Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

    The gas turbine presents significant challenges to any computational fluid dynamics techniques. The combination of a wide range of flow phenomena with complex geometry is difficult to model in the context of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solvers. We review the potential for large eddy simulation (LES) in modelling the flow in the different components of the gas turbine during a practical engineering design cycle. We show that while LES has demonstrated considerable promise for reliable prediction of many flows in the engine that are difficult for RANS it is not a panacea and considerable application challenges remain. However, for many flows, especially those dominated by shear layer mixing such as in combustion chambers and exhausts, LES has demonstrated a clear superiority over RANS for moderately complex geometries although at significantly higher cost which will remain an issue in making the calculations relevant within the design cycle.

    References

    • Andersson, N. 2003 A study of Mach 0.75 jets and their radiated sound using large-eddy simulation. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden. Google Scholar
    • Arunajatesan, S., Kannepalli, C. & Dash, S. M. 2002 Progress towards hybrid RANS-LES modelling for high speed jet flows. In 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. AIAA paper AIAA-2002-0428. Google Scholar
    • Chauvet N., Deck S.& Jacquin L.. 2007Zonal detached eddy simulation of a controlled propulsive jet. AIAA J. 45, 2458–2473.doi:10.2514/1.28562. . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Chew J.W.& Hills N.. 2007Computational fluid dynamics for turbomachinery internal air systems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 365, 2587–2611.doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2022. . Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • DeBonis, J. R. 2006 Progress towards large eddy simulations for prediction of realistic nozzle systems. In 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. AIAA paper AIAA-2006-0487. Google Scholar
    • di Mare F., Jones W.P.& Menzies K.R.. 2004Large eddy simulation of a model gas turbine combustor. Combustion Flame. 137, 278–294.doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.01.008. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • di Mare L., Klein M., Jones W.P.& Janicka J.. 2006Synthetic turbulence inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids. 18, 025 107doi:10.1063/1.2130744. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Ffowcs-Williams J.E.& Hawkings D.L.. 1969Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 264, 321–342.doi:10.1098/rsta.1969.0031. . Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Fröhlich J.& Rodi W.Introduction to large eddy simulation of turbulent flows. Closure strategies for turbulent and transitional flows, Launder B.E.& Sandham N.D.. 2002pp. 267–298. Eds. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Georgiadis, N. J. 2001 A hybrid numerical method for turbulent mixing layers. NASA-TM-2001-210811. NASA Glenn Research Center. Google Scholar
    • Gicquel, L. Y. M., Staffelbach, G., Cuenot, B. & Poinsot, T. 2008 Large eddy simulations of turbulent reacting flows in real burners: the status and challenges. In SciDAC 2008 Conference, Seattle, USA. Google Scholar
    • Jones W.P.. 2002Large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion processes. Comput. Phys. Commun. 147, 533–537.doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00330-2. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Jones W.P.& Launder B.E.. 1972The prediction of laminarisation with a two equation model of turbulence. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 15, 301–314.doi:10.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-2. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Kim, W.-W. & Syed, S. 2004 Large-eddy simulation needs for gas turbine combustor design. In 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. AIAA paper AIAA-2004-0331. Google Scholar
    • Kim W.-W., Menon S.& Mongia H.C.. 1999Large eddy simulation of a gas turbine combustor flow. Combustion Sci. Technol. 143, 25–62.doi:10.1080/00102209908924192. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Klein M., Sadiki A.& Janicka J.. 2003A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 186, 652doi:10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00090-1. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Lardeau, S., Li, N. & Leschziner, M. 2005 LES of transitional boundary layer at high free-stream turbulence intensity, and implications for RANS modelling. In 4th Int. Symp. on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, pp. 431–436. Google Scholar
    • Leschziner M.A.Statistical turbulence modelling for the computation of physically complex flows. New trends in turbulence& Lesieur M.. 2001pp. 188–258. Eds. Berlin, Germany:Springer. Google Scholar
    • Li, Q., Page, G. J. & McGuirk, J. J. 2006 LES of impinging jet flows relevant to vertical landing aircraft using an unstructured mesh approach. In AIAA 24th Applied Aerodynamics Conference. AIAA paper AIAA-2006-2997. Google Scholar
    • Lighthill M.J.. 1962Sound generated aerodynamically. The Bakerian lecture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 267, 147–182.doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.0090. . AbstractGoogle Scholar
    • Mahesh K., Constantinescu G., Apte S., Iaccarino G., Ham F.& Moin P.. 2006Large-eddy simulation of reacting turbulent flows in complex geometries. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 73, 374–381.doi:10.1115/1.2179098. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Menter F.. 1994Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32, 1598–1605.doi:10.2514/3.12149. . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Menter F., Langtry R., Likki S., Huang P.& Volker S.. 2006A correlation-based transition model using local variables—Part I: model formulation. ASME J. Turbomachinery. 128, 413–422.doi:10.1115/1.2184352. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Menzies, K. R. 2001 Turbulence modelling for industrial reacting flows: current best practice and future prospects. In Proc. ECCOMAS CFD 2001, Swansea, UK. Google Scholar
    • Midgley K., Spencer A.& McGuirk J.J.. 2005Unsteady flow structures in radial swirler fed fuel injectors. ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 127, 755–764.doi:10.1115/1.1925638. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Page, G. J., Li, Q., McGuirk, J. J. & Richardson, G. A. 2007 Large eddy simulation of a Harrier aircraft at touchdown. In 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. AIAA paper AIAA-2007-4294. Google Scholar
    • Sagaut, P. 2002 LES and DNS simulation of turbomachinery flows. In Recent developments in numerical methods for turbomachinery flows (ed. T. Arts). Von Kárman Institute Lecture Series 2002-01. Google Scholar
    • Secundov A.N., Birch S.F.& Tucker P.G.. 2007Propulsive jets and their acoustics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 365, 2443–2467.doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2017. . Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Shur M., Spalart P.& Strelets M.. 2005Noise prediction for increasingly complex jets. Part I: methods and tests. Int. J. Aeroacoustics. 4, 213–246.doi:10.1260/1475472054771376. . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Spalart, P. R. & Allmaras, S. R. 1992 A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA paper AIAA-92-0439. Google Scholar
    • Spalart, P. R., Jou, W. H., Strelets, M. & Allmaras, S. R. 1997 Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach. In 1st AFOSR Int. Conf. on DNS/LES (eds C. Liu & Z. Liu), pp. 137–148. Columbus, OH: Greyden Press. Google Scholar
    • Spalart P.R., Deck S., Shur M.L., Squires K.D., Strelets M.& Travin A.. 2006A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 20, 181–195.doi:10.1007/s00162-006-0015-0. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Sun Z., Lindblad K., Chew J.W.& Young C.. 2007LES and RANS investigations into buoyancy affected convection in a rotating cavity with a central axial throughflow. ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 129, 318–325.doi:10.1115/1.2364192. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Trapier S., Deck S.& Duveau P.. 2008Delayed detached-eddy simulation and analysis of supersonic inlet buzz. AIAA J. 46, 118–131.doi:10.2514/1.32187. . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Tristanto, I. H. & Page, G. J. 2004 A mesh-transparent method for LES of compressible flow. In Proc. ECCOMAS 2004, Jyväskylä, Finland. Google Scholar
    • Tristanto, I. H., Page, G. J. & McGuirk, J. J. 2006 Large eddy simulation of hot coaxial jets. In 27th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA paper AIAA-2006-2497. Google Scholar
    • Tucker, P. G., Eastwood, S., Liu, Y. & Jefferson-Loveday, R. 2005 Computational modeling of jets with coflow. In 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA paper AIAA-2005-2818. Google Scholar
    • Tucker, P. G., Coupland, J., Eastwood, S., Liu, Y., Jefferson-Loveday, R. J. & Hassan, O. 2006 Contrasting code performances for computational aeroacoustics of jets. In 12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA paper AIAA-2006-2672. Google Scholar
    • Tucker, P. G., Xia, H., Eastwood, S. & Jefferson-Loveday, R. 2008 Exploring the LES model's role with jet noise in mind. In 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. AIAA paper AIAA-2008-0527. Google Scholar
    • Voke, P. R. & Yang, Z. 1999 Large-eddy simulation of separation and transition for turbomachinery flows. In Industrial and environmental applications of direct and large-eddy simulation. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 529, pp. 46–63. Berlin, Germany: Springer. Google Scholar
    • Walters D.& Leylek J.. 2004A new model for boundary layer transition using a single point RANS approach. ASME J. Turbomachinery. 126, 193–202.doi:10.1115/1.1622709. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Wilcox D.Turbulence modelling for CFD. 1993La Canada, CA:DCW Industries Inc. Google Scholar
    • Xia, H., Tucker, P. G. & Eastwood, S. 2008 Towards jet flow LES of conceptual nozzles for acoustic predictions. In 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. AIAA paper AIAA-2008-0010. Google Scholar
    • You D., Wang M., Moin P.& Mittal R.. 2007Large-eddy simulation analysis of mechanisms for viscous losses in a turbomachinery tip-clearance flow. J. Fluid Mech. 586, 177–204.doi:10.1017/S0022112007006842. . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar