Abstract
The evolution of life on earth has been characterized by generalized long-term increases in phenotypic complexity. Although natural selection is a plausible cause for these trends, one alternative hypothesis—generative bias—has been proposed repeatedly based on theoretical considerations. Here, we introduce a computational model of a developmental system and use it to test the hypothesis that long-term increasing trends in phenotypic complexity are caused by a generative bias towards greater complexity. We use our model to generate random organisms with different levels of phenotypic complexity and analyse the distributions of mutational effects on complexity. We show that highly complex organisms are easy to generate but there are trade-offs between different measures of complexity. We also find that only the simplest possible phenotypes show a generative bias towards higher complexity, whereas phenotypes with high complexity display a generative bias towards lower complexity. These results suggest that generative biases alone are not sufficient to explain long-term evolutionary increases in phenotypic complexity. Rather, our finding of a generative bias towards average complexity argues for a critical role of selective biases in driving increases in phenotypic complexity and in maintaining high complexity once it has evolved.
Footnotes
References
Arthur W . 2004The effect of development on the direction of evolution: toward a twenty-first century consensus. Evol. Dev. 6, 282–288.doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2004.04033.x. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarAzevedo R.B.R, Keightley P.D, Laurén-Määttä C, Vassilieva L.L, Lynch M& Leroi A.M . 2002Spontaneous mutational variation for body size in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 162, 755–765. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarAzevedo R.B.R, 2005The simplicity of metazoan cell lineages. Nature. 433, 152–156.doi:10.1038/nature03178. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarAzevedo R.B.R, Lohaus R, Srinivasan S, Dang K.K& Burch C.L . 2006Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks. Nature. 440, 87–90.doi:10.1038/nature04488. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarBraun V, Azevedo R.B.R, Gumbel M, Agapow P.-M, Leroi A.M& Meinzer H.-P . 2003ALES: cell lineage analysis and mapping of developmental events. Bioinformatics. 19, 851–858.doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg087. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarBritten R.J& Davidson E.H . 1969Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory. Science. 165, 349–357.doi:10.1126/science.165.3891.349. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarBrooks D.R, Collier J, Maurer B.A, Smith J.D.H& Wiley E.O . 1989Entropy and information in evolving biological systems. Biol. Phil. 4, 407–432.doi:10.1007/BF00162588. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarCisne J.L . 1974Evolution of the world fauna of aquatic free-living arthropods. Evolution. 28, 337–366.doi:10.2307/2407157. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarConlon I& Raff M . 1999Size control in animal development. Cell. 96, 235–244.doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80563-2. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarCsete M.E& Doyle J.C . 2002Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science. 295, 1664–1669.doi:10.1126/science.1069981. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarCubas P, Vincent C& Coen E . 1999An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature. 401, 157–161.doi:10.1038/43657. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarDawkins R& Krebs J.R . 1979Arms races between and within species. Proc. R. Soc. B. 205, 489–511.doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0081. . Link, ISI, Google ScholarDewel R.A . 2000Colonial origin for eumetazoa: major morphological transitions and the origin of bilaterian complexity. J. Morph. 243, 35–74.doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4687(200001)243:1<35::AID-JMOR3>3.0.CO;2-#. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarDrăgulescu A& Yakovenko V.M . 2001Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth and income in the United Kingdom and the United States. Physica A. 148, 213–221.doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00298-9. . Crossref, Google ScholarDrake J.W, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D& Crow J.F . 1998Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics. 299, 1667–1686. Crossref, Google ScholarEdelman G.M& Gally J.A . 2001Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 98, 13 763–13 768.doi:10.1073/pnas.231499798. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarFichelson P, Audibert A, Simon F& Gho M . 2005Cell cycle and cell-fate determination in Drosophila neural cell lineages. Trends Genet. 21, 413–420.doi:10.1016/j.tig.2005.05.010. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarFlatt T . 2005The evolutionary genetics of canalization. Q. Rev. Biol. 80, 287–316.doi:10.1086/432265. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarFurusawa C& Kaneko K . 2001Theory of robustness of irreversible differentiation in a stem cell system: chaos hypothesis. J. Theor. Biol. 209, 395–416.doi:10.1006/jtbi.2001.2264. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarGeard N& Wiles J . 2005A gene network model for developing cell lineages. Artif. Life. 11, 249–267.doi:10.1162/1064546054407202. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarGoodwin B How the leopard changed its spots: the evolution of complexity. 1994New York, NY:C. Scribner's Sons. Google ScholarGould S.J . 1989A developmental constraint in Cerion, with comments of the definition and interpretation of constraint in evolution. Evolution. 43, 516–539.doi:10.2307/2409056. . PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarGregory T.R . 2001Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biol. Rev. 76, 65–101.doi:10.1017/S1464793100005595. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarHogeweg P . 2000Evolving mechanisms of morphogenesis: on the interplay between differential adhesion and cell differentiation. J. Theor. Biol. 203, 317–333.doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.1087. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarKeränen S.V . 2004Simulation study on effects of signaling network structure on the developmental increase in complexity. J. Theor. Biol. 231, 3–21.doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.03.021. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarKim H, Klein R, Majewski J& Ott J . 2004Estimating rates of alternative splicing in mammals and invertebrates. Nat. Genet. 36, 915–916.doi:10.1038/ng0904-915. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarKing N . 2004The unicellular ancestry of animal development. Dev. Cell. 7, 313–325.doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2004.08.010. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarLenski R.E, Ofria C, Pennock R.T& Adami C . 2003The evolutionary origin of complex features. Nature. 423, 139–144.doi:10.1038/nature01568. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarMaynard Smith J& Szathmáry E The major transitions in evolution. 1995Oxford, UK:W. H. Freeman Spektrum. Google ScholarMaynard Smith J, Burian R, Kauffman S, Alberch P, Campbell J, Goodwin B, Lande R, Raup D& Wolpert L . 1985Developmental constraints and evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 60, 265–287.doi:10.1086/414425. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarMcShea D.W . 1991Complexity and evolution: what everybody knows. Biol. Phil. 6, 303–324.doi:10.1007/BF00132234. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarMcShea D.W . 1994Mechanisms of large-scale evolutionary trends. Evolution. 48, 1747–1763.doi:10.2307/2410505. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarMcShea D.W . 2005The evolution of complexity without natural selection, a possible large-scale trend of the fourth kind. Paleobiology. 31, 146–156.doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2005)031[0146:TEOCWN]2.0.CO;2. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarNewman S.A . 2002Developmental mechanisms: putting genes in their place. J. Biosci. 27, 97–104. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarNilsson D.E& Pelger S . 1994A pessimistic estimate of the time required for an eye to evolve. Proc. R. Soc. B. 256, 53–58.doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0048. . Link, ISI, Google ScholarOdling-Smee F.J, Laland K.N& Feldman M.W . 1996Niche construction. Am. Nat. 147, 641–648.doi:10.1086/285870. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarPlatzer U& Meinzer H.-P . 2004Genetic networks in the early development of Caenorhabditis elegans. Int. Rev. Cytol. 234, 47–100. Crossref, PubMed, Google ScholarReinitz J& Sharp D.H . 1995Mechanism of eve stripe formation. Mech. Dev. 49, 133–158.doi:10.1016/0925-4773(94)00310-J. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarRichardson M.K& Chipman A.D . 2003Developmental constraints in a comparative framework: a test case using variations in phalanx number during amniote evolution. J. Exp. Zool. B (Mol. Dev. Evol.). 269, 8–22.doi:10.1002/jez.b.13. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarSalazar-Ciudad I, Garcia-Fernandez J& Solé R.V . 2000Gene networks capable of pattern formation: from induction to reaction-diffusion. J. Theor. Biol. 205, 587–603.doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.2092. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarSaunders P.T& Ho M.W . 1976On the increase in complexity in evolution. J. Theor. Biol. 63, 375–384.doi:10.1016/0022-5193(76)90040-0. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarSaunders W.B, Work D.M& Nikolaeva S.V . 1999Evolution of complexity in paleozoic ammonoid sutures. Science. 286, 760–763.doi:10.1126/science.286.5440.760. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarSiegal M.L& Bergman A . 2002Waddington's canalization revisited: developmental stability and evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 99, 10 528–10 532.doi:10.1073/pnas.102303999. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarSoyer O.S& Bonhoeffer S . 2006Evolution of complexity in signaling pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 103, 16 337–16 342.doi:10.1073/pnas.0604449103. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarSzathmáry E, Jordán F& Pál C . 2001Molecular biology and evolution: can genes explain biological complexity?. Science. 292, 1315–1316.doi:10.1126/science.1060852. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarValentine J.W, Collins A.G& Meyer C.P . 1994Morphological complexity increase in metazoans. Paleobiology. 20, 131–142. Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarWaxman D& Peck J.R . 2003The anomalous effects of biased mutation. Genetics. 164, 1615–1626. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarWolpert L . 1990The evolution of development. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 39, 109–124. Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarYampolsky L.Y& Stoltzfus A . 2001Bias in the introduction of variation as an orienting factor in evolution. Evol. Dev. 3, 73–83.doi:10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003002073.x. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Figure 1a and references to figure 15 in the electronic supplementary material are now correct. 26 February 2007



