Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Restricted access

Stability or stasis in the names of organisms: the evolving codes of nomenclature

Sandra Knapp

Sandra Knapp

Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK

[email protected]

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

,
Gerardo Lamas

Gerardo Lamas

Departmento de Entomologia, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Apartado 14–0434, Lima–14, Peru

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

,
Eimear Nic Lughadha

Eimear Nic Lughadha

Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

and
Gianfranco Novarino

Gianfranco Novarino

Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK

Google Scholar

Find this author on PubMed

    Nomenclature, far from being a dry dusty subject, is today more relevant than ever before. Researchers into genomics are discovering again the need for systems of nomenclature—names are what we use to communicate about organisms, and by extension the rest of their biology. Here, we briefly outline the history of the published international codes of nomenclature, tracing them from the time of Linnaeus in the eighteenth century to the present day. We then outline some of what we feel are the major challenges that face the codes in the twenty–first century; focusing primarily on publication, priority, typification and the role of science in the naming of organisms. We conclude that the codes are essential for taxonomists in the pursuance of their science, and that the democratic nature of decision–making in the regulation of the rules of nomenclature, though sometimes perceived as a potential weakness, is in fact one of its great strengths.