Relationship satisfaction and outcome in women who meet their partner while using oral contraception
Abstract
Hormonal variation over the menstrual cycle alters women's preferences for phenotypic indicators of men's genetic or parental quality. Hormonal contraceptives suppress these shifts, inducing different mate preference patterns among users and non-users. This raises the possibility that women using oral contraception (OC) choose different partners than they would do otherwise but, to date, we know neither whether these laboratory-measured effects are sufficient to exert real-world consequences, nor what these consequences would be. Here, we test for differences in relationship quality and survival between women who were using or not using OC when they chose the partner who fathered their first child. Women who used OC scored lower on measures of sexual satisfaction and partner attraction, experienced increasing sexual dissatisfaction during the relationship, and were more likely to be the one to initiate an eventual separation if it occurred. However, the same women were more satisfied with their partner's paternal provision, and thus had longer relationships and were less likely to separate. These effects are congruent with evolutionary predictions based on cyclical preference shifts. Our results demonstrate that widespread use of hormonal contraception may contribute to relationship outcome, with implications for human reproductive behaviour, family cohesion and quality of life.
References
- 1
Penton-Voak I. S., Perrett D. I., Castles D. L., Kobayashi T., Burt D. M., Murray L. K.& Minamisawa R. . 1999 Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature 399, 741–742.doi:10.1038/21557 (doi:10.1038/21557). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 2
Gangestad S. W.& Thornhill R. . 2008 Human oestrus. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 991–1000.doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1425 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1425). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 3
Roberts S. C.& Little A. C. . 2008 Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences. Genetica 132, 309–321.doi:10.1007/s10709-007-9174-1 (doi:10.1007/s10709-007-9174-1). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 4
Jones B. C., DeBruine L. M., Perrett D. I., Little A. C., Feinberg D. R.& Law Smith M. J. . 2008 Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Arch. Sex Behav. 37, 78–84.doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9268-y (doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9268-y). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 5
Little A. C., Jones B. C., Penton-Voak I. S., Burt D. M.& Perrett D. I. . 2002 Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1095–1100.doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.1984 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.1984). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 6
Feinberg D. R., DeBruine L. M., Jones B. C.& Little A. C. . 2008 Correlated preferences for men's facial and vocal masculinity. Evol. Hum. Behav. 29, 233–241.doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.008 (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.008). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 7
Jones B. C., 2005 Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 347–354.doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2962 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2962). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 8
Wedekind C., Seebeck T., Bettens F.& Paepke A. J. . 1995 MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260, 245–249.doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0087 (doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0087). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 9
Roberts S. C., Gosling L. M., Carter V.& Petrie M. . 2008 MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 2715–2722.doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0825 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0825). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 10
Havlicek J.& Roberts S. C. . 2009 MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: a review. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34, 497–512.doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.007 (doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.007). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 11
Roberts S. C., Miner E. J.& Shackelford T. K. . 2010 The future of an applied evolutionary psychology for human partnerships. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 14, 318–329.doi:10.1037/a0021253 (doi:10.1037/a0021253). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 12
Alvergne A.& Lummaa V. . 2010 Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans? Trend Ecol. Evol. 25, 171–179.doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.003 (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.003). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 13
Mosher W. D.& Jones J. . 2010 Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics (Vital Health Stat). Google Scholar - 14
Lader D. . 2009 Contraception and sexual health, 2008/9. Opinions survey report no. 41, UK Office for National Statistics. See http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/lifestyles/contraception_and_sexual_health/contraception_and_sexual_health/2008-09.pdf. Google Scholar - 15
Garver-Apgar C. E., Gangestad S. W., Thornhill R., Miller R. D.& Olp J. J. . 2006 Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychol. Sci. 17, 830–835.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01789.x (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01789.x). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 16
Pluchino N., Cubeddu A., Giannini A., Merlini S., Cela V., Angioni S.& Genazzani A. R. . 2009 Progestogens and brain: an update. Maturitas 62, 349–355.doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.11.023 (doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.11.023). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 17
Gangestad S. W., Garver-Apgar C. E., Simpson J. A.& Cousins A. J. . 2007 Changes in women's mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92, 151–163.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.151 (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.151). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 18
Perrett D. I., Lee K. J., Penton-Voak I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D. M., Henzi S. P., Castles D. L.& Akamatsu S. . 1998 Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394, 884–887.doi:10.1038/29772 (doi:10.1038/29772). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 19
Booth A.& Dabbs J. M. . 1993 Testosterone and men's marriage. Soc. Forces 72, 463–477. Crossref, Google Scholar - 20
Ellis B. J. . 1998 The partner-specific investment inventory: an evolutionary approach to individual differences in investment. J. Pers. 66, 383–442.doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00017 (doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00017). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 21
Brown M. . 1986 Social support, stress and health: a comparison of expectant mothers and fathers. Nursing Res. 35, 72–76.doi:10.1097/00006199-198601000-00002 (doi:10.1097/00006199-198601000-00002). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 22
DeBruine L. M., 2006 Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 1355–1360.doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3445 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3445). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 23
Penke L.& Asendorpf J. . 2008 Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95, 1113–1135.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113 (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 24
Klusmann D. . 2002 Sexual motivation and duration of the partnership. Arch. Sex. Behav. 31, 275–287.doi:10.1023/A:1015205020769 (doi:10.1023/A:1015205020769). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 25
Vollrath F.& Milinski M. . 1995 Fragrant genes help Damenwahl. Trend. Ecol. Evol. 10, 307–308.doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89113-2 (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89113-2). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 26
Boero F. . 1996 MHC and mate selection in humans? Trend. Ecol. Evol. 11, 24.doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)80238-2 (doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)80238-2). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 27
Havlicek J., Roberts S. C.& Flegr J. . 2005 Women's preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biol. Lett. 1, 256–259.doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0332 (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0332). Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 28
Little A. C., Saxton T. K., Roberts S. C., Jones B. C., DeBruine L. M., Vukovic J., Perrett D. I., Feinberg D. R.& Chenore T. . 2010 Women's preferences for masculinity in male faces are highest during reproductive age range and lower around puberty and post-menopause. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35, 912–920.doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.006 (doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.006). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 29
Jones B. C., Little A. C., Boothroyd L., DeBruine L. M., Feinberg D. R., Smith M. J., Cornwell R. E., Moore F. R.& Perrett D. I. . 2005 Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Horm. Behav. 48, 283–290.doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.03.010 (doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.03.010). Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 30
Hewitt B., Western M.& Baxter J. . 2006 Who decides? The social characteristics of who initiates marital separation. J. Marriage Fam. 68, 1165–1177.doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00321.x (doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00321.x). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar - 31
Braver S. L., Whitely M.& Ng C. . 1993 Who divorced whom? Methodological and theoretical issues. J. Divorce Remarriage 20, 1–19.doi:10.1300/J087v20n01_01 (doi:10.1300/J087v20n01_01). Crossref, Google Scholar