Abstract
The ‘Support Problem’ is a benchmark test to investigate the understanding of spatial relationships between objects. We tested kea parrots' performance in a paradigm that has previously been studied in primates. Kea perform comparably well to tamarins when they are confronted with a choice between two support devices, one of which has a reward resting on it and the other slightly next to it, or when given a choice between a continuous and a disrupted support. Kea did better than chimpanzees in some tasks in which the perceptual connection of the food to the support was altered. The results indicate that kea are capable of assessing the spatial means–end relationships of this problem spontaneously and in a way that is comparable with primates.
References
Byrne R. W. . 1997The technical intelligence hypothesis: an additional evolutionary stimulus to intelligence? In Machiavellian intelligence II: extensions and evaluations (eds, Whiten A.& Byrne R. W. ), pp. 289–211. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.(doi:10.2277/0521550874). Crossref, Google Scholarde Mendonça-Furtado O.& Ottoni E. B. . 2008Learning generalization in problem solving by a blue-fronted parrot (Amazona aestiva). Anim. Cogn. 11, 719–725. (doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0168-x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarDiamond J.& Bond A. B. . 2004Social play in kaka (Nestor meridionalis) in comparison to kea (Nestor notabilis). Behaviour 141, 777–798. Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarEmery N. J.& Clayton N. S. . 2004The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science 306, 1903–1907. (doi:10.1126/science.1098410). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarFunk M. . 2002Problem solving skills in young yellow-crowned parakeets (Cyanoramphus auriceps). Anim. Cogn. 5, 167–176. (doi:10.1007/s10071-002-0149-4). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarHauser M. D., Kralik J. D.& Botto-Mahan C. . 1999Problem solving and functional design features: experiments on cotton-top tamarins Saguinus oedipus oedipus. Anim. Behav. 57, 565–582. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.3066). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarHerrmann E., Wobber V.& Call J. . 2008Great apes' (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) understanding of tool functional properties after limited experience. J. Comp. Psychol. 122, 220–230. (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.220). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarHunt G. R. . 1996Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows. Nature 379, 249–251. (doi:10.1038/379249a0). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarPepperberg I. M. . 2004‘Insightful’ string-pulling in grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) is affected by vocal competence. Anim. Cogn. 7, 263–266. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarPiaget J. . 1952The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International Universities Press. Crossref, Google ScholarPovinelli D. J. . 2000Folk physics for apes. The chimpanzee's theory of how the world works. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google ScholarSchmidt G. F.& Cook R. G. . 2006Mind the gap: means–end discrimination by pigeons. Anim. Behav. 71, 599–608. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.010). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarSpinozzi G.& Potí P. . 1993Piagetian stage 5 in two infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the development of permanence of objects and the spatialization of causality. Int. J. Primatol. 14, 905–917. Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarWerdenich D.& Huber L. . 2006A case of quick problem solving in birds: string pulling in keas Nestor notabilis. Anim. Behav. 71, 855–863. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.018). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar



