Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2006.1925

    Structural health monitoring (SHM) is a term increasingly used in the last decade to describe a range of systems implemented on full-scale civil infrastructures and whose purposes are to assist and inform operators about continued ‘fitness for purpose’ of structures under gradual or sudden changes to their state, to learn about either or both of the load and response mechanisms. Arguably, various forms of SHM have been employed in civil infrastructure for at least half a century, but it is only in the last decade or two that computer-based systems are being designed for the purpose of assisting owners/operators of ageing infrastructure with timely information for their continued safe and economic operation.

    This paper describes the motivations for and recent history of SHM applications to various forms of civil infrastructure and provides case studies on specific types of structure. It ends with a discussion of the present state-of-the-art and future developments in terms of instrumentation, data acquisition, communication systems and data mining and presentation procedures for diagnosis of infrastructural ‘health’.

    References

    • Aktan, A. E., Chase, S., Inman, D. & Pines, D. 2001 Monitoring and managing the health of infrastructure systems. In Proc. SPIE4337, xi–xxi. Google Scholar
    • Alampalli, S., 1998 Influence of in-service environment on modal parameters. In Proc. IMAC16, Santa Barbara, CA, vol. 1, pp. 111–116. Google Scholar
    • Alampalli S& Fu G. 1994Instrumentation for remote and continuous monitoring of structure conditions. Transport. Res. Rec. 1432, 59–67. Google Scholar
    • ANCOLD 1994 Appendix 4—checklist of details for consideration when undertaking a surveillance operation. ANCOLD Dam safety management guidelines, www.nrm.qld.gov.au/compliance/wic/pdf//guidelines/dam_safety/appendix_04.pdf. Google Scholar
    • Ashkenazi V& Roberts G.W. 1997Experimental monitoring of the Humber Bridge using GPS. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. 120, 177–182. Google Scholar
    • Bakht B& Jaeger J.G. 1990Bridge testing: a surprise every time. ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 116, 1370–1383. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Balendra T, Ma Z& Tan C.L. 2003Design of tall residential buildings in Singapore for wind effects. Wind Struct. 6, 221–248. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Bampton, M. C. C., Ramsdell, J. V., Graves, R. E. & Strope, L. A. 1986 Deer Isle-Sedgwick suspension bridge. Wind and motion analysis. Report FHWA/RD-86/183. Google Scholar
    • Barr. I. G., Waldron, P. & Evans, H. R. 1987 Instrumentation of glued segmental box girder bridges. In Proc. IABSE colloquium, monitoring of large structures and assessment of their safety, Bergamo. Google Scholar
    • Bettinali. F., Galimberti. C. & Meghella, M. 1990 Talvacchia Dam. The dynamic analysis of large structures as a method for structural investigation. ENEL/CRIS report 4002fb. Google Scholar
    • Branceleoni F& Diana G. 1993The aerodynamic design of the Messina Straits Bridge. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 48, 395–409.doi:10.1016/0167-6105(93)90148-H. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Brederode, P., De Winter, P., Van Staalduinen, P. & Segers, W. 1986 Dynamic offshore structure test (DOST) project—a new approach to quality assessment of offshore structures. In Proc. Inspection, repair and maintenance IRM/AODC86, Aberdeen. Google Scholar
    • Brownjohn J.M.W. 1994Estimation of damping in suspension bridges. Struct. Build. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. 104, 401–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Brownjohn J.M.W. 2005Lateral loading and response for a tall building in the nonseismic doldrums. Eng. Struct. 27, 1801–1812.doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.021. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Brownjohn, J. M. W. & Moyo, P. 2001 Monitoring of Malaysia–Singapore second link during construction. In Proc. SPIE. 4317, pp. 528–533. Google Scholar
    • Brownjohn J.M.W& Pan T.C. 2001Response of a tall building to long distance earthquakes. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30, 709–729.doi:10.1002/eqe.32. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Brownjohn, J. M. W., Dumanoglu, A. A., Severn, R. T. & Taylor, C. A. 1987 Ambient vibration measurements of the Humber suspension bridge and comparison with calculated characteristics. In Proc. Inst. of Civil Eng. pt. 2 83, pp. 561–600. Google Scholar
    • Brownjohn J.M.W, Bocciolone M, Curami A, Falco M& Zasso A. 1994Humber Bridge full-scale measurement campaigns 1990–1991. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 52, 185–218.doi:10.1016/0167-6105(94)90047-7. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Brownjohn J.M.W, Pan T.C, Mita A& Chow K.F. 1998Dynamic and static response of Republic Plaza. J. Inst. Eng. Singapore. 38, 35–41. Google Scholar
    • Brownjohn, J. M. W., Moyo, P., Rizos, C. & Tjin, S. C. 2003a Practical issues in using novel sensors in SHM of civil infrastructure: problems and solutions in implementation of GPS and fibre optics. In Proc. 4th Int. workshop on structural health monitoring, Stanford University. pp. 499–506. Destech Publications Inc., USA. Google Scholar
    • Brownjohn J.M.W, Moyo P, Omenzetter P& Lu YAssessment of highway bridge upgrading by dynamic testing and finite element model updating. ASCE J. Bridge Eng. 8, 2003b162–172.doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:3(162). . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Brownjohn, J. M. W., Rizos, C., Tan, G. H. & Pan, T. C. 2004 Real-time long-term monitoring of static and dynamic displacements of an office tower, combining RTK GPS and accelerometer data. In Proc. 1st FIG Int. symposium on engineering surveys for construction works and structural engineering, Nottingham, UK. http://www.fig.net/nottingham/. Google Scholar
    • BSI 2004 Mechanical vibration and shock-performance parameters for condition monitoring of structures. BS ISO 15587:2004, British Standards Organisation. Google Scholar
    • California Geological Survey 2003 California strong motion instrumentation program. California Department of Conservation. http://www.consrv.ca.gov/cgs/smip/about.htm. Google Scholar
    • Campbell, R. B. & Vandiver, J. K. 1980 The estimation of natural frequencies and damping ratios of offshore structures. In Proc. OTC vol. 4, pp. 53–61. Houston, Texas. Google Scholar
    • Carder D.S. 1937Observed vibrations of bridges. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 27, 267–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Catbas F.N, Grimmelsman K.A& Aktan A.E. 2000Structural identification of the Commodore Barry Bridge. Proc. SPIE. 3995, 84–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Chang, F. K. 2000 A summary report of the 2nd workshop on structural health monitoring held at Stanford University on September 8–10, 1999. Report AO83483, www.stormingmedia.us. Google Scholar
    • Cheung M.S, Tadros G.S, Brown J, Dilger W.H, Ghali A& Lau D.T. 1997Field monitoring and research on performance of the Confederation Bridge. Can. J. Civil Eng. 24, 951–962.doi:10.1139/cjce-24-6-951. . ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Chung, B. Y. 2003 Recent R&D activities on structural health monitoring for civil infrastructures in Korea. In Proc. Int. workshop on advanced sensors, structural health monitoring and smart structures, Keio, Japan. www.mita.sd.keio.ac.jp/news/workshop/workshop.htm. Google Scholar
    • Civera, P., Cravero, M., Franco, G. & Iabichino, G. 2003 Development of an inclinometer chain for wireless data acquisition. In Proc. 4th Int. workshop on structural health monitoring Stanford University. pp. 1169–1176. Destech Publications, Inc, USA. Google Scholar
    • Comerford J.B, Salvaneschi P, Lazzari M, Bonaldi P, Ruggeri G, Fanelli M, Giusepetti G& Mazza G. 1992The role of AI technology in the management of dam safety: the DAMSAFE system. Dam Eng. 3, 215–226. Google Scholar
    • Cook N.J. 1982Towards better estimation of extreme winds. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 9, 295–323.doi:10.1016/0167-6105(82)90021-6. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Coppolino, R. N. & Rubin, S. 1980 Detectability of structural failure in offshore platforms by ambient vibration monitoring. In Proc. OTC 12, vol. 4, pp. 101–110 Houston, Texas. Google Scholar
    • Cornwell P, Farrar C.R, Doebling S.W& Sohn H. 1999Environmental variability of modal properties. Exp. Tech. 23, 45–48. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Cullen, W. H. 2002 NRC Response to the Davis-Besse head degradation event. In Proc. Americas nuclear energy symposium, ANES 2002, Florida. anes.fiu.edu/pro/s11cu.pdf. Google Scholar
    • Dalgleish, W. A. & Rainer, J. H. 1978 Measurements of wind induced displacements and accelerations of a 57-storey building in Toronto, Canada. In Proc. 3rd Colloquium Onindustrial Aerodynamics, Aachen, Building Aerodynamics, pt. 2, pp. 67–78. Google Scholar
    • Darbre G.R& Proulx J. 2002Continuous ambient-vibration monitoring of the arch dam of Mauvosin. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31, 475–480.doi:10.1002/eqe.118. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • De Roeck GHealth monitoring of civil engineering structures. Computational Mechanics for the 20th Century& Topping B.H.Vch. 172003Stirling, UK:Saxe Coburg Publications. Google Scholar
    • DETR 2001 List of Panel Engineers: Reservoirs Act 1975. Department of the Environment, Transportation and the Regions. www.dtatabases.detr.gov.uk/reservoir. Google Scholar
    • Det Norske Veritas 1977 Rules for the design, construction and inspection of offshore structures. Norway: DNV. Google Scholar
    • Doebling, S., Farrar, C., Prime, M. & Schevitz, D. W. 1996 Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a review. Los Alamos National Labs Report LA-13070-MS UC-900. Google Scholar
    • Dumanoglu, A. A. & Severn, R. T. 1987 Seismic response of modern suspension bridges to asynchronous vertical ground motion. In Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. pt. 2 83, pp. 701–730. Google Scholar
    • Dunnicliff JGeotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance. 1994New York, NY:Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Dyke, S. J., Bernal, D., Beck, J. & Ventura, C. 2003 Experimental phase 2 of the structural health monitoring benchmark problem. In Proc. ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, WA. Google Scholar
    • Edwards, J. 2005 Sensors working overtime. CFO Magazine August 25, 26. www.cfo.com. Google Scholar
    • Fanelli M.A& Blockley D. 1992pp. 205–223. Eds. Berkshire, UK:McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
    • Flatau A.B& Chong K.P. 2002Dynamic smart material and structural systems. Eng. Struct. 24, 261–270.doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00093-1. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Flint A.R& Smith B.W. 1992Strengthening and refurbishment of Severn Crossing. Part 5: Other background research and development. Proc. Institution of Civil Engineers, Structures and buildings. 94, 51–60. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Geier, R. & Wenzel, H. 2002 Bridge classification based upon ambient vibration monitoring. In Proc. First European conference on structural health monitoring, Paris, pp. 981–988. Google Scholar
    • Hanna, T. H. 1985 Field instrumentation in geotechnical engineering. Transtech Publications Ltd. Google Scholar
    • Heywood R.J, Roberts W, Taylor R& Anderson R. 2000Fitness-for-purpose evaluation of bridges using health monitoring technology. Transport. Res. Rec. 1696, 193–201. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Hillman, B. A., Baldwin, C. & Meyerholtz, S. 2003 Real-time GPS monitoring—Libby Dam, Libby, Montana. In Proc. 23rd USSD Annu. Meet. and Conf. Google Scholar
    • Hudson, D. E. 1977 Dynamic tests on full-scale structures In Proc. ASCE EMD Specialty Conf., UCLA, pp. 1–39. Google Scholar
    • ICOLD 2000 Automated dam monitoring systems. Guidelines and case histories. Bulletin 118. Paris: CIGB ICOLD. Google Scholar
    • Inaudi DLong-gage fiber optic sensors for structural monitoring. Photomechanics& Rastogi P.K. 1997pp. 273–293. Eds. Berlin, Germany:Springer. Google Scholar
    • Inaudi, D. 2004 SOFO sensors for static and dynamic measurements. In Proc. 1st FIG Int. Symp. on Engineering Surveys for Construction Works and Structural Engineering, Nottingham, UK. http://www.fig.net/nottingham/. Google Scholar
    • Inaudi D, Vurpillot S& Casanova N. 1996Bridge monitoring by interferometric deformation sensors. Proc SPIE. 2895, 34–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • ISIS 2001 Guidelines for structural health monitoring. Design Manual No. 2 ISIS Canada Corporation www.isiscanada.com. ISBN 0-9689006-0-7. Google Scholar
    • Iwaki, H., Yamakawi, H., Shiba, K. & Mitia, A. 2001 Structural health monitoring system using FBG-based sensors for a damage tolerant building. In Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University. Google Scholar
    • Jeary, A. P. & Ellis, B. R. 1981 Vibration tests on structures at varied amplitudes. In Proc. ASCE EMD specialty conference-dynamic response of structures, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 281–294. Google Scholar
    • Jeary, A. P., Sparks, P. R. & DeSouza, V. C. M. 1981 A study on the use of ambient vibration measurements to detect changes in the structural characteristics of a building. In Proc. ASCE EMD specialty conference—dynamic response of structures, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 189–199. Google Scholar
    • Jeary A.P, Chiu G.C& Wong J.C.K. 2001Wholistic structural appraisal. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. and Structural Safety and Reliability: ICOSSAR 200. Google Scholar
    • Kenley R M, Dodds C J, 1980, West Sole WE Platform: Detection of damage by structural response measurements. In Proc. OTC 12 vol. 4, pp. 111-118, Houston Texas. Google Scholar
    • Kijewski-Correa, T. L. & Kareem, A. 2003 The Chicago monitoring project: a fusion of information technologies and advanced sensing for civil infrastructure. In Proc. SHMII-1 Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructures, vol. 2 (ed. Z. Wu & M. Abe), pp. 1003–1010. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger. Google Scholar
    • Kiremidjian, A. & Straser, E. 1998 A modular wireless damage monitoring system for structures. Report TR128, Blume Centre, Stanford CA. Google Scholar
    • Koh, H. M., Choo, J. F., Kim, S. K. & Yim, C. F. 2003 Recent application and development of structural health monitoring systems and intelligent structures in Korea. In Proc. SHMII- 1, Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructures, vol. 1 (ed. Z. Wu & M. Abe), pp. 99–112. Swets & Zeitlinger. Google Scholar
    • Kumarasena T, Scanlan R.H& Bosch H.R. 1990Wind response of flexible bridges. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 36, 1365–1372. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Larsen A, Esdahl S, Anderson J.E& Vejrun T. 2000Storebaelt suspension bridge-vortex shedding excitation and mitigation by guide vanes. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 88, 283–296.doi:10.1016/S0167-6105(00)00054-4. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Leitch J, Long A.E, Thompson A& Sloan T.DMonitoring the behaviour of a major box-girder bridge. Structural assessment based on full and large-scale testing& Garston B.R.E. 1987pp. 212–219. Eds. Watford, UK:Butterworths. Google Scholar
    • Li, X., Ge, L., Peng, G. D., Rizos, C., Tamura, Y. & Yoshida, A. 2004 Seismic response of a tower as measured by an integrated RTK-GPS system. In Proc. 1st FIG Int. symposium on engineering surveys for construction works and structural engineering, Nottingham, UK. http://www.fig.net/nottingham/. Google Scholar
    • List, D. 2004 Rejuvenating the Tamar Bridge. A review of the strengthening and widening project and its effect on operations. In Proc. 4th Int. Cable Supported Bridge Operators' Conference, Copenhagen. www.icsboc.com. Google Scholar
    • Littler J.D& Ellis B.R. 1990Interim findings from full-scale measurements at Hume Point. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 36, 1181–1190. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Lynch J.P. 2005Design of a wireless active sensing unit for localized structural health monitoring. J. Struct. Control Health Monit. 12, 405–423.doi:10.1002/stc.77. . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Macdonald J.H.G, Dagless E.L, Thomas B.T& Taylor C.A. 1997Dynamic measurements of the second Severn crossing. Proc. Institution of Civil Engineers, Transport. 123, 241–248. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Maeck J, Peeters B& De Roeck G. 2001Damage identification on the Z24 bridge using vibration monitoring analysis. Smart Mater. Struct. 10, 512–517.doi:10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/313. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Maguire, J. R. 1999 Condition monitoring of structures: a briefing note for clients and authors. In Proc. Institution of Civil Engineers, Structures and Buildings134, pp. 279–280. Google Scholar
    • Mita, A. 1999 Emerging needs in Japan for health monitoring technologies in civil and building structures. In Proc. 2nd Int. workshop on structural health monitoring, Stanford University. Google Scholar
    • Mita A& Takhira S. 2003A smart sensor using mechanical memory for structural health monitoring of a damage-controlled building. Smart Mater. Struct. 12, 193–203.doi:10.1088/0964-1726/12/2/307. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Miyata T, Yamada H& Katsuchi H. 2002Kitagawi, full-scale measurement of Akashi-Kaikyo bridge during typhoon. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 90, 1517–1527.doi:10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00267-2. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Moyo P& Brownjohn J.M.WDetection of anomalous structural behaviour using wavelet analysis. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 16, 2002a429–445.doi:10.1006/mssp.2001.1449. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Moyo P& Brownjohn J.M.WApplication of Box–Jenkins models for assessing the impact of unusual events recorded by structural health monitoring systems. Int. J. Struct. Health Monit. 1, 2002b149–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Moyo P, Brownjohn J.M.W& Omenzetter P. 2004Highway bridge live loading assessment and load carrying capacity estimation using a health monitoring system. Struct. Eng. Mech. 18, 609–626. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Moyo P, Brownjohn J.M.W, Suresh R& Tjin S.C. 2005Development of fiber Bragg grating sensors for monitoring civil infrastructure. Eng. Struct. 27, 1828–1834.doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.023. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Mufti, A. 2001 Guidelines for structural health monitoring. ISIS Design Manual No. 2. ISIS Canada. www.isiscanada.com. Google Scholar
    • Mufti A.A, Tadros G& Jones P.R. 1997Field assessment of fibre-optic Bragg grating strain sensors in the Confederation Bridge. Can. J. Civil Eng. 24, 963–966.doi:10.1139/cjce-24-6-963. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Okundi, E., Aylott, P. J. & Hassenein, A. M. 2003 Structural health monitoring of underground railways. In Proc. SHMII-1, structural health monitoring and intelligent infrastructures, vol. 2 (ed. Z. Wu & M. Abe), pp. 1039–1046. Swets & Zeitlinger. Google Scholar
    • Omenzetter P& Brownjohn J.M.W. 2006Application of time series analysis for bridge health monitoring. J. Smart Mater. Struct. 15, 129–138.doi:10.1088/0964-1726/15/1/041. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Omenzetter P, Brownjohn J.M.W& Moyo P. 2004Identification of unusual events in multi-channel bridge monitoring data. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 18, 409–430.doi:10.1016/S0888-3270(03)00040-2. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Peeters B& De Roeck GStochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: a review. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control. 123, 2001a659–667.doi:10.1115/1.1410370. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Peeters B& De Roeck GOne-year monitoring of the Z24-bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30, 2001b149–171.doi:10.1002/1096-9845(200102)30:2<149::AID-EQE1>3.0.CO;2-Z. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Price G, Longworth T.L& Sullivan P.J.E. 1994Installation and performance of monitoring systems at mansion house. In Proc. Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering. 107, 77–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Reid, M. E. & LaHusen, R. G. 1998 Real-time monitoring of active landslides along highway 50, El Dorado County. California Geol. 51, pp. 17–20, see also http://landslides.usgs.gov/monitoring/hwy50/. Google Scholar
    • Rizos CMaking sense of the GPS techniques. Manual of geospatial science and technology, Bossler J, Jenson J, McMaster R& Rizos C. 2002pp. 146–161. Eds. London, UK:Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar
    • Roberts, W. S., Heywood, R. J. & McKenzie, C. K. 2003 Protecting heritage structures from explosive blasts. In Proc. Concrete in the Third Millennium, Biennial Conference of the Concrete Institute of Australia. Google Scholar
    • Ross R.M& Matthews S.LIn-service structural monitoring—a state of the art review. Struct. Eng. 73, 1995a23–31. Google Scholar
    • Ross R.M& Matthews S.LDiscussion: in-service structural monitoring—a state of the art review. Struct. Eng. 73, 1995b214–217. Google Scholar
    • Rucker, W., Rohrmann, R. G. & Hille, F. 2006 Guidelines for monitoring and assessment—a SAMCO initiative as a basis for international standardization. In Proc. SHMII-2, structural health monitoring and intelligent infrastructures, vol. 2 (ed. J. Ou, H. Li and Z. Duan), pp. 1671–1676. London, UK: Taylor & Francis Group. Google Scholar
    • Salane H.J, Baldwin J.W& Duffield R.C. 1981Dynamics approach for monitoring highway bridge deterioration. Transport. Res. Rec. 832, 21–28. Google Scholar
    • Salvaneschi P, Cadei M& Lazzari M. 1996Applying AI to structural safety monitoring and evaluation. IEEE Expert Int. Syst. Appl. 11, 24–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Severn, R. T., Jeary, A. P. & Ellis, B. R. 1981 Forced vibration tests and theoretical studies on dams. In Proc. Inst. Civil Eng., pp. 575–595, pt. 2 71. Google Scholar
    • Shahrivar, F & Bouwkamp, J. G. 1980 Damage detection in offshore platforms using vibration information. In Proc. 3rd Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Symposium, New Orleans, vol. 2, pp. 174–185. Google Scholar
    • Smith L.M. 1996In-service monitoring of nuclear-safety-related structures. Struct. Eng. 74, 210–211. Google Scholar
    • Smith, L. M. & McCluskey, D. T. 1997 In-service inspection of nuclear safety related structures on AGR and PWR stations in the UK. In Proc. Workshop on Containment, Inservice Inspection, Testing and Management. Clearwater Beach, Florida. Google Scholar
    • Spidsoe, N., Berg, S., Hoen, C. & Beck, G. 1980 Measured behaviour of platforms on the Norwegian continental shelf. In Proc. European Offshore Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, London, pp. 375–391. Google Scholar
    • Stephen G.A, Brownjohn J.M.W& Taylor C.A. 1993Measurements of static and dynamic structural displacement from visual monitoring of the Humber bridge. Eng. Struct. 15, 197–208.doi:10.1016/0141-0296(93)90054-8. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Sumitro, S. & Wang, M. L. 2003 Sustainable structural health monitoring system. In Proc. Int. Workshop on Advanced Sensors, Structural Health Monitoring and Smart Structures, Keio, Japan. www.mita.sd.keio.ac.jp/news/workshop/workshop.htm. Google Scholar
    • Tabatabai H, Mehrabi A.B& Yen W.P. 1998Bridge stay cable condition assessment unsing vibration measurement techniques. Proc. SPIE. 3400, 194–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Tan, G. H. & Chua, K. G. 2003 Developing an operational automatic real time tunnel monitoring system. In Proc. Underground, Singapore, pp. 308–315. Google Scholar
    • The Nuclear Installations Act 1965 (Repeal and Modifications) Regulations 1990, ISBN 0110049187. Google Scholar
    • Udd E. 1991New York, NY:Wiley. Google Scholar
    • University of Washington, 1954 Aerodynamic stability of suspension bridges with special reference to the Tacoma Narrows Bridge. Bulletin no. 116, University of Washington Engineering Experiment Station, Seattle, Washington. Google Scholar
    • Wang, C. Y., Wang, H. L., Wu, C. Y. & Chen, C. H. 2003 Development of bridge health monitoring systems in Taiwan. In Proc. SHMII-1, Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructures, vol. 2 (ed. Z. Wu & M. Abe), pp. 1067–1072. Swets & Zeitlinger. Google Scholar
    • Wenzel, H. 2003 E-MOI -European monitoring initiative. In Proc. SHMII-1, Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructures, vol. 1 (ed. Z. Wu & M. Abe), pp. 145–152. Swets & Zeitlinger. Google Scholar
    • Wong K.Y. 2003Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable-supported bridges. Struct. Control Health Monit. 11, 91–124.doi:10.1002/stc.33. . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Wong, K. Y., Man, K. L. & Chan, W. Y. 2001 Real-time kinematic spans the Gap GPS world, July 1. Google Scholar
    • Wu, Z. R. & Su, H. Z. 2003 Dianosis and evaluation of dam health. In Proc. SHMII-1, Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructures, vol. 1 (ed. Z. Wu & M. Abe), pp. 79–86. Swets & Zeitlinger. Google Scholar
    • Yang, C. S., Aggour, M. S., Dagalakis, N. & Miller, F. 1981 Damping of an offshore platform by ‘random dec’ method. In Proc. ASCE EMD Specialty Conference—Dynamic Response of Structures, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 819–832. Google Scholar
    • Yanev, B. 2003 Structural health monitoring as a bridge management tool. In Proc. SHMII-1, Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructures, vol. 1 (ed. Z. Wu & M. Abe), pp. 87–98. Swets & Zeitlinger. Google Scholar