The importance of the Atlantic walrus ivory trade for the colonization, peak, and collapse of the medieval Norse colonies on Greenland has been extensively debated. Nevertheless, no studies have directly traced medieval European ivory back to distinct Arctic populations of walrus. Analysing the entire mitogenomes of 37 archaeological specimens from Europe, Svalbard, and Greenland, we here discover that Atlantic walrus comprises two monophyletic mitochondrial (MT) clades, which diverged between 23 400 and 251 120 years ago. Our improved genomic resolution allows us to reinterpret the geographical distribution of partial MT data from 306 modern and nineteenth-century specimens, finding that one of these clades was exclusively accessible to Greenlanders. With this discovery, we ascertain the biological origin of 23 archaeological specimens from Europe (most dated between 900 and 1400 CE). These results reveal a significant shift in trade from an early, predominantly eastern source towards a near exclusive representation of Greenland ivory. Our study provides empirical evidence for how this remote Arctic resource was progressively integrated into a medieval pan-European trade network, contributing to both the resilience and vulnerability of Norse Greenland society.

1. Introduction

Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) has long been exploited for its ivory, which was a popular material for the manufacture of luxury art objects in medieval Europe. With isolated earlier and later exceptions, its use started in the tenth century, peaked with the Romanesque art style of the twelfth century, and subsequently declined [1–4]. To what extent this European demand for ivory encouraged exploration and colonization of the North Atlantic region and the Arctic has been extensively discussed [5–9]. While the Atlantic walrus is widely distributed—with populations being found from Siberia to Canada [10]—of all potential sources it is Norse Greenland for which ivory trade has been suggested as especially important. First, the initial exploration and settlement of Greenland ca 980–990 CE has been attributed to the hunt for ivory [7]. Second, the thirteenth- and early fourteenth-century peak in transatlantic trade to Greenland, and architectural (particularly church) investments there, have been similarly connected with the walrus [6,9,11–14]. Finally, the abandonment of the Norse colony—its Western Settlement in the fourteenth century and its (more southern) Eastern Settlement in the fifteenth century—has been blamed on the declining popularity of walrus ivory in Europe and/or on a switch to alternative Arctic sources such as Svalbard or Russia [7,15]. However, no studies have directly traced medieval European ivory back to distinct walrus populations in order to evaluate the importance of various Arctic sources between the tenth and fifteenth century CE.

The hunting of walruses for ivory by Norse Greenlanders is testified by archaeological finds of skulls, skull fragments, tusk offcuts, cheek teeth, and carved objects [9,16,17]. Post-cranial walrus bones (that represent hunting for meat rather than ivory) are rare from Norse sites in Greenland, particularly from the Eastern Settlement. Based on historical sources, most hunting took place further north along the west coast, mainly around Disko Bay, which can explain the lack of post-cranial bones at the settlements [9,18–21]. The actual transport of walrus products—ivory, hide ropes, and even a decorated walrus skull—from Greenland to Europe as gifts, tithes, and trade goods is also described in historical sources. Although these sources vary in their historicity and are dated to the thirteenth century CE or later, they describe practices thought (by their medieval authors and modern scholars) to have had an earlier origin [6,7,13,21]. Yet another major source of ivory was the Barents Sea region of Arctic Fennoscandia and Russia. This eastern source was documented as early as the late ninth century CE, when the Arctic Norwegian chieftain Ohthere visited the court of King Alfred of Wessex in England [22,23]. The continued importance of this source is implied by the great abundance of walrus ivory known from medieval Novgorod—an important trading town with an extensive network into Arctic Fennoscandia and Russia [24,25]—and by the hunting of the Arctic European walrus in the Svalbard Archipelago between the sixteenth and twentieth centuries [26]. Finally, walruses were also initially hunted in Iceland during its colonization in the late ninth and tenth centuries [7,9,27], but by the twelfth–thirteenth centuries, when the island's earliest laws and narrative texts were first recorded, Icelandic walruses were reduced to isolated visitors only [9,28]. Isotopic analyses indicate that Icelandic ivory finds dated to the Viking Age were probably from local hunting [7], but there exists no empirical evidence on the geographical origin of the ivory imported to European trading centres such as Trondheim, Bergen, Oslo, Dublin, London, Sigtuna, and Schleswig during the chronology of the Norse Greenland settlements. Here, we fill this knowledge gap.

Genetic analyses of modern walruses reveal significant population structure based on microsatellite variation [29–32], mitochondrial (MT) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) [29,30], and partial MT sequence variation [33], which agrees with high levels of observed site fidelity [34,35]. Analyses of RFLP data reveal the widespread distribution of a common MT haplotype across the entire North Atlantic region, with a small subset of haplotypes that is geographically restricted to populations in western Greenland and the Canadian Arctic [29,30]. So far, the limited resolution of the available MT data has made it difficult to determine whether this distinct distribution is the result from pre- or post-glacial isolation [29,30,33,36,37].

Here, we analyse the entire mitogenomes of 20 archaeological walrus rostrums and three tusk offcuts traded to western Europe to determine their geographical origin. Although aDNA can trace such specimens towards their biological source [38–40], it is difficult to apply this destructive technique to objects of fine art such as worked ivory. Nonetheless, partial walrus skulls (rostrums) with in situ tusks were also transported to Europe [41]. In rare instances these ‘ivory packages’ remain intact, while in others they were broken up to extract the ivory [41–46]. These rostrums and rostrum fragments can serve as proxies for the ivory they carried and can be sampled for biomolecular analyses without the need to damage ivory artefacts. We include mitogenomes from a set of controls—representing samples whereby hunting location can be confidently assumed—consisting of four medieval samples from Greenland and 10 samples from eighteenth and nineteenth-century Svalbard. We compare our data to 306 modern and nineteenth-century specimens from the Barents Sea region, Greenland, and the Canadian Arctic [32,33,36,37] to infer the geographical origin of European walrus imports during the chronology of the Norse occupation of Greenland.

2. Material and methods

(a) Sampling

We sampled 37, morphologically identified walrus bone and ivory specimens from western Europe (n = 23), Greenland (n = 4), and Svalbard (n = 10, figure 1a; electronic supplementary material, table S1). Specimens have been dated by archaeological context, associated artefacts, or (in one case) a runic inscription. Direct radiocarbon dating was not used because precise marine reservoir correction requires a ΔR value which cannot be predicted without catch location [49]. Two late outliers that post-date the Norse occupation of Greenland are included for comparison, one from a context dating 1500–1532 CE and one post-dating 1600 CE. Two other samples are undated, being from old excavations, but are probably medieval in origin. The specimens were originally obtained from excavations and subsequently archived in museum collections, although in Le Mans a rostrum with a thirteenth–fourteenth century runic inscription on one of its tusks has come down to posterity intact [41,50]. The Le Mans rostrum must have been kept as a display piece over the centuries, until being acquired by Musée Vert, muséum d'histoire naturelle du Mans [41]. The set of control samples consisted of four medieval rostrums, excavated at the site of Igaliku (Gardar) in Greenland's former Eastern Settlement [51], and 10 specimens from eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Svalbard that were dated based on the documented use of the hunting stations from which they were collected.

(b) DNA extraction, library creation, and sequencing

All DNA extraction and pre-PCR protocols were performed in a dedicated laboratory at the University of Oslo following strict aDNA precautions [52,53]. Samples were exposed to UV (10 min) on each side (total dosage of 4 800 J m⁻²) before cutting. Cut fragments were again exposed to UV (10 min) on each side before milling using a custom-designed stainless-steel mortar [54] or a Retsch MM400 mill. Extraction used a bleach and pre-digestion protocol [55], apart from the Greenland samples for which only pre-digestion was used [56]. Bleach washes were done in duplicate (150–200 mg of powder each) [55], followed by pre-digestion and an overnight, second digestion [56]. The two eluates were combined and concentrated (Amicon-30kDA Centrifugal Filter Units), extracting DNA using Minelute (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA was eluted in 60 µl pre-heated (60°C) elution buffer (EB), incubating for 15 min at 37°C [57]. Negative controls were included in all extraction experiments. Blunt-end Illumina libraries [39,58] were amplified with sample-specific 7 bp P7 indexes in triplicate, 25 µl reactions [40], quantified (Bioanalyzer 2100, Agilent), sequenced (125 bp paired-end, Illumina HiSeq 2500), and demultiplexed (--mismatch 0).

(c) Data processing and analyses

Sequencing reads were processed (PALEOMIX [59]), collapsed (AdapterRemoval v1.5 [60]), and aligned to the Pacific walrus nuclear genome [61] and the Atlantic walrus mitogenome [62] (BWA aln v.0.7.5a-r405 [63]). Pacific walrus reads [61] were aligned to the Atlantic walrus mitogenome to obtain a Pacific walrus MT sequence (electronic supplementary material). aDNA damage was investigated (mapDamage v.2.0.6 [64]) excluding alignments with a MapQ-value < 25. Genotypes were jointly called (GATK v.3.4.46 [65] Haplotypecaller --ploidy 1 & Genotypecaller), after duplicate removal (PicardTools v.1.96), indel realignment (IndelRealigner), and filtered (BCFTOOLS v.1.6 [66] -i ‘FS < 60.0 && SOR < 4 && MQ > 30.0 && QD > 2.0’, --SnpGap 10). Indels were excluded and genotypes with quality less than 15 and read depth less than 3 were set as missing (VCFTOOLS v.0.1.14 [67]).

Phylogenetic analyses were performed (BEAST 2.4.7 [48]) with Pacific walrus as outgroup, implementing the Hasegawa, Kishino, and Yano (HKY) substitution model with the Yule tree prior and a strict clock (jModeltest2 v.0.1.10 [68]). Timing to most recent common ancestor (MRCA) was estimated using a faster rate of 0.75 × 10⁻⁷ substitutions/site/year from southern elephant seal control region (CR) data [69] and a slower rate of 0.7 × 10⁻⁸ estimated from baleen whale cytochrome b data [70,71], because the CR mutates relatively fast compared to other parts of the mitogenome [72]. The Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) (10 million gen, pre-burnin 1 million gen) was sampled every 1 000 trees and effective sample size (ESS) values above 200 confirmed convergence (Tracer v.1.6.0 [73]). After a 10% burnin (TreeAnnotator) the maximum clade credibility tree was visualized (FigTree v.1.4.3). A haplotype genealogy was drawn using Fitchi [74]. Differentiation among lineages and clade supporting SNPs were obtained (smartPCA v.6.1.4 [75] --snpweightoutname; electronic supplementary material, figure S3).

We integrated our data from archaeological walrus specimens with data from modern walrus samples on MT RFLP variation and MT CR haplotypes. First, we investigated if observed genetic divergence in archaeological walruses can be detected in previously published RLFP data [29,30]. In such a case, it should be possible to identify specific SNPs that alter the sequence motifs of restriction fragment binding sites. Clade-specific modification of RFLP motifs was obtained using FindMotif, (IGV [76]; electronic supplementary material). Second, we compared the CR haplotypes of our archaeological specimens to CR data of modern and historic walrus populations. CR population data [32,33,36,37] were aligned to the Atlantic walrus MT genome and genotypes at position 15 564, 15 760, and 15 779 were scored (IGV [77]; electronic supplementary material, table S3). Finally, the binomial probability of observing different western and eastern clade ratios before and after ca 1125 CE was calculated by simulating variable contributions of a western Greenlandic/Canadian and Northeast Atlantic source, assuming 100% eastern clade specimens in the Northeast Atlantic populations and 48% in western Greenland/Canada (see below). Probabilities for source admixture were scaled to one for each period.

3. Results

(a) Phylogeography of Atlantic walrus mitogenomes

We obtained 520 million paired sequencing reads for 37 samples that passed downstream filtering (figure 1a; electronic supplementary material, table S1). These samples contained 0.01 to 71% endogenous DNA and yielded 4.8 to 438-fold MT coverage (electronic supplementary material, table S2). The reads show the typical fragmentation and deamination patterns expected from post-mortem degradation (electronic supplementary material, figure S1). Including a de novo Pacific walrus MT sequence as outgroup (electronic supplementary material), a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of 346 SNPs reveals two fully supported monophyletic clades in the archaeological Atlantic walrus data (figure 1b). The medieval walruses belong to either clade, whereas all the eighteenth and nineteenth century CE specimens from Svalbard fall into one clade. We tentatively define the clade containing the Svalbard samples as eastern, and the other clade as western (figure 1b). Of the four Greenland samples, two specimens fall into the western and two into the eastern clade (figure 1b). The two major lineages form distinct haplotype genealogies, with each clade separated by 21 or 18 substitutions from the most recent common ancestor (MRCA; electronic supplementary material, figure S2). Using two different substitution rates, the time to the MRCA was estimated to have been 23 400 (95% highest posterior density (HPD): 14 539–34 522) to 251 120 (95% HPD: 163 819–355 131) years ago.

A Principle Component Analysis (PCA) shows two significantly differentiated clusters supported by clade-specific SNPs that are located throughout the entire mitogenome (electronic supplementary material, figure S3). We investigated if these clade-specific SNPs can be associated with RFLP and control region (CR) data from modern (and historic) walrus populations. First, the RFLP studies focused on ND1, ND2, and ND3/4 MT gene regions [29,30]. We find 5 clade-specific SNPs in NADH dehydrogenase 1 (ND1), 3 in ND2, and 9 in ND3/4 (electronic supplementary material, figure S3c). At least one of these SNPs alters a RFLP motif depending on clade membership in each of these ND genes (electronic supplementary material). The combination of enzymes [29,30] can therefore separate the western and eastern clades we identify in our mitogenomes—on multiple restriction sites and within each ND gene region. While these RFLP analyses report four MT clades, the data show a pronounced bimodal divergence, with the majority of distinctive restriction sites and highest statistical support observed between clade 1 and any combination of clades 2–4 [29,30]. Clades 2–4 comprise 94% of the Northwest Greenland and 52% of the West Greenland population [30] (figure 1c). Crucially, these clade 2–4 haplotypes are exclusively identified in western Greenland and Artic Canada, and are absent in the Northeast Atlantic [29,30]. Clade 1 is found in every individual in the Northeast Atlantic and in various proportions in western Greenland (figure 1c).

Second, we investigated a 499 bp section (between 15 328 and 15 827 bp) of an extensive CR population dataset [32,33,36,37]. We observe three SNPs in this section, for which 12 out of 15 archaeological western clade specimens share a distinct A₁₅₅₆₄ C₁₅₇₆₀ C₁₅₇₇₉ haplotype (electronic supplementary material, figure S3c). Reanalysing the CR data for this ACC haplotype, we identified 38 out of 306 Atlantic walruses with the same haplotype (electronic supplementary material, table S3). The ACC haplotype is fixed in the Northwest Greenland population, co-occurs mixed with other haplotypes in Canada, yet is absent from the Northeast Atlantic (figure 1c). The distribution of this CR haplotype is therefore analogous to the RFLP distribution. We derive that the RFLP and CR analyses detect variation explained by the monophyletic lineages of our medieval and eighteenth and nineteenth century CE specimens. Moreover, these analyses reveal a consistent distribution, whereby a subset of haplotypes is geographically restricted to western Greenland and Canada. Since the ACC haplotype of our western clade is only found in western Greenland and Canada, we conclude that the European archaeological specimens belonging to this clade came from Norse Greenland, either because they were hunted by the Norse or because they were traded from further north and west via contact with indigenous Dorset or Thule peoples [18,19,21,78,79]. In contrast, haplotypes of the eastern clade may originate from either side of the Atlantic Ocean (figure 1c).

(b) The chronology of historic walrus trade

The dates of the archaeological walrus specimens cover the entire chronology of the Norse Greenland occupation, with two outliers post-dating its abandonment (figure 2a; electronic supplementary material, table S3). Before the founding of Greenland's bishopric in the 1120s CE [80]—during the settlement phase and the early period of Norse occupation—we identified one western and six eastern clade specimens in Europe (figure 2a). In contrast, during the later occupation, between the 1120s and the end of the fourteenth century, we observe 10 western and two eastern clade specimens. The timing of this significant increase (p-value = 0.0063, Fisher's exact test) in western clade specimens thus coincides with new ecclesiastical infrastructure in Greenland [80] and the height of Romanesque ivory carving in Europe [3]. We have not yet discovered European walrus rostrums that date specifically to the century of Norse Greenland's abandonment (the 1400s). By this date walrus ivory had long gone out of fashion, with the Gothic style using different materials such as elephant ivory [4]. Of the two later outliers in our dataset (both from Trondheim), one from the archbishop's palace is of the western clade, dated 1500–1532. It may represent redeposition of an earlier find, or the latest known export of a walrus rostrum from Greenland. The second outlier postdates 1600 CE and is of the eastern clade.

Figure 2. Chronology of Atlantic walrus specimens in Europe. (a) Archaeological specimens classified as western clade (*blue*) or eastern clade (*orange*) are plotted according to their estimated age range. The start and end of the Norse Greenland occupation, the founding of the bishopric, and the arrival of the Black Death in Norway are indicated (*dashed red lines*). For each specimen, its location (*light grey*) is indicated. (b) Probability of obtaining the observed sample of eastern and western clade specimens as a function of a variable contribution of a western Greenland source. The probability was calculated for those samples obtained before (*dark grey*) or after (*light grey*) the founding of the Greenland bishopric, excluding the sixteenth and seventeenth century CE specimens.

Based on RFLP data, eastern clade specimens make up nearly half (48%) of the modern West Greenland population—which is closest to the Disko Bay hunting grounds of the Greenland Norse (figure 1c). Albeit a small sample size, the medieval Greenland specimens from Gardar also have such a 50/50 distribution (figure 1b), suggesting long-term temporal stability of these haplotype frequencies and showing that eastern clade trade specimens could also have originated from Norse Greenland. We calculated the binomial probability of the observed ratio of western and eastern clade archaeological samples in the period before and after the founding of the Greenlandic bishopric ca 1125 CE (excluding the two outliers from Trondheim), given variable contributions from western Greenlandic/Canadian and Northeast Atlantic/European Arctic sources. This probability is calculated assuming that populations in the Northeast Atlantic are fixed for the eastern clade, whereas those in western Greenland and Canada comprised a mixture of clades, following the RFLP frequencies (48% eastern clade) of the West Greenland population. The probability distribution of the samples dated before the bishopric's founding shows evidence of geographical admixture, with a most likely contribution of a western source between 20% and 30% (figure 2b). In contrast, the samples dated after the founding and before ca 1400 CE show evidence for a near 100% western source (figure 2b). Thus, in its early period, it is statistically unlikely that Norse Greenland was an exclusive source of walrus for Europe. The Barents Sea region is the most likely alternative based on the Ohthere account of the late ninth century. Iceland and (less likely, due to difficult summer ice conditions) northeast Greenland are other possibilities [7,21]. In the later period between ca 1125 and ca 1400 CE, however, the eastern clade samples can—with high statistical probability—have come entirely from Norse Greenland together with the western clade specimens.

4. Discussion

We have reconstructed a chronology of long-distance ivory trade during the medieval period by investigating complete mitogenomes of archaeological Atlantic walrus specimens from Greenland, Svalbard, and Europe. Specifically, we distinguish whether individual walruses were obtained from a western Greenland source and our work has evolutionary, ecological, and archaeological implications.

We discover that Atlantic walrus comprises two major, monophyletic MT lineages. Several observations support a hypothesis that these lineages have evolved in glacial refugia on either side of the Atlantic Ocean. First, we estimate a divergence date between 23 400 and 251 120 years ago, well before or during the last glacial maximum (LGM). Second, (sub)fossil walrus bones dated over 10 k years BP have been found on both the European and the North American continent at lower latitudes compared to the walrus's modern distribution [81,82]. Third, glacial refugia on either side of the Atlantic have also been proposed to explain (partial) MT divergence in marine mammals with a similar coastal ecology like walrus, such as harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) [83], harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) [84], and grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) [85]. Based on these observations, we conclude that the two MT lineages have evolved in spatial separation on either side of the Atlantic Ocean.

Such a scenario further explains the distinct geographical distribution of RFLP and CR population data, which show that haplotypes associated with the western clade occur solely in western Greenland and Canada [29–32,37]. The lack of such haplotypes in the Northeast Atlantic, despite the genetic analysis of hundreds of specimens covering multiple decades [29–32,37] indicates that gene flow has been asymmetrical, with eastern clade females dispersing to the western Atlantic but not vice versa. This dispersal follows the direction of the East Greenland Current [86], suggesting that ocean currents influence the tendency of walrus dispersal. Historically, a similar asymmetrical pattern has been observed on a regional scale in Baffin Bay—with walruses migrating counterclockwise, following the direction of the coastal currents and the breakup of sea ice [31,47]. Asymmetrical gene flow has also been observed between breeding areas of Pacific walrus in the Bering Sea [87], although the direction of ocean currents can be variable in this region [88]. Our study suggests that the direction of female dispersal from Eastern Greenland to Baffin Bay has been persistent since these two MT lineages came into secondary contact.

The possibility of geographical change in clade distribution between past and present populations is an inevitable challenge in aDNA studies (e.g. [89,90]). Nonetheless, it is highly improbable that western clade walruses could have occupied the historically recorded hunting grounds of the Barents Sea region in the Middle Ages, given the universal distribution of the eastern clade throughout the Northeast Atlantic region, the direction of the East Greenland current [86], the predominantly coastal habitat of the walrus [10], and the high levels of natal homing of walruses [30,34,35,91,92]. Moreover, given the location of Iceland well within the distribution of the eastern clade, and its recorded accessibility to Svalbard walruses [93], it is most likely that Icelandic walruses were of the eastern clade.

Thus, with our discovery of these two MT lineages and their geographical distribution, we provide quantitative, empirical evidence on the source of walrus imports to medieval Europe, and with that re-evaluate past hypotheses on the role of walrus ivory in the origins, efflorescence, and collapse of Norse Greenlandic society. Only one of our seven samples predating the 1120s CE is of the western clade. The other six samples of this period are of the eastern clade and could have come from a variety of sources, including Greenland, but it is probable that most derived from the Northeast Atlantic. Thus the theory that walrus ivory was a primary motive for the initial exploration and settlement of Greenland around 980–990 CE may need reconsideration [7]. Other relevant factors include the optimal conditions of the medieval climate anomaly, the search for new (pastoral) farmland, and the politics of exile noted in medieval Icelandic sources [7,94,95]. Conversely, 10 of 12 specimens dating between the 1120s and ca 1400 CE are of the western clade and must have arrived in Europe via Norse Greenland. Moreover, the observed ratio of eastern and western clade specimens has a high probablility of deriving exclusively from western Greenland. Thus, the documented heyday of Norse Greenlandic settlement, trade, and architectural elaboration (particularly evident in churches and their accoutrements)—between the twelfth and fourteenth centuries—did coincide with exports of walrus ivory. In fact, our data suggest that the Greenland trade of this commodity may have held a near monopoly in western Europe. The historically and/or archaeologically attested walrus hunts of the ninth–tenth centuries in the Barents Sea region and Iceland may have declined or ended by the early twelfth century, either because of rising Greenlandic exports or local reduction/extirpation of populations.

The reasons for the significant shift in trade cannot be inferred from aDNA alone and historically contingent local factors, as well as broader socioeconomic and environmental developments can be invoked as potential contributors. In thirteenth–fourteenth century Iceland it was believed that the Greenlanders used walrus products as gifts to influence the policies of Scandinavian monarchs, for example in the story of Einar Sokkason (Grænlendinga tháttr) [2]. Although the historicity of Einar's use of walrus ivory to secure a Greenland bishop and episcopal see in the early twelfth century cannot be confirmed, tithes (including papal dues) were paid in this material during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries [1,6]. Thus both local initiative and the reach of pan-European church infrastructure potentially played a role in the naissance and maintenance of the Greenland ivory trade. Moreover, the eleventh to thirteenth centuries represent a period of major demographic and economic growth in Europe, in part due to environmental conditions favourable to cereal agriculture [96]. A growing urban and elite demand was served by transport from increasingly distant sources in a process of proto-globalization. Our discovery shows that Greenland was well integrated into this network.

Less can be said about the end of the Greenland colony based on the evidence here. Is the absence of sampled (or known) European finds of walrus rostrums from the fifteenth century evidence for the end of trade? Is the single, sixteenth-century western clade specimen an example of the last, isolated, Greenland export, or is it a redeposition of an earlier find? These are classic challenges of archaeological interpretation. Nonetheless, it is a conspicuous observation that Greenland may have been the exclusive supplier of walrus ivory to Europe between the 1120s and the fourteenth century. The demise of Norse Greenland would therefore have reduced European supplies of this raw material, whereas a decline in demand would have undermined Greenland's social and economic organization. Whatever other factors may have been influential—from the Little Ice Age [97–100], to gradual out-migration [99,100], to the impact of the Black Death (1346–1353) on European markets [2,96]—the cessation of trade in walrus ivory must have been significant for the end of Greenland's Eastern and Western settlements. Greenland is often discussed as a general example of both human resilience and vulnerability in the face of environmental and economic change [98,101–104]. Thus, the implications of this study—that the influence of ecological globalization for the Greenlandic Norse started small yet became paramount—extend far beyond medieval Europe.

Data accessibility

All ancient read data are available at the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA, www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) under study accession number PRJEB25536.

Authors' contributions

B.S., J.H.B., and S.B. designed the study. A.T.G. performed the laboratory work. B.S. performed the genetic analyses. S.B. performed the Bayesian analyses. B.S., J.H.B., and S.B. interpreted the results. J.H.B. identified and selected archaeological samples. B.S., J.H.B., and S.B. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

We declare that we have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was supported by the Nansenfondet, the Research Council of Norway projects 262777 and 230821, and the Leverhulme Trust project ‘Northern Journeys’ MRF-2013-065.

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Skage, S. Kollias, A. Tooming-Klunderud, and H. Rydbeck from the Norwegian Sequencing Centre. Samples (and/or information regarding their chronology) were kindly provided by: National Museum of Denmark (J. Arneborg), Natural History Museum of Denmark (K. M. Gregersen, K. H. Kjær), NTNU Museum of Natural History and Archaeology (A. Christophersen, J. A. Risvaag, J. Rosvold), University Museum, University of Bergen (G. Hansen, A. K. Hufthammer), AHKR, University of Bergen (S. Nordeide), Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo (M. Vedeler), NIKU (L. M. Fuglevik), National Museum of Ireland (M. Sikora, A. Halpin), MOLA (L. Blackmore, A. Pipe), Sigtuna Museum (A. Söderberg), Schleswig-Holsteinische Landesmuseen Schloss Gottorf (V. Hilberg, U. Schmölcke), and Le musée Vert, Le Mans (N. Morel). A. H. Pálsdóttír and S. Wickler also helped obtain samples.

Footnotes

^†These authors contributed equally.

Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4174382.

Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

1.
Roesdahl E. 1998 L'ivoire de morse et les colonies norroises du Groenland. Proxima Thulé 3, 9-48. Google Scholar
2.
Seaver KA. 2009 Desirable teeth: the medieval trade in Arctic and African ivory. J. Glob. Hist. 4, 271-292. (doi:10.1017/S1740022809003155) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3.
Williamson P. 2010 Medieval ivory carvings: early Christian to Romanesque. London, UK: V&A Publishing. Google Scholar
4.
Williamson P, Davies G. 2014 Medieval ivory carvings: 1200–1550. London, UK: V&A Publishing. Google Scholar
5.
Pierce E. 2009 Walrus hunting and the ivory trade in early Iceland. Archaeologia Islandica 7, 55-63. Google Scholar
6.
Keller C. 2010 Furs, fish and ivory: medieval Norsemen at the Arctic fringe. J. North Atlantic 3, 1-23. (doi:10.3721/037.003.0105) Crossref, Google Scholar
7.
Frei KM et al. 2015 Was it for walrus? Viking Age settlement and medieval walrus ivory trade in Iceland and Greenland. World Archaeol. 47, 439-466. (doi:10.1080/00438243.2015.1025912) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8.
Kintisch E. 2016 The lost Norse. Science 354, 696. (doi:10.1126/science.aal0363) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9.
McGovern TH et al. 2017 Zooarchaeology of the Scandinavian settlements in Iceland and Greenland: diverging pathways. In The Oxford handbook of zooarchaeology (eds Albarella U, Russ H, Vickers K, Viner-Daniels S). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
10.
Folkens PA, Reeves RR. 2002 Guide to marine mammals of the world. New York, NY: National Audubon Society. Google Scholar
11.
Nørlund P, Roussell A. 1929 Norse ruins at Gardar: the episcopal seat of medieval Greenland. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Commission for Scientific Research in Greenland. Google Scholar
12.
McGovern TH. 1980 Cows, harp seals, and churchbells: adaptation and extinction in Norse Greenland. Hum. Ecol. 8, 245-275. (doi:10.1007/BF01561026) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
13.
Arneborg J. 2003 Norse Greenland: reflections on settlement and depopulation. In Contact, continuity and collapse: the Norse colonization of the North Atlantic (ed. Barrett JH), pp. 163-182. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, Studies in the Early Middle Ages. Google Scholar
14.
Seaver KA. 1996 The frozen echo: Greenland and the exploration of North America ca AD. 1000–1500. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
15.
Roesdahl E. 2005 Walrus ivory—demand, supply, workshops, and Greenland. In Viking and Norse in the North Atlantic: select papers from the proceedings of the fourteenth Viking Congress, Tórshavn, 19–30 July 2001 (eds Mortensen A, Arge SV), pp. 182-191. Tórshavn: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag, Annales Societatis Scientiarum Færoensis Supplementum XLIV. Google Scholar
16.
McGovern TH. 1985 Contributions to the paleoeconomy of Norse Greenland. Acta Archaeologica 54, 73-122. Web of Science, Google Scholar
17.
Roesdahl E. 2015 Fine belt-buckles of walrus ivory—also made in Greenland. In Nordic Middle Ages—artefacts, landscapes and society: Essays in honour of Ingvild Øye on her 70th birthday (eds Baug I, Larsen J, Mygland SS), pp. 267-273. Bergen: University of Bergen. Google Scholar
18.
McGovern TH. 1985 The Arctic frontier of Norse Greenland. In The archaeology of frontiers and boundaries (eds Green SW, Perlman SM), pp. 275-324. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Google Scholar
19.
Vebæk CL. 1991 Hunting on land and at sea and fishing in medieval Norse Greenland. Acta Borealia 8, 5-14. (doi:10.1080/08003839108580395) Crossref, Google Scholar
20.
Enghoff IB. 2003 Hunting, fishing and animal husbandry at the farm beneath the sand, Western Greenland. An archaeozoological analysis of a Norse farm in the Western Settlement. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Polar Centre, Meddelelser om Grønland: Man and Society, 28. Google Scholar
21.
Ljungqvist FC. 2005 The significance of remote resource regions for Norse Greenland. Scripta Islandica 56, 13-54. Google Scholar
22.
Roesdahl E. 2001 Walrus ivory in the Viking Age—and Ohthere (Ottar). Offa 58, 33-37. Google Scholar
23.
Bately J, Englert A. 2007 Ohthere's voyages: a late 9th-century account of voyages along the coasts of Norway and Denmark and its cultural context. Roskilde, Denmark: Viking Ship Museum. Google Scholar
24.
Smirnova L. 2001 Utilization of rare bone materials in medieval Novgorod. In Crafting bone: skeletal technologies through time and space (eds Choyke AM, Bartosiewicz L), pp. 9-17. Oxford, UK: Archaeopress. Google Scholar
25.
Smirnova L. 2005 Comb-making in Medieval Novgorod (950–1450): an industry in transition. Oxford, British Archaeological Reports International Series S1369, Hadrian Books. Google Scholar
26.
Kovacs KM, Aars J, Lydersen C. 2014 Walruses recovering after 60+ years of protection in Svalbard, Norway. Polar Res. 33, 26034. (doi:10.3402/polar.v33.26034) Crossref, Google Scholar
27.
Einarsson BF. 2011 Róum við í selinn, rostungs út á melinn: Um rostunga við Íslandsstrendur. In Fjöruskeljar: Afmælisrit til heiðurs Jónínu Hafsteinsdóttur sjötugri 29 Mars 2011 (eds Kvaran G, Ámundason HJ, Sigmundsson S), pp. 31-52. Reykjavík, Stofnun Árna Magnússonar í íslenskum fræðum. Google Scholar
28.
Murray-Bergquist K. 2017 ‘To talk of many things’: Whales, walrus, and seals in medieval Icelandic literature. MA thesis. Reykjavik, Iceland: University of Iceland. Google Scholar
29.
Andersen LW, Born EW, Gjertz I, Wiig Ø, Holm LE, Bendixen C. 1998 Population structure and gene flow of the Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) in the eastern Atlantic Arctic based on mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite variation. Mol. Ecol. 7, 1323-1336. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00455.x) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30.
Born E, Andersen L, Gjertz I, Wiig Ø. 2001 A review of the genetic relationships of Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) east and west of Greenland. Polar Biol. 24, 713-718. (doi:10.1007/s003000100) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
31.
Andersen LW, Born E, Doidge D, Gjertz I, Wiig Ø, Waples RS. 2009 Genetic signals of historic and recent migration between sub-populations of Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus west and east of Greenland. Endanger. Species Res. 9, 197-211. (doi:10.3354/esr00242) Crossref, Google Scholar
32.
Andersen LW, Jacobsen MW, Lydersen C, Semenova V, Boltunov A, Born EW, Wiig Ø, Kovacs KM. 2017 Walruses (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) in the Pechora Sea in the context of contemporary population structure of Northeast Atlantic walruses. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 122, 897-915. (doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blx093) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33.
Lindqvist C, Bachmann L, Andersen LW, Born EW, Arnason U, Kovacs KM, Lydersen C, Abramov AV, Wiig Ø. 2009 The Laptev Sea walrus Odobenus rosmarus laptevi: an enigma revisited. Zool. Scr. 38, 113-127. (doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.2008.00364.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34.
Born EW, Aquarone M, Knutsen LØ, Pedersen LT. 2005 Homing behaviour in an Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus). Aquat. Mamm. 31, 23-33. (doi:10.1578/AM.31.1.2005.23) Crossref, Google Scholar
35.
Freitas C, Kovacs KM, Ims RA, Fedak MA, Lydersen C. 2009 Deep into the ice: over-wintering and habitat selection in male Atlantic walruses. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 375, 247-261. (doi:10.3354/meps07725) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36.
McLeod BA, Frasier TR, Lucas Z. 2014 Assessment of the extirpated Maritimes walrus using morphological and ancient DNA analysis. PLoS ONE 9, e99569. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099569) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37.
Lindqvist C, Roy T, Lydersen C, Kovacs KM, Aars J, Wiig Ø, Bachmann L. 2016 Genetic diversity of historical Atlantic walruses (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) from Bjørnøya and Håøya (Tusenøyane), Svalbard, Norway. BMC Res. Notes 9, 112. (doi:10.1186/s13104-016-1907-8) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
38.
Boessenkool S, Star B, Scofield RP, Seddon PJ, Waters JM. 2009 Lost in translation or deliberate falsification? Genetic analyses reveal erroneous museum data for historic penguin specimens. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 1057-1064. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1837) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
39.
Schroeder H et al. 2015 Genome-wide ancestry of 17th-century enslaved Africans from the Caribbean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3669-3673. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1421784112) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
40.
Star B et al.. 2017 Ancient DNA reveals the Arctic origin of Viking Age cod from Haithabu, Germany. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 9152-9157. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1710186114) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
41.
Roesdahl E, Stoklund M. 2006 Un crâne de morse décoré et gravé de runes: Á propos d'une découverte récente dans un musée du Mans. Proxima Thulé 5, 9-38. Google Scholar
42.
Grieg S. 1933 Middelalderske Byfund fra Bergen og Oslo. Oslo, AW. Brøggers Boktrykkeri A/S. Google Scholar
43.
Ulbricht I. 1984 Die Verarbeitung von Knochen, Geweih und Horn im mittelalterlichen Schleswig. Neumünster, Karl Wachholtz Verlag. Google Scholar
44.
Caulfield D. 1992 Walrus skull and tusk fragment. In From Viking to Crusader: Scandinavia and Europe 800–1200 (eds Roesdahl E, Wilson DW), p. 385. Uddevalla, Sweden: Nordic Council. Google Scholar
45.
Bowsher D, Dyson T, Holder N, Howell I. 2007 The London Guildhall: an archaeological history of a neighbourhood from early medieval to modern times. London, UK: Museum of London Archaeology Service. Google Scholar
46.
Karlsson J. 2016 Spill om Djur, Hantverk och Nätverk i Mälarområdet under Vikingatid och Medeltid. Stockholm, Institutionen för arkeologi och antikens kultur, Stockholms universitet. Google Scholar
47.
Born EW, Gjertz I, Reeves RR. 1995 Population assessment of Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus L.). Oslo, Norway: Norsk Polarinstitutt. Google Scholar
48.
Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu C.-H, Xie D, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2014 BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003537. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
49.
Cook GT, Ascough PL, Bonsall C, Hamilton W, Russell N, Sayle KL, Scott E, Bownes JM. 2015 Best practice methodology for ¹⁴C calibration of marine and mixed terrestrial/marine samples. Quat. Geochronol. 27, 164-171. (doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2015.02.024) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
50.
Imer LM. 2017 Peasants and prayers: The inscriptions of Norse Greenland. Copenhagen, Denmark: University Press of Southern Denmark. Google Scholar
51.
Degerbøl M. 1929 Animal bones from the Norse Ruins at Gardar. In Norse ruins at Gardar: the episcopal seat of medieval Greenland (eds Nørlund P, Roussell A), pp. 183-192. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Commission for Scientific Research in Greenland. Google Scholar
52.
Poinar HN, Cooper A. 2000 Ancient DNA: do it right or not at all. Science 5482, 1139. (doi:10.1126/science.289.5482.1139b) Google Scholar
53.
Gilbert M, Bandelt H-J, Hofreiter M, Barnes I. 2005 Assessing ancient DNA studies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 541-544. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.005) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
54.
Gondek AT, Boessenkool S, Star B. 2018 A stainless-steel mortar, pestle and sleeve design for the efficient fragmentation of ancient bone. BioTechniques 64, 266-269. (doi:10.2144/btn-2018-0008) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
55.
Boessenkool S, Hanghøj K, Nistelberger HM, Der Sarkissian C, Gondek A, Orlando L, Barrett JH, Star B. 2017 Combining bleach and mild pre-digestion improves ancient DNA recovery from bones. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 17, 742-751. (doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12623) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
56.
Gamba C, Hanghoj K, Gaunitz C, Alfarhan AH, Alquraishi SA, Al-Rasheid KA, Bradley DG, Orlando L. 2016 Comparing the performance of three ancient DNA extraction methods for high-throughput sequencing. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 459-469. (doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12470) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
57.
Star B et al. 2014 Palindromic sequence artifacts generated during next generation sequencing library preparation from historic and ancient DNA. PLoS ONE 9, e89676. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089676) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
58.
Meyer M, Kircher M. 2010 Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2010, pdb.prot5448. (doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5448) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
59.
Schubert M et al. 2014 Characterization of ancient and modern genomes by SNP detection and phylogenomic and metagenomic analysis using PALEOMIX. Nat. Protoc. 9, 1056-1082. (doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.063) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
60.
Lindgreen S. 2012 AdapterRemoval: easy cleaning of next-generation sequencing reads. BMC Res. Notes 5, 337. (doi:10.1186/1756-0500-5-337) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
61.
Foote AD et al.. 2015 Convergent evolution of the genomes of marine mammals. Nat. Genet. 47, 272-275. (doi:10.1038/ng.3198) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
62.
Arnason U et al. 2002 Mammalian mitogenomic relationships and the root of the eutherian tree. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8151-8156. (doi:10.1073/pnas.102164299) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
63.
Li H, Durbin R. 2009 Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
64.
Jonsson H, Ginolhac A, Schubert M, Johnson PLF, Orlando L. 2013 mapDamage2.0: fast approximate Bayesian estimates of ancient DNA damage parameters. Bioinformatics 29, 1682-1684. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt193) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
65.
McKenna A et al.. 2010 The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297-1303. (doi:10.1101/gr.107524.110) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
66.
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N. 2009 The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
67.
Danecek P et al. 2011 The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156-2158. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
68.
Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012 jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 9, 772. (doi:10.1038/nmeth.2109) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
69.
Slade RW, Moritz C, Hoelzel AR, Burton HR. 1998 Molecular population genetics of the southern elephant seal Mirounga leonina. Genetics 149, 1945-1957. Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
70.
Nabholz B, Glémin S, Galtier N. 2007 Strong variations of mitochondrial mutation rate across mammals—the longevity hypothesis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 120-130. (doi:10.1093/molbev/msm248) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
71.
Sasaki T et al.. 2005 Mitochondrial phylogenetics and evolution of mysticete whales. Syst. Biol. 54, 77-90. (doi:10.1080/10635150590905939) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
72.
Pesole G, Gissi C, De Chirico A, Saccone C. 1999 Nucleotide substitution rate of mammalian mitochondrial genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 48, 427-434. (doi:10.1007/PL00006487) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
73.
Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. 2018 Tracer v1.7. See http://treebioedacuk/software/tracer/. Google Scholar
74.
Matschiner M. 2015 Fitchi: haplotype genealogy graphs based on the Fitch algorithm. Bioinformatics 32, 1250-1252. (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv717) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
75.
Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D. 2006 Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2, e190. (doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
76.
Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. 2013 Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief. Bioinform. 14, 178-192. (doi:10.1093/bib/bbs017) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
77.
Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, Mesirov JP. 2011 Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24. (doi:10.1038/nbt.1754) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
78.
Appelt M, Gulløv HC. 2009 Tunit, Norsemen, and Inuit in thirteenth-century Northwest Greenland: Dorset between the devil and the deep sea. In The Northern World, AD 900–1400 (eds Maschner H, Mason O, McGhee R), pp. 300-320. Salt Lake City, UT: The University of Utah Press. Google Scholar
79.
Gotfredsen AB, Appelt M, Hastrup K. 2018 Walrus history around the North Water: human–animal relations in a long-term perspective. Ambio 47, 193-212. (doi:10.1007/s13280-018-1027-x) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
80.
Arneborg J. 1991 The Roman church in Norse Greenland. Acta Archaeologica 61, 142-150. Google Scholar
81.
Møhl U. 1985 The walrus, Odobenus rosmarus (L.), as a ‘Danish’ faunal element during the Weichsel Ice Age. Bull. Geol. Soc. Den. 34, 83-85. Google Scholar
82.
Dyke AS, Hooper J, Harington CR, Savelle JM. 1999 The Late Wisconsinan and Holocene record of walrus (Odobenus rosmarus) from North America: a review with new data from Arctic and Atlantic Canada. Arctic 0, 160-181. (doi:10.14430/arctic920) Google Scholar
83.
Stanley HF, Casey S, Carnahan JM, Goodman S, Harwood J, Wayne RK. 1996 Worldwide patterns of mitochondrial DNA differentiation in the harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 368-382. (doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025596) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
84.
Tolley KA, Víkingsson GA, Rosel PE. 2001 Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation and phylogeographic patterns in harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) from the North Atlantic. Conserv. Genet. 2, 349-361. (doi:10.1023/A:1012561811074) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
85.
Klimova A, Phillips C, Fietz K, Olsen MT, Harwood J, Amos W, Hoffman J. 2014 Global population structure and demographic history of the grey seal. Mol. Ecol. 23, 3999-4017. (doi:10.1111/mec.12850) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
86.
Aagaard K, Coachman LK. 1968 The East Greenland Current north of Denmark Strait: Part I. Arctic, 21, 181-200. (doi:10.14430/arctic3262) Google Scholar
87.
Sonsthagen SA, Jay CV, Fischbach AS, Sage GK, Talbot SL. 2012 Spatial genetic structure and asymmetrical gene flow within the Pacific walrus. J. Mammal. 93, 1512-1524. (doi:10.1644/11-MAMM-A-344.1) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
88.
Danielson SL, Weingartner TJ, Hedstrom KS, Aagaard K, Woodgate R, Curchitser E, Stabeno PJ. 2014 Coupled wind-forced controls of the Bering–Chukchi shelf circulation and the Bering Strait throughflow: Ekman transport, continental shelf waves, and variations of the Pacific–Arctic sea surface height gradient. Prog. Oceanogr. 125, 40-61. (doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2014.04.006) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
89.
Fietz K et al.. 2016 Shift of grey seal subspecies boundaries in response to climate, culling and conservation. Mol. Ecol. 25, 4097-4112. (doi:10.1111/mec.13748) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
90.
Martin MD, Zimmer EA, Olsen MT, Foote AD, Gilbert MTP, Brush GS. 2014 Herbarium specimens reveal a historical shift in phylogeographic structure of common ragweed during native range disturbance. Mol. Ecol. 23, 1701-1716. (doi:10.1111/mec.12675) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
91.
Wiig Ø, Gjertz I, Griffiths D. 1996 Migration of walruses (Odobenus rosmarus) in the Svalbard and Franz Josef Land area. J. Zool. 238, 769-784. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05429.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
92.
Dietz R et al. 2014 Movements of walruses (Odobenus rosmarus) between Central West Greenland and Southeast Baffin Island, 2005–2008. NAMMCO Scientific Publications 9, 53-74. (doi:10.7557/3.2605) Crossref, Google Scholar
93.
Born E, Stefansson E, Mikkelsen B, Laidre KL, Andersen LW, Rigét F, Jensen MV, Bloch D. 2014 A note on a walrus’ European odyssey. NAMMCO Scientific Publications 9, 75-91. (doi:10.7557/3.2921) Crossref, Google Scholar
94.
Dansgaard W, Johnsen SJ, Reeh N, Gundestrup N, Clausen HB, Hammer CU. 1975 Climatic changes, Norsemen and modern man. Nature 255, 24. (doi:10.1038/255024a0) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
95.
Barrett J, Anderson A. 2010 Histories of global seafaring: a discussion. In The global origins and development of seafaring (eds Anderson A, Barrett JH, Boyle KV), pp. 305-314. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. Google Scholar
96.
Campbell BMS. 2016 The great transition: climate, disease and society in the late-medieval world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
97.
Buckland PC et al.. 1996 Bioarchaeological and climatological evidence for the fate of Norse farmers in medieval Greenland. Antiquity 70, 88-96. (doi:10.1017/S0003598X00082910) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
98.
Dugmore AJ, McGovern TH, Vésteinsson O, Arneborg J, Streeter R, Keller C. 2012 Cultural adaptation, compounding vulnerabilities and conjunctures in Norse Greenland. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3658-3663. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1115292109) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
99.
Lynnerup N. 1996 Paleodemography of the Greenland Norse. Arctic Anthropol. 33, 122-136. Web of Science, Google Scholar
100.
Lynnerup N. 2014 Endperiod demographics of the Greenland Norse. J. North Atlantic 7, 18-24. (doi:10.3721/037.002.sp702) Crossref, Google Scholar
101.
McGovern TH. 1994 Management for extinction in Norse Greenland. In Historical ecology: cultural knowledge and changing landscapes (ed. Crumley C), pp. 127-154. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press. Google Scholar
102.
Diamond J. 2006 Collapse: how societies choose to fail or survive. London, UK: Penguin. Google Scholar
103.
Berglund J. 2010 Did the medieval Norse society in Greenland really fail? In Questioning collapse: human resilience, ecological vulnerability, and the aftermath of empire (eds McAnany PA, Yoffee N), pp. 45-70. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
104.
Nelson MC et al.. 2016 Climate challenges, vulnerabilities, and food security. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 298-303. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1506494113) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar