Abstract
Nesting behaviour is critical for reproductive success in oviparous organisms with no parental care. In organisms where sex is determined by incubation temperature, nesting behaviour may be a prime target of selection in response to unbalanced sex ratios. To produce an evolutionary change in response to sex-ratio selection, components of nesting behaviour must be heritable. We estimated the field heritability of two key components of nesting behaviour in a population of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) with temperature-dependent sex determination by applying the ‘animal model’ to a pedigree reconstructed from genotype data. We obtained estimates of low to non-detectable heritability using repeated records across all environments. We then determined environment-specific heritability by grouping records with similar temperatures for the winter preceding the nesting season, a variable known to be highly associated with our two traits of interest, nest vegetation cover and Julian date of nesting. The heritability estimates of nest vegetation cover and Julian date of nesting were qualitatively highest and significant, or nearly so, after hot winters. Additive genetic variance for these traits was not detectable after cold winters. Our analysis suggests that the potential for evolutionary change of nesting behaviour may be dependent on the thermal conditions of the preceding winter, a season that is predicted to be especially subject to climate change.
References
Blouin-Demers G., Weatherhead P. J.& Row J. R. . 2004Phenotypic consequences of nest-site selection in black rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta). Can. J. Zool. 82, 449–456. (doi:10.1139/z04-014). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarBrommer J. E., Merilä J., Sheldon B. C.& Gustafsson L. . 2005Natural selection and genetic variation for reproductive reaction norms in a wild bird population. Evolution 59, 1362–1371. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01785.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarBrommer J. E., Rattiste K.& Wilson A. J. . 2008Exploring plasticity in the wild: laying date–temperature reaction norms in the common gull Larus canus. Proc. R. Soc. B. 275, 687–693. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0951). Link, ISI, Google ScholarBull J. J., Vogt R. C.& Bulmer M. G. . 1982Heritability of sex ratio in turtles with environmental sex determination. Evolution 36, 333–341. (doi:10.2307/2408052). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarBull J. J., Gutzke W. H. N.& Bulmer M. G. . 1988Nest choice in a captive lizard with temperature-dependent sex determination. J. Evol. Biol. 2, 177–184. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1988.1020177.x). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarBulmer M. G.& Bull J. J. . 1982Models of polygenic sex determination and sex ratio control. Evolution 36, 13–26. (doi:10.2307/2407962). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarCagle K., Packard G., Miller K.& Packard M. . 1993Effects of the microclimate in natural nests on development of embryonic painted turtles, Chrysemys picta. Funct. Ecol. 7, 653–660. (doi:10.2307/2390185). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarCharmantier A.& Garant D. . 2005Environmental quality and evolutionary potential: lessons from wild populations. Proc. R. Soc. B. 272, 1415–1425. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3117). Link, ISI, Google ScholarCharmantier A., McCleery R., Cole L. R., Perrins C., Kruuk L. E. B.& Sheldon B. C. . 2008Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population. Science 320, 800–803. (doi:10.1126/science.1157174). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarDohm M. R. . 2002Repeatability estimates do not always set an upper limit to heritability. Funct. Ecol 16, 273–280. Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarDoody J. S., Guarino E., Georges A., Corey B., Murray G.& Ewert M. . 2006Nest site choice compensates for climate effects on sex ratios in a lizard with environmental sex determination. Evol. Ecol. 20, 307–330. (doi:10.1007/s10682-006-0003-2). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarDownes S. J.& Shine R. . 1999Do incubation-induced changes in a lizard's phenotype influence its vulnerability to predators?Oecologia 120, 9–18. (doi:10.1007/s004420050827). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarErnst C. H., Lovich J. E.& Barbour R. W. . 1994Turtles of the United States and Canada.Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. Google ScholarEwert M. A., Lang J. W.& Nelson C. E. . 2005Geographic variation in the pattern of temperature-dependent sex determination in the American snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina). J. Zool. Lond. 265, 81–95. (doi:10.1017/S0952836904006120). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarFisher R. A. . 1930The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Crossref, Google ScholarFox C. W., Stillwell R. C., Amarillo-S A. R., Czesak M. E.& Messina F. J. . 2004Genetic architecture of population differences in oviposition behaviour of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. J. Evol. Biol. 17, 1141–1151. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00719.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarGeorges A. . 1992Thermal-characteristics and sex determination in field nests of the pig-nosed turtle, Carettochelys insculpta (Chelonia, Carettochelydidae), from northern Australia. Aust. J. Zool. 40, 511–521. (doi:10.1071/ZO9920511). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarGienapp P., Teplitsky C., Alho J. S., Mills J. A.& Merilä J. . 2008Climate change and evolution: disentangling environmental and genetic responses. Mol. Ecol. 17, 167–178. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03413.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarGilmour A. R., Gogel B. J., Cullis B. R.& Thompson R. . 2006ASReml user guide release 2.0. Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International Ltd. Google ScholarHatchwell B. J., Chamberlain D. E.& Perrins C. M. . 1996The reproductive success of blackbirds Turdus merula in relation to habitat structure and choice of nest site. Ibis 138, 256–262. (doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1996.tb04337.x). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarHughes E. J.& Brooks R. J. . 2006The good mother: does nest-site selection constitute parental investment in turtles?Can. J. Zool. 84, 1545–1554. (doi:10.1139/Z06-148). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarHunt J.& Simmons L. W. . 2002The genetics of maternal care: direct and indirect genetic effects on phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 6828–6832. (doi:10.1073/pnas.092676199). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarJaffrézic F.& Pletcher S. D. . 2000Statistical models for estimating the genetic basis of repeated measures and other function-valued traits. Genetics 156, 913–922. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarJamieson A.& Taylor C. S. . 1997Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. Anim. Genet. 28, 397–400. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.1997.00186.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarJanzen F. J. . 1994aClimate change and temperature-dependent sex determination in reptiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7487–7490. (doi:10.1073/pnas.91.16.7487). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarJanzen F. J. . 1994bVegetational cover predicts the sex ratio of hatchling turtles in natural nests. Ecology 75, 1593–1599. (doi:10.2307/1939620). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarJanzen F. J.& Krenz J. G. . 2004Which was first, TSD or GSD? In. Temperature-dependent sex determination in vertebrates (eds, Valenzuela N.& Lance V. A. ), pp. 121–130. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books. Google ScholarJanzen F. J.& Morjan C. L. . 2001Repeatability of microenvironment-specific nesting behaviour in a turtle with environmental sex determination. Anim. Behav. 62, 73–82. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1732). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarJanzen F. J.& Paukstis G. L. . 1991Environmental sex determination in reptiles: ecology, evolution, and experimental design. Q. Rev. Biol. 66, 149–179. (doi:10.1086/417143). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarKalinowski S. T., Wagner A. P.& Taper M. L. . 2006ML-Relate: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 576–579. (doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01256.x). Crossref, Google ScholarKamel S. J.& Mrosovsky N. . 2005Repeatability of nesting preferences in the hawksbill sea turtle, Eretmochelys imbricata, and their fitness consequences. Anim. Behav. 70, 819–828. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.006). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarKing T. L.& Julian S. . 2004Conservation of microsatellite DNA flanking sequence across 13 emydid genera assayed with novel bog turtle (Glyptemys muhlenbergii) loci. Conserv. Genet. 5, 719–725. (doi:10.1007/s10592-004-1854-0). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarKolbe J. J.& Janzen F. J. . 2001The influence of propagule size and maternal nest-site selection on survival and behaviour of neonate turtles. Funct. Ecol. 15, 772–781. (doi:10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00587.x). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarKruuk L. E. B. . 2004Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the ‘animal model.’. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359, 873–890. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1437). Link, ISI, Google ScholarKruuk L. E. B.& Hadfield J. D. . 2007How to separate genetic and environmental causes of similarity between relatives. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 1890–1903. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01377.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarLessells C. M.& Boag P. T. . 1987Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104, 116–121. Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarLynch M.& Walsh B. . 1998Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits.Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. Google ScholarMorjan C. L. . 2003aHow rapidly can maternal behaviour affecting primary sex ratio evolve in a reptile with environmental sex determination?Am. Nat. 162, 205–219. (doi:10.1086/376583). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarMorjan C. L. . 2003bVariation in nesting patterns affecting nest temperatures in two populations painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) with temperature-dependent sex determination. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53, 254–261. (doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0570-3). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarMorjan C. L.& Janzen F. J. . 2003Nest temperature is not related to egg size in a turtle with temperature-dependent sex determination. Copeia 2003, 366–372. (doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2003)003[0366:NTINRT]2.0.CO;2). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarNussey D. H., Postma E., Gienapp P.& Visser M. E. . 2005Selection on heritable phenotypic plasticity in a wild bird population. Science 310, 304–306. (doi:10.1126/science.1117004). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarNussey D. H., Wilson A. J.& Brommer J. E. . 2007The evolutionary ecology of plasticity in the wild. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 831–844. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01300.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarOrgan C. L.& Janes D. E. . 2008Evolution of sex chromosomes in Sauropsida. Integr. Comp. Biol. 48, 512–519. (doi:10.1093/icb/icn041). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarPatterson L. D.& Blouin-Demers G. . 2008The effect of constant and fluctuating incubation temperatures of the phenotype of black rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta). Can. J. Zool. 86, 882–889. (doi:10.1139/Z08-067). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarPeakall R.& Smouse P. E. . 2006Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 288–295. (doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x). Crossref, Google ScholarPearse D. E., Janzen F. J.& Avise J. C. . 2001Genetic markers substantiate long-term storage and utilization of sperm by female painted turtles. Heredity 86, 378–384. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00841.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarPearse D. E., Janzen F. J.& Avise J. C. . 2002Multiple paternity, sperm storage, and reproductive success of female and male painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) in nature. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51, 164–171. (doi:10.1007/s00265-001-0421-7). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarRage C. . 1998Latest Cretaceous extinctions and environmental sex determination in reptiles. Bull. Soc. Geol. France 169, 479–483. Google ScholarRaymond M.& Rousset F. . 1995Genepop v. 1.2: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86, 248–249. Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarRéale D.& Roff D. A. . 2002Quantitative genetics of oviposition behaviour and interactions among oviposition traits in the sand cricket. Anim. Behav. 64, 397–406. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.3084). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarReed T. E., Wanless S., Harris M. P., Frederiksen M., Kruuk L. E. B.& Cunningham E. . 2006Responding to environmental change: plastic responses vary little in a synchronous breeder. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2713–2719. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3631). Link, ISI, Google ScholarReguera P.& Gomendio M. . 2002Flexible oviposition behaviour in the golden egg bug (Phyllomorpha laciniata) and its implications for offspring survival. Behav. Ecol. 13, 70–74. (doi:10.1093/beheco/13.1.70). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarReinhold K. . 1998Nest-site philopatry and selection for environmental sex determination. Evol. Ecol. 12, 245–250. (doi:10.1023/A:1006591914859). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarRoosenburg W. M. . 1996Maternal condition and nest site choice: an alternative for the maintenance of environmental sex determination?Am. Zool. 36, 157–168. (doi:10.1093/icb/36.2.157). Crossref, Google ScholarRoosenburg W. M.& Niewiarowski P. . 1998Maternal effects and the maintenance of environmental sex determination. Maternal effects as adaptations (eds, Mousseau T. A.& Fox C. W. ), pp. 307–322. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google ScholarSargent R. C.& Gebler J. B. . 1980Effects of nest site concealment on hatching success, reproductive success, and paternal behaviour of the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7, 137–142. (doi:10.1007/BF00299519). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarSchwanz L. E.& Janzen F. J. . 2008Climate change and temperature-dependent sex determination: can individual plasticity in nesting phenology prevent extreme sex ratios?Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 81, 826–834. (doi:10.1086/590220). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarShine R.& Brown G. P. . 2002Effects of seasonally varying hydric conditions on hatchling phenotypes of keelback snakes (Tropidonophis mairii, Colubridae) from the Australian wet–dry tropics. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76, 339–347. (doi:10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00068.x). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarSinger M. C., Ng D.& Thomas C. D. . 1988Heritability of oviposition preference and its relationship to offspring performance within a single insect population. Evolution 42, 977–985. (doi:10.2307/2408913). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarSpencer R.-J. . 2002Experimentally testing nest site selection fitness trade-offs and predation risk in turtles. Ecology 83, 2136–2144. (doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2136:ETNSSF]2.0). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarSpencer R.-J.& Thompson M. B. . 2003The significance of predation in nest site selection of turtles: an experimental consideration of macro- and microhabitat preferences. Oikos 102, 592–600. (doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12436.x). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarStarkey D. E., Shaffer H. B., Burke R. L., Forstner M. R. J., Iverson J. B., Janzen F. J., Rhodin A. G. J.& Ultsch G. R. . 2003Molecular systematics, phylogeography, and the effects of Pleistocene glaciation in the painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) complex. Evolution 57, 119–128. (doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00220.x). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarThompson J. N. . 1988Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 47, 3–14. (doi:10.1007/BF00186709). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarTucker J. K., Filoramo N. I.& Janzen F. J. . 1999Size-biased mortality due to predation in a nesting freshwater turtle, Trachemys scripta. Am. Midl. Nat. 141, 198–203. (doi:10.1674/0003-0031(1999)141[0198:SBMDTP]2.0.CO;2). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarTucker J. K., Paukstis G. L.& Janzen F. J. . 2008Does predator swamping promote synchronous emergence of turtle hatchlings among nests?Behav. Ecol 19, 35–40. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arm097). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarUller T. . 2008Developmental plasticity and the evolution of paternal effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 432–438. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.04.005). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarValenzuela N.& Janzen F. J. . 2001Nest-site philopatry and the evolution of temperature-dependent sex determination. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 779–794. ISI, Google ScholarVia S., Gomulkiewicz R., de Jong G., Scheiner S. M., Schlichting C. D.& Van Tienderen P. H. . 1995Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 212–217. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89061-8). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarVisscher P. M. . 2006A note on the asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio tests to test variance components. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 9, 490–495. (doi:10.1375/twin.9.4.490). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarWagner A., Creel S.& Kalinowski S. . 2006Estimating relatedness and relationships using microsatellite loci with null alleles. Heredity 97, 336–345. (doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800865). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarWarner D. A.& Andrews R. M. . 2002Nest-site selection in relation to temperature and moisture by the lizard Sceloporus undulatus. Herpetologica 58, 399–407. (doi:10.1655/0018-0831(2002)058[0399:NSIRTT]2.0.CO;2). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarWeisrock D. W.& Janzen F. J. . 1999Thermal and fitness-related consequences of nest location in painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Funct. Ecol. 13, 94–101. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00288.x). Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarWilson D. S. . 1998Nest-site selection: microhabitat variation and its effects on the survival of turtle embryos. Ecology 79, 1884–1892. (doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1884:NSSMVA]2.0.CO;2). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar



