Skip main navigationJournal menuClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Skip main navigationJournal menuClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Restricted access

How can a knowledge of the past help to conserve the future? Biodiversity conservation and the relevance of long-term ecological studies

Published:09 January 2007https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1977

Abstract

This paper evaluates how long-term records could and should be utilized in conservation policy and practice. Traditionally, there has been an extremely limited use of long-term ecological records (greater than 50 years) in biodiversity conservation. There are a number of reasons why such records tend to be discounted, including a perception of poor scale of resolution in both time and space, and the lack of accessibility of long temporal records to non-specialists. Probably more important, however, is the perception that even if suitable temporal records are available, their roles are purely descriptive, simply demonstrating what has occurred before in Earth's history, and are of little use in the actual practice of conservation. This paper asks why this is the case and whether there is a place for the temporal record in conservation management. Key conservation initiatives related to extinctions, identification of regions of greatest diversity/threat, climate change and biological invasions are addressed. Examples of how a temporal record can add information that is of direct practicable applicability to these issues are highlighted. These include (i) the identification of species at the end of their evolutionary lifespan and therefore most at risk from extinction, (ii) the setting of realistic goals and targets for conservation ‘hotspots’, and (iii) the identification of various management tools for the maintenance/restoration of a desired biological state. For climate change conservation strategies, the use of long-term ecological records in testing the predictive power of species envelope models is highlighted, along with the potential of fossil records to examine the impact of sea-level rise. It is also argued that a long-term perspective is essential for the management of biological invasions, not least in determining when an invasive is not an invasive. The paper concludes that often inclusion of a long-term ecological perspective can provide a more scientifically defensible basis for conservation decisions than the one based only on contemporary records. The pivotal issue of this paper is not whether long-term records are of interest to conservation biologists, but how they can actually be utilized in conservation practice and policy.

References

The references Behling & Pillar, and Gillson & Duffin, are now presented in their correct form.

19 January 2007

The legend of figure 2 was incorrect in print, and should read as follows:

Figure 2. Fossil trends through time of birds (Aves), flowering plants (Magnoliophyta) and gymnosperms (Gymnospermophyta). Data from Cleal (1993: Gymnospermophyta), Collinson et al. (1993: Magnoliophyta) and Unwin (1993: Aves) and tabulated in Benton (1993).

A detailed erratum will appear at the end of the volume. 7 February 2007

Notice of correction

    Previous Article
    Next Article