You have access
Research articles
Research articlesA simple and general explanation for the evolution of altruism
Published:02 September 2008https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0829
Abstract
We present a simple framework that highlights the most fundamental requirement for the evolution of altruism: assortment between individuals carrying the cooperative genotype and the helping behaviours of others with which these individuals interact. We partition the fitness effects on individuals into those due to self and those due to the ‘interaction environment’, and show that it is the latter that is most fundamental to understanding the evolution of altruism. We illustrate that while kinship or genetic similarity among those interacting may generate a favourable structure of interaction environments, it is not a fundamental requirement for the evolution of altruism, and even suicidal aid can theoretically evolve without help ever being exchanged among genetically similar individuals. Using our simple framework, we also clarify a common confusion made in the literature between alternative fitness accounting methods (which may equally apply to the same biological circumstances) and unique causal mechanisms for creating the assortment necessary for altruism to be favoured by natural selection.
References
Ackermann M, Stecher B, Freed N.E, Songhet P, Hardt W.-D& Doebeli M . 2008Self-destructive cooperation mediated by phenotypic noise. Nature. 454, 987–990.doi:10.1038/nature07067. . Crossref, PubMed, Google ScholarAxelrod R& Hamilton W.D . 1981The evolution of cooperation. Science. 211, 1390–1396.doi:10.1126/science.7466396. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarDoebeli M& Knowlton N . 1998The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 95, 8676–8680.doi:10.1073/pnas.95.15.8676. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarFletcher J.A& Zwick M . 2006Unifying the theories of inclusive fitness and reciprocal altruism. Am. Nat. 168, 252–262.doi:10.1086/506529. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarFletcher J.A& Zwick M . 2007The evolution of altruism: game theory in multilevel selection and inclusive fitness. J. Theor. Biol. 245, 26–36.doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.030. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarFletcher J.A, Zwick M, Doebeli M& Wilson D.S . 2006What's wrong with inclusive fitness?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 597–598.doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.08.008. . Crossref, PubMed, Google ScholarFoster K.R, Wenseleers T& Ratnieks F.L.W . 2006Kin selection is the key to altruism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 57–60.doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.020. . Crossref, PubMed, Google ScholarFrank S.A Foundations of social evolution. 1998Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press. Google ScholarHamilton W.D . 1964The genetical evolution of social behavior I and II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–52.doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarHamilton W.D Innate social aptitudes of man: an approach from evolutionary genetics. Biosocial anthropology& Fox R . 1975pp. 133–155. Eds. New York, NY:Wiley. Google ScholarHauert C& Doebeli M . 2004Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game. Nature. 428, 643–646.doi:10.1038/nature02360. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarKerr B& Godfrey-Smith P . 2002On Price's equation and average fitness. Biol. Philos. 17, 551–565.doi:10.1023/A:1020572704223. . Crossref, Google ScholarLehmann L& Keller L . 2006The evolution of cooperation. A general framework and a classification of models. J. Evol. Biol. 19, 1365–1376.doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01119.x. . Crossref, PubMed, Google ScholarLieberman E, Hauert C& Nowak M.A . 2005Evolutionary dynamics on graphs. Nature. 433, 312–316.doi:10.1038/nature03204. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarMaynard Smith J . 1998The origin of altruism. Nature. 393, 639–640.doi:10.1038/31383. . Crossref, Google ScholarMcNamara J.M, Barta Z, Fromhage L& Houston A.I . 2008The coevolution of choosiness and cooperation. Nature. 451, 189–192.doi:10.1038/nature06455. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarNowak M.A . 2006Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science. 314, 1560–1563.doi:10.1126/science.1133755. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarNowak M.A& May R.M . 1992Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature. 359, 826–829.doi:10.1038/359826a0. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarNowak M.A& Sigmund K . 1992Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature. 355, 250–253.doi:10.1038/355250a0. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarNowak M.A& Sigmund K . 1993A strategy of win-stay lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game. Nature. 364, 56–58.doi:10.1038/364056a0. . Crossref, PubMed, Google ScholarNowak M.A& Sigmund K Games on grids. The geometry of ecological interactions: simplifying spatial complexity, Dieckmann U, Law R& Metz J.A.J . 2000pp. 135–150. Eds. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google ScholarNunney L . 1985Group selection, altruism, and structured-deme models. Am. Nat. 126, 212–230.doi:10.1086/284410. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarNunney L . 2000Altruism, benevolence and culture: commentary discussion of Sober and Wilson's ‘Unto others’. J. Conscious. Stud. 7, 231–236. Google ScholarOlson M The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. 1971Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. Google ScholarPepper J.W . 2000Relatedness in trait group models of social evolution. J. Theor. Biol. 206, 355–368.doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.2132. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarQueller D.C . 1985Kinship, reciprocity and synergism in the evolution of social behaviour. Nature. 318, 366–367.doi:10.1038/318366a0. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarQueller D.C . 1992Quantitative genetics, inclusive fitness, and group selection. Am. Nat. 139, 540–558.doi:10.1086/285343. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarSober E& Wilson D.S Unto others, the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. 1998Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press. Google ScholarTaylor P.D& Frank S.A . 1996How to make a kin selection model. J. Theor. Biol. 180, 27–37.doi:10.1006/jtbi.1996.0075. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarTaylor P.D, Wild G& Gardner A . 2007Direct fitness or inclusive fitness: how shall we model kin selection?. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 301–309.doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01196.x. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarWade M.J . 1980Kin selection: its components. Science. 210, 665–667.doi:10.1126/science.210.4470.665. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarWest S.A, Griffin A.S& Gardner A Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Curr. Biol. 17, 2007aR661–R672.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.004. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarWest S.A, Griffin A.S& Gardner A Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 2007b415–432.doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarWest S.A, Griffin A.S& Gardner A . 2008Social semantics: how useful has group selection been?. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 374–385.doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01458.x. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarWilson D.S . 1979Structured demes and trait-group variation. Am. Nat. 113, 606–610.doi:10.1086/283417. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarWilson D.S . 1990Weak altruism, strong group selection. Oikos. 59, 135–140.doi:10.2307/3545133. . Crossref, ISI, Google ScholarWilson D.S . 2004What is wrong with absolute individual fitness?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 245–248.doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.02.008. . Crossref, PubMed, Google ScholarWilson D.S . 2008Social semantics: toward a genuine pluralism in the study of social behaviour. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 368–373.doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01500.x. . Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google ScholarWilson E.O . 2005Kin selection as the key to altruism: its rise and fall. Soc. Res. 72, 159–168. Google ScholarWilson E.O& Hölldobler B . 2005Eusociality: origin and consequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 102, 13 367–13 371.doi:10.1073/pnas.0505858102. . Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
