Royal Society Open Science
Open AccessResearch articles

Agarwood wound locations provide insight into the association between fungal diversity and volatile compounds in Aquilaria sinensis

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of wound location on the fungal communities and volatile distribution of agarwood in Aquilaria sinensis. Two-dimensional gas chromatography with high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry revealed 60 compounds from the NIST library, including 25 sesquiterpenes, seven monoterpenes, two diterpenes, nine aromatics, nine alkanes and eight others. Of five agarwood types, Types IV and II contained the greatest number and concentration of sesquiterpenes, respectively. The fungal communities of the agarwood were dominated by the phylum Ascomycota and were significantly affected by the type of wound tissue. Community richness indices (observed species, Chao1, PD whole tree, ACE indices) indicated that Types I and IV harboured the most and least species-rich fungal communities, and the fungal communities of Types V, I, III and IV/II were dominated by Lasiodiplodia, Hydnellum, Phaeoisaria and Ophiocordyceps species, respectively. Correlations between fungal species and agarwood components revealed that the chemical properties of A. sinensis were associated with fungal diversity. More specifically, the dominant fungal genera of Types V, I and III (Lasiodiplodia, Hydnellum and Phaeoisaria, respectively) were strongly correlated with specific terpenoid compounds. The finding that wound location affects the fungal communities and volatile distribution of agarwood provides insight into the formation of distinct agarwood types.

1. Introduction

Agarwood, also known as ‘wood of the Gods’, is of huge cultural significance, due to its peculiar perfume and use in incense ceremonies. Derived from the resinous portions of trunks and branches from Aquilaria and Gyrinops species, it is the basis of some of the most world's most exclusive perfumes and is used extensively for medicine and incense across Asia, the Middle East and Europe [1,2]. This widespread use can likely be attributed to the sesquiterpene and phenylethyl chromone derivatives of agarwood [35], which have biological and pharmacological properties, including antimicrobial, anti-oxidant and anti-proliferative activities [68]. Moreover, agarwood has the potential to prevent cancer and to treat both gastric ulcers and cough in asthma patients [810]. Indeed, in China, agarwood, which is mainly derived from Aquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Spreng, is valued as a traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of emesia, asthma and insomnia [11,12]. However, wild sources of agarwood are at serious risk of depletion, owing to the slow and infrequent formation of agarwood and to the resource's uncontrolled collection in forests. As a result, all Aquilaria and Gyrinops species are endangered and are listed in Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES, http://www.cites.org). To protect both wild agarwood resources and sustainable agarwood production, A. sinensis has been widely cultivated in Guangdong and Hainan provinces in China, and due to its rarity and value, A. sinensis has also been used to investigate processes for improving the oil yield of agarwood in China.

Under natural conditions, agarwood is produced when attacked by microbes, insects or other damaging organisms and promotes the accumulation of agarwood resin [13]. Fungal infection has long been recognized as the cause of agarwood formation in Aquilaria host trees [1416]; a variety of fungi (e.g. Fusarium sp., Chaetomium globosum, Menanotus flavolives, Lasiodiplodia theobromae and Rigidoporus vinctus) isolated from infectious Aquilaria trees have been reported to accelerate agarwood formation and to promote the accumulation of volatile compounds [2,1721]. Agarwood is categorized, in China, into different types on the basis of the location at which it forms [22,23]. However, even though the various agarwood types are widely traded on the Chinese market, the relationship between the volatile compounds and fungal diversity of agarwood remains relatively unclear. Elucidating such relationships would help to delineate the numerous potential fungal niches and chemical characteristics of agarwood formed in different regions of the trees.

Using A. sinensis as a model system for agarwood formation, the aim of the present study was to investigate the variation of fungal communities across habitats within a tree host from different agarwood-formed tissues. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC-HR-TOF-MS), which is a versatile analytical tool combining two powerful analytical technologies with complementary attributes [24,25], was also used to elucidate the volatile constituents of different types of agarwood. In addition, the regular patterns of fungal communities and volatile constituents observed in different types of agarwood facilitated the characterization of fungal community structures within different parts of agarwood formation, as well as the investigation of the relationship between fungal diversity and volatile compound production, which could help elucidate the variation of agarwood fragrance.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study location and sampling methods

Thirty-year-old A. sinensis trees in Dalingshan town, Guangdong province, China (latitude 22°45′43″ N, longitude 113°48′45″ E), were physically wounded using a machete according to the previous treated method [26,27], and after five years, 0.5- to 1-cm thick agarwood sections had formed beneath the wounded surface. In November 2017, the agarwood was collected by cutting at about 5 cm below the wound area, and the non-agarwood parts were removed from the samples. These trees were similar in diameter, about 20–30 cm and spaced at intervals of about 5–10 m. Fifteen trees were wounded at different locations as following, with each treatment group including three individual trees. The five types of agarwood that formed at the different wound points were considered Type I, II, III, IV and V, respectively (figure 1). Type I agarwood formed in the transverse section of wounded main trunks at about 2.0–2.5 m above the ground. Type II agarwood formed in the transverse section of wounded lateral branches at about 1.5–1.8 m above the ground. Type III agarwood formed in the transverse section of wounded main trunks at about 1.0–1.2 m above the ground. Type IV formed in the longitudinal section of main trunks at about 0.8–1.2 m above the ground, and Type V usually formed in the main trunks near the root, which was encapsulated by surrounding tissue (at about 0.2–0.4 m above the ground).

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Wound tissues and agarwood sample collection from Aquilaria sinensis.

2.2. DNA extraction, PCR amplification and DNA sequencing

All agarwood samples were washed with distilled sterile water and were surface sterilized by soaking in 75% ethanol for 2 min, after which they were rinsed with sterile water and dried on sterile filter paper. Total DNA was extracted from each agarwood sample (100 mg) using the MoBio PowerPlant Pro DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Two replicate extractions were performed for each agarwood sample, in order to achieve sufficient DNA yields, and DNA quantity was determined using electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels. The extracted DNA was quantified using a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Products, Wilmington, DE, USA). According to the concentration, each DNA sample was diluted to 1 ng µl−1 using sterile water. Internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) sequences were then amplified from all the samples using the universal primers ITS5-1737F (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′) and ITS2-2043R (5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′) and barcodes to distinguish between the samples. The PCR was performed using a Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), according to Cregger et al. [28]. The resulting PCR products were mixed in equal ratios and purified using a Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Duesseldorf, Germany). Sequencing libraries were then generated using the Ion Plus Fragment Library Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), following the manufacturer's recommendations, and index codes were added. Library quality was assessed using a Qubit v. 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA), and the library was sequenced using a Thermofisher Life Ion S5 platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The high-throughput sequencing data are available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database, under BioProject number PRJNA509099.

2.3. Bioinformatics processing

Raw sequences (2 × 300-bp reads) were generated using an Illumina MiSeq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and MiSeq reagent kit v. 3 (Illumina) by the University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center (Madison, WI, USA) [29]. Low-quality reads were first removed using Cutadapt v. 1.9.1 (http://cutadapt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/), and paired-end reads were categorized according to the unique barcodes that were then removed along with the primer sequences. Overlapping reads were merged using FLASH [30], and high-quality clean tags were filtered using the QIIME quality-control process [31]. The tags were compared with the Unite database [32], using the UCHIME algorithm to remove chimaeric sequences and to obtain clean reads [33]. High-quality sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs), which were defined as 97% similar, using the UPARSE software [34]. These OTUs were applied to analyse diversity, richness and rarefaction curves using MOTHUR [35]. Taxonomic assignments of OTUs that achieved 97% similarity were obtained using the QIIME v. 1.9.1 [31] software package through comparison with the SILVA [36], Greengene [37] and RDP [38] databases. Subsequent analyses on alpha and beta diversity were performed based on the normalized OTU abundance. Venn diagrams, alpha diversity (including Chao1 and ACE richness estimators, Shannon and Simpson diversity indices, and phylogenetic diversity whole tree), beta diversity (including principal co-ordinates analysis, principal component analysis and non-metric multidimensional scaling) and heat map analysis were performed to identify mutual and unique taxa between groups, and the above analysis of fungal species diversity in samples using R software (http://www.r-project.org/).

2.4. Extraction of volatile oil

Dried agarwood powder (0.1 g) from each sample was separately weighed and placed in a 2-ml centrifuge tube, and 1.5 ml ethyl acetate was added to the tube. The powder was soaked overnight at room temperature and extracted for 45 min using the 40-kHz ultrasonic cold extraction method, according to Liao et al. [39] with slight modification. The solvent phase (upper layer) was separated by centrifugation at 12 000 r.p.m. and 4°C for 10 min. After adding ethyl acetate to supplement the reduced weight, the volatile oil was filtered through a 0.22-µm PTFE filter membrane and then stored in a non-transparent glass bottle at 4°C prior to GC × GC-HR-TOF-MS analysis.

2.5. GC × GC-HR-TOF-MS analysis

The GC × GC-HR-TOF-MS system consisted of an East & West 3300 GC × GC equipped with a TOF-MS (East & West Analytical Instrument Co., Beijing, China), which is used to acquire mass spectral data from the GC × GC. The first separation was performed in a conventional non-polar GC column Agilent DB-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm inner diameter × 0.25 µm film thickness), and the second was performed in a medium GC column Agilent DB-17HT (2.5 m × 0.25 mm inner diameter × 0.15 µm film thickness). An aliquot (1 µl) of each sample was separately injected into the GC injector, using a split ratio of 30 : 1 at 300°C. The separation was performed under the following conditions: initial temperature of 70°C for 1 min, ramped at 6°C min−1 to 300°C, and held at 300°C for 1 min. The transfer line into the TOF-MS source was heated to 270°C, and the electron impact ionization source was operated at 240°C with a collision energy of 70 eV and an acquisition voltage of 1800 V. The mass spectrometer was operated at an acquisition rate of 100 spectra s−1, ranging from 50 to 550 u. The relative contents of the individual components of each sample were expressed in percentage of peak area relative to the total peak area. The identification of volatiles of the agarwood samples was based on a National Institute of Standards and Technology 11 (NIST11) library search combined with the Kovats retention index (RI) [40]. Compounds with lower search probabilities (less than 60) were regarded as unknowns. The mass spectral match factor (probability > 60) was used to judge whether a peak was correctly identified or not. For the determination of RI, calculated on the first dimension, a series of n-alkanes (C9–C23) was used under the same experimental conditions. The RI for each compound was calculated as follows:

RI=100×{n+logt(i)logt(n)logt(n+1)logt(n)},
where n and n + 1 are the number of carbon atoms in alkanes eluting before and after the compound, respectively; t′(n) and t′(n + 1) were the corresponding retention time values and t′(i) was the retention time of the identified compound.

2.6. Statistical analysis

The mean and standard error (s.e.) of all data were calculated, and all values were reported as the mean of three replicates. The community richness and diversity indices of the fungi and volatile contents of the five types of agarwood were analysed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with a significance level of p < 0.05. Heat map analysis was used to analyse the abundance of fungal distribution and the concentration of volatile compounds. Principal component analysis (PCA) was also performed to investigate the differences in volatile contents among the above agarwood samples. In addition, Pearson correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between fungal communities and volatile components. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v. 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) [41].

3. Results

3.1. Identification of characterized agarwood components

To investigate the relationship between agarwood characteristics and the presence of specific fungal species, the volatile compounds of different agarwood types were first identified using GC × GC-HR-TOF-MS. More specifically, the volatile compounds of five different agarwood samples were separated and identified using a DB-5MS column on the first dimension and a DB-17HT column on the second dimension via GC × GC-HR-TOF-MS analysis. This analysis identified 60 strong matches to the NIST library data, including 25 sesquiterpenes, seven monoterpenes, two diterpenes, nine aromatics, nine alkanes and eight other components (table 1 and figure 2). The agarwood volatile fraction was characterized by a high percentage of sesquiterpenes, including guaianes (compounds 1–5; figure 2), eudesmanes (compounds 7–13; figure 2), agarofurans (compound 14; figure 2) and several others (compounds 6, 15–25; figure 2). Of these sesquiterpenes, two compounds, namely α-eudesmol and α-copaen-11-ol, were found in all the agarwood samples (electronic supplementary material, figure S1, and table 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Structures of volatile compounds identified in the agarwood samples using GC × GC-HR-TOF-MS. Compound numbers follow the nomenclature used in table 1.

Table 1. Volatile compounds identified in the agarwood samples using GC×GC-HR-TOF-MS. Library probability of each compound was above 60 Mol. Wt., molecular weight. CAS No., library CAS number.

no.compound nameRIpeakI/minpeakII/slibrary formulalibrary probabilityCAS No.Mol. Wt.I (%)II (%)III (%)IV (%)V (%)
sesquiterpenes
1aromadendrene153312.723.27C15H24824893942040.0015 ± 0.0010not detectednot detected0.6923 ± 0.5293not detected
2guaiol166315.285.16C15H26O794898612225.3112 ± 3.7519not detectednot detected2.3544 ± 0.16454.2907 ± 3.8226
3longifolenaldehyde149712.483.55C15H24O7319890847220not detectednot detectednot detected1.3292 ± 0.9446not detected
4espatulenol149712.482.52C15H24O7667506032201.7892 ± 0.12462.3159 ± 1.7728not detected1.1377 ± 0.94861.1186 ± 0.6457
58-(hydroxymethyl)-3,6,8-trimethyloctahydro-1H-3a,7-methanoazulen-6-ol197520.770.37C15H26O27362600059238not detectednot detected0.7556 ± 0.63020.0354 ± 0.01900.0409 ± 0.0230
61,1,4a,7-tetramethyl-2,3,4,4a,5,6,7,8-octahydro-1H-benzo[7]annulen-7-ol214026.132.57C15H26O686892804222not detected0.0759 ± 0.0203not detectednot detectednot detected
7α-eudesmol163414.824.24C15H26O8312097182220.7001 ± 0.28120.1698 ± 0.00710.9775 ± 0.15151.0196 ± 0.66240.7444 ± 0.6523
82,4a,5,8a-tetramethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,7,8,8a-octahydronaphthalen-1-yl acetate171216.15.27C16H26O269205582182505.5941 ± 1.6811not detectednot detected6.8546 ± 3.492211.0327 ± 9.7659
95,6-dimethyl-8-isopropenylbicyclo(4.4.0)dec-1-en-3-one174416.683.77C15H22O694674504218not detected3.2207 ± 2.8745not detectednot detectednot detected
10(+)-valencene151112.722.45C15H24814630073204not detected0.1616 ± 0.0175not detectednot detectednot detected
11(3,8,8-trimethyl-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydro-2-naphthalenyl)methyl acetate171916.220.61C16H26O268314773278250not detectednot detected3.6388 ± 0.0790not detected7.3226 ± 0.0343
12dehydrofukinone182018.082.38C15H22O7819598459218not detected3.7005 ± 2.7568not detected0.6524 ± 0.1635not detected
13α-copaen-11-ol168515.635.89C15H24O73413705632205.2734 ± 1.78747.1112 ± 5.61534.0888 ± 1.52791.9115 ± 1.47930.0369 ± 0.0147
14agaruspirol166315.284.49C15H26O831460737222not detected4.1321 ± 1.6386not detected6.2798 ± 3.1912not detected
152-isopropenyl-4,4,6b-trimethyl-4,5,5a,6,6a,6b-hexahydro-2H-cyclopropa[g][1]benzofuran164615.874.84C15H22O76102681492218not detected28.1937 ± 4.0029not detected3.6005 ± 0.23071.3055 ± 1.0888
16dehydrosaussurea lactone210224.734.71C15H20O27428290359232not detected1.2429 ± 0.0490not detected0.0406 ± 0.02230.1199 ± 0.0372
17methyl-2-(3,6-dimethyl-2-oxo-6-vinyl-2,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydrobenzofuran-5-yl)acrylate186718.93.02C16H20O46119892194276not detectednot detectednot detected0.2207 ± 0.1593not detected
182,2,4-trimethyl-4-(2-methylallyl)hexahydrocyclopropa[cd]pentalene-1,3-dione185418.672.21C15H20O274946091842320.1986 ± 0.1178not detected0.7312 ± 0.11330.0796 ± 0.05480.1786 ± 0.1174
193,4,4-trimethyl-3-[(1E)-3-methyl-1,3-butadienyl]bicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-2-one186718.92.72C15H22O69102146816218not detectednot detectednot detected0.1445 ± 0.0096not detected
20(E)-2,2,6-trimethyl-1-(4-methylpenta-2,4-dien-2-yl)-7-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptane202822.174.51C15H24O6889128143220not detectednot detectednot detected0.1581 ± 0.01270.5011 ± 0.1012
211-[(1E)-2,3-Dimethyl-1,3-butadienyl]-2,2,6-trimethyl-7-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptane202822.175.76C15H24O6659744126220not detectednot detectednot detected1.5545 ± 0.8055not detected
222,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-2-cyclohexene-1-carbaldehyde188719.251.13C15H24O7256772077220not detected0.9327 ± 0.7353not detectednot detectednot detected
23(E)-2,3,3-trimethyl-2-(3-methylbuta-1,3-dien-1-yl)-6-methylenecyclohexan-1-one220828.582.65C15H22O7177822572218not detectednot detectednot detectednot detected1.2203 ± 0.7010
24(E)-2,2,6-trimethyl-1-(3-methylbuta-1,3-dien-1-yl)-5-methylene-7-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptane229731.622.06C15H22O7070038209218not detectednot detectednot detectednot detected1.2714 ± 0.9411
252-(3-isopropenyl-4-methyl-4-vinylcyclohexyl)-2-propanol167815.521.61C15H26O68639996222not detectednot detectednot detectednot detected0.4491 ± 0.3673
total sesquiterpenes18.868151.257010.191928.065429.6327
monoterpenes
261,3,3-trimethyl-2-vinylcyclohexene170615.985.27C11H187352939031506.7032 ± 4.6849not detected0.7544 ± 0.42551.8548 ± 0.0363not detected
27(E)-b-ionone184018.436.25C13H20O66797761924.8090 ± 4.0616not detectednot detectednot detected0.2716 ± 0.2292
28(4E)-4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-ylidene)-2-butanone214726.372.38C13H20O6656052610192not detectednot detectednot detectednot detected1.5186 ± 0.8964
296,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,5,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalene12759.12.4C12H1874107914921162not detected0.8786 ± 0.29552.0628 ± 0.8246not detectednot detected
301,8-dimethyl-4,11-dioxatricyclo[6.2.1.02,7]undeca-2,9-diene159114.125.65C11H14O270121029638178not detectednot detected1.6647 ± 0.2766not detectednot detected
31(4-tert-butylphenyl)acetaldehyde142411.324.13C12H16O73109347457176not detectednot detectednot detectednot detected0.0275 ± 0.0068
32thymol176217.034.09C10H14O7089838150not detected8.3843 ± 7.7453not detectednot detectednot detected
total monoterpenes11.51229.26294.48191.85481.8177
diterpenes
332-methylenecholestan-3-ol185418.673.33C28H48O70225999684000.0810 ± 0.03470.0094 ± 0.0030not detectednot detected0.0674 ± 0.0061
34stigmast-5-en-3-yl acetate175217.731.66C31H52O271915059456not detectednot detectednot detectednot detected1.1457 ± 0.4734
total diterpenes0.08100.00940.00000.00001.2131
aromatics
354,6-di-tert-butyl-o-cresol149012.371.67C15H24O686165572200.1980 ± 0.0642not detected0.6796 ± 0.12220.5806 ± 0.01780.7009 ± 0.1337
36p-methoxybenzylacetone152412.953.5C11H14O280104201178not detected0.4269 ± 0.0940not detected0.1421 ± 0.06120.4741 ± 0.2739
37(1-methoxy-4-methyl-3-pentenyl)benzene192119.831.91C13H18O7268705862190not detected0.2839 ± 0.22572.4052 ± 1.61843.3340 ± 0.42461.4515 ± 0.3223
38(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-enylmethanesulfonyl) benzene204822.872.51C16H22O2S6856691748278not detectednot detectednot detected0.2523 ± 0.05590.7627 ± 0.2472
394-phenylbutan-2-one12678.982.3C10H12O862550267148not detected0.4726 ± 0.1153not detected3.5987 ± 2.6857not detected
40dibutyl phthalate196120.535.83C16H22O474847422787.3164 ± 4.8192not detectednot detectednot detectednot detected
41ethyl benzoate11957.932.01C9H10O28593890150not detected0.5335 ± 0.1159not detectednot detectednot detected
42benzothiazole12598.872.79C7H5NS8395169135not detected0.2800 ± 0.0481not detectednot detectednot detected
436-(benzyloxy)-4,4-dimethylchroman-2-one162714.72.28C18H18O37284945108282not detected0.2019 ± 0.0437not detectednot detectednot detected
total aromatics7.51442.19883.08487.90773.3892
alkanes
444,7-dimethylundecane10656.071.2C13H288517301325184not detected0.7911 ± 0.38077.8485 ± 5.92922.3577 ± 0.39611.1704 ± 0.253
45tridecane12278.41.28C13H2887629505184not detectednot detectednot detected1.4251 ± 0.2479not detected
46hexadecane12999.452.53C16H34845447632267.5238 ± 5.2513not detected5.7390 ± 4.51801.5395 ± 0.04092.3853 ± 2.0450
473,8-dimethylundecane149012.371.99C13H2880173013031842.9744 ± 0.45090.6414 ± 0.27901.6418 ± 0.44010.6497 ± 0.35862.0775 ± 0.2829
482,6,10,15-tetramethylheptadecane149712.483.21C21H448054833486296not detectednot detectednot detected0.2712 ± 0.0094not detected
493-ethyl-3-methylheptane155713.533.8C10H227817302011142not detectednot detectednot detected0.3293 ± 0.1140not detected
50heptatriacontan-1-ol193520.073.38C37H76O751057945895360.2469 ± 0.04890.0218 ± 0.00932.5082 ± 0.05680.0594 ± 0.01090.8715 ± 0.7472
51undecane12128.171.34C11H248611202141568.3629 ± 1.7491not detectednot detectednot detectednot detected
522,5,9-trimethyldecane12278.41.35C13H287362108229184not detectednot detectednot detectednot detected0.1544 ± 0.0072
total alkanes19.10801.454317.73756.63196.6591
others
532-(7-Heptadecynyloxy)tetrahydro-2H-pyran181417.975.88C22H40O269565995093360.2877 ± 0.02930.0747 ± 0.01760.2114 ± 0.11610.2749 ± 0.06080.3608 ± 0.1783
541-chlorooctadecane193520.073.34C18H37Cl723386332288not detectednot detectednot detected0.2630 ± 0.01220.0911 ± 0.0270
552,4-decadienal13319.922.89C10H16O842363884152not detectednot detected0.1276 ± 0.0761not detected0.1524 ± 0.0520
56methyl 2,5-octadecadiynoate213425.95.23C19H30O27257156919290not detectednot detected0.4789 ± 0.0620not detected0.0159 ± 0.0075
57bicyclohexyliden-2-one215626.722.7C12H18O681011127178not detectednot detectednot detectednot detected0.2567 ± 0.1567
58methyl arachidonate222529.174.19C21H34O2752566894318not detectednot detectednot detectednot detected0.0108 ± 0.0025
59vinyl stearate10486.531.11C20H38O259111637310not detected0.0900 ± 0.0214not detectednot detectednot detected
606-(3,5-dimethylfuran-2-yl)-6-methylheptan-2-one194120.185.81C14H22O26590165096222not detected0.9870 ± 0.3374not detectednot detectednot detected

3.2. Analyses of volatile compounds from various types of agarwood

Of the five agarwood types, Types IV and II contained the greatest number and concentration of distinct sesquiterpenes, respectively (table 1), and Types I and II contained greater monoterpene concentrations than Types IV and V. In addition, Type V had the greatest diterpene concentration, and Types I and III contained high levels of alkanes (table 1). A concentration heat map of volatile compounds was generated to further analyse the volatile profiles of the agarwood samples (figure 3). From this, Type II was clustered on a single branch of the cluster tree, which suggested that the volatile compounds of Type II were quite different from the others.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Distribution of identified compounds in the five types of agarwood.

3.3. Structure and diversity of agarwood-associated fungal communities

Between 52 594 and 80 303 qualified reads were obtained from each of the five types of agarwood, and were attributed to six phyla, 25 classes, 63 orders, 115 families and 141 genera of fungi, with 221–378 OTUs identified with a similarity of 97% (table 2). The species diversity of Type IV was lower than that of the others (table 2), and the samples of each agarwood type possessed more common OTUs than specific ones (figure 4). Significantly more fungal species were observed in Type I than in Type IV (p < 0.05; figure 5a). Other community richness indices, including PD whole tree, ACE and Chao1, also indicated that the fungal community of Type I was richer than that of the other types and that the fungal community of Type IV possessed the lowest richness (figure 5bd). However, the Shannon and Simpson indices identified Type III as possessing the greatest fungal diversity and Type II as possessing the lowest (figure 5e,f). UniFrac analysis, including PCoA, NMDS and PCA, indicated that Types III and I were distinct from Types II and IV (figure 6ac).

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Distribution of fungal species among the five types of agarwood. Each circle represents one type of agarwood, and overlapping regions indicate common operational taxonomic units (OTUs); non-overlapping regions indicate type-specific OTUs.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Richness and diversity of fungal communities associated with the five types of agarwood. The indices included observed species (a), PD whole tree (b), ACE (c), Chao 1 (d), Shannon (e) and Simpson (f) indices.

Figure 6.

Figure 6. Evaluation of fungal communities by UniFrac analysis: (a) principal coordinated analysis of weighted UniFrac distance, which depicts the species composition structure of the five types of agarwood; (b) non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) plot, which depicts the diversity of the fungal community by nonlinear structure; (c) principal component analysis (PCA) of the five types of agarwood.

Table 2. Diversity of fungal species in the five types of agarwood.

typeno.phylumclassorderfamilygenusOTUs
I1520417164378
2519437767350
3416406861359
II1418437366337
2315396356251
3417376657285
III1212314744298
2315355554352
3415396260339
IV1314334843235
2316355041229
3212314940221
V1314336154239
2318406859272
3518416259319

3.4. Distribution of fungi among agarwood types

A heat map was generated to further analyse the taxonomic distribution of fungi among the different types of agarwood (figure 7). Among the five detected fungal phyla, the Ascomycota was the most dominant in all the agarwood samples, and Basidiomycota and Zygomycota were more abundant in Type I than in the other types of agarwood (figure 7a). Among the 25 detected fungal classes, the Agaricomycetes, Archaeorhizomycets, Orbiliomycetes and Monoblepharidomycetes were most abundant in Type I, whereas the Tremellomycetes was most abundant in Type III, the Pezizomycetes and Taphrinomycetes were most abundant in Type II, and the Saccharomycetes, Dacrymycetes, Atractiellomycetes, Chytridiomycetes and Cystobasidiomycetes were most abundant in Type V. By contrast, no fungal classes were particularly abundant in Type IV (figure 7b). Among the 10 most abundant fungal classes, the Sordariomycetes was dominant in Types I, III and IV, whereas the Dothideomycetes and Eurotiomycetes were dominant in Types II and V, respectively. The fungal orders and families of Type I were different to those of Types II, III, IV and V (figure 7c,d), and the dominant fungal orders and families of the five agarwood types were different (figure 7b,c). The most dominant genera of Types V, I, III and II/IV were Lasiodiplodia, Hydnellum, Phaeoisaria and Ophiocordyceps, respectively (figure 7e).

Figure 7.

Figure 7. Distribution of fungal taxa in the five types of agarwood. Heat maps are based on the distribution of fungal phyla (a), classes (b), orders (c), families (d) and genera (e).

3.5. Correlation between agarwood chemistry and fungal diversity

The correlation between the chemical and fungal components of the agarwood was analysed to further examine the correlation between fungal species and agarwood composition. Based on the presence of different volatiles and fungal genera, correlation analysis revealed that the Zygomycota was associated with the distribution of aromatic compounds (r = 0.661**, p < 0.01; table 3). Correlations between the 30 most abundant fungal genera and levels of 60 compounds were analysed (table 4 and electronic supplementary material, table S1). Analysis of the 25 sesquiterpenes revealed that the presence of Paraconiothyrium and Cladosporium species was significantly correlated with compounds 11, 20 and 24; whereas the presence of Limacella and Trichothecium species was associated with compounds 24 and 25; the presence of Resinicium species was associated with compounds 23–25; and the presence of Lasiodiplodia species was associated with compound 23 (r > 0.8, p < 0.01; table 4 and table S1). Meanwhile, further investigation of the seven identified monoterpenes revealed that the presence of Cercopemyces and Neofabraea species was associated with compound 26; the presence of Hydnellum, Monographella and Veronaea species was correlated with compound 27; the presence of Limacella, Lasiodiplodia, Ascotaiwania, Asterotremella and Ramichloridium species was correlated with compound 28; the presence of Helicosporium and Phlebiopsis species was associated with compounds 29 and 32, respectively; the presence of both Phaeoisaria and Capnobotryella species was correlated with compound 30; and the presence of Lentinus and Resinicium species was associated with compound 31 (r > 0.8, p < 0.01; table 4 and table S1). In regard to diterpene distribution, six fungal genera were found to be correlated with compound 34, including Limacella, Lasiodiplodia, Lentinus, Resinicium, Trichothecium and Ramichloridium, whereas Phaeoacremonium was associated with compound 33 (r > 0.8, p < 0.01; table 4 and table S1). Of the nine aromatics, compounds 38, 39, 40, and 42 were correlated with the presence of Microidium, Sporobolomyces, Gliomastix and Veronaea, and Thaxteriella, respectively (r > 0.8, p < 0.01; table 4 and table S1). Among the nine alkanes, compound 52 was associated with the presence of Paraconiothyrium, Ascotaiwannia and Phaeoacremonium, whereas compounds 44, 49 and 51 were associated with Devriesin, Sporobolomyces and Comoclathris, respectively (r > 0.8, p < 0.01; table 4 and table S1).

Table 3. Correlation of volatiles and fungal phyla among the five types of agarwood.

sesquiterpenesmonoterpenesditerpenesaromaticsalkanesZygomycotaChytridiomycotaAscomycotaGlomeromycotaBasidiomycota
sesquiterpenes1.0000.161**0.099**−0.0100.727**−0.167**−0.059**0.289**0.324**−0.288**
monoterpenes0.161**1.000−0.326**−0.176**0.112**0.191**−0.058**−0.335**−0.058**0.334**
diterpenes0.099**−0.326**1.000−0.193**−0.199**−0.137**0.354**0.070**0.310**−0.070**
aromatics−0.010−0.176**−0.193**1.000−0.016*0.661**−0.149**−0.288**0.296**0.279**
alkanes0.727**0.112**−0.199**−0.016*1.0000.189**0.300**−0.481**−0.167**0.480**
Zygomycota−0.167**0.191**−0.137**0.661**0.189**1.0000.094**−0.286**0.145**0.272**
Chytridiomycota−0.059**−0.058**0.354**−0.149**0.300**0.094**1.000−0.204**0.607**0.200**
Ascomycota0.289**−0.335**0.070**−0.288**−0.481**−0.286**−0.204**1.000−0.330**1.000**
Glomeromycota0.324**−0.058**0.310**0.296**−0.167**0.145**0.607**−0.330**1.0000.327**
Basidiomycota−0.288**0.334**−0.070**0.279**0.480**0.272**0.200**1.000**0.327**1.000

**p < 0.01; *p < 0.05; italic labelled number, correlation coefficient r-value greater than 0.6.

Table 4. Correlation between volatile compounds and fungal genera.

compound
fungal genusr-valuecompound
fungal genusr-value
sesquiterpenescompound 5Helicosporium0.85**monoterpenescompound 28Limacella0.81**
Nectria0.91**Lasiodiplodia0.98**
compound 10Thaxteriella0.93**Ascotaiwania0.91*
compound 11Paraconiothyrium0.89**Asterotremella0.91**
Cladosporium0.87**Ramichloridium0.90**
compound 12Phlebiopsis0.89**compound 29Helicosporium0.81**
compound 16Phlebiopsis1.00**compound 30Phaeoisaria0.86**
compound 18Helicosporium0.94**Capnobotryella0.87**
compound 20Paraconiothyrium0.95**compound 31Lentinus0.98**
Cladosporium0.93**Resinicium0.92**
Phaeoacremonium0.83**compound 32Phlebiopsis0.88**
compound 22Phlebiopsis0.91**diterpenescompound 33Phaeoacremonium0.91**
compound 23Lasiodiplodia0.98**compound 34Limacella0.93**
Lentinus0.87**Lasiodiplodia0.83**
Resinicium0.89**Lentinus0.85**
compound 24Paraconiothyrium0.85**Resinicium0.98**
Limacella0.81**Trichothecium0.87**
Cladosporium0.85**Ramichloridium0.83**
Resinicium0.87**aromaticscompound 38Microidium0.94**
Trichothecium0.97**compound 39Sporobolomyces0.95**
compound 25Limacella0.99**compound 40Gliomastix0.91**
Ascotaiwania0.83**Veronaea1.00**
Asterotremella0.83**compound 43Thaxteriella0.95**
Resinicium0.87**alkanescompound 44Devriesia0.86**
Trichothecium0.95**compound 49Sporobolomyces0.99**
Ramichloridium0.88**compound 51Comoclathris0.93**
monoterpenescompound 26Cercopemyces0.87**compound 52Paraconiothyrium0.99**
Neofabraea0.91**Cladosporium0.98**
compound 27Hydnellum0.85**phaeoacremonium0.89**
Veronaea0.92**
Monographella0.83**

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

Together, these analyses indicate that the presence of Lasiodiplodia, Cladosporium, Resinicium, Hydnellum and Monographella is highly correlated with volatiles in eight common fungal genera that were present in all agarwood samples. Although Fusarium, Trichoderma and Aspergillus were not highly correlated with the volatiles (r < 0.8), the genera have been reported to play roles in agarwood formation [4245].

4. Discussion

Agarwood is a typical example of the raw materials for perfume and oriental medicine, with the most potent compounds being sesquiterpene, monoterpene and aromatic compounds [3]. Natural agarwood can be divided into different types, owing to the different formation locations and incenses. The present study is the first work to investigate the chemical characteristics of agarwood types formed at different wound locations. Using GC × GC-HR-TOF-MS, the present study determined that differences in the type and number of compounds in the different types of agarwood were significant and that GC × GC-HR-TOF-MS can be used as an effective tool for the separation and identification of individual compounds from complex volatile oils.

Previous studies have reported that certain fungal strains obtained from Aquilaria can produce volatile compounds similar to those found in the essential oil of agarwood [46]. UniFrac analysis indicated that the crosscutting (including Types I and III) and rip cutting (Type IV) wounding methods affected the surrounding microbial communities, thereby indicating that regional wound differences may contribute to the variation observed in agarwood (figure 6). Distribution analysis revealed that the fungal communities of agarwood types vary significantly at sub-order levels of classification. Moreover, functional fungal genera were further investigated through heat map analysis of the 35 most abundant fungal genera (figure 7). Although the abundance of each fungal genus differed among the agarwood types, eight common genera were found in all the agarwood samples, including Fusarium, Lasiodiplodia, Cladosporium, Trichoderma, Aspergillus, Resinicium, Hydnellum and Monographella, which suggests that these eight fungal genera play key roles in agarwood formation. However, only Lasiodiplodia [21], Fusarium [47] and Trichoderma [48] fungi from A. sinensis have been shown to induce agarwood formation.

The results of the present study demonstrate that the chemical properties of A. sinensis-derived agarwood are strongly associated with fungal diversity. For example, Lasiodiplodia and Cladosporium were highly correlated with certain sesquiterpene, monoterpene and diterpene compounds (table 4 and table S1), whereas the abundances of Hydnellum and Monographella were correlated with certain monoterpene compounds. However, even though the presence of these five genera were highly correlated with the biosynthesis of agarwood volatiles, only Lasiodiplodia sp. has been reported that could promote agarwood formation. Lasiodiplodia theobromae isolated from A. sinensis has been reported to produce jasmonic acids that induce significant increases in sesquiterpene contents and chromate stimulation [49,50], which could, thereby, promote agarwood formation [21]. In the present study, the presence of Fusarium, Trichoderma and Aspergillus was also correlated with volatile contents (table S1), and other studies have also reported that the genera play roles in agarwood formation [4245]. Indeed, Fusarium has been reported to induce the formation of agarwood in A. malaccensis and is capable of producing certain agarwood compounds, such as tridecanoic acid, α-santalol and spathulenol [43]. Fusarium has also been reported to produce specific secondary metabolites, such as pyrone derivatives [51]. Meanwhile, Trichoderma has been reported to promote the production of both sesquiterpenes and chromone derivatives in A. malaccensis cell suspension cultures [44], and Aspergillus, one of the most predominant fungal genera in agarwood, has been shown to induce the biosynthesis of mycotoxins, including aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and ochratoxin A (OTA) [45]. Together, the results of the present study demonstrate that the chemical properties of A. sinensis are strongly associated with fungal diversity. However, it remains unclear whether the volatile constituents of agarwood are synthesized by the fungi or by the host trees. Accordingly, future research should focus more on the underlying mechanisms of agarwood formation, such as the role of functional genes in the interaction between Aquilaria, fungi and agarwood compounds.

5. Conclusion

The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the chemistry and fungal associates of agarwood formed at different spatial locations. The findings presented here reveal that the location of agarwood formation significantly affects the chemical and fungal constituents of agarwood in A. sinensis. The occurrence of terpenoids, such as sesquiterpenes, monoterpenes and diterpenes, was closely related to fungal diversity, which is a primary determinant of agarwood properties. In agreement with previous studies that have reported that the volatile oil of agarwood can inhibit fungal growth, the results of the present study indicate that the volatile compounds of agarwood directly affect fungal diversity, which could further influence agarwood formation.

Data accessibility

Raw reads of the high-throughput sequencing data: Sequence Read Achieve (SRA) database (BioProject number: PRJNA509099).

Authors' contributions

L.H. and Y.Y. conceived and designed the study, and helped draft the manuscript. J.L. carried out the data analysis, participated in the design of the study and drafted the manuscript; X.Z. and J.Y. carried out the GC × GC-HR-TOF-MS experiment; J.Z. carried out the statistical analyses; C.J. and X.C. carried out the treatment of trees and selected the agarwood samples. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81603236) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Public Welfare Research Institutes (grant no. ZZXT201904).

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Ou Huang, the general manager of Guangdong Shangzhengtang Group Co., for his assistance during A. sinensis planting, wound treatment, and agarwood sample collection.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4540850.

Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

Comments