Despite the well-documented historical importance of polyploidy, the mechanisms responsible for the establishment and evolutionary success of novel polyploid lineages remain unresolved. One possibility, which has not been previously evaluated theoretically, is that novel polyploid lineages are initially more resistant to pathogens than the diploid progenitor species. Here, we explore this possibility by developing and analysing mathematical models of interactions between newly formed polyploid lineages and their pathogens. We find that for the genetic mechanisms of pathogen resistance with the best empirical support, newly formed polyploid populations of hosts are expected to be more resistant than their diploid progenitors. This effect can be quite strong and, in the case of perennial species with recurrent polyploid formation, may last indefinitely, potentially providing a general explanation for the successful establishment of novel polyploid lineages.

References

Agrawal A& Lively C.M. 2002Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching-alleles models and all points in between. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4, 79–90. ISI, Google Scholar
Baack E.J. 2005Ecological factors influencing tetraploid establishment in snow buttercups (Ranunculus adoneus, Ranunculaceae): minority cytotype exclusion and barriers to triploid formation. Am. J. Bot. 92, 1827–1835. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Bagheri H.C& Wagner G.P. 2004Evolution of dominance in metabolic pathways. Genetics. 168, 1713–1735.doi:10.1534/genetics.104.028696. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Bretagnolle F& Thompson J.D. 1995Tansley review no. 78. Gametes with the stomatic chromosome number: mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolypoid plants. New Phytol. 129, 1–22.doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03005.x. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Burdon J.JDiseases and plant population biology. 1987Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Burdon J.J& Marshall D.R. 1981Inter- and intra-specific diversity in the disease-response of glycine species to the leaf-rust fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi. J. Ecol. 69, 381–390.doi:10.2307/2259674. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
Busey P, Glibin-Davis R.M& Center B.J. 1993Resistance in Stenotaphrum to the sting nematode. Crop Sci. 33, 1066–1070. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
Frank S.A. 1994Recognition and polymorphism in host–parasite genetics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 346, 283–293.doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0145. . Link, ISI, Google Scholar
Grosberg R.K& Hart M.W. 2000Mate selection and the evolution of highly polymorphic self/nonself recognition genes. Science. 289, 2111–2114.doi:10.1126/science.289.5487.2111. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Guegan J.-F& Morand S. 1996Polyploid hosts: strange attractors for parasites?. Oikos. 77, 366–370.doi:10.2307/3546079. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
Hammond-Kosack K.E& Jones J.D.G. 1997Plant disease resistance genes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48, 575–607.doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.575. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Husband B.C. 2000Constraints on polyploid evolution: a test of the minority cytotype exclusion principle. Proc. R. Soc. B. 267, 217–223.doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.0990. . Link, ISI, Google Scholar
Husband B.C. 2004The role of triploid hybrids in the evolutionary dynamics of mixed-ploidy populations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82, 537–546.doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00339.x. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
Husband B.C& Sabara H.A. 2004Research review reproductive isolation between autotetraploids and their diploid progenitors in fireweed, Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). New Phytol. 161, 703–713.doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2004.00998.x. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Levin D.A. 1975Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon. 24, 35–43.doi:10.2307/1218997. . Crossref, Google Scholar
Levin D.A. 1983Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. Am. Nat. 122, 1–25.doi:10.1086/284115. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
Masterson J. 1994Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science. 264, 421–424.doi:10.1126/science.264.5157.421. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Meyers L.A& Levin D.A. 2006On the abundance of polyploids in flowering plants. Evolution. 60, 1198–1206. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Ness B.D, Soltis D.E& Soltis P.S. 1989Autopolyploidy in Heuchera micrantha (Saxifragaceae). Am. J. Bot. 76, 614–626.doi:10.2307/2444357. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
Nuismer S.L& Thompson J.N. 2001Plant polyploidy and non-uniform effects on insect herbivores. Proc. R. Soc. B. 268, 1937–1940.doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1760. . Link, ISI, Google Scholar
Osborn T.C, et al.2003Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids. Trends Genet. 19, 141–147.doi:10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00015-5. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Otto S.P& Whitton J. 2000Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34, 401–437.doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Parker I.M& Gilbert G.S. 2004The evolutionary ecology of novel plant–pathogen interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 675–700.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132339. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
Penn D.J, Damjanovich K& Potts W.K. 2002MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 99, 11 260–11 264.doi:10.1073/pnas.162006499. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
Ramsey J& Schemske D.W. 1998Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 467–501.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467. . Crossref, Google Scholar
Ramsey J& Schemske D.W. 2002Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 589–639.doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150437. . Crossref, Google Scholar
Rausch J.H, Morgan M.T& Husband B. 2005The effect of self-fertilization, inbreeding depression, and population size on autopolyploid establishment. Evolution. 59, 1867–1875. PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Schoen D.J, Burdon J.J& Brown A.H.D. 1992Resistance of Glycine tomentella to soybean leaf rust Phakopsora pachyrhizi in relation to ploidy level and geographic distribution. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83, 827–832.doi:10.1007/BF00226704. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Singh R.S& Krimbas C.B. 2000New York, NY:Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Soltis D.E& Soltis P.S. 1999Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 348–352.doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01638-9. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Stebbins G.L. 1938Cytological characteristics associated with the different growth habits in the dicotyledons. Am. J. Bot. 25, 189–198.doi:10.2307/2436589. . Crossref, Google Scholar
Stebbins G.LChromosomal evolution in higher plants. 1971Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar
Thompson J.N& Burdon J.J. 1992Gene-for-gene coevolution between plants and parasites. Nature. 360, 121–125.doi:10.1038/360121a0. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
Thompson J.N, Cunningham B.M, Segraves K.A, Althoff D.M& Wagner D. 1997Plant polyploidy and insect/plant interactions. Am. Nat. 150, 730–743.doi:10.1086/286091. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
Thompson J.N, Nuismer S.L& Merg K. 2004Plant polyploidy and the evolutionary ecology of plant/animal interactions. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82, 511–519.doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00338.x. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

This Issue

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences cover image

07 October 2007

Volume 274Issue 1624

Article Information

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0692
PubMed:17686733
Published by:Royal Society
Print ISSN:0962-8452
Online ISSN:1471-2954

History:

Manuscript received22/05/2007
Manuscript accepted12/07/2007
Published online07/08/2007
Published in print07/10/2007

License:

Citations and impact

Keywords

Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad