Research articlesThe Invariant Set Postulate: a new geometric framework for the foundations of quantum theory and the role played by gravity
Abstract
A new law of physics is proposed, defined on the cosmological scale but with significant implications for the microscale. Motivated by nonlinear dynamical systems theory and black-hole thermodynamics, the Invariant Set Postulate proposes that cosmological states of physical reality belong to a non-computable fractal state-space geometry I, invariant under the action of some subordinate deterministic causal dynamics DI. An exploratory analysis is made of a possible causal realistic framework for quantum physics based on key properties of I. For example, sparseness is used to relate generic counterfactual states to points p∉I of unreality, thus providing a geometric basis for the essential contextuality of quantum physics and the role of the abstract Hilbert Space in quantum theory. Also, self-similarity, described in a symbolic setting, provides a possible realistic perspective on the essential role of complex numbers and quaternions in quantum theory. A new interpretation is given to the standard ‘mysteries’ of quantum theory: superposition, measurement, non-locality, emergence of classicality and so on. It is proposed that heterogeneities in the fractal geometry of I are manifestations of the phenomenon of gravity. Since quantum theory is inherently blind to the existence of such state-space geometries, the analysis here suggests that attempts to formulate unified theories of physics within a conventional quantum-theoretic framework are misguided, and that a successful quantum theory of gravity should unify the causal non-Euclidean geometry of space–time with the atemporal fractal geometry of state space.
The task is not to make sense of the quantum axioms by heaping more structure, more definitions, more science fiction imagery on top of them, but to throw them away wholesale and start afresh. We should be relentless in asking ourselves: From what deep physical principles might we derive this exquisite structure? These principles should be crisp, they should be compelling. They should stir the soul.
Chris Fuchs (Gilder 2008, p. 335)References
Albeverio S.& Khrennikov A. Yu. . 1998A regularisation of quantum field Hamiltonians with the aid of p-adic numbers. Acta Appl. Math. 50, 225–251. (doi:10.1023/A:1005813632179). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholarbeim Graben P.& Atmanspacher H. . 2006Complementarity in classical dynamical systems. Found. Phys. 36, 291–306. (doi:10.1007/s10701-005-9013-0). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarBell J. S. . 1995Free variables and local causality. Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarBerry M. V. . 2002Singular limits. Phys. Today 55, 10–11. (doi:10.1063/1.1485555). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarBlum L., Cucker F., Shub M.& Smale S. . 1997Complexity and real computation, p. 453. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.. Google ScholarBirman J. S.& Williams R. F. . 1983Knotted periodic orbits in dynamical systems I: Lorenz's equations. Topology 22, 47–82. (doi:10.1016/0040-9383(83)90045-9). Crossref, Google ScholarBojowald M. . 2007What happened before the big bang?. Nat. Phys. 3, 523–525. (doi:10.1038/nphys654). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarCornish N. J. . 1997Fractals and symbolic dynamics as invariant descriptors of chaos in general relativity. (http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9709036). Google ScholarEhrendorfer M. . 2006The Liouville equation and atmospheric predictability. Predictability of weather and climate (eds, Palmer T.& Hagedorn R. ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarEl Naschie S. . 2004A review of E-infinity theory and the mass spectrum of high energy particle physics. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 19, 209–236. (doi:10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00278-9). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarHardy G. H.& Wright E. M. . 1979An introduction to the theory of numbers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google ScholarHardy L. . 2004Why is nature described by quantum theory?. In Science and ultimate reality (eds, Barrow John D., Davies Paul C. W.& Harper Charles L. ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarHawking S. . 1975Particle creation by black holes. Comm. Math. Phys. 25, 152–166. (doi:10.1007/BF01877517). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarHawking S.& Penrose R. . 2000The nature of space and time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google ScholarKhrennikov A. . 1997Non-Archimedean analysis: quantum paradoxes, dynamical systems and biological models. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Crossref, Google ScholarLapidus M. L.& van Frankenhuijsen M. . 2006Fractal geometry, complex dimensions and zeta functions. New York, NY: Springer. Crossref, Google ScholarLind D.& Marcus B. . 1995An introduction to symbolic dynamics and coding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google ScholarLiouville J. . 1838Sur la théorie de la variation des constants arbitraries. J. Math. Pure Appl. 3, 342–349. Google ScholarLorenz E. N. . 1963Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130–141. (doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarMisner C. W., Thorne K. S.& Wheeler J. A. . 1973Gravitation. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman. Google ScholarNottale L.& Schneider J. . 1984Fractals and non-standard analysis. J. Math. Phys. 25, 1296–1300. (doi:10.1063/1.526285). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarOrd G. N. . 1983Fractal space-time: a geometric analogue of relativistic quantum mechanics. J. Phys. A 16, 1869–1884. (doi:10.1088/0305-4470/16/9/012). Crossref, Google ScholarPalmer T. N. . 1995A local deterministic model of quantum spin measurement. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 451, 585–608. (doi:10.1098/rspa.1995.0145). Link, ISI, Google ScholarPalmer T. N. . 2004A granular permutation-based representation of complex numbers and quaternions: elements of a possible realistic quantum theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 460, 1039–1055. (doi:10.1098/rspa.2003.1189). Link, ISI, Google ScholarPenrose R. . 1965Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57–59. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.57). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarPenrose R. . 1989The emperor's new mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Crossref, Google ScholarPenrose R. . 2008Causality, quantum theory and Cosmology. On Space and Time (ed.& Majid Shahn ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google ScholarPrice H. . 1996Time's arrow and Archimedes' point: new directions for the physics of time. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google ScholarRössler O. E. . 1976An equation for continuous chaos. Phys. Lett. A 57, 397–398. (doi:10.1016/0375-9601(76)90101-8). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarSciamarella D.& Mindlin G. B. . 1999Topological structure of chaotic flows from human speech data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1450–1453. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1450). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar‘tHooft G. . 2007The free-will postulate in quantum mechanics. (http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0701097). Google ScholarTakens F. . 1981Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Dynamical systems and turbulence, vol. 898 of Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 366–381. New York, NY: Springer. Google ScholarWeinstein S. . 2008Nonlocality without nonlocality. (http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.0349v2). Google Scholar
