousek P.M, Mooney H.A, Lubchenco J& Melillo J.M. 1997 Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 277, 494–499.doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar