Skip main navigationJournal menuClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Skip main navigationJournal menuClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Restricted accessResearch article

Flow sensing by pinniped whiskers

Published:12 November 2011https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0155

    Abstract

    Beside their haptic function, vibrissae of harbour seals (Phocidae) and California sea lions (Otariidae) both represent highly sensitive hydrodynamic receptor systems, although their vibrissal hair shafts differ considerably in structure. To quantify the sensory performance of both hair types, isolated single whiskers were used to measure vortex shedding frequencies produced in the wake of a cylinder immersed in a rotational flow tank. These measurements revealed that both whisker types were able to detect the vortex shedding frequency but differed considerably with respect to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). While the signal detected by sea lion whiskers was substantially corrupted by noise, harbour seal whiskers showed a higher SNR with largely reduced noise. However, further analysis revealed that in sea lion whiskers, each noise signal contained a dominant frequency suggested to function as a characteristic carrier signal. While in harbour seal whiskers the unique surface structure explains its high sensitivity, this more or less steady fundamental frequency might represent the mechanism underlying hydrodynamic reception in the fast swimming sea lion by being modulated in response to hydrodynamic stimuli impinging on the hair.

    Footnotes

    One contribution of 18 to a Theo Murphy Meeting Issue ‘Active touch sensing’.

    References

    • 1
      Hanke F. D., Hanke W., Scholtyssek C.& Dehnhardt G.. 2009Basic mechanisms in pinniped vision. Exp. Brain Res. 199, 299–311.doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1793-6 (doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1793-6). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 2
      Hanke F. D.& Dehnhardt G.. 2009Aerial visual acuity in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) as a function of luminance. J. Comp. Physiol. A 195, 643–650.doi:10.1007/s00359-009-0439-2 (doi:10.1007/s00359-009-0439-2). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 3
      Hanke F. D., Scholtyssek C., Hanke W.& Dehnhardt G.. 2011Contrast sensitivity in a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). J. Comp. Physiol. A 197, 203–210.doi:10.1007/s00359-010-0600-y (doi:10.1007/s00359-010-0600-y). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 4
      Weiffen M., Möller B., Mauck B.& Dehnhardt G.. 2006Effect of water turbidity on the visual acuity of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). Vis. Res. 46, 1777–1783.doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.015 (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.015). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 5
      Au W. W. L., Ford J. K. B., Horne J. K.& Allman K. A. N.. 2004Echolocation signals of free-ranging killer whales (Orcinus orca) and modeling of foraging for chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 901–909.doi:10.1121/1.1642628 (doi:10.1121/1.1642628). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 6
      Nachtigall P. E.& Supin A. Y.. 2008A false killer whale adjusts its hearing when it echolocates. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 1714–1718.doi:10.1242/jeb.013862 (doi:10.1242/jeb.013862). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 7
      Dehnhardt G.. 2002Sensory systems. Marine mammal biology (ed. & Hoelzel A. R.), pp. 116–141. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar
    • 8
      Schusterman R. J., Kastak D., Levenson D. H., Kastak C. R.& Southall B. L.. 2004Pinniped sensory systems and the echolocation issue. Echolocation in bats and dolphins (eds , Thomas J. A.& Vater C. M. M.), pp. 531–535. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • 9
      Hyvärinen H.. 1989Diving in darkness: whiskers are sense organs of the ringed seal (Phoca hispida saimensis). J. Zool. 218, 663–678.doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1989.tb05008.x (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1989.tb05008.x). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 10
      Ebara S., Kumamoto K., Matsuura T., Mazurkiewicz J. E.& Rice F. L.. 2002Similarities and differences in the innervation of mystacial vibrissal follicle–sinus complexes in the rat and cat: a confocal microscopic study. J. Comp. Neurol. 449, 103–119.doi:10.1002/cne.10277 (doi:10.1002/cne.10277). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 11
      Dehnhardt G.& Mauck B.. 2008Mechanoreception in secondarily aquatic vertebrates. Sensory evolution on the threshold: adaptations in secondarily aquatic vertebrates (eds , Thewissen J. G. M.& Nummela S.), pp. 295–314. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
    • 12
      Watkins W. A.& Wartzok D.. 1985Sensory biophysics of marine mammals. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 1, 219–260.doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1985.tb00011.x (doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.1985.tb00011.x). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 13
      Ginter C. C., Fish F. E.& Marshall C. D.Morphological analysis of the bumpy profile of phocid vibrissae. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 26, 733–743.doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2009.00365.x (doi:10.1111/j.1748-7692.2009.00365.x). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 14
      Hanke W., Witte M., Miersch L., Brede M., Oeffner J., Michael M., Hanke F., Leder A.& Dehnhardt G.. 2010Harbor seal vibrissa morphology suppresses vortex-induced vibrations. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 2665–2672.doi:10.1242/jeb.043216 (doi:10.1242/jeb.043216). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 15
      Hyvärinen H., Kangasperko H.& Peura R.. 1977Functional structure of the carpal and ventral vibrissae of the squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris). J. Zool. 182, 457–466. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 16
      Fundin B. T., Arvidsson J.& Rice F. L.. 1995Innervation of nonmystacial vibrissae in the adult rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 357, 501–512.doi:10.1002/cne.903570402 (doi:10.1002/cne.903570402). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 17
      Dykes R. W.. 1975Afferent fibers from mystacial vibrissae of cats and seals. J. Neurophysiol. 38, 650–662. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 18
      Kastelein R. A.& van Gaalen M. A.. 1988The sensitivity of the vibrissae of a Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens). Aquat. Mamm. 14, 123–133. Google Scholar
    • 19
      Dehnhardt G.. 1990Preliminary results from psychophysical studies on the tactile sensitivity in marine mammals. Sensory abilities of cetaceans (eds , Thomas J. A.& Kastelein R. A.), pp. 435–446. New York, NY: Plenum Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 20
      Dehnhardt G.. 1994Tactile size discrimination by a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) using its mystacial vibrissae. J. Comp. Physiol. A 175, 791–800. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 21
      Dehnhardt G.& Dücker G.. 1996Tactual discrimination of size and shape by a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus). Anim. Learn. Behav. 24, 366–374.doi:10.3758/BF03199008 (doi:10.3758/BF03199008). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 22
      Dehnhardt G.& Kaminski A.. 1995Sensitivity of the mystacial vibrissae of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) for size differences of actively touched objects. J. Exp. Biol. 198, 2317–2323. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 23
      Dehnhardt G., Mauck B.& Hyvärinen H.. 1998Ambient temperature does not affect the tactile sensitivity of mystacial vibrissae of harbour seals. J. Exp. Biol. 201, 3023–3029. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 24
      Welker C. I.. 1964Analysis of sniffing in the albino rat. Behaviour 22, 223–244.doi:10.1163/156853964X00030 (doi:10.1163/156853964X00030). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 25
      Wineski L. E.. 1985Facial morphology and vibrissal movement in the golden hamster. J. Morphol. 183, 199–217.doi:10.1002/jmor.1051830208 (doi:10.1002/jmor.1051830208). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 26
      Carvell G. E.& Simons D. J.. 1990Biometric analyses of vibrissal tactile discrimination in the rat. J. Neurosci. 10, 2638–2648. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 27
      Lederman S. J.& Klatzky R. L.. 1987Hand movements—a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 19, 342–368.doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90008-9 (doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90008-9). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 28
      Bleckmann H.. 1994Reception of hydrodynamic stimuli in aquatic and semiaquatic animals, 41st edn, pp. 1–115. Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer Verlag. Google Scholar
    • 29
      Dehnhardt G., Mauck B.& Bleckmann H.. 1998Seal whiskers detect water movements. Nature 394, 235–236.doi:10.1038/28303 (doi:10.1038/28303). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 30
      Blickhan R., Krick C. M., Zehren D.& Nachtigall W.. 1992Generation of a vortex chain in the wake of a subundulatory swimmer. Naturwissenschaften 79, 220–221.doi:10.1007/BF01227131 (doi:10.1007/BF01227131). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 31
      Müller U. K., van den Heuvel B. L. E., Stamhuis E. J.& Videler J. J.. 1997Fish foot prints: morphology and energetics of the wake of a continuously swimming mullet. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 2893–2906. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 32
      Nauen J. C.& Lauder G. V.. 2002Quantification of the wake of a rainbow trout using three-dimensional stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 3271–3279. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 33
      Hanke W., Brücker C.& Bleckmann H.. 2000The ageing of the low-frequency water disturbances caused by swimming goldfish and its possible relevance to prey detection. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 1193–1200. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 34
      Hanke W.& Bleckmann H.. 2004The hydrodynamic trails of Lepomis gibbosus (Centrarchidae), Colomesus psittacus (Tetraodontidae) and Thysochromis ansorgii (Cichlidae) measured with scanning particle image velocimetry. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 1585–1596.doi:10.1242/jeb.00922 (doi:10.1242/jeb.00922). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 35
      Dehnhardt G., Mauck B., Hanke W.& Bleckmann H.. 2001Hydrodynamic trail following in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). Science 293, 102–104.doi:10.1126/science.1060514 (doi:10.1126/science.1060514). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 36
      Schulte-Pelkum N., Wieskotten S., Hanke W., Dehnhardt G.& Mauck B.. 2007Tracking of biogenic hydrodynamic trails in a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). J. Exp. Biol. 210, 781–787.doi:10.1242/jeb.02708 (doi:10.1242/jeb.02708). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 37
      Wieskotten S., Dehnhardt G., Mauck B., Miersch L.& Hanke W.. 2010The impact of glide phases on the trackability of hydrodynamic trails in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina). J. Exp. Biol. 213, 3734–3740.doi:10.1242/jeb.047134 (doi:10.1242/jeb.047134). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 38
      Blake R. W.. 1983Functional design and burst-and-coast swimming in fishes. Can. J. Zool. 61, 2491–2494.doi:10.1139/z83-330 (doi:10.1139/z83-330). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 39
      Videler J. J.& Weihs D.. 1982Energetic advantages of burst-and-coast swimming of fish at high speeds. J. Exp. Biol. 97, 169–178. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 40
      Drucker E. G.& Lauder G. V.. 2002Experimental hydrodynamics of fish locomotion: functional insights from wake visualization. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42, 243–257.doi:10.1093/icb/42.2.243 (doi:10.1093/icb/42.2.243). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 41
      Nauen J. C.& Lauder G. V.. 2002Hydrodynamics of caudal fin locomotion by chub mackerel, Scomber japonicus (Scombridae). J. Exp. Biol. 205, 1709–1724. Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 42
      Fish F. E.& Lauder G. V.. 2006Passive and active flow control by swimming fishes and mammals. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 193–224.doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092201 (doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092201). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 43
      Standen E. M.& Lauder G. V.. 2007Hydrodynamic function of dorsal and anal fins in brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). J. Exp. Biol. 210, 325–339.doi:10.1242/jeb.02661 (doi:10.1242/jeb.02661). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 44
      Tytell E. D., Standen E. M.& Lauder G. V.. 2008Escaping Flatland: three-dimensional kinematics and hydrodynamics of median fins in fishes. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 187–195.doi:10.1242/jeb.008128 (doi:10.1242/jeb.008128). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 45
      Wieskotten S., Dehnhardt G., Mauck B., Miersch L.& Hanke W.. 2010Hydrodynamic determination of the moving direction of an artificial fin by a harbour seal (Phoca vitulina). J. Exp. Biol. 213, 2194–2200.doi:10.1242/jeb.041699 (doi:10.1242/jeb.041699). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 46
      Wieskotten S., Mauck B., Miersch L., Dehnhardt G.& Hanke W.. 2011Hydrodynamic discrimination of wakes caused by objects of different size or shape in a harbour seal (phoca vitulina).J. Exp. Biol. 214, 1922–1930.doi:10.1242/jeb.053926 (doi:10.1242/jeb.053926). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 47
      Gallon S. L., Sparling C. E., Georges J. Y., Fedak M. A., Biuw M.& Thompson D.. 2007How fast does a seal swim? Variations in swimming behaviour under differing foraging conditions. J. Exp. Biol. 210, 3285–3294.doi:10.1242/jeb.007542 (doi:10.1242/jeb.007542). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 48
      Gläser N., Wieskotten S., Otter C., Dehnhardt G.& Hanke W.. 2011Hydrodynamic trail following in a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus). J. Comp. Physiol. A 197, 141–151.doi:10.1007/s00359-010-0594-5 (doi:10.1007/s00359-010-0594-5). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 49
      Fish F. E., Howle L. E.& Murray M. M.. 2008Hydrodynamic flow control in marine mammals. Integr. Comp. Biol. 48, 788–800.doi:10.1093/icb/icn029 (doi:10.1093/icb/icn029). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 50
      Wieskotten S., Mauck B., Miersch L., Dehnhardt G.& Hanke W.. 2011Hydrodynamic discrimination of wakes caused by objects of different size or shape in a harbour seal (Phoca vitulina). J. Exp. Biol. 214, 1922–1930.doi:10.1242/jeb.053926 (doi:10.1242/jeb.053926). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 51
      Miklosovic D. S., Murray M. M., Howle L. E.& Fish F. E.. 2004Leading-edge tubercles delay stall on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) flippers. Phys. Fluids 16, L39–L42.doi:10.1063/1.1688341 (doi:10.1063/1.1688341). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 52
      Fish F. E., Miklosovic D. S., Murray M. M.& Howle L. E.. 2003Delayed stall due to leading edge tubercles of the humpback whale flipper. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43, 903. ISI, Google Scholar
    • 53
      Solomon J. H.& Hartmann M. J.. 2006Robotic whiskers used to sense features. Nature 443, 525.doi:10.1038/443525a (doi:10.1038/443525a). Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar
    Previous Article
    Next Article