Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Restricted accessResearch articles

Climate change and spring-fruiting fungi

Published:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1537

    Most macrofungi produce ephemeral fruit bodies during autumn but some have adapted to spring fruiting. In this study, temporal changes in the time of spring fruiting in Norway and the UK during 1960–2007 have been investigated by statistical analyses of about 6000 herbarium and field records, covering 34 species. Nearly 30 per cent of the temporal variation in fruiting could be ascribed to spatial and species-specific effects. Correcting for these effects, linear trends towards progressively earlier fruiting were detected during the entire period in both Norway and the UK, with a change in average fruiting day of 18 days over the study period. Early fruiting was correlated with high winter temperatures in both countries, indicating that the observed phenological changes are likely due to earlier onset of spring. There were also significant correlations between climatic conditions in one year and timing of fruiting the following year, indicating that below-ground mycelia are influenced by climatic conditions over a longer time period before fruiting. Fruiting dates were, however, not strictly related to changes in vernal accumulated thermal time. Our results indicate that global warming has lead to progressively earlier fruiting of spring fungi in northwest Europe during the last half century.

    References

    • Badeck F.-W., Bondeau A., Böttcher K., Doktor D., Lucht W., Schaber J.& Sitch S.. 2004Responses of spring phenology to climate change. New Phytol. 162, 295–309. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01059.x). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Chmielewski M.. 2003Phenology and agriculture. Tasks for vegetation science. Phenology: an integrative environmental science, vol. 39 (ed. & Schwartz M. D.), pp. 505–522. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher. Google Scholar
    • Fitter A. H.& Fitter R. S. R.. 2002Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants. Science 296, 1689–1691. (doi:10.1126/science.1071617). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Gange A. C., Gange E. G., Sparks T. H.& Boddy L.. 2007Rapid and recent changes in fungal fruiting patterns. Science 316, 71. (doi:10.1126/science.1137489). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Gordo O.& Sanz J. J.. 2005Phenology and climate change: a long-term study in a Mediterranean locality. Oecologia 146, 484–495. (doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0240-z). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Harrington R., et al.2007Environmental change and the phenology of european aphids. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 1550–1564. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01394.x). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Hastie T., Tibshirani R.& Friedman J.. 2001The elements of statistical learning.New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Jonzén N., et al.2006Rapid advance of spring arrival dates in long-distance migratory birds. Science 312, 1959–1961. (doi:10.1126/science.1126119). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Kauserud H., Stige L. C., Vik J. O., Økland R. H., Høiland K.& Stenseth N. C.. 2008Mushroom fruiting and climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 3811–3814. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0709037105). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Legendre P.& Legendre L.. 1998Numerical ecology.Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. Google Scholar
    • Liu R. Y.. 1988Bootstrap procedures under some non-i.i.d. models. Ann. Stat. 16, 1696–1708. (doi:10.1214/aos/1176351062). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Mammen E.. 1993Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models in resampling. Ann. Stat. 21, 255–285. (doi:10.1214/aos/1176349025). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Mattock G., Gange A. C.& Gange E. G.. 2007Spring fungi are fruiting earlier. Brit. Wild. 18, 267–272. Google Scholar
    • Menzel A., et al.2006European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 1969–1976. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01193.x). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Moore D., Gange A. C., Gange E. G.& Boddy L.. 2008Fruit bodies: their production and development in relation to environment. Ecology of saprotrophic basidiomycetes (eds , Boddy L., Frankland J. C.& van West P.), pp. 79–102. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. Google Scholar
    • Ovaska J. A., Nilsen J., Wielgolaski F. E., Kauhanen H., Partanen R., Neuvonen S., Kapari L., Skre O.& Laine K.. 2005Phenology and growth in mountain birch provenances of latitudinal, altitudinal and cost—inland gradients. Plant growth, herbivory and human impact in Nordic mountain birch forests. Ecological studies, 180(eds), pp. 99–116. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar
    • Pinheiro J. C.& Bates D. M.. 2002Mixed effect models for S and S-plus.New York, NY: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar
    • Pinheiro J. C., Bates D., DebRoy S.& Sarkar D.The R Core team. 2008nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models, pp. 1–90, R package v. 3. Google Scholar
    • Primack D., Imbres C., Primack R. B., Miller-Rushing A. J.& Del Tredici P.. 2004Herbarium specimens demonstrate earlier flowering times in response to warming in Boston. Am. J. Bot. 91, 1260–1264. (doi:10.3732/ajb.91.8.1260). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • R Development Core Team. 2008R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0. See http://www.R-project.org. Google Scholar
    • Root T. L., Price J. T., Hall K. R., Schneider S. H., Rosenzweig C.& Pounds J. A.. 2003Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421, 57–60. (doi:10.1038/nature01333). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Rosenzweig C., et al.2007Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds , Parry M. L., Canziani O. F., Palutikof J. P., van der Linden P. J.& Hanson C. E.), pp. 79–131. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Roy D. B.& Sparks T. H.. 2000Phenology of British butterflies and climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 6, 407. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00322.x). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Rubolini D., Møller A. P., Rainio K.& Lehikoinen E.. 2007Intraspecific consistency and geographic variability in temporal trends of spring migration phenology among European bird species. Clim. Res. 35, 135–146. (doi:10.3354/cr00720). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Wolfe D. W., Schwartz M. D., Lakso A. N., Otsuki Y., Pool R. M.& Shaulis N. J.. 2005Climate change and shifts in spring phenology of three horticultural woody perennials in northeastern USA. Int. J. Biometeorol. 49, 303–309. (doi:10.1007/s00484-004-0248-9). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Wood S. N.. 2006Generlized additive models. London, UK: Chapman & Hall. CrossrefGoogle Scholar