Skip main navigationJournal menuClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Brought to you by Laboratorio Nacional de Engenharia Civil
Skip main navigationJournal menuClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
You have accessResearch articles

A novel mammalian social structure in Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.): complex male alliances in an open social network

Published:28 March 2012https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0264

    Abstract

    Terrestrial mammals with differentiated social relationships live in ‘semi-closed groups’ that occasionally accept new members emigrating from other groups. Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Shark Bay, Western Australia, exhibit a fission–fusion grouping pattern with strongly differentiated relationships, including nested male alliances. Previous studies failed to detect a group membership ‘boundary’, suggesting that the dolphins live in an open social network. However, two alternative hypotheses have not been excluded. The community defence model posits that the dolphins live in a large semi-closed ‘chimpanzee-like’ community defended by males and predicts that a dominant alliance(s) will range over the entire community range. The mating season defence model predicts that alliances will defend mating-season territories or sets of females. Here, both models are tested and rejected: no alliances ranged over the entire community range and alliances showed extensive overlap in mating season ranges and consorted females. The Shark Bay dolphins, therefore, present a combination of traits that is unique among mammals: complex male alliances in an open social network. The open social network of dolphins is linked to their relatively low costs of locomotion. This reveals a surprising and previously unrecognized convergence between adaptations reducing travel costs and complex intergroup–alliance relationships in dolphins, elephants and humans.

    References

    • 1
      Crook J. H., Ellis J. E.& Goss-Custard J. D.. 1976Mammalian social systems: structure and function. Anim. Behav. 24, 261–274.doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80035-8 (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80035-8). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 2
      Greenwood P. J.. 1980Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim. Behav. 28, 1140–1162.doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80103-5 (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80103-5). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 3
      Goodall J.. 1986The chimpanzees of Gombe: patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • 4
      Wrangham R. W.. 1980An ecological model of female bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75, 262–292.doi:10.1163/156853980X00447 (doi:10.1163/156853980X00447). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 5
      Mosser A.& Packer C.. 2009Group territoriality and the benefits of sociality in the African lion, Panthera leo. Anim. Behav. 78, 359–370.doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.04.024 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.04.024). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 6
      Moss C. J.& Poole J. H.. 1983Relationships and social structure of African elephants. Primate social relationships (ed. & Hinde R. A.), pp. 315–325. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc. Google Scholar
    • 7
      Wittemyer G., Douglas-Hamilton I.& Getz W. M.. 2005The socioecology of elephants: analysis of the processes creating multi-tiered social structures. Anim. Behav. 69, 1357–1371.doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.08.018 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.08.018). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 8
      Baird R. W.. 2000The killer whale: foraging specializations and group hunting. Cetacean societies: field studies of whales and dolphins (eds , Mann J., Connor R., Tyack P.& Whitehead H.), pp. 91–126. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • 9
      Whitehead H.& Weilgart L.. 2000The sperm whale: social females and roving males. Cetacean societies: field studies of whales and dolphins (eds , Mann J., Connor R., Tyack P.& Whitehead H.), pp. 91–126. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • 10
      Weilgart L., Whitehead H.& Payne K.. 1996A colossal convergence. Am. Sci. 84, 278–287. Google Scholar
    • 11
      Connor R. C., Wells R., Mann J.& Read A.. 2000The bottlenose dolphin: social relationships in a fission–fusion society. Cetacean societies: field studies of whales and dolphins (eds , Mann J., Connor R., Tyack P.& Whitehead H.), pp. 91–126. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • 12
      Connor R. C., Smolker R. A.& Richards A. F.. 1992Two levels of alliance formation among male bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 987–990.doi:10.1073/pnas.89.3.987 (doi:10.1073/pnas.89.3.987). Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
    • 13
      Connor R. C., Smolker R. A.& Richards A. F.. 1992Dolphin alliances and coalitions. Coalitions an. d alliances in animals and humans (eds , Harcourt A. H.& de Waal F. B. M.), pp. 415–443. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • 14
      Connor R. C., Watson-Capps J., Sherwin W. S.& Krützen M.. 2010New levels of complexity in the male alliance networks of Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). Biol. Lett. 7, 623–626. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0852). Link, Google Scholar
    • 15
      Connor R. C., Smolker R. A.& Bejder L.. 2006Synchrony, social behaviour and alliance affiliation in Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus). Anim. Behav. 72, 1371–1378.doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.03.014 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.03.014). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 16
      Smolker R. S., Richards A. F., Connor R. C.& Pepper J. W.. 1992Sex-differences in patterns of association among Indian Ocean bottle-nosed dolphins. Behaviour 123, 38–69.doi:10.1163/156853992X00101 (doi:10.1163/156853992X00101). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 17
      Watson-Capps J. J.. 2005Female mating behavior in the context of sexual coercion and female ranging behavior of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Shark Bay, Western Australia. PhD dissertation. Department of Biology, Georgetown University, USA. Google Scholar
    • 18
      Clutton-Brock T.. 1989Mammalian mating systems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 236, 339–372.doi:10.1098/rspb.1989.0027 (doi:10.1098/rspb.1989.0027). Link, Google Scholar
    • 19
      Aureli F., et al.2008Fission–fusion dynamics: new research frameworks. Curr. Anthropol. 49, 627–654.doi:10.1086/586708 (doi:10.1086/586708). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 20
      Chapman C. A.& Wrangham R. W.. 1993Range use of the forest chimpanzees of Kibale: implications for the understanding of chimpanzee social organization. Am. J. Primatol. 31, 263–273.doi:10.1002/ajp.1350310403 (doi:10.1002/ajp.1350310403). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 21
      Mitani J. C.& Watts D. P.. 2005Correlates of territorial boundary patrol behaviour in wild chimpanzees. Anim. Behav. 70, 1070–1086.doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.012 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.012). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 22
      Aureli F., Schaffner C. M., Verpooten J., Slater K.& Ramos-Fernandez G.. 2006Raiding parties of male spider monkeys: insights into human warfare?Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 131, 486–497.doi:10.1002/ajpa.20451 (doi:10.1002/ajpa.20451). Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
    • 23
      Wallace R. B.. 2008Towing the party line: territoriality, risky boundaries and male group size in spider monkey fission–fusion societies. Am. J. Primatol. 70, 271–281.doi:10.1002/ajp.20484 (doi:10.1002/ajp.20484). Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
    • 24
      Connor R. C.. 2007Dolphin social intelligence: complex alliance relationships in bottlenose dolphins and a consideration of selective environments for extreme brain size evolution in mammals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 362, 587–602.doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1997 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1997). Link, Google Scholar
    • 25
      Emery N. J., Clayton N. S.& Frith C. D.. 2007Introduction. Social intelligence: from brain to culture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 362, 485–488.doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2022 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2022). Link, Google Scholar
    • 26
      Connor R. C.. 2000Group living in whales and dolphins. Cetacean societies: field studies of whales and dolphins (eds , Mann J., Connor R., Tyack P.& Whitehead H.), pp. 199–218. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
    • 27
      Wilson B., Thompson P. M.& Hammond P. S.. 1997Habitat use by bottlenose dolphins: seasonal distribution and stratified movement patterns in the Moray Firth, Scotland. J. Appl. Ecol. 34, 1365–1374.doi:10.2307/2405254 (doi:10.2307/2405254). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 28
      Connor R. C., Richards A. F., Smolker R. A.& Mann J.. 1996Patterns of female attractiveness in Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. Behaviour 133, 37–69.doi:10.1163/156853996X00026 (doi:10.1163/156853996X00026). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 29
      Connor R. C.& Smolker R. A.. 1995Seasonal changes in the stability of male–male bonds in Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). Aq. Mamm. 21, 213–216. Google Scholar
    • 30
      Würsig B.& Würsig M.. 1977The photographic determination of group size, composition, and stability of coastal porpoises (Tursiops truncatus). Science 198, 755–756.doi:10.1126/science.198.4318.755 (doi:10.1126/science.198.4318.755). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 31
      Connor R. C., Heithaus M. R.& Barré L. M.. 2001Complex structure, alliance stability and mating access in a bottlenose dolphin ‘super-alliance.’. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 263–267.doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1357 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1357). Link, Google Scholar
    • 32
      Beyer H. L.. 2004Hawth's analysis tools for ArcGIS. See http://www.spatialecology.com/htools. Google Scholar
    • 33
      Worton B. J.. 1989Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home range studies. Ecology 70, 164–168.doi:10.2307/1938423 (doi:10.2307/1938423). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 34
      Wauters L. A., Preatoni D. G., Molinari A.& Tosi G.. 2007Radio-tracking squirrels: performance of home range density and linkage estimators with small range and sample size. Ecol. Model. 202, 333–344.doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.001 (doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.001). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 35
      Laver P. N.& Kelly M. J.. 2008A critical review of home range studies. J. Wildl. Manag. 72, 290–298.doi:10.2193/2005-589 (doi:10.2193/2005-589). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 36
      Connor R. C.& Mann J.. 2006Social cognition in the wild: Machiavellian dolphins? In Rational animals (eds , Hurley S.& Nudd M.), pp. 329–367. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • 37
      Krützen M., Sherwin W. B., Connor R. C., Barré L. M., Van de Casteele T., Mann J.& Brooks R.. 2003Contrasting relatedness patterns in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) with different alliance strategies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 497–502.doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2229 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2229). Link, Google Scholar
    • 38
      Würsig B.. 1978Occurrence and group organization of Atlantic bottlenose porpoises (Tursiops truncatus) in an Argentine bay. Biol. Bull. 154, 348–359.doi:10.2307/1541132 (doi:10.2307/1541132). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 39
      Connor R. C.& Vollmer N.. 2009Sexual coercion in dolphin consortships: a comparison with chimpanzees. Sexual coercion in primates: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females (eds , Muller M. N.& Wrangham R. W.), pp. 218–243. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • 40
      Idani G.. 1990Relations between unit-groups of bonobos at Wamba, Zaire: encounters and temporary fusions. Afr. Study Monogr. 11, 153–186. Google Scholar
    • 41
      Singleton I.& van Schaik C. P.. 2002The social organization of a population of Sumatran orangutans. Folia Primatol. 73, 1–20.doi:10.1159/000060415 (doi:10.1159/000060415). Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
    • 42
      Bradley B. J., Doran-Sheehy D. M., Lukas D., Boesch C.& Vigilant L.. 2004Dispersed male networks in western gorillas. Curr. Biol. 14, 510–513.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.062 (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.062). Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
    • 43
      Rodseth L., Wrangham R. W., Harrigan A. M.& Smuts B. B.. 1991The human community as a primate society.’. Curr. Anthropol. 32, 221–254.doi:10.1086/203952 (doi:10.1086/203952). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 44
      Archie E. A., Moss C. J.& Alberts S. C.. 2006The ties that bind: genetic relatedness predicts the fission and fusion of social groups in wild African elephants. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 513–522.doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3361 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3361). Link, Google Scholar
    • 45
      Gobush K., Kerr B.& Wasser S.. 2009Genetic relatedness and disrupted social structure in a poached population of African elephants. Mol. Ecol. 18, 722–734.doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04043.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04043.x). Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
    • 46
      Burhman-Deever S. C., Hobson E. A.& Hobson A. D.. 2008Individual recognition and selective response to contact calls in foraging brown-throated conures, Aratinga pertinax. Anim. Behav. 76, 1715–1725.doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.007 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.007). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 47
      Berg K. S., Delgado S., Cortopassi K. A., Beissinger S. A.& Bradbury J. W.. 2011Vertical transmission of learned signatures in a wild parrot. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 585–591. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0932). Link, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 48
      Beissinger S. R.. 2008Long-term studies of the green-rumped parrotlet (Forpus passerinus) in Venezuela: hatching asysnchrony, social system and population structure. Ornitol. Neotrop. 19, 73–83. Google Scholar
    • 49
      Langman V. A., Roberts T. J., Black J., Maloiy G. M. O., Heglund N. C., Weber J.-M., Kram R.& Taylor C. R.. 1995Moving cheaply: energetics of walking in the African elephant. J. Exp. Biol. 198, 629–632. PubMed, Google Scholar
    • 50
      Sockol M. D., Raichlen D. A.& Pontzer H.. 2007Chimpanzee locomotor energetics and the origin of human bipedalism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12 265–12 269.doi:10.1073/pnas.0703267104 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0703267104). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 51
      Connor R. C.& Whitehead H.. 2005Alliances. II. Rates of encounter during resource utilization: a general model of intrasexual alliance formation in fission–fusion societies. Anim. Behav. 69, 127–132.doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.02.022 (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.02.022). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 52
      Dunbar R. I. M.. 1992Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. J. Hum. Evol. 22, 469–493.doi:10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-J (doi:10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-J). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 53
      Mathew S.& Boyd R.. 2011Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in pre-state warfare. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11 375–11 380.doi:10.1073/pnas.1105604108 (doi:10.1073/pnas.1105604108). Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 54
      Wrangham R. W.. 2009Catching fire: how cooking made us human. New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar
    Previous ArticleBack to TopNext Article