Restricted access
Research articles
Research articlesNon-numerical strategies used by bees to solve numerical cognition tasks
Published:17 February 2021https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2711
Abstract
We examined how bees solve a visual discrimination task with stimuli commonly used in numerical cognition studies. Bees performed well on the task, but additional tests showed that they had learned continuous (non-numerical) cues. A network model using biologically plausible visual feature filtering and a simple associative rule was capable of learning the task using only continuous cues inherent in the training stimuli, with no numerical processing. This model was also able to reproduce behaviours that have been considered in other studies indicative of numerical cognition. Our results support the idea that a sense of magnitude may be more primitive and basic than a sense of number. Our findings highlight how problematic inadvertent continuous cues can be for studies of numerical cognition. This remains a deep issue within the field that requires increased vigilance and cleverness from the experimenter. We suggest ways of better assessing numerical cognition in non-speaking animals, including assessing the use of all alternative cues in one test, using cross-modal cues, analysing behavioural responses to detect underlying strategies, and finding the neural substrate.
Footnotes
References
- 1.
MaBouDi H, Solvi C, Chittka L . 2020Bumblebees learn a relational rule but switch to a win-stay/lose-switch heuristic after extensive training. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 14, 137. (doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00137) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 2.
Guiraud M, Roper M, Chittka L . 2018High-speed videography reveals how honeybees can turn a spatial concept learning task into a simple discrimination task by stereotyped flight movements and sequential inspection of pattern elements. Front. Psychol. 9, 1347. (doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01347) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 3.
Izquierdo A, Belcher AM . 2012Rodent models of adaptive decision making. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ 829, 85-101. (doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-458-2_5) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar - 4.
Risko EF, Gilbert SJ . 2016Cognitive offloading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 676-688. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 5.
Jolicoeur P . 1988Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Can. J. Psychol. 42, 461-478. (doi:10.1037/h0084200) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 6.
Wasserman EA, Zentall TR . 2006Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar - 7.
Chittka L, Rossiter SJ, Skorupski P, Fernando C . 2012What is comparable in comparative cognition?Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 2677-2685. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0215) Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 8.
Cammaerts M-C, Cammaerts R . 2019Ants correctly locate the zero in a continuous series of numbers. Int. J. Biol. 11, 16. (doi:10.5539/ijb.v11n4p16) Crossref, Google Scholar - 9.
Vonk J, Beran MJ . 2012Bears ‘count’ too: quantity estimation and comparison in black bears, Ursus americanus. Anim. Behav. 84, 231-238. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.05.001) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 10.
Aulet LS, Chiu VC, Prichard A, Spivak M, Lourenco SF, Berns GS . 2019Canine sense of quantity: evidence for numerical ratio-dependent activation in parietotemporal cortex. Biol. Lett. 15, 20190666. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2019.0666) Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 11.
Rugani R, Vallortigara G, Priftis K, Regolin L . 2015Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans' mental number line. Science 347, 534-536. (doi:10.1126/science.aaa1379) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 12.
Rugani R, Vallortigara G, Regolin L . 2013Numerical abstraction in young domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). PLoS ONE 8, e65262. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065262) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 13.
Rugani R, McCrink K, de Hevia M-D, Vallortigara G, Regolin L. 2016Ratio abstraction over discrete magnitudes by newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Sci. Rep. 6, 1-8. (doi:10.1038/srep30114) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 14.
Tomonaga M . 2008Relative numerosity discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for approximate numerical representations. Anim. Cogn. 11, 43-57. (doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0089-0) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 15.
Ditz HM, Nieder A. 2016Numerosity representations in crows obey the Weber–Fechner law. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20160083. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.0083) Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 16.
Wagener L, Loconsole M, Ditz HM, Nieder A . 2018Neurons in the endbrain of numerically naive crows spontaneously encode visual numerosity. Curr. Biol. 28, 1090-1094.e4. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.023) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 17.
Ditz HM, Nieder A . 2015Neurons selective to the number of visual items in the corvid songbird endbrain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 12, 7827-7832. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1504245112) Crossref, Google Scholar - 18.
Yaman S, Kilian A, von Fersen L, Güntürkün O. 2012Evidence for a numerosity category that is based on abstract qualities of ‘Few’ vs. ‘Many’ in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Front. Psychol. 3, 473. (doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00473) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 19.
Irie N, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M, Kutsukake N . 2019Unique numerical competence of Asian elephants on the relative numerosity judgment task. J. Ethol. 37, 111-115. (doi:10.1007/s10164-018-0563-y) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 20.
Piffer L, Petrazzini MEM, Agrillo C . 2013Large number discrimination in newborn fish. PLoS ONE 8, e62466. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062466) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 21.
Agrillo C, Miletto Petrazzini ME, Tagliapietra C, Bisazza A . 2012Inter-specific differences in numerical abilities among teleost fish. Front. Psychol. 3, 483. (doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00483) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 22.
DeLong CM, Barbato S, O'Leary T, Wilcox KT . 2017Small and large number discrimination in goldfish (Carassius auratus) with extensive training. Behav. Processes 141, 172-183. (doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2016.11.011) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 23.
Vonk J, Torgerson-White L, McGuire M, Thueme M, Thomas J, Beran MJ . 2014Quantity estimation and comparison in western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Anim. Cogn. 17, 755-765. (doi:10.1007/s10071-013-0707-y) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 24.
Lucon-Xiccato T, Miletto Petrazzini ME, Agrillo C, Bisazza A . 2015Guppies discriminate between two quantities of food items but prioritize item size over total amount. Anim. Behav. 107, 183-191. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.019) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 25.
Bisazza A, Agrillo C, Lucon-Xiccato T . 2014Extensive training extends numerical abilities of guppies. Anim. Cogn. 17, 1413-1419. (doi:10.1007/s10071-014-0759-7) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 26.
Gatto E, Lucon-Xiccato T, Savaşçı BB, Dadda M, Bisazza A . 2017Experimental setting affects the performance of guppies in a numerical discrimination task. Anim. Cogn. 20, 187-198. (doi:10.1007/s10071-016-1037-7) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 27.
Howard SR, Avarguès-Weber A, Garcia JE, Greentree AD, Dyer AG . 2019Numerical cognition in honeybees enables addition and subtraction. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav0961. (doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav0961) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 28.
Howard SR, Avarguès-Weber A, Garcia JE, Greentree AD, Dyer AG . 2018Numerical ordering of zero in honey bees. Science 360, 1124-1126. (doi:10.1126/science.aar4975) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 29.
Howard SR, Avarguès-Weber A, Garcia JE, Greentree AD, Dyer AG . 2019Symbolic representation of numerosity by honeybees (Apis mellifera): matching characters to small quantities. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20190238. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.0238) Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 30.
Howard SR, Avarguès-Weber A, Garcia JE, Greentree AD, Dyer AG . 2019Surpassing the subitizing threshold: appetitive–aversive conditioning improves discrimination of numerosities in honeybees. J. Exp. Biol. 222, jeb205658. (doi:10.1242/jeb.205658) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 31.
Bortot M, Agrillo C, Avarguès-Weber A, Bisazza A, Miletto Petrazzini ME, Giurfa M . 2019Honeybees use absolute rather than relative numerosity in number discrimination. Biol. Lett. 15, 20190138. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2019.0138) Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 32.
Bortot M, Stancher G, Vallortigara G . 2020Transfer from number to size reveals abstract coding of magnitude in honeybees. iScience 23, 101122. (doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101122) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 33.
Howard SR, Schramme J, Garcia JE, Ng L, Avarguès-Weber A, Greentree AD, Dyer AG . 2020Spontaneous quantity discrimination of artificial flowers by foraging honeybees. J. Exp. Biol. 223, jeb223610. (doi:10.1242/jeb.223610) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 34.
de Hevia MD, Addabbo M, Nava E, Croci E, Girelli L, Macchi Cassia V. 2017Infants' detection of increasing numerical order comes before detection of decreasing number. Cognition 158, 177-188. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.022) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 35.
Jones SM, Pearson J, DeWind NK, Paulsen D, Tenekedjieva A-M, Brannon EM . 2014Lemurs and macaques show similar numerical sensitivity. Anim. Cogn. 17, 503-515. (doi:10.1007/s10071-013-0682-3) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 36.
Okuyama S, Iwata J, Tanji J, Mushiake H . 2013Goal-oriented, flexible use of numerical operations by monkeys. Anim. Cogn. 16, 509-518. (doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0592-9) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 37.
Ramirez-Cardenas A, Moskaleva M, Nieder A . 2016Neuronal representation of numerosity zero in the primate parieto-frontal number network. Curr. Biol. 26, 1285-1294. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.052) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 38.
Reznikova Z, Panteleeva S, Vorobyeva NS . 2019Precise relative-quantity judgement in the striped field mouse Apodemus agrarius Pallas. Anim. Cogn. 22, 277-289. (doi:10.1007/s10071-019-01244-7) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 39.
Scarf D, Hayne H, Colombo M . 2011Pigeons on par with primates in numerical competence. Science 334, 1664-1664. (doi:10.1126/science.1213357) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 40.
Lucon-Xiccato T, Gatto E, Bisazza A . 2018Quantity discrimination by treefrogs. Anim. Behav. 139, 61-69. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.03.005) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 41.
Vallortigara G . 2017An animal's sense of number. In The nature and development of mathematics: cross disciplinary perspectives on cognition, learning and culture (edsAdams JW, Barmby P, Mesoudi A ), pp. 43-65. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar - 42.
Bortot M, Regolin L, Vallortigara G . In press.A sense of number in invertebrates. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. (doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.11.039) Google Scholar - 43.
Nieder A, Dehaene S . 2009Representation of number in the brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 185-208. (doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 44.
Henik A . 2016Continuous issues in numerical cognition: how many or how much. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar - 45.
Leibovich T, Katzin N, Harel M, Henik A . 2017From ‘sense of number’ to ‘sense of magnitude’: the role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 40, e164. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X16000960) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 46.
Banks MS, Ginsburg AP . 1985Infant visual preferences: a review and new theoretical treatment. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 19, 207-246. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 47.
Mix KS, Huttenlocher J, Levine SC . 2002Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: is number one of them?Psychol. Bull. 128, 278-294. (doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.278) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 48.
Maffei L, Fiorentini A . 1977Spatial frequency rows in the striate visual cortex. Vis. Res. 17, 257-264. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(77)90089-X) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 49.
Pollen DA, Ronner SF . 1983Visual cortical neurons as localized spatial frequency filters. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC 13, 907-916. (doi:10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313086) Crossref, Google Scholar - 50.
Horridge GA . 1997Pattern discrimination by the honeybee: disruption as a cue. J. Comp. Physiol. A 181, 267-277. (doi:10.1007/s003590050113) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 51.
Lehrer M . 1999Shape perception in the honeybee: symmetry as a global framework. Int. J. Plant Sci. 160, S51-S65. (doi:10.1086/314216) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 52.
Lehrer M . 1997Honeybee's use of spatial parameters for flower discrimination. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 45, 157-167. (doi:10.1080/07929978.1997.10676681) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 53.
Dafni A, Lehrer M, Kevan PG . 1997Spatial flower parameters and insect spatial vision. Biol. Rev. 72, 239-282. (doi:10.1017/S0006323196005002) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 54.
Rivas-Blanco D, Pohl I-M, Dale R, Heberlein MTE, Range F . 2020Wolves and dogs may rely on non-numerical cues in quantity discrimination tasks when given the choice. Front. Psychol. 11, 2412. (doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573317) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 55.
Miletto Petrazzini ME, Wynne CDL . 2016What counts for dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) in a quantity discrimination task?Behav. Processes 122, 90-97. (doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2015.11.013) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 56.
Gatto E, Carlesso D . 2019Spontaneous quantity discrimination in crickets. Ethology 125, 613-619. (doi:10.1111/eth.12912) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 57.
Leibovich T, Henik A . 2014Comparing performance in discrete and continuous comparison tasks. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 67, 899-917. (doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.837940) Crossref, Google Scholar - 58.
Rugani R, Regolin L, Vallortigara G . 2010Imprinted numbers: newborn chicks' sensitivity to number vs. continuous extent of objects they have been reared with. Dev. Sci. 13, 790-797. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00936.x) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 59.
Agrillo C, Piffer L, Bisazza A . 2011Number versus continuous quantity in numerosity judgments by fish. Cognition 119, 281-287. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.022) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 60.
Burnham KP, Anderson DR . 2002Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar - 61.
van der Schaaf A, van Hateren JH. 1996Modelling the power spectra of natural images: statistics and information. Vis. Res. 36, 2759-2770. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(96)00002-8) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 62.
O'Carroll D . 1993Feature-detecting neurons in dragonflies. Nature 362, 541-543. (doi:10.1038/362541a0) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 63.
James AC, Osorio D . 1996Characterisation of columnar neurons and visual signal processing in the medulla of the locust optic lobe by system identification techniques. J. Comp. Physiol. A 178, 183-199. (doi:10.1007/BF00188161) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 64.
Sachs MB, Nachmias J, Robson JG . 1971Spatial-frequency channels in human vision. J. Optic. Soc. Am. 61, 1176-1186. (doi:10.1364/JOSA.61.001176) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 65.
Silverman MS, Grosof DH, De Valois RL, Elfar SD. 1989Spatial-frequency organization in primate striate cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 711-715. (doi:10.1073/pnas.86.2.711) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 66.
Srinivasan MV . 2010Honey bees as a model for vision, perception, and cognition. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 267-284. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.010908.164537) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 67.
Gevers W, Kadosh RC, Gebuis T . 2016Sensory integration theory: an alternative to the approximate number system. In Continuous issues in numerical cognition: how many or how much (ed.Henik A ), pp. 405-418. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Crossref, Google Scholar - 68.
Uller C, Lewis J . 2009Horses (Equus caballus) select the greater of two quantities in small numerical contrasts. Anim. Cogn. 12, 733-738. (doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0225-0) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 69.
Ditz HM, Nieder A . 2020Format-dependent and format-independent representation of sequential and simultaneous numerosity in the crow endbrain. Nat. Commun. 11, 1-10. (doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14519-2) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 70.
Meck WH, Church RM . 1983A mode control model of counting and timing processes. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 9, 320-334. (doi:10.1037/0097-7403.9.3.320) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar - 71.
Gallistel CR, Gelman R . 2000Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 59-65. (doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01424-2) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 72.
Vasas V, Chittka L . 2019Insect-inspired sequential inspection strategy enables an artificial network of four neurons to estimate numerosity. iScience 11, 85-92. (doi:10.1016/j.isci.2018.12.009) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 73.
Rapp H, Nawrot MP, Stern M . 2020Numerical cognition based on precise counting with a single spiking neuron. iScience 23, 100852. (doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.100852) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 74.
Eimas PD . 1969Multiple-cue discrimination learning in children. Psychol. Rec. 19, 417-424. (doi:10.1007/BF03393868) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 75.
Slotnick B . 2001Animal cognition and the rat olfactory system. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 216-222. (doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01625-9) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 76.
Gerber B, Smith BH . 1998Visual modulation of olfactory learning in honeybees. J. Exp. Biol. 201, 2213-2217. PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 77.
Ohnishi K . 1991Goldfish's visual information processing patterns in food-reinforced discrimination learning between compound visual stimuli. J. Comp. Physiol. A 168, 581-589. (doi:10.1007/BF00215080) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 78.
Brembs B, Heisenberg M . 2001Conditioning with compound stimuli in Drosophila melanogaster in the flight simulator. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 2849-2859. PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 79.
Clipperton-Allen A, Cole M, Peck M, Quirt J . 2016Pattern cue and visual cue competition in a foraging task by rats. Learn. Behav. 44, 378-389. (doi:10.3758/s13420-016-0231-4) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 80.
MaBouDi H, Dona HSG, Gatto E, Loukola OJ, Buckley E, Onoufriou PD, Skorupski P, Chittka L . 2020Bumblebees use sequential scanning of countable items in visual patterns to solve numerosity tasks. Integr. Comp. Biol. 60, 929-942. (doi:10.1093/icb/icaa025) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 81.
Gabay S, Leibovich T, Ben-Simon A, Henik A, Segev R . 2013Inhibition of return in the archer fish. Nat. Commun. 4, 1657. (doi:10.1038/ncomms2644) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 82.
Sapir A, Soroker N, Berger A, Henik A . 1999Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 1053-1054. (doi:10.1038/15977) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 83.
Jordan KE, MacLean EL, Brannon EM . 2008Monkeys match and tally quantities across senses. Cognition 108, 617-625. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.006) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 84.
Egnor SER, Branson K . 2016Computational analysis of behavior. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 39, 217-236. (doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-070815-013845) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 85.
Skorupski P, MaBouDi H, Dona HSG, Chittka L . 2018Counting insects. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 373, 20160513. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0513) Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 86.
Nieder A . 2016The neuronal code for number. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 366-382. (doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.40) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 87.
Harvey BM . 2016Quantity cognition: numbers, numerosity, zero and mathematics. Curr. Biol. 26, R419-R421. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.059) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
