Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
You have accessResearch articles

Evolution of spur-length diversity in Aquilegia petals is achieved solely through cell-shape anisotropy

Published:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1873

    The role of petal spurs and specialized pollinator interactions has been studied since Darwin. Aquilegia petal spurs exhibit striking size and shape diversity, correlated with specialized pollinators ranging from bees to hawkmoths in a textbook example of adaptive radiation. Despite the evolutionary significance of spur length, remarkably little is known about Aquilegia spur morphogenesis and its evolution. Using experimental measurements, both at tissue and cellular levels, combined with numerical modelling, we have investigated the relative roles of cell divisions and cell shape in determining the morphology of the Aquilegia petal spur. Contrary to decades-old hypotheses implicating a discrete meristematic zone as the driver of spur growth, we find that Aquilegia petal spurs develop via anisotropic cell expansion. Furthermore, changes in cell anisotropy account for 99 per cent of the spur-length variation in the genus, suggesting that the true evolutionary innovation underlying the rapid radiation of Aquilegia was the mechanism of tuning cell shape.

    References

    • 1
      Hodges S. A.& Arnold M. L.. 1995Spurring plant diversification: are floral nectar spurs a key innovation?Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 262, 343–348.doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0215 (doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0215). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 2
      Whittall J. B.& Hodges S. A.. 2007Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers. Nature 447, 706.doi:10.1038/Nature05857 (doi:10.1038/Nature05857). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 3
      Fulton M.& Hodges S. A.. 1999Floral isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 2247–2252.doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0915 (doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0915). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 4
      Darwin C.. 1885The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilized by insects, 2nd edn. London, UK: John Murray. Google Scholar
    • 5
      Tepfer S. S.. 1953Floral anatomy and ontogeny in Aquilegia formosa var. truncata, and Ranunculus repens. Univ. Cal. Pub. Bot. 25, 513–648. Google Scholar
    • 6
      Tucker S. C.& Hodges S. A.. 2005Floral ontogeny of Aquilegia, Semiaquilegia, and Enemion (Ranunculaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 166, 557–574.doi:10.1086/429848 (doi:10.1086/429848). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 7
      Erbar C., Kusma S.& Leins P.. 1999Development and interpretation of nectary organs in Ranunculaceae. Flora 194, 317–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 8
      Kramer E. M.. 2005Methods for studying the evolution of plant reproductive structures: comparative gene expression techniques. Molecular evolution: producing the biochemical data, pp. 617–636. Methods in Enzymology, vol. 395. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar
    • 9
      Baskin T. I.. 2005Anisotropic expansion of the plant cell wall. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 203–222.doi:10.1146/Annurev.Cellbio.20.082503.103053 (doi:10.1146/Annurev.Cellbio.20.082503.103053). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 10
      Hamant O., et al.2008Developmental patterning by mechanical signals in Arabidopsis. Science 322, 1650–1655.doi:10.1126/science.1165594 (doi:10.1126/science.1165594). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 11
      Baskin T. I., Wilson J. E., Cork A.& Williamson R. E.. 1994Morphology and microtubule organization in Arabidopsis roots exposed to oryzalin or taxol. Plant Cell Physiol. 35, 935–942. PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 12
      Munz P. A.. 1946Aquilegia: the cultivated and wild columbines. Gentes Herbarum 7, 150. Google Scholar
    • 13
      Wang W.& Chen Z.-D.. 2007Generic level phylogeny of Thalictroideae (Ranunculaceae): implications for the taxonomic status of Paropyrum and petal evolution. Taxon 56, 811–821.doi:10.2307/25065864 (doi:10.2307/25065864). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 14
      Wang W., Lu A.-M., Ren Y., Endress M. E.& Chen Z.-D.. 2009Phylogeny and classification of Ranunculales: evidence from four molecular loci and morphological data. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 11, 81–110.doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2009.01.001 (doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2009.01.001). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 15
      Keller R., Davidson L., Edlund A., Elul T., Ezin M., Shook D.& Skoglund P.. 2000Mechanisms of convergence and extension by cell intercalation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355, 897–922.doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0626 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0626). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 16
      Coen E., Rolland-Lagan A. G., Matthews M., Bangham J. A.& Prusinkiewicz P.. 2004The genetics of geometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4728–4735.doi:10.1073/pnas.0306308101 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0306308101). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 17
      Blanchard G. B., Kabla A. J., Schultz N. L., Butler L. C., Sanson B., Gorfinkiel N., Mahadevan L.& Adams R. J.. 2009Tissue tectonics: morphogenetic strain rates, cell shape change and intercalation. Nat. Methods 6, 458–486.doi:10.1038/nmeth.1327 (doi:10.1038/nmeth.1327). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 18
      Chickarmane V., Roeder A. H. K., Tarr P. T., Cunha A., Tobin C.& Meyerowitz E. M.. 2010Computational morphodynamics: a modeling framework to understand plant growth. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 65–87.doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112213 (doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112213). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 19
      Lee Y. K., Kim G.-T., Park J., Kwak S.-S., Choi G.& Chung W.-I.. 2006LONGIFOLIA1 and LONGIFOLIA2, two homologous genes, regulate longitudinal cell elongation in Arabidopsis. Development 133, 4305–4314.doi:10.1242/dev.02604 (doi:10.1242/dev.02604). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 20
      Kim G. T., Shoda K., Tsuge T., Cho K. H., Uchimiya H., Yokoyama R., Nishitani K.& Tsukaya H.. 2002The ANGUSTIFOLIA gene of Arabidopsis, a plant CtBP gene, regulates leaf-cell expansion, the arrangement of cortical microtubules in leaf cells and expression of a gene involved in cell-wall formation. EMBO J. 21, 1267–1279. Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 21
      Box M. S., Dodsworth S., Rudall P. J., Bateman R. M.& Glover B. J.. 2011Characterization of Linaria KNOX genes suggests a role in petal-spur development. Plant J. 68, 703–714.doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04721.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04721.x). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 22
      Venail J., Dell'Olivo A.& Kuhlemeier C.. 2010Speciation genes in the genus Petunia. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 461–468.doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0242 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0242). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 23
      Bradshaw H. D., Otto K. G., Frewen B. E., McKay J. K.& Schemske D. W.. 1998Quantitative trait loci affecting differences in floral morphology between two species of monkeyflower (Mimulus). Genetics 149, 367–382. PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar