Skip main navigationJournal menuClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Skip main navigationJournal menuClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Restricted access

Culture, embodiment and genes: unravelling the triple helix

Published:19 September 2008https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0135

    Abstract

    Much recent work stresses the role of embodiment and action in thought and reason, and celebrates the power of transmitted cultural and environmental structures to transform the problem-solving activity required of individual brains. By apparent contrast, much work in evolutionary psychology has stressed the selective fit of the biological brain to an ancestral environment of evolutionary adaptedness, with an attendant stress upon the limitations and cognitive biases that result. On the face of it, this suggests either a tension or, at least, a mismatch, with the symbiotic dyad of cultural evolution and embodied cognition. In what follows, we explore this mismatch by focusing on three key ideas: cognitive niche construction; cognitive modularity; and the existence (or otherwise) of an evolved universal human nature. An appreciation of the power and scope of the first, combined with consequently more nuanced visions of the latter two, allow us to begin to glimpse a much richer vision of the combined interactive potency of biological and cultural evolution for active, embodied agents.

    References

    • Atkinson A& Wheeler M. 2004The grain of domains: the evolutionary-psychological case against domain-general cognition. Mind Lang. 19, 147–176.doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00252.x. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Atran S. 2001The case for modularity: sin or salvation?. Evol. Cogn. 7, 46–55. Google Scholar
    • Ballard D, Hayhoe M, Pook P& Rao R. 1997Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 20, 723–767. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Barkow J.H, Cosmides L& Tooby J. 1992New York, NY:Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Beach KThe role of external mnemonic symbols in acquiring an occupation. Practical aspects of memory, Gruneberg M.M& Sykes R.N. 1988pp. 342–346. Eds. New York, NY:Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Boyd R& Richerson P.JCulture and the evolutionary process. 1985Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Brooks, R. A. 1991 Intelligence without reason. In Proc. 12th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 569–595. San Mateo, California: Morgan Kauffman. Google Scholar
    • Buller D.JAdapting minds: evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. 2005Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Buss D.MThe evolution of desire: strategies of human mating. 1994New York, NY:Basic Books. Google Scholar
    • Buss D.MThe handbook of evolutionary psychology. 2005Hoboken, NJ:Wiley. Google Scholar
    • Clark ABeing there: putting brain, body and world together again. 1997Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Clark AMindware: an introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. 2001New York, NY:Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Clark, A. In press. Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Clark A& Chalmers D. 1998The extended mind. Analysis. 58, 7–19.doi:10.1111/1467-8284.00096. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Collins S.H, Ruina A.L, Tedrake R& Wisse M. 2005Efficient bipedal robots based on passive-dynamic walkers. Science. 307, 1082–1085.doi:10.1126/science.1107799. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Cosmides L& Tooby JFrom evolution to behavior: evolutionary psychology as the missing link. The latest on the best: essays on evolution and optimality& Dupre J. 1987pp. 227–306. Eds. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Coultas J.C. 2004When in Rome… an evolutionary perspective on conformity. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 7, 317–331.doi:10.1177/1368430204046141. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Crawford CEnvironments and adaptations: then and now. Handbook of evolutionary psychology: ideas, issues, and applications, Crawford C& Krebs D.L. 1998pp. 275–302. Eds. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
    • Dawkins RThe extended phenotype. 1982Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Dennett D.CKinds of minds: towards an understanding of consciousness. 1996London, UK:Weidenfeld & Nicolson. Google Scholar
    • Dupre JAre there genes?. In Philosophy, biology and life& O'Hear A. 2005pp. 193–210. Eds. Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Feldman M.W& Cavalli-Sforza L.LOn the theory of evolution under genetic and cultural transmission with application to the lactose absorption problem. Mathematical evolutionary theory& Feldman M.W. 1989pp. 145–173. Eds. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
    • Gaulin S.J.C& McBurney D.HPsychology: an evolutionary approach. 2001Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
    • Gould S.JMore things in heaven and earth. Alas poor Darwin: arguments against evolutionary psychology, Rose H& Rose S. 2000pp. 101–126. Eds. New York, NY:Harmony Books. Google Scholar
    • Gregory RMind in science: a history of explanations in psychology. 1981Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Griffiths P.E. 2001Genetic information: a metaphor in search of a theory. Philos. Sci. 68, 394–412.doi:10.1086/392891. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Griffiths P.E& Knight R.D. 1998What is the developmentalist challenge?. Philos. Sci. 65, 253–258.doi:10.1086/392636. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Hirsh-Pasek K& Golinkoff R.MThe origins of grammar: evidence from early language comprehension. 1996Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Hollich G, Hirsh-Pasek K, Tucker M.L& Golinkoff R.MA change is afoot: emergentist thinking in language acquisition. Downward causation, Anderson P, Emmeche C, Finnemann N.O& Christiansen P.V. 2000pp. 143–178. Eds. Oxford, UK:Aarhus University Press. Google Scholar
    • Hurley S.LConsciousness in action. 1998Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Hutto DFolk psychological narratives: the sociocultural basis of understanding reasons. 2008Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Jablonka E& Lamb M.JEvolution in four dimensions: genetic epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. 2005Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Johnson M. 2001Functional brain development in humans. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 475–483.doi:10.1038/35081509. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Kamiloff-Smith ABeyond modularity: a developmental perspective on cognitive science. 1992Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Kirby SLearning, bottlenecks and the evolution of recursive syntax. Linguistic evolution through language acquisition: formal and computational models& Briscoe E. 2002pp. 173–204. Eds. Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Kirsh D. 1995The intelligent use of space. Artif. Intell. 73, 31–68.doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00017-U. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Kirsh D& Maglio P. 1994On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cogn. Sci. 18, 513–549.doi:10.1016/0364-0213(94)90007-8. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Laland K.N, Odling-Smee J& Feldman M.W. 2000Niche construction, biological evolution and cultural change. Behav. Brain Sci. 23, 131–146.doi:10.1017/S0140525X00002417. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Lewontin R.CGene, organism, and environment. Evolution from molecules to men& Bendall D.S. 1983pp. 273–285. Eds. Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Lewontin R.CThe triple helix: gene, organism and environment. 2000Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Lorenz KEvolution and the modification of behaviour. 1965Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Mameli M. 2005The inheritance of features. Biol. Philos. 20, 365–399.doi:10.1007/s10539-004-0560-0. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Mareschal D, Johnson M, Sirois S, Spratling M, Thomas M& Westermann GNeuroconstructivism: vol. 1, how the brain constructs cognition. 2007aNew York, NY:Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Mareschal D, Sirois S, Westermann G& Johnson MNeuroconstructivism: vol. 2, perspectives and prospects. 2007bNew York, NY:Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Mataric MNavigating with a rat brain: a neurobiologically inspired model for robot spatial representation. From animals to animats: proceedings of the first international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior, Meyer J.-A& Wilson S. 1991pp. 169–175. Eds. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Maturana H& Varela F.JThe tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding. 1987Boston, MA:New Science Library. Google Scholar
    • Namy L, Smith L& Gershkoff-Stowe L. 1997Young children's discovery of spatial classification. Cogn. Dev. 12, 163–184.doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(97)90011-3. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Noë AAction in perception. 2004Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Norman DThings that make us smart. 1993Cambridge, MA:Perseus Books. Google Scholar
    • Odling-Smee J, Laland K& Feldman MNiche construction. 2003Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
    • Pfeifer R& Bongard JHow the body shapes the way we think. 2007Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Pinker SHow the mind works. 1997New York, NY:Norton. Google Scholar
    • Rowlands MThe body in mind. 1999Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Samuels R. 1998Evolutionary psychology and the massive modularity hypothesis. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 49, 575–602.doi:10.1093/bjps/49.4.575. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Schlesinger M& Parisi DConnectionism in an artificial life perspective: simulating motor, cognitive, and language development. Neuroconstructivism: perspectives and prospects, Mareschal D, Sirois S, Westermann G& Johnson M.H Vol. 22007pp. 129–158. Eds. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Smith E.A, Borgerhoff Mulder M& Hill J. 2001Controversies in the evolutionary social sciences: a guide for the perplexed. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 128–135.doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02077-2. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Sperber DExplaining culture: a naturalistic approach. 1996Oxford, UK:Blackwell. Google Scholar
    • Sporns OWhat neuro-robotic models can teach us about neural and cognitive development. Neuroconstructivism: perspectives and prospects, Mareschal D, Sirois S, Westermann G& Johnson M.H Vol. 22007pp. 179–204. Eds. Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Sterelny KThought in a hostile world: the evolution of human cognition. 2003Oxford, UK:Blackwell. Google Scholar
    • Sterelny K& Griffiths P.ESex and death: an introduction to philosophy of biology. 1999Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • Tomasello MThe cultural origins of human cognition. 1999Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Tooby J& Cosmides L. 1990The past explains the present: emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethol. Sociobiol. 11, 375–424.doi:10.1016/0162-3095(90)90017-Z. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Turner S.JThe extended organism: the physiology of animal-built structures. 2000Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Varela F.J, Thompson E& Rosch EThe embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. 1991Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • von Frisch KAnimal architecture. 1975London, UK:Hutchinson. Google Scholar
    • Wheeler MDo genes code for traits?. In Philosophical dimensions of logic and science: selected contributed papers from the 11th International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Rojszczak A, Cachro J& Kurczewski G. 2003pp. 151–164. Eds. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Wheeler MReconstructing the cognitive world: the next step. 2005Cambridge, MA:MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Wheeler MTraits, genes and coding. Handbook of the philosophy of biology2006pp. 381–411. Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands:Elsevier. Google Scholar
    • Wheeler, M. In press. Evolutionary models in psychology. In The Routledge companion to the philosophy of psychology (eds P. Calvo and J. Symons). Oxford, UK: Routledge. Google Scholar
    • Wheeler M& Clark A. 1999Genic representation: reconciling content and causal complexity. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 50, 103–135.doi:10.1093/bjps/50.1.103. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Wilson R.A. 1994Wide computationalism. Mind. 103, 351–372.doi:10.1093/mind/103.411.351. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • Wilson R.ABoundaries of the mind: the individual in the fragile sciences. 2004Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Wilson, R. & Clark, A. In press. How to situate cognition: letting nature take its course. In Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (eds M. Aydede and P. Robbins). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Ziemke T, Bergfeldt N, Buason G, Susi T& Svensson H. 2004Evolving cognitive scaffolding and environment adaptation: a new research direction for evolutionary robotics. Connect. Sci. 16, 339–350.doi:10.1080/09540090412331314821. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    Previous Article
    Next Article
    VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF