Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
You have accessResearch articles

Defect segregation facilitates oxygen transport at fluorite UO2 grain boundaries

A. R. Symington

A. R. Symington

Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

,
M. Molinari

M. Molinari

Department of Chemistry, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

,
N. A. Brincat

N. A. Brincat

AWE plc, Aldermaston, Reading, Berkshire RG7 4PR, UK

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

,
N. R. Williams

N. R. Williams

AWE plc, Aldermaston, Reading, Berkshire RG7 4PR, UK

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

and
S. C. Parker

S. C. Parker

Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK

[email protected]

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

    Abstract

    An important challenge for modelling transport in materials for energy applications is that in most applications they are polycrystalline, and hence it is critical to understand the properties in the presence of grain boundaries. Moreover, most grain boundaries are not pristine stoichiometric interfaces and hence dopants are likely to play a significant role. In this paper, we describe our recent work on using atomistic molecular dynamics simulations to model the effect of doped grain boundaries on oxygen transport of fluorite structured UO2. UO2, much like other fluorite grain boundaries, are found to be sinks for oxygen vacancy segregation relative to the grain interior, thus facilitating oxygen transport. Fission products further enhance diffusivity via strong interactions between the impurities and oxygen defects. Doping produces a striking structural alteration in the Σ5 class of grain boundaries that enhances oxygen diffusivity even further.

    This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Energy materials for a low carbon future’.

    1. Introduction

    As of 2018, 66% of the world's energy is generated from coal, oil and gas, while solar/wind energy is responsible for less than 5% (figure 1) [1]. Rapid expansion of greener alternatives is a necessity in order to reduce the impact of global warming. Nuclear energy plays a vital role in twenty-first century energy production and is responsible for 11.1% of the world's energy production. Nuclear energy is an established technology that has functioned across the globe for half a century and has the potential to bridge the gap between fossil fuel and renewable technologies for a low carbon future [2]. Despite the ubiquity of nuclear energy production, there are still many poorly understood aspects [3]. Uranium oxide (UO2) is a common polycrystalline energy material used in nuclear energy, but it is challenging to work with due to its propensity for oxidation [3]. Ionic transport in polycrystalline materials is a common research question for many energy materials. In UO2, understanding oxygen transport is key to understanding the corrosion of the fuel. The fluorite lattice of UO2 accommodates additional oxygen with little expansion up to around UO2.5 stoichiometry but then undergoes a transition to a layered structure which is associated with a 36% volume increase [4,5]. In a nuclear power plant, this can cause swelling and eventually cracking of fuel rods, which can in turn release harmful contaminants into the environment [6]. Developing a fundamental understanding of oxygen transport properties in UO2 can therefore be used to improve the efficiency, lifespan and, most importantly, safety of nuclear power plants.

    Figure 1.

    Figure 1. Total contributions to global energy production from coal, gas, oil, hydroelectric, nuclear, wind and other sources. The data were obtained from the global energy database [1]. (Online version in colour.)

    Although oxygen transport and impurities are well documented in UO2 [712], there is no work considering the two phenomena together. The transport properties of GBs have received some attention in recent years but the results have been contradictory. Using experimental techniques, Marin et al. and Sabioni et al. both reported no change in the oxygen transport properties at grain boundaries [7,13]. Whereas, using molecular dynamics studies, Verwerft et al. [14] and Arima et al. [15] both reported enhanced oxygen transport at grain boundaries. The latter suggested that this effect was due to the misorientation angle of the grain boundaries. Further molecular dynamics studies by Vincent-Aublant et al. and Williams el al. have found enhanced diffusion within the grain boundary region at the atomic scale [16,17]. Grain boundaries in other fluorite materials are well studied although there are contrasting interpretations. For example, there are studies stating that it is generally accepted that diffusion along grain boundaries is faster than in the bulk due to the higher defect concentrations and the reduced activation energy of oxygen hops [17,18]. Whereas other studies claim that there is no fast ion diffusion along grain boundaries [19,20]. Furthermore, grain boundaries have been shown to have a blocking effect to ionic transport across the boundary. This is considered to be due to the space charge effect, whereby segregation of charged defects to the grain boundary causes a reduction in ionic transport across the boundary [2124].

    Chemical impurities, i.e. non-stoichiometric cations and anions, are present in high concentrations within UO2, particularly after time within a reactor [25]. Impurities can be introduced to the fuel in three common ways. The first is fuel fabrication, e.g. fuel pellet sintering. Iron cations are a common impurity, widely reported within UO2 at high concentrations (100–180 ppm [26]) and attributed to fuel pellet sintering with steel equipment at high temperatures 1750°C [13,2636]. A second common way for impurities to enter UO2 is as a fuel poison, e.g. gadolinium, which is a common UO2 dopant, acting as a burnable poison to control the reactivity of fuels in boiling water reactors [3741]. Gd2O3-doped UO2 has recently been investigated computationally and found to significantly increase the oxygen diffusivity of bulk UO2 [42]; furthermore, Th-doped UO2 has also been studied and found to have higher diffusivity [43]. The most common defects are fission products, which are produced during the burning of UO2. There are a wide variety of fission products, and they can be grouped into four categories based upon their chemical state. They can exist as volatile fission products (Kr, Xe, Br, I), metallic precipitates (alloys), ceramic precipitates (oxides based on Rb, Cs, Ba, Zr, Nb, Mo, Te) and oxides dissolved in the fuel (Sr, Zr, Nb, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm) [44].

    There is significant evidence, both experimental and theoretical, which shows that impurities segregate to UO2 grain boundaries [25,45] as well as other fluorite boundaries [46]. Hiernaut et al. found that fuel oxidation enhanced the segregation of non-soluble fission products from the bulk to the boundaries [47]. Insoluble fission gases such as Xe migrate to grain boundaries where they form bubbles [48,49]. Xe can undergo further chain decay leading to other stable fission products, e.g. La/Gd3+ has been shown to segregate to the grain boundaries, resulting in an increase in oxygen conductivity [50]. Recognizing the potential significance of this, in this work we investigate the combination of chemical impurities (fission products and fabrication impurities) within extended structural defects (grain boundaries) and the effect that this combination has on the oxygen transport properties of UO2.

    Despite the importance of grain boundaries (GBs) and fission products, their combined effect on the oxygen transport properties of UO2 remains poorly understood and a number of important questions remain. Using large-scale molecular dynamics (MD), we explore the effects of some common impurities (M = M3+, Gd3+ and La3+) on the oxygen diffusivity at grain boundaries in UO2, and we discuss our findings within the broader context of the literature.

    2. Methodology

    This work employs a classical potential model throughout, derived by Molinari et al. [51] and Williams et al. [17] in the fashion of Pedone et al. [52]. The model is based on rigid ions and uses partial charges (electronic supplementary material, table S1). This model has been shown to accurately reproduce the structural and elastic properties of UO2 [17].

    All molecular mechanics calculations, and all models of grain boundaries, were generated using the METADISE [53] code as described in detail elsewhere [17,54].

    All molecular dynamics simulations (MD) are performed using the DLPOLY code [55]. MD simulations of 5 ns were completed using a timestep of 1 fs with supercells of 8000 species (further information in electronic supplementary material, table S2) and an 8.5 Å cut-off. Equilibration was performed using the NPT ensemble until unit cell volume had been converged. Production simulations were carried out within a temperature range of 2000–3000 K at intervals of 250 K using the NVT ensemble with a Nose–Hoover thermostat. Cation impurities (Fe3+, Gd3+ and La3+) were substituted onto uranium lattice sites up to a concentration of 1% and were distributed randomly within the grain boundary region (figure 2). This low concentration was chosen to establish whether even a small concentration of dopants will affect oxygen transport, i.e. early stage of corrosion. All details on models are included in electronic supplementary material, table S2. These models are constructed under the approximation that impurities segregate at the boundary as suggested by experimentation [56,57]. Oxygen vacancies were introduced randomly to maintain charge neutrality throughout the entire structure. Oxygen vacancies reached their equilibrium distribution within the NPT MD simulation, which was confirmed by examining the evolution of the oxygen stoichiometry over time. Oxygen vacancies segregated during the early stages of the NPT simulation and this distribution persisted for the duration of the simulation.

    Figure 2.

    Figure 2. Schematic illustrating the model configuration for grain boundary and doping scheme. (Online version in colour.)

    Tracer-diffusion data for O within grain boundaries was obtained from a regional mean squared displacement (MSD) within the grain boundary according to

    ri2(t)=6D0t,2.1
    where 〈r2i(t)〉 is the MSD, D0 is the diffusion coefficient for oxygen, and t is time. The calculation of the MSD only takes into account those segments of atom trajectories for oxygen species that pass within the grain boundary region.

    We use the residence time τ to evaluate the average length of time that an oxygen atom spends in contact with each cation (U4+ and M3+). The τ was calculated from the residence time correlations function, which is defined as

    R(t)=1N0i=1NtΘi(0)Θi(t),2.2
    where N is the number of oxygen atoms within a 3 Å radius of the cation and Θi(t) is the heavyside function, which is 1 if the ith oxygen atom is in the 3 Å radius at t and 0 otherwise. An oxygen atom was only considered to have left the 3 Å radius if it did so for at least 2 ps, which allowed molecules that temporarily left then re-entered to be included in τ. Equation (2.2) is integrated to calculate τ.
    τ=0R(t)dt.2.3

    3. Results

    (a) Potential surfaces of grain boundaries

    The Σ3(111), Σ11(311), Σ5(210), Σ5, (310), Σ9(221) and Σ19(331) tilt grain boundary configurations have been constructed according to coincidence site lattice theory [58]. The potential energy surface was probed as a function of displacements of one grain relative to the other in the fashion of Galmarini et al. [54,59].

    A two-dimensional grid of energies was constructed to map the complexity of the grain boundary structure. At each point of the grid, a full minimization was carried out and the grain boundary formation energy σGB was calculated using

    σGB=EGBEBulk2A,3.1
    where EGB and EBulk are the energies of the grain boundary configuration and the UO2 bulk simulation cells, respectively, and A is the GB area. A gradient colour map for each boundary is presented in figure 3, where low and high energy grain boundary configurations are highlighted in the blue and red areas; the structures of the lowest energy configurations are also presented for each grain boundary.
    Figure 3.

    Figure 3. Potential energy surfaces for all grain boundaries (blue and red areas represent low and high energy GB structures), along with their lowest energy structure (only U atoms (blue) shown for clarity) and the grain boundary formation energy. (Online version in colour.)

    The lowest energy grain boundary structures for the Σ3(111), Σ5(210), Σ5(310), Σ9(221) and Σ11(311) show strong resemblance to experimental structures of CeO2, and doped ZrO2 [56,60,61]. The low σGB values of the Σ3 and Σ9 boundaries indicate the presence of high concentrations of these boundaries in UO2 polycrystals in line with experimental SEM analysis of UO2 samples [62].

    (b) Grain boundary doped structure

    As molecular mechanics calculations do not account explicitly for temperature effects, we have simulated all the lowest energy structures in figure 3 within the molecular dynamics framework. These were first annealed at high temperature and the structures are all consistent with previous calculations [17]. All stoichiometric structures were then doped following the doping scheme illustrated in figure 2. We have also considered a case wherein all impurities are located within the intergrain region of the structure and calculated the energy difference in order to confirm that segregation is energetically feasible. All energy differences are negative, showing that segregation is energetically feasible (figure 4).

    Figure 4.

    Figure 4. Energy difference per dopant between the doped GB structure and doped IG structure, calculated by subtracting the energy of the intergrain region doped structure from that of the GB-doped structure. (Online version in colour.)

    Doping does not cause any significant structural change with increasing temperature in the Σ3(111), Σ9(221), Σ19(331) and Σ11(311) boundaries. By contrast, the presence of impurities promotes an alteration to the structure of the Σ5(210) grain boundary and a partial structural change in the Σ5(310) grain boundary. Figure 5 depicts the time averaged two-dimensional density profiles of the centre of mass of the cations (U4+/M3+) in the Σ5 grain boundaries at different temperatures. A structural change has been previously reported in the Σ5(210) GB in stoichiometric UO2 and occurs within a temperature range of 2400–2600 K [17]; when the structure is doped the transition occurs between 1700 and 2000 K. In the Σ5(310), the partial structural change occurs above 2500 K for the doped boundary but it has not been reported in the case of stoichiometric UO2.

    Figure 5.

    Figure 5. (a,b) Time averaged two-dimensional density profiles of the centre of mass of the cations (U4+/M3+) displayed every 0.25 ps at different temperatures for a 1% Fe3+-doped Σ5(210) and (c,d) Σ5(310) grain boundaries. The red dots denote the U arrays parallel to the grain boundary plane. Patterns have been drawn to aid visibility. (Online version in colour.)

    The energy map for the two Σ5 boundaries is relatively complicated with many structural configurations within the low energy areas (figure 3). These structural changes as a function of temperature show that impurities stabilize metastable grain boundary configurations, which may not be accessible at low temperature when the structure is stoichiometric.

    (c) Oxygen vacancy segregation

    Oxygen vacancies were randomly distributed throughout the entire system (figure 2). During the NPT simulation step the mobile oxygen vacancies reach their equilibrium positions within the doped structure. To quantify the segregation of oxygen vacancies within the doped grain boundary region, we have evaluated reduction in oxygen concentration for all grain boundaries. As the behaviour in each boundary is similar, here we present the reduction in oxygen concentration (figure 6b) and Fe distribution (figure 6c) in the grain boundary region compared to the grain interior for the 1% Fe3+-doped Σ3(111) grain boundary (figure 6a). For clarity, IB, GB and C refer to UO2 layers in the interboundary region, within the grain boundary width and the grain boundary core, respectively.

    Figure 6.

    Figure 6. (a) Atomic configuration of Fe-doped Σ3(111) along [110] direction. (b) Percentage concentration of oxygen vacancies per UO2 layer relative to the stoichiometric structure. (c) Percentage concentration of Fe3+ cation per UO2 layer relative to the stoichiometric structure. For clarity, IB, GB and C refer to UO2 layers in the interboundary region, within the grain boundary width and the grain boundary core, respectively. (Online version in colour.)

    The radial distribution functions of cation (figure 7a) were calculated in the fashion of Lucid et al. [63] and provide evidence that the M3+ increases greatly at short distance (i.e. for the nearest neighbours) for all the M3+ compared to the U4+. This is evidence that Vo interact strongly with the impurity compared to the host uranium lattice. Further inspection of the peaks of the radial distribution functions shows that in contrast to Fe, La and Gd also have a second intense peak, which is evidence that for these two dopants the interaction with the vacancy is extended to the next-nearest neighbour positions. M3+ defect clusters have been observed experimentally in other M2O3-doped UO2 [64]. This has also been seen for doped CeO2 and linked to the difference in ionic radii of the dopants La3+, Gd3+, Fe3+ (1.061, 0.958, 0.645 Å, respectively) compared to the host cation U4+ (0.89 Å) [65].

    Figure 7.

    Figure 7. (a) Radial distribution functions for U4+, Fe3+, Gd3+ and La3+ (blue, green, red and purple lines) atoms within the grain boundary region with oxygen vacancies for the Σ3(111) GB. (bd) Residence time, coordination number in the first (0–3 Å) and second (3–6 Å ) shells for oxygen with U4+ (blue squares), Fe3+ (green circles), Gd3+ (red triangles) and La3+ (purple stars) cations as a function temperature in the Σ3(111) boundary. (Online version in colour.)

    We used residence time analysis, i.e. the average time spent by an oxygen atom within the coordination sphere of a cation impurity at the boundaries. We find that oxygen resides longest close to U4+ then La3+ > Gd3+ > Fe3+ (figure 7b) which again follows the atomic radii of the impurity cations. The average coordination number within the first coordination shell (0–3 Å from the impurity) and second coordination shell (3–6 Å from the impurity) are shown in figure 7c,d. Fe3+ in particular has a significantly lower average CN within the first coordination shell. By contrast, Fe has a higher average CN within the second shell, which supports the RDF data which suggest that oxygen vacancies reside within 3 Å of the Fe but up to 6 Å for Gd and La.

    The percentage increase in Vo concentration within the grain boundary region of each structure is presented as a function of temperature (figure 8). There is a common behaviour for our grain boundaries considered, whereby there is an increase in Vo concentration in the grain boundary region. The Σ5(310), Σ9(221), Σ19(331) and Σ11(311) boundaries show a 1.5–2.5% increase in vacancy concentration in the full grain boundary region regardless of the type of impurity up to a temperature of 2750 K, where the oxygen sublattice becomes significantly mobile. To separate the effects of the grain boundary and the impurities, we compared the oxygen stoichiometry of the stoichiometric structures with that of the IG-doped structures mentioned in figure 4 and found no change in the oxygen concentration at the boundary. This indicates that it is the impurities driving the segregation behaviour in UO2. Vo segregation at grain boundaries is generally accepted for fluorite structures, e.g. Gadolinium-doped ceria (GDC) and Yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ), in line with the space charge theory [23]. In this work, we have only considered the segregation behaviour of oxygen vacancies at grain boundaries and we have not calculated the electrostatic potential and the space charge effect. Arora & Aidhy [66] studied the energetics of Vo within UO2 grain boundaries and found vacancy segregation favourable when compared to the bulk material. Several other studies have reported within doped grain boundary systems [6771]. This represents the first time that impurity promoted oxygen vacancy segregation at the grain boundaries has been proposed in UO2.

    Figure 8.

    Figure 8. Percentage change in oxygen vacancy concentration within each grain boundary between 2000 and 3000 K. (Online version in colour.)

    (d) Oxygen diffusion at grain boundaries

    Our modelling results show that impurities significantly increase the oxygen transport within the grain boundaries. A simple visual representation is shown in figure 9 where a single GB oxygen atom over a 1 ns trajectory is depicted in grey for a stoichiometric (figure 9a) and 1% Fe3+-doped (figure 9b) grain boundary. This shows that there is localization of the oxygen diffusing species only in the grain boundary region, thus the grain boundaries act as a sink for vacancies. This behaviour is consistent with other studies investigating the effect of space charge on transport [24].

    Figure 9.

    Figure 9. (a,b) Structure of the stoichiometric and 1% Fe3+-doped Σ3(111) grain boundary structures. For clarity, oxygen, uranium and iron atoms are shown in red, blue and pink, respectively. To illustrate the effect of the grain boundary on diffusion, the full trajectory across 1 ns for a single oxygen atom has been shown for a grain boundary oxygen (grey) and an interboundary oxygen (orange). (c) Activation energies for the stoichiometric (blue), Fe3+ (green), Gd3+ (red) and La3+ (purple) doped grain boundary regions compared to the activation energy of oxygen diffusion in 1% M3+-doped bulk UO2 (2.4 eV). (Online version in colour.)

    The oxygen diffusion coefficients are shown in electronic supplementary material, figure S1 for all the grain boundary configurations. We find that the diffusion enhancement in stoichiometric boundaries follows the order Σ3(111) > Σ9(221) > Σ19(331) > Σ11(311) > Σ5(310) > Σ5(210) at a representative temperature of 2500 K. There is a significant difference in the diffusion coefficient of the grain boundaries, with a 1 order of magnitude difference between the lowest value of 0.049 × 10−9 m s−2 obtained for the Σ5(210) and the highest value of 0.53 × 10−9 m s−2 found for the Σ3(111) at 2500 K.

    Impurity cations further increase the diffusion within the grain boundary with Fe3+ having a greater effect than La3+ and Gd3+. The increase corresponds to 0.1 × 10−9 m s−2 for the Σ3(111), Σ9(221), Σ19(331), Σ11(311) boundaries and 0.5 × 10−9 m s−2 for the Σ5(210) and Σ5(310) boundaries. The large increase in the Σ5 series is due to the Σ5 structural changes discussed in §3a (figure 10).

    Figure 10.

    Figure 10. Cation density difference between the intergrain region and the grain boundary region (a). Time averaged two dimensional density profiles of the centre of mass of both U and M3+ (b) and 1% Fe doped (c) Σ5(210). (Online version in colour.)

    The calculated activation energy for a 1% concentration of M3+-doped bulk UO2 is 2.4 eV. While this is the activation energy of a UO2−x system and a comparison should be treated with caution, the activation energy of stoichiometric UO2 calculated experimentally −2.60 eV should be noted [72]. For clarity, we only present activation energies for oxygen diffusion within the grain boundary region (figure 9c). There is a general decrease in activation energy (Ea) from the stoichiometric bulk (2.4 eV) to the grain boundaries with the exception of the Σ5(210) and Σ5(310) boundaries. The stoichiometric Σ3(111)/Σ11(311) and Σ9(221)/Σ19(331) boundaries have similar Ea −1.7 and 1.6 eV, which is approximately half that of the intergrain region. Fe3+ and Gd3+ cause a small decrease in Ea in the Σ3(111) boundary, while La3+ has no effect. With the exception of Fe3+ in the Σ11(311) boundary, impurities cause a small increase in Ea in the Σ9(221), Σ19(331) and Σ11(311) grain boundaries compared to their stoichiometric counterparts. So while the impurities are promoting increased diffusivity, the activation energy is for the most part unchanged or slightly increased.

    For the stoichiometric Σ5 boundaries, there is a particularly high Ea, 4.3 and 2.7 eV for the Σ5(210) and Σ5(310), respectively, highlighting the poor transport properties of these boundaries. This shows that the Σ5 boundaries are blocking oxygen transport. Upon the introduction of impurities, there is a large decrease in the Ea for both the Σ5(210) boundary and a modest decrease for the Σ5(310) boundary, which we infer is due to the structural change discussed in §3a. In our previous work, we reported modest increases in transport in small segments of the Σ5 boundaries at short timescales. This work highlights that at long timescales when considering the boundary as a single structure, there is a blocking effect.

    A possible explanation for the low diffusivity in the Σ5 boundaries relates to the cation density at the boundary compared with the inter-boundary region. Upon going from the interboundary region to the grain boundary in the Σ3, Σ9, Σ11 and Σ19 boundaries, there is a slight decrease in cation density. Whereas in the Σ5 boundaries, there is an increase in cation density (figure 10). Upon introduction of impurities, there is a decrease in the cation density at the boundary due to a small increase in grain boundary width (figure 10c). Relating the cation density at the grain boundary to the transport properties of boundaries provides a possible explanation for the blocking nature of the Σ5.

    4. Discussion

    We studied the early stage of segregation of impurities at grain boundaries, and we demonstrated that even at a concentration as low as 1%, there is segregation of oxygen vacancies and an increase of local oxygen diffusion that will impact the oxygen storage capacity of the fuel and so the availability of oxygen to enter the corrosion process. Our results demonstrate that the impurity content of UO2 can have important implications for the corrosion of nuclear material.

    Our work illustrates the importance of the pre-reactor stage of the fuel cycle. Fe3+ is a potentially avoidable impurity that is found in all fuels as a result of the fuel pellet sintering. It has been shown that the amount of Fe within the fuel pellets can be reduced by different fabrication processes, e.g. high levels of Fe are characteristic of fuel produced by dry chemical conversion compared to other methods such as the water or gas flame methods [26]. Fabrication plants typically have a purity limit (generally 1250 ppm [73]). Given that impurities segregate to the grain boundaries [24,45], there will be high local concentrations of impurity within the grain boundaries, as opposed to an homogeneous distribution of the impurity in the grain interiors. Based upon these results, sintering methods that minimize the inclusion of Fe within the UO2 pellet are crucial to increasing the safety and lifetime of the fuel. Unlike Fe3+, our results add further evidence to previous experimental and theoretical studies that Gd3+ is enhancing the oxygen transport within the fuel and thus the corrosion. We have also provided information on the state of the grain boundaries within irradiated UO2. The presence of La3+ in UO2 is unavoidable as it forms through fission chain decay within the reactor [74]. These results show that La3+ will increase the corrosion through oxygen diffusion and in the case of the Σ5 boundaries cause structural changes. Experimental studies of post reactor fuel should pay careful attention to La3+ concentration within the spent fuel as its presence could indicate unstable grain boundary systems.

    These results can be expected to be applicable to the wider field of fluorite grain boundaries. While it is accepted that transport along grain boundaries is higher than bulk transport, transport across the grain boundaries is blocked by the space charge effect. The space charge effect is well documented in CeO2−x and doped zirconia and is due to the segregation of charged defects to the grain boundary [2224]. This causes a blocking effect of transport across the boundary. Our results show that the M3+ cations present at the boundary strongly attract oxygen vacancies (figures 68), pulling them to the boundary where they will remain trapped and facilitate high levels of oxygen transport along the boundary and thereby increase the rate of corrosion. Kubo et al. have seen a similar effect in UO2 whereby at Gd3+ concentrations at or exceeding 10 wt%, a potential barrier for the migration of electron holes formed [50]. This suggests that this behaviour (i.e. segregation o at grain boundaries and high diffusion in the grain boundary region) is indeed common to the fluorite structure and thus cation independent, whether U, Ce, or Zr. Space charge can be probed using molecular dynamics simulations by calculating the electrostatic potential from the atomic trajectories. This therefore presents an avenue for future study on this topic.

    5. Conclusion

    The atomistic effects of grain boundaries are important to fully understand the transport properties of UO2. Enhancing our fundamental understanding of these interfaces and their influence on oxygen ion transport is crucial for the future optimization of new nuclear fuel materials. In this study, we have quantified this effect using large-scale MD simulations. Our results support three key features. A common feature of a grain boundary structure is the segregation of oxygen vacancies at grain boundary regions, promoted by the impurity cations. This is related to the energetic preference for impurities to have a lower oxygen coordination number. The presence of different sites at the grain boundary provides a way for the material to accommodate the strain induced by the impurities. This increase in charge carriers (oxygen vacancies) induces an enhanced oxygen diffusivity which is localized at the grain boundary regions. Finally, there are structural changes occurring as a function of temperature for Σ5 grain boundaries, which are facilitated by the presence of impurities; as the potential energy surface of these boundaries is complex, the presence of impurities lowers the grain boundary energy allowing more structural configurations to be explored during the molecular dynamics simulation.

    Our modelling shows that GB are areas of fast ionic diffusion and thus may enhance corrosion. As the material starts corroding, oxygen enters via the grain boundaries and diffuses out into the individual grains to ultimately form higher oxide phases, which has been predicted previously [75]. Impurities within grain boundaries will, based upon our results, increase this process and ultimately accelerate the degradation of the fuel.

    Data accessibility

    Force field parameters, atomic configurations, diffusion coefficients and Arrhenius plots can be found in the electronic supplementary material. Atomic density analysis and the mean squared displacements were carried out using the polypy code [76]. The data supporting the findings of this study are openly available at https://zenodo.org/record/3228371#.XOgEWBZKipo.

    Author's contributions

    A.R.S. carried out the simulations, performed the data analysis and wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors; S.C.P., M.M. and A.R.S. designed the study; M.M. and S.C.P. derived the force fields used in the study.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Funding

    A.R.S. acknowledges AWE and EPSRC (EP/R010366/1) for funding. Computations were run on Balena HPC facility at the University of Bath and the ARCHER UK National Supercomputing Service (http://www.archer.ac.uk) via our membership of the UK's HEC Materials Chemistry Consortium funded by EPSRC (EP/L000202, EP/R029431).

    Acknowledgments

    M.M. thanks the University of Huddersfield for access to the Orion computing facility.

    Footnotes

    One contribution of 13 to a discussion meeting issue ‘Energy materials for a low carbon future’.

    Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4516277.

    Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.