Skip main navigationJournal menuClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Skip main navigationJournal menuClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Restricted access

Measuring the fate of plant diversity: towards a foundation for future monitoring and opportunities for urgent action

Published:28 February 2005https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1596

    Abstract

    Vascular plants are often considered to be among the better known large groups of organisms, but gaps in the available baseline data are extensive, and recent estimates of total known (described) seed plant species range from 200 000 to 422 000. Of these, global assessments of conservation status using International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) categories and criteria are available for only approximately 10 000 species. In response to recommendations from the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity to develop biodiversity indicators based on changes in the status of threatened species, and trends in the abundance and distribution of selected species, we examine how existing data, in combination with limited new data collection, can be used to maximum effect. We argue that future work should produce Red List Indices based on a representative subset of plant species so that the limited resources currently available are directed towards redressing taxonomic and geographical biases apparent in existing datasets. Sampling the data held in the world's major herbaria, in combination with Geographical Information Systems techniques, can produce preliminary conservation assessments and help to direct selective survey work using existing field networks to verify distributions and gather population data. Such data can also be used to backcast threats and potential distributions through time. We outline an approach that could result in: (i) preliminary assessments of the conservation status of tens of thousands of species not previously assessed, (ii) significant enhancements in the coverage and representation of plant species on the IUCN Red List, and (iii) repeat and/or retrospective assessments for a significant proportion of these. This would result in more robust Sampled Red List Indices that can be defended as more representative of plant diversity as a whole; and eventually, comprehensive assessments at species level for one or more major families of angiosperms. The combined results would allow scientifically defensible generalizations about the current status of plant diversity by 2010 as well as tentative comments on trends. Together with other efforts already underway, this approach would establish a firmer basis for ongoing monitoring of the status of plant diversity beyond 2010 and a basis for comparison with the trend data available for vertebrates.

    References

    • Baillie, J. E. M., Hilton-Taylor, C. & Stuart, S. N. (eds) 2004 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. A Global Species Assessment. Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK: IUCN. www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/red_list_2004/main_EN.htm. Google Scholar
    • Barthlott W, Biedinger N, Braun G, Feig F, Kier G& Mutke JTerminological and methodological aspects of the mapping and analysis of global biodiversity. Acta Bot. Fenn. 162, 1999a103–110. Google Scholar
    • Barthlott W, Kier G& Mutke JGlobale Artenvielfalt und ihre ungleiche Verteilung. Cour. Forsch. Inst. Senck. 215, 1999b7–22. Google Scholar
    • Brummitt R.KWorld geographical scheme for recording plant distributions. 2nd edn.2001Pittsburgh, USA:Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie Mellon University. Google Scholar
    • Buckland S.T, Magurran A.E, Green R.E& Fewster R.M. 2005Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 360, . Link, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Butchart, S. H. M., Stattersfield, A. J., Bennun, L. A., Shutes, S. M., Akçakaya, H. R., Baillie, J. E. M., Stuart, S. N., Hilton-Taylor, C., Mace, G. M. 2004. Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: Red List Indices for birds. PLoS Biol. 2, e383. Google Scholar
    • Butchart, S. H. M., Stattersfield, A. J., Baillie, J., Bennun, L. A., Stuart, S. N., Akçakaya, H. R., Hilton-Taylor, C. & Mace, G. M. 2005 Using red list indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B360. Google Scholar
    • Donaldson J.SIUCN/SSC Cycad Specialist Group2003Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK:IUCN. Google Scholar
    • Du Puy D.J, Labat J.-N, Rabevohitra R, Villiers J.-F, Bosser J& Moat JThe Leguminosae of Madagascar. 2002Kew, UK:Royal Botanic Gardens. Google Scholar
    • Farjon A& Page C.NConifers status survey and conservation action plan. 1999Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK:IUCN. Google Scholar
    • Farjon A, Page C.N& Schellevis N. 1993A preliminary world list of threatened conifer taxa. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2, 304–326. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Franklin J. 1995Predictve vegetation mapping: geographic modeling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 19, 474–499. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Gaston K.JSpecies richness: measure and measurement. Biodiversity. A biology of numbers and difference& Gaston K.J. 1996pp. 77–113. Eds. Oxford:Blackwell Science. Google Scholar
    • Golding J.S& Timberlake J. 2003How taxonomists can bridge the gap between taxonomy and conservation science. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1177–1178. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Govaerts R. 2001How many species of seed plants are there?. Taxon. 50, 1085–1090. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Graham C.H, Ferrier S, Huettman F, Moritz C& Townsend Paterson A. 2004New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. TRENDS Ecol. Evol. 19, 497–503. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Groombridge B& Jenkins M.DGlobal biodiversity: earth's living resources in the 21st century. 2000UK:World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Google Scholar
    • IUCNRed List Categories. Prepared by the IUCN Species Survival Commission1994Gland, Switzerland:IUCN. Google Scholar
    • IUCNIUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Version 3.1. Prepared by the IUCN Species Survival Commission2001Gland, Switzerland:IUCN. Google Scholar
    • Kirschner J& Kaplan Z. 2002Taxonomic monographs in relation to global Red Lists. Taxon. 51, 155–158. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 2005Loh, J., Green, R. E., Ricketts, T., Lamoreux, J., Jenkins, M., Kapos, V. & Randers, J. 2005 The Living Planet Index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 360, . ISI, Google Scholar
    • Lowry P.P& Smith P.P. 2003Closing the gulf between botanists and conservationists. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1175–1176. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Mabberley D.JThe plant book. 2nd edn.1997Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Mittermeier R.A, Myers N, Gil P.R& Mittermeier C.GHotspots: earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. 1999Mexico City:CEMEX, Conservation International and Agrupacion Sierra Madre. Google Scholar
    • Mutke J& Barthlott WSome aspects of North American phytodiversity and its biogeographic relationships. Results of worldwide ecological studies, Breckle S.-W, Schweizer B& Arndt U. 2000pp. 435–447. Eds. Stuttgart:Verlag Günter Heimbach. Google Scholar
    • Mutke, J. & Barthlott, W. In press. Patterns of vascular plant diversity at continental to global scales. In Plant diversity and complexity patterns: local, regional and global dimensions (ed. I. Friis & H. Balslev). Copenhagen: CA Reitzels Forlag for Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters. Google Scholar
    • Myers N. 1988Threatened biotas: ‘hotspots’ in tropical forests. Environmentalist. 8, 187–208. Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
    • NERC Centre for Population Biology, Imperial CollegeThe Global Population Dynamics Database. (1999). Google Scholar
    • Oldfield S, Lusty C& MacKinven AThe world list of threatened trees. 1998Cambridge, UK:World Conservation Press. Google Scholar
    • Schatz G.E. 2002Taxonomy and herbaria in service of plant conservation: lessons from Madagascar's endemic families. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 89, 145–152. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Scotland R.W& Wortley A.H. 2003How many species of seed plants are there?. Taxon. 52, 101–104. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Walter, K. S. & Gillett, H. J. (eds) 1998 1997 IUCN Red List of Threatened Plants. Cambridge, UK/Gland, Switzerland: UNEP – World Conservation Monitoring Centre/IUCN – The World Conservation Union. Google Scholar
    • Willis F, Moat J& Paton A. 2003Defining a role for herbarium data in Red List assessments: a case study of Plectranthus from eastern and southern tropical Africa. Biodivers. Conserv. 12, 1537–1552. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    Previous Article
    Next Article