Turbulent mixing and beyond: non-equilibrium processes from atomistic to astrophysical scales
Abstract
Turbulent mixing is a source of paradigm problems in physics, engineering and mathematics. Beyond this important interdisciplinary role, it has immense consequences for a broad range of applications in astrophysics, geophysics, climate and large-scale energy systems. In two volumes, we summarize and provide a perspective on the topic through some 20 articles focusing on turbulent mixing and beyond. The volumes are grouped, somewhat loosely, into those associated with fundamental aspects of turbulence and those specific to Rayleigh–Taylor turbulent mixing.
We developed the programme ‘Turbulent mixing and beyond’ (TMB) to bring together researchers from different areas of science, engineering and mathematics, and to focus their attention on the fundamental problem of turbulent mixing [1,2].
Turbulent mixing is a non-equilibrium turbulent process that occurs in a broad variety of natural phenomena and technological applications, ranging from astrophysical to atomistic scales and from high- to low- energy-density regimes (see [2] and references therein). Examples include inertial confinement fusion, light–matter interaction, strong shock waves, explosions, supernovae and accretion discs, convection in stellar and planetary interiors, premixed and non-premixed combustion, hypersonic and supersonic flows—both wall-bounded and boundary-free—as well as the atmosphere and the ocean [3–10]. A good grasp on turbulent mixing is crucial for the cutting-edge technology in laser micro-machining and free-space optical telecommunications, and for traditional industrial applications in the areas of aeronautics [3,6,11,12]. In some of these applications (e.g. combustion processes), turbulent mixing should be enhanced, whereas in some others (inertial confinement fusion) it should be mitigated. However, in all circumstances, we have to understand the fundamentals of turbulent mixing, be able to gather high-quality data and derive knowledge from these data, and, ultimately, achieve a better control of these complex processes.
The TMB programme spans fluid dynamics, plasmas, high-energy-density physics, astrophysics, material science, combustion, Earth sciences, nonlinear physics, applied mathematics, probability, statistics, data processing, computations, optics and communications, and other areas [1]. Non-equilibrium turbulent processes are present everywhere, and are exceedingly difficult to study in their direct manifestation. At macroscopic scales, their properties depart substantially from those of canonical Kolmogorov turbulence [13–16]. At atomistic and meso-scales, their non-equilibrium dynamics differ from a standard scenario given by the Gibbs ensemble [17,18]. Their theoretical description is intellectually challenging, as it has to account for the multi-scale, nonlinear, non-local and statistically unsteady character of the dynamics [5,7,19–24]. Their numerical modelling effectively pushes the boundaries of computations to the exascale level and demands significant improvement of numerical methods in order to capture shocks, track interfaces and accurately account for the dissipation processes, non-equilibrium and singularities [18,25]. On the experimental front, these processes are a challenge to implement and systematically study in a well-controlled laboratory environment [26]. They are sensitive to details and are transient, and their dynamics impose unusually tight requirements on the accuracy and resolution of flow measurements, as well as on data acquisition rates [3,12,27,28]. Furthermore, because of their statistical unsteadiness, systematic interpretation of these processes from experimental data alone is neither easy nor straightforward [12,26].
Despite these challenges, the tremendous success that has been achieved in the past 20 years in large-scale numerical simulations (e.g. large-scale numerical modelling of a supernova explosion and nuclear burning [18,25]), in laboratory experiments (especially those in high-power laser systems [6,8]), in technology development (including possibilities for improvements in precision, dynamic range, reproducibility, motion-control accuracy, and data acquisition rate [12]), in theoretical analysis (in particular, new approaches for handling complex multi-scale, non-local and statistically unsteady transport [7,9,10,23,24]) renders unparallel opportunities to explore properties of turbulent mixing and probe the matter at the extremes. This success as well as the striking similarity in behaviour of non-equilibrium turbulent processes in vastly different physical regimes make this moment right for integrating our knowledge of the subject and for further enriching its development.
Thus, with the support of the international scientific community and international funding agencies and institutions, we founded the TMB programme. We saw its goals in the development of new ideas for understanding the fundamentals of turbulent mixing, in applications of novel approaches for description of a broad range of phenomena where these processes occur, and in the potential impact on technology development [1].
In 2010, the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A published the first volume based on the material presented at TMB-2007 [2]. Now, in two companion volumes, we summarize and provide a perspective through some 20 papers focusing on the theme of the programme. The first volume represents the broad variety of themes of the programme, and is concerned with fundamental aspects of turbulence, mixing and non-equilibrium dynamics. The second volume is focused on one of the key problems of the programme—the Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities and mixing.
We hope that the programme will expose the world of turbulent mixing phenomena and that an inquisitive mind will be fascinated by the opportunity to capture the universality of non-equilibrium dynamics and to elaborate new concepts, whose lucidity and simplicity can cut through the complexity of the problem.
Acknowledgements
The programme resulted from the collaborations of the members of the Coordination Board: S. I. Abarzhi, M. J. Andrews, S. I. Anisimov, H. Azechi, V. E. Fortov, S. Gauthier, C. J. Keane, J. J. Niemela, K. Nishihara, S. S. Orlov, B. A. Remington, R. Rosner, K. R. Sreenivasan, A. L. Velikovich. We greatly acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation, USA; European Office of Aerospace Research and Development (EOARD), UK, of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR), USA; Office of Naval Research Global (ONRG), UK; US Department of Energy, USA; US Department of Energy Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), USA; US Department of Energy Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), USA; US Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), USA; Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), France; UNESCO-IAEA International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Italy; The University of Chicago, USA; Institute for Laser Engineering (ILE), Osaka University, Japan; Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Academy of Sciences, Russia; and Photron (Europe) Ltd, UK. We warmly appreciate valuable contributions to the programme of the members of the Scientific Advisory Committee: S. I. Abarzhi, Y. Aglitskiy, G. Ahlers, M. J. Andrews, S. I. Anisimov, H. Azechi, E. Bodenschatz, F. Cattaneo, P. Cvitanovich, S. Cowley, S. Dalziel, R. Ecke, H. J. Fernando, I. Foster, Y. Fukumoto, S. Gauthier, B. Galperin, G. A. Glatzmaier, W. Gekelman, J. Glimm, W. A. Goddard III, F. Grinstein, J. Jimenez, L. P. Kadanoff, D. Q. Lamb, D. P. Lathrop, S. Lebedev, P. Manneville, D. I. Meiron, P. Moin, H. Nagib, A. Nepomnyashchy, J. Niemela, K. Nishihara, S. S. Orlov, S. A. Orszag, E. Ott, N. Peters, S. B. Pope, A. Pouquet, B. A. Remington, R. R. Rosales, R. Rosner, A. Schmidt, C.-W. Shu, K. R. Sreenivasan, V. Steinberg, E. Tadmor, Y. C. F. Thio, A. L. Velikovich, V. Yakhot, P. K. Yeung, F. A. Williams, E. Zweibel.
Footnotes
References
- 1
Abarzhi SI, Anisimov SI, Andrews MJ, Gauthier S, Nishihara K, Remington B, Rosner R, Sreenivasan KR& Velikovich AL . 2007Preface. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Turbulent Mixing and Beyond, Trieste, Italy, 18–26 August 2007. Google Scholar - 2
Abarzhi SI& Sreenivasan KR . 2010Introduction: turbulent mixing and beyond. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 1539–1546.doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0021 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0021). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 3
Gutman EJ, Schadow KC& Yu KH . 1995Mixing enhancement in supersonics free shear flows. Annu. Rev. Fluids 27, 375–417.doi:10.1146/annurev.f1.27.010195.002111 (doi:10.1146/annurev.f1.27.010195.002111). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 4
Hillebrandt W& Niemeyer JC . 2000Type Ia supernova explosion models. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 38, 191–230.doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.191 (doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.191). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 5
Zel'dovich Ya B& Raizer Yu P . 2002Physics of shock waves and high-temperature hydrodynamic phenomena, 2nd edn.New York, NY: Dover. Google Scholar - 6
Remington BA, Drake RP& Ryutov DD . 2006Experimental astrophysics with high power lasers and Z-pinches. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 755–807.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.78.755 (doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.78.755). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 7
Abarzhi SI . 2010Review of theoretical modelling approaches of Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities and turbulent mixing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 1809–1828.doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0020 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0020). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 8
Aglitskiy Y, 2010Basic hydrodynamics of Richtmyer–Meshkov-type growth and oscillations in the inertial confinement fusion-relevant conditions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 1739–1768.doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0131 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0131). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 9
Julien K& Knobloch E . 2010Magneto-rotational instability: recent developments. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 1607–1633.doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0251 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0251). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 10
Pouquet A& Mininni PD . 2010The interplay between helicity and rotation in turbulence: implications for scaling laws and small-scale dynamics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 1635–1662.doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0284 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0284). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 11
Choi JP& Chan VWS . 2002Predicting and adapting satellite channels with weather-induced impairments. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst 38, 779–790.doi:10.1109/TAES.2002.1039399 (doi:10.1109/TAES.2002.1039399). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 12
Orlov SS, Abarzhi SI, Oh SB, Barbastathis G& Sreenivasan KR . 2010High-performance holographic technologies for fluid-dynamics experiments. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 1705–1737.doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0285 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0285). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 13
Kolmogorov AN . 1941The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds number. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 30, 9–13.doi:10.1098/rspa.1991.0075 (doi:10.1098/rspa.1991.0075). Link, Google Scholar - 14
Batchelor GK . 1953The theory of homogeneous turbulence.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar - 15
Kraichnan RH . 1968Small-scale structure of a scalar field convected by turbulence. Phys. Fluids 11, 945–953.doi:10.1063/1.1692063 (doi:10.1063/1.1692063). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 16
Monin AS& Yaglom AM . 1975Statistical fluid mechanics, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar - 17
Evans DJ& Morriss GP . 2008Statistical mechanics of non-equilibrium liquids, 2nd edn.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar - 18
Kadau K, Rosenblatt C, Carles P& Alder BJ . 2007The importance of fluctuations in fluid mixing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7741–7745.doi:10.1073/pnas.0702871104 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0702871104). Google Scholar - 19
Rayleigh . 1882Investigations of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 14, 170–177.doi:10.1112/plms/s1-14.1.170 (doi:10.1112/plms/s1-14.1.170). Google Scholar - 20
Landau LD& Lifshitz EM . 1987Course of theoretical physics VI; fluid mechanics.New York, NY: Pergamon Press. Google Scholar - 21
Ladyzhenskaya OA . 1975Mathematical analysis of Navier–Stokes equations for incompressible liquids. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 7, 249–272.doi:10.1146/annurev.fi.07.010175.001341 (doi:10.1146/annurev.fi.07.010175.001341). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 22
Scheffer V . 1976Turbulence and Hausdorff dimension. Turbulence and the Navier–Stokes equations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 565, pp. 94–112. Berlin, Germany: Springer. Google Scholar - 23
Gauthier S& Creurer B . 2010Compressibility effects in Rayleigh–Taylor instability-induced flows. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 1681–1704.doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0139 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0139). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 24
Nishihara K, Matsuoka C, Ishizaki R& Zhakhovsky VV . 2010Richtmyer–Meshkov instability: theory of linear and nonlinear evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 1769–1807.doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0252 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0252). Link, ISI, Google Scholar - 25
Rosner R . 2003Solar physics: heat exposure. Nature 425, 672–673.doi:10.1038/425672a (doi:10.1038/425672a). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 26
- 27
Meshkov EE . 1969Instability of the interface of two gases accelerated by a shock. Sov. Fluid. Dyn. 4, 101–104.doi:10.1007/BF01015969 (doi:10.1007/BF01015969). Crossref, Google Scholar - 28
Andrews MJ& Dalziel SB . 2010Small Atwood number Rayleigh–Taylor experiments. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 1663–1679.doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0007 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0007). Link, ISI, Google Scholar


