Abstract
The initial conditions for the density perturbations in the early Universe, which dictate the large-scale structure and distribution of galaxies we see today, are set during inflation. Measurements of primordial non-Gaussianity are crucial for distinguishing between different inflationary models. Current measurements of the matter power spectrum from the cosmic microwave background only constrain this on scales up to k ∼ 0.1 Mpc−1. Reaching smaller angular scales (higher values of k) can provide new constraints on non-Gaussianity. A powerful way to do this is by measuring the HI matter power spectrum at . In this paper, we investigate what values of k can be reached for the Low-Frequency Array (LOFAR), which can achieve 1″ resolution at approximately 50 MHz. Combining this with a technique to isolate the spectrally smooth foregrounds to a wedge in –k⊥ space, we demonstrate what values of k we can feasibly reach within observational constraints. We find that LOFAR is approximately five orders of magnitude away from the desired sensitivity, for 10 years of integration time.
This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Astronomy from the Moon: the next decades’.
Footnotes
References
- 1. Planck Collaboration:
Akrami Y et al.2018Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06211) Google Scholar - 2.
Gil-Marín H et al.2016The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: RSD measurement from the LOS-dependent power spectrum of DR12 BOSS galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460, 4188–4209. (doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1096) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 3. Planck Collaboration:
Akrami Y et al.2018Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06205) Google Scholar - 4.
Neben AR et al.2016The Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array dish. I. Beam pattern measurements and science implications. Astrophys. J. 826, 199. (doi:10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/199) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 5.
Parsons AR et al.2010The Precision Array for Probing the Epoch of Re-ionization: eight station results. Astron. J. 139, 1468–1480. (doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/4/1468) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 6.
van Haarlem MP et al.2013LOFAR: the LOw-Frequency ARray. Astron. Astrophys. 556, A2. (doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220873) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 7.
Monsalve RA, Rogers AE, Bowman JD, Mozdzen TJ . 2017Results from EDGES High-band. I. Constraints on phenomenological models for the global 21 cm signal. Astrophys. J. 847, 64. (doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa88d1) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 8.
Beardsley AP et al.2016First season MWA EoR power spectrum results at redshift 7. Astrophys. J. 833, 102. (doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/102) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 9.
Mertens FG et al.2020Improved upper limits on the 21 cm signal power spectrum of neutral hydrogen at z ≈ 9.1 from LOFAR. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 1662–1685. (doi:10.1093/mnras/staa327) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 10.
Shaw JR, Sigurdson K, Sitwell M, Stebbins A, Pen UL . 2015Coaxing cosmic 21 cm fluctuations from the polarized sky using m-mode analysis. Phys. Rev. D 91, 083514. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.083514) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 11.
Bowman JD, Rogers AE, Monsalve RA, Mozdzen TJ, Mahesh N . 2018An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum. Nature 555, 67–70. (doi:10.1038/nature25792) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 12.
Datta A, Bowman JD, Carilli CL . 2010Bright source subtraction requirements for redshifted 21 cm measurements. Astrophys. J. 724, 526. (doi:10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/526) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 13.
Vedantham H, Shankar NU, Subrahmanyan R . 2012Imaging the Epoch of Reionization: limitations from foreground confusion and imaging algorithms. Astrophys. J. 745, 176. (doi:10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/176) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 14.
Trott CM, Wayth RB, Tingay SJ . 2012The impact of point-source subtraction residuals on 21 cm Epoch of Reionization estimation. Astrophys. J. 757, 101. (doi:10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/101) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 15.
Pober JC et al.2013Opening the 21 cm Epoch of Reionization window: measurements of foreground isolation with PAPER. Astrophys. J. Lett. 768, L36. (doi:10.1088/2041-8205/768/2/L36) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 16.
Liu A, Parsons AR, Trott CM . 2014Epoch of reionization window. II. Statistical methods for foreground wedge reduction. Phys. Rev. D 90, 023019. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.023019) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 17.
Cole PS, Silk J . 2019Small-scale primordial fluctuations in the 21cm Dark Ages signal. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02171) Google Scholar - 18.
Muñoz JB, Dvorkin C, Cyr-Racine FY . 2020Probing the small-scale matter power spectrum with large-scale 21-cm data. Phys. Rev. D 101, 063526. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063526) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 19.
Carr B, Silk J . 2018Primordial black holes as generators of cosmic structures. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 478, 3756–3775. (doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1204) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 20.
Latif MA, Ferrara A . 2016Formation of supermassive black hole seeds. Publ. Astron. Soc. Australia 33, e051. (doi:10.1017/pasa.2016.41) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 21.
Bernal JL, Raccanelli A, Verde L, Silk J . 2018Signatures of primordial black holes as seeds of supermassive black holes. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2018, 017. (doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/017) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 22.
Jester S, Falcke H . 2009Science with a lunar low-frequency array: from the dark ages of the Universe to nearby exoplanets. New Astron. Rev. 53, 1–26. (doi:10.1016/j.newar.2009.02.001) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 23. Planck Collaboration:
Ade PAR et al.2014Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 571, A16. (doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 24.
Varenius E et al.2015Subarcsecond international LOFAR radio images of the M82 nucleus at 118 MHz and 154 MHz. Astron. Astrophys. 574, A114. (doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425089) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 25.
Morabito LK et al.2016LOFAR VLBI studies at 55 MHz of 4C 43.15, a z = 2.4 radio galaxy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 2676–2687. (doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1501) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 26.
Patil AH et al.2017Upper limits on the 21 cm Epoch of Reionization power spectrum from one night with LOFAR. Astrophys. J. 838, 65. (doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa63e7) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 27.
Koopmans LV . 2017Current status of the LOFAR EoR key science project. Proc. Int. Astron. Union 12, 71–76. (doi:10.1017/S1743921318000583) Crossref, Google Scholar - 28.
Gehlot BK et al.2019The first power spectrum limit on the 21-cm signal of neutral hydrogen during the Cosmic Dawn at from LOFAR. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 488, 4271–4287. (doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1937) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 29.
Chapman E, Zaroubi S, Abdalla FB, Dulwich F, Jelic V, Mort B . 2016The effect of foreground mitigation strategy on EoR window recovery. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 2928–2939. (doi:10.1093/mnras/stw161) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 30.
Nijboer RJ, Pandey-Pommier M, de Bruyn AG . 2013LOFAR imaging capabilities and system sensitivity. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.4267) Google Scholar - 31.
Pritchard JR, Loeb A . 201221 cm cosmology in the 21st century. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 086901. (doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/8/086901) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 32.
Furlanetto S et al.2019Astro 2020 Science White Paper: fundamental cosmology in the dark ages with 21-cm line fluctuations. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.06212) Google Scholar - 33.
Fialkov A, Barkana R, Cohen A . 2018Constraining baryon–dark-matter scattering with the cosmic dawn 21-cm signal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 011101. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.011101) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 34.
Muñoz JB, Kovetz ED, Ali-Haïmoud Y . 2015Heating of baryons due to scattering with dark matter during the dark ages. Phys. Rev. D 92, 083528. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.083528) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 35.
Muñoz JB, Loeb A . 2018A small amount of mini-charged dark matter could cool the baryons in the early Universe. Nature 557, 684–686. (doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0151-x) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 36.
Berlin A, Hooper D, Krnjaic G, McDermott SD . 2018Severely constraining dark-matter interpretations of the 21-cm anomaly. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 011102. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.011102) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 37.
Costa AA, Landim RC, Wang B, Abdalla E . 2018Interacting dark energy: possible explanation for 21-cm absorption at cosmic dawn. Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 746. (doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6237-7) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 38.
Moroi T, Nakayama K, Tang Y . 2018Axion–photon conversion and effects on 21 cm observation. Phys. Lett. B 783, 301–305. (doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.07.002) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 39.
Pospelov M, Pradler J, Ruderman JT, Urbano A . 2018Room for new physics in the Rayleigh–Jeans tail of the cosmic microwave background. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 031103. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.031103) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 40.
Chianese M, Di Bari P, Farrag K, Samanta R . 2019Probing relic neutrino radiative decays with 21 cm cosmology. Phys. Lett. B 790, 64–70. (doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.09.040) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 41.
Joudaki S, Doré O, Ferramacho L, Kaplinghat M, Santos MG . 2011Primordial non-gaussianity from the 21 cm power spectrum during the epoch of reionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 131304. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.131304) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar - 42.
Mao Y, D’Aloisio A, Zhang J, Shapiro PR . 2013Primordial non-gaussianity estimation using 21 cm tomography from the epoch of reionization. Phys. Rev. D 88, 081303. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.081303) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 43.
Chongchitnan S . 2013The 21 cm power spectrum and the shapes of non-Gaussianity. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013, 037. (doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/03/037) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 44.
Bull P, Ferreira PG, Patel P, Santos MG . 2015Late-time cosmology with 21 cm intensity mapping experiments. Astrophys. J. 803, 21. (doi:10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/21) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar


