Abstract
Foraging theory seeks to explain how the distribution and abundance of prey influence the evolution of predatory behaviour, including the allocation of effort to searching for prey and handling them after they are found. While experiments have shown that many predators alter their behaviour phenotypically within individual lifetimes, few have examined the actual evolution of predatory behaviour in light of this theory. Here, we test the effects of prey density on the evolution of a predator's searching and handling behaviours using a bacterial predator, Myxococcus xanthus. Sixteen predator populations evolved for almost a year on agar surfaces containing patches of Escherichia coli prey at low or high density. Improvements in searching rate were significantly greater in those predators that evolved at low prey density. Handling performance also improved in some predator populations, but prey density did not significantly affect the magnitude of these gains. As the predators evolved greater foraging proficiency, their capacity diminished to produce fruiting bodies that enable them to survive prolonged periods of starvation. More generally, these results demonstrate that predators evolve behaviours that reflect at least some of the opportunities and limitations imposed by the distribution and abundance of their prey.
Footnotes
References
Abedon S.T, Hyman P& Thomas C . 2003Experimental examination of bacteriophage latent-period evolution as a response to bacterial availability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 7499–7506.doi:10.1128/AEM.69.12.7499-7506.2003. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarBennett A.F& Lenski R.E . 2007An experimental test of evolutionary trade-offs during temperature adaptation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 104, 8649–8654.doi:10.1073/pnas.0702117104. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarBiesinger Z& Haefner J.W . 2005Proximate cues for predator searching: a quantitative analysis of hunger and encounter rate in the ladybird beetle, Coccinella septempunctata. Anim. Behav. 69, 235–244.doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.02.023. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarBlount Z.D, Borland C.Z& Lenski R.E . 2008Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 105, 7899–7906.doi:10.1073/pnas.0803151105. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarBohannan B.J.M& Lenski R.E . 2000Linking genetic change to community evolution: insights from studies of bacteria and bacteriophage. Ecol. Lett. 3, 362–377.doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00161.x. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarBouma J.E& Lenski R.E . 1988Evolution of a bacteria/plasmid association. Nature. 355, 351–352.doi:10.1038/335351a0. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarBretscher A.P& Kaiser D . 1978Nutrition of Myxococcus xanthus, a fruiting myxobacterium. J. Bacteriol. 133, 763–768. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarBull J.J& Molineaux I.J . 1992Molecular genetics of adaptation in an experimental model of cooperation. Evolution. 46, 882–895.doi:10.2307/2409743. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarBull J.J, Molineaux I.J& Rice W.R . 1991Selection of benevolence in a host–parasite system. Evolution. 45, 875–882.doi:10.2307/2409695. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarCatania K.C& Remple F.E . 2005Asymptotic prey profitability drives star-nosed moles to the foraging speed limit. Nature. 433, 519–522.doi:10.1038/nature03250. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarCharnov E.L . 1976Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid. Am. Nat. 110, 141–151.doi:10.1086/283054. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarCooper T.F . 2007Recombination speeds adaptation by reducing competition between beneficial mutations in populations of Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol. 5, e225doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050225. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarCooper V.S& Lenski R.E . 2000The population genetics of ecological specialization in evolving Escherichia coli populations. Nature. 407, 736–739.doi:10.1038/35037572. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholarde Visser J, Zeyl C.W, Gerrish P.J, Blanchard J.L& Lenski R.E . 1999Diminishing returns from mutation supply rate in asexual populations. Science. 283, 404–406.doi:10.1126/science.283.5400.404. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarDworkin M . 1996Recent advances in the social and developmental biology of the myxobacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 60, 70–102. Crossref, PubMed, Google ScholarEmlen J.M . 1966The role of time and energy in food preference. Am. Nat. 100, 611–617.doi:10.1086/282455. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarFiegna F, Yu Y.T.N, Kadam S.V& Velicer G.J . 2006Evolution of an obligate social cheater to a superior cooperator. Nature. 441, 310–314.doi:10.1038/nature04677. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarGiraldeau L& Caraco T Social foraging theory. 2000Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press. Google ScholarGoddard M.R, Godfray H.C.J& Burt A . 2005Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations. Nature. 434, 636–640.doi:10.1038/nature03405. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarGuyader S& Burch C.L . 2008Optimal foraging predicts the ecology but not the evolution of host specialization in bacteriophages. PLoS ONE. 3, e1946doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001946. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarHeineman R.H& Bull J.J . 2007Testing optimality with experimental evolution: lysis time in a bacteriophage. Evolution. 61, 1695–1709.doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00132.x. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarHeineman R.H, Springman R& Bull J.J . 2008Optimal foraging by bacteriophages through host avoidance. Am. Nat. 171, E149–E157.doi:10.1086/528962. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar- Hillesland, K. L. 2005 Evolutionary ecology of predation by the soil bacterium, Myxococcus xanthus. In Microbiology and molecular genetics, vol. PhD. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. Google Scholar
Hillesland K.L& Velicer G.J . 2005Resource level affects relative performance of the two motility systems of Myxococcus xanthus. Microb. Ecol. 49, 558–566.doi:10.1007/s00248-004-0069-8. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarHillesland K.L, Lenski R.E& Velicer G.J . 2006Ecological variables affecting predatory success in Myxococcus xanthus. Microb. Ecol. 53, 571–578.doi:10.1007/s00248-006-9111-3. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarHodgkin J& Kaiser D Genetics of gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus (Myxobacterales): two gene systems control movement. Mol. Gen. Genet. 171, 1979a177–191.doi:10.1007/BF00270004. . Crossref, Google ScholarHodgkin J& Kaiser D Genetics of gliding motility in Myxococcus xanthus (Myxobacteriales): genes controlling movement of single cells. Mol. Gen. Genetics. 171, 1979b167–176.doi:10.1007/BF00270003. . Crossref, Google ScholarHolling C.S . 1959Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91, 385–398. Crossref, Google ScholarHuey R.B& Hertz P.E . 1984Is a jack-of-all-temperatures a master of none?. Evolution. 38, 441–444.doi:10.2307/2408502. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarKaiser D . 2000Bacterial motility: how do pili pull?. Curr. Biol. 10, R777–R780.doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00764-8. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarKrebs J.R, Kacelnik A& Taylor P . 1978Test of optimal sampling by foraging great tits. Nature. 275, 27–31.doi:10.1038/275027a0. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarLevins R Evolution in changing environments. 1968Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press. Google ScholarLenski R.E, Simpson S.C& Nguyen T.I . 1994Genetic analysis of a plasmid-encoded, host genotype-specific enhancement of bacterial fitness. J. Bacteriol. 176, 3140–3147. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarMignot T, Shaevitz J.W, Hartzell P.L& Zusman D.R . 2007Evidence that focal adhesion complexes power bacterial gliding motility. Science. 315, 853–856.doi:10.1126/science.1137223. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarPerry G& Pianka E.R . 1997Animal foraging: past, present and future. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 360–364.doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01097-5. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarPham V.D, Shebelut C.W, Diodati M.E, Bull C.T& Singer M . 2005Mutations affecting predation ability of the soil bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. Microbiology. 151, 1865–1874.doi:10.1099/mic.0.27824-0. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarRosenberg E& Varon M Antibiotics and lytic enzymes. Myxobacteria: development and cell interactions& Rosenberg E . 1984pp. 109–125. Eds. New York, NY:Springer. Crossref, Google ScholarSchoener T.W . 1971Theory of feeding strategies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2, 369–404.doi:10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002101. . Crossref, Google ScholarShi W& Zusman D.R . 1993The two motility systems of Myxococcus xanthus show different selective advantages on various surfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 90, 3378–3382.doi:10.1073/pnas.90.8.3378. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarSih A& Christensen B . 2001Optimal diet theory: when does it work, and when and why does it fail?. Anim. Behav. 61, 379–390.doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1592. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarStephens D.W& Krebs J.R Foraging theory. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology1986Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press. Google ScholarThiel A& Hoffmeister T.S . 2004Knowing your habitat: linking patch-encounter rate and patch exploitation in parasitoids. Behav. Ecol. 15, 419–425.doi:10.1093/beheco/arh030. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarThompson J.N . 1998Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 329–332.doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01378-0. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarTravisano M, Mongold J.A, Bennett A.F& Lenski R.E . 1995Experimental tests of the roles of adaptation, chance, and history in evolution. Science. 267, 87–90.doi:10.1126/science.7809610. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarTully T, Cassey P& Ferriere R . 2005Functional response: rigorous estimation and sensitivity to genetic variation in prey. Oikos. 111, 479–487.doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2005.14062.x. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarTurner P.E, Cooper V.S& Lenski R.E . 1998Tradeoff between horizontal and vertical modes of transmission in bacterial plasmids. Evolution. 52, 315–329.doi:10.2307/2411070. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarUrban M.C . 2007Risky prey behavior evolves in risky habitats. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 104, 14 377–14 382.doi:10.1073/pnas.0704645104. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarVelicer G.J& Yu Y.N . 2003Evolution of novel cooperative swarming in the bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. Nature. 425, 75–78.doi:10.1038/nature01908. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarVelicer G.J, Kroos L& Lenski R.E . 1998Loss of social behaviors by Myxococcus xanthus during evolution in an unstructured habitat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 95, 12 376–12 380.doi:10.1073/pnas.95.21.12376. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarVelicer G.J, Kroos L& Lenski R.E . 2000Developmental cheating in the social bacterium Myxococcus xanthus. Nature. 404, 598–601.doi:10.1038/35007066. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarVos M& Velicer G.J . 2008Natural variation of gliding motility in a centimetre-scale population of Myxococcus xanthus. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 64, 343–350.doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00484.x. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarWeinreich D.M, Delaney N.F, DePristo M.A& Hartl D.L . 2006Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science. 312, 111–114.doi:10.1126/science.1123539. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarWerner E.E& Hall D.J . 1974Optimal foraging and the size selection of prey by the bluegill sunfish. Ecology. 55, 1042–1052.doi:10.2307/1940354. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarYoshida T, Ellner S.P, Jones L.E, Bohannan B.J.M, Lenski R.E& Hairston N.G . 2007Cryptic population dynamics: rapid evolution masks trophic interactions. PLoS Biol. 5, e235doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050235. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar



