Skip main navigationJournal menuClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Skip main navigationJournal menuClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Restricted access

Artificial selection and maintenance of genetic variance in the global dairy cow population

Published:07 July 2005https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1668

    Abstract

    Genetic improvement of dairy cows, which has increased the milk yield of cows in the UK by 1200 kg per lactation in 12 years, is an excellent example of the application of quantitative genetics to agriculture. The most important traits of dairy cattle are expressed only in females, but the main opportunity for selection is in males. Despite this, genetic improvement was achieved by the invention of a new statistical methodology, called ‘best linear unbiased prediction’ to estimate the breeding value of bulls. Intense selection of the best bulls, combined with the worldwide use of these bulls through artificial insemination and frozen semen, has created a global population and caused concern that the genetic variation available in the future will be reduced. Maintenance of genetic variation and long-term genetic gains would be aided by rational payment systems, use of crossbreeding where profitable, inclusion of all economically important traits in the breeding objective, recognition of genotype by environment interactions and the use of selection algorithms that balance estimated breeding value against the average relationship among the selected animals. Fortunately, all of these things are happening to some degree.

    References

    • Banos G, Philipsson J, Gundel M, Juga J& Sander-Nielsen U. 1993Linear model comparisons of black-and-white dairy bulls from the Nordic countries. Interbull Bull8. Google Scholar
    • Bunger LResults of long term selection for growth traits in laboratory miceProc. Fourth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 131990321–324. Google Scholar
    • Canavesi F, Boichard D, Ducrocq V, Gengler N, De Jong G& Liu Z. 2001Production traits European joint evaluation (PROTEJE). Interbull Bull. 27, 32–34. Google Scholar
    • De Souza V.A.B, Byrne D.H& Taylor J.F. 2000Predicted breeding values for nine plant and fruit characteristics of 28 peach genotypes. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 125, 460–465. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Dudley J.W76 generations of selection for oil and protein percentage in maize. Proc. International Conference on Quantitative Genetics, Pollak E, Kempthorne O& Bailry T.B. 1977pp. 459–473. Eds. Ames:Iowa State University Press. Google Scholar
    • Fikse W.F, Sigurdsson A& Banos G. 1995Genetic correlations between three countries for conformation traits. Interbull Bull. 11, . Google Scholar
    • Goddard M.E. 1992Optimum effective population size for the global population of black and white dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 75, 2902–2911. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Goddard M.E& Howarth JDynamic selection rules and selection of males to progeny testProc. Fifth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 181994306–309. Google Scholar
    • Goddard M.E& Smith C. 1989Optimum number of bull sires in dairy cattle breeding. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 1113–1122. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Guo Z& Swalve H.H. 1997Comparison of different lactation curve sub-models in test day models. Interbull Bull. 16, 75–79. Google Scholar
    • Haile-Mariam M, Bowman P.J& Goddard M.E. 2004Genetic parameters of fertility traits and their correlation with production, type, workability, liveweight, survival index, and cell count. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 55, 77–87. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Hassanin, A. & Ropiquet, A. 2004 Molecular phylogeny of the tribe Bovini (Bovidae, Bovinae) and the taxonomic status of the Kouprey, Bos sauveli Urbain 1937. Mol. Phylogeny Evol. 33, 896–907. Google Scholar
    • Hayes B, Carrick M, Bowman P& Goddard M.E. 2003Genotype×environment interaction for milk production of daughters of Australian dairy sires from test-day records. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 3736–3744. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Hayes, B. Carrick M. Callus M., Goddard M. 2004 Genotype by environment interactions for milk production in Australian dairy cattle. Final report to Dairy Australia. Google Scholar
    • Hazel L.N. 1943The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics. 28, 476–490. Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
    • Henderson, C. R. 1948 Estimation of general, specific and maternal combining abilities in crosses among inbred lines of swine. Ph.D. thesis. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Google Scholar
    • Henderson, C. R. 1973 Sire evaluation, genetic trends. Proc. Anim. Breed. Gen. Symp. Hon. Dr Jay Lush, 10–41. Amer. Soc. Anim. Sci. and Amer. Dairy Sci. Assoc., Champaign, Illinois. Google Scholar
    • Henderson C.R. 1975Use of relationships among sires to increase accuracy of sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 58, 1731–1738. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Henderson C.R& Quaas R.L. 1976Multiple trait evaluation using relatives records. J. Anim. Sci. 43, 1188–1197. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Hill W.G. 1982Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations. Genet. Res. 10, 255–278. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Hill W.GInferences from evolutionary biology to livestock breedingProc. Sixth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 23199832–39. Google Scholar
    • Hill W.G. 2000Maintenance of quantitative genetic variation in animal breeding programmes. Livest. Prod. Sci. 63, 99–109. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Hill W.G& Swanson G.J.T. 1983A selection index for dairy cows. Anim. Prod. 37, 313–319. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Jones L.P& Goddard M.EFive years experience with the animal model for dairy evaluations in AustraliaProc. Fourth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 131990382–385. Google Scholar
    • Juga J, Mäntysaari E.A& Pösö JEconomic response to total merit selection in Finnish Ayrshire breeding. Proc. International workshop on EU Concerted Action on Genetics Improvement of Functional Traits in Cattle1999pp. 79–87. Eds. The Netherlands:Wageningen. Google Scholar
    • Kidd K.K, Osterhoff D, Erhard L& Stone W.H. 1974The use of genetic relationships among cattle breeds in the formulation of rational breeding policies: an example with South Devon (South Africa) and Gelbveih (Germany). Anim. Blood Grps Biochem. Genet. 5, 21–28. Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
    • Kinghorn B.P& Shepherd R.KA tactical approach to breeding for information rich designsProc. Fifth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 181994255–261. Google Scholar
    • Klei B& Weigel K. 1998A method to estimate correlations among countries using data on all bulls. Interbull Bull17. Google Scholar
    • Kruuk L.E.B. 2004Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the ‘animal model’. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 359, 873–890. Link, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Loftus R.T, Machugh D.E, Bradley D.G, Sharp P.M& Cunningham P. 1994Evidence for two independent domestications of cattle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 91, 2757–2761. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Lohuis, M. M., Dekkers, J. C. M., 1998 Merit of borderless evaluations. In Proc. Sixth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production25, 169–172. Google Scholar
    • Lynch M& Walsh BGenetics and analysis of quantitative traits. 1998Sunderland, MA:Sinauer. Google Scholar
    • MacHugh D.E, Shriver M.D, Loftus R.T, Cunningham P& Bradley D.G. 1997Microsatellite DNA variation and the evolution, domestication and phylogeography of taurine and zebu cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus). Genetics. 146, 1071–1086. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Merila J, Kruuk L.E.B& Sheldon B.C. 2001Natural selection on the genetical component of variance in body condition in a wild bird population. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 918–929. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Milk Marketing Board. 1974The improved contemporary comparison: report of the breeding and production organisation. Milk Marketing Board No. 24, 80–86. Google Scholar
    • Meuwissen T.H.E. 1997Maximizing response to selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J. Anim. Sci. 75, 934–940. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Montgomerie W.A. 2004Future genetic progress of dairy cattle in New Zealand. Proc. NZ Soc. Anim. Prod. 64, 96–100. Google Scholar
    • Pedersen J, Langdahl C, Poso J& Johansson K. 2001A joint Nordic animal model for milk production traits in Holsteins and Ayrshires. Interbull Bull. 27, 3–8. Google Scholar
    • Pedersen J, Nielsen U.S& Aamand G.P. 2002Economic values in the Danish total merit index. Interbull Bull. 29, 150–154. Google Scholar
    • Robertson A& Rendel J.M. 1954The performance of heifers got by artificial insemination. J. Agric. Sci. 44, 184. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Schaeffer L.R. 1994Multiple-country comparison of dairy sires. J. Dairy Sci. 77, 2671–2678. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Schaeffer L.R& Dekkers J.C.MRandom regressions in animal models for test day production in dairy cattleProc. Fifth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 181994443–446. Google Scholar
    • Smith L.A, Cassell B.G& Pearson R.E. 1998The effects of inbreeding on the lifetime performance of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 81, 2729–2737. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Thompson J.R, Everett R.W& Hammerschmidt N.LEffects of inbreeding on production and survival in Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 2000a1856–1864. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Thompson J.R, Everett R.W& Wolfe C.WEffects of inbreeding on production and survival in Jerseys. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 2000b2131–2138. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Troy C.S, Machugh D, Balley J.F, Magee D.A, Loftus R.T, Cunningham P, Chamberlain A.T, Sykes B.C& Bradley D.G. 2001Genetic evidence for Near-Eastern origins of European cattle. Nature. 410, 1088–1091. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Veerkamp R.F, Dillon P, Kelly E, Cromie A.R& Groen A.F. 2002Dairy cattle breeding objectives combining yield, survival and calving interval for pasture-based systems in Ireland under different milk quota scenarios. Livest. Prod. Sci. 76, 137–151. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Wall E, Brotherstone S, Kearney J.F, Woolliams J.A& Coffey M.P. 2005Impact of non-additive genetic effects in the estimation of breeding values for fertility and correlated traits. J. Dairy Sci. 88, 376–385. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Weber K.E. 1990Increased selection response in large populations. I. Selection for wing tip height in Drosophial melanogaster at three population sizes. Genetics. 125, 579–584. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Wei M, Caballero A& Hill W.G. 1996Selection response in finite populations. Genetics. 144, 1961–1974. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Weigel K.A& Rekaya R. 1999A multiple-trait herd cluster model for international dairy sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 815–821. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Wray N.R& Goddard M.E. 1994Increasing long term response to selection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 26, 431–451. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Xiang B& Li B.L. 2001A new mixed analytical method for genetic analysis of diallel data. Can. J. Forest Res. 31, 2252–2259. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Yan W.K, Hunt L.A, Johnson P, Stewart G& Lu X.W. 2002On-farm strip trials vs replicated performance trials for cultivar evaluation. Crop Sci. 42, 385–392. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Zhang X.-S, Wang J& Hill W.G. 2002Pleiotropic model of maintenance of quantitative genetic variation at mutation–selection balance. Genetics. 161, 419–433. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Zhang X.-S, Wang J& Hill W.G. 2004Redistribution of gene frequency, changes of genetic variation following a bottleneck in population size. Genetics. 167, 1475–1492. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Zwald N.R, Weigel K.A, Fikse W.F& Rekaya R. 2003Application of a multiple-trait herd cluster model for genetic evaluation of dairy sires from 17 countries. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 376–382. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    Previous Article
    Next Article