Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
You have accessResearch articles

Cambrian bivalved arthropod reveals origin of arthrodization

    Extant arthropods are diverse and ubiquitous, forming a major constituent of most modern ecosystems. Evidence from early Palaeozoic Konservat Lagerstätten indicates that this has been the case since the Cambrian. Despite this, the details of arthropod origins remain obscure, although most hypotheses regard the first arthropods as benthic predators or scavengers such as the fuxianhuiids or megacheirans (‘great-appendage’ arthropods). Here, we describe a new arthropod from the Tulip Beds locality of the Burgess Shale Formation (Cambrian, series 3, stage 5) that possesses a weakly sclerotized thorax with filamentous appendages, encased in a bivalved carapace, and a strongly sclerotized, elongate abdomen and telson. A cladistic analysis resolved this taxon as the basal-most member of a paraphyletic grade of nekto-benthic forms with bivalved carapaces. This grade occurs at the base of Arthropoda (panarthropods with arthropodized trunk limbs) and suggests that arthrodization (sclerotization and jointing of the exoskeleton) evolved to facilitate swimming. Predatory and fully benthic habits evolved later in the euarthropod stem-lineage and are plesiomorphically retained in pycnogonids (sea spiders) and euchelicerates (horseshoe crabs and arachnids).

    References

    • 1
      Edgecombe G. D.. 2010Arthropod phylogeny: an overview from the perspectives of morphology, molecular data and the fossil record. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 39, 74–87.doi:10.1016/j.asd.2009.10.002 (doi:10.1016/j.asd.2009.10.002). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 2
      Budd G. E.& Telford M. J.. 2009The origin and evolution of arthropods. Nature 457, 812–817.doi:10.1038/nature07890 (doi:10.1038/nature07890). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 3
      Legg D. A., Ma X., Wolfe J. M., Ortega-Hernández J., Edgecombe G. D.& Sutton M. D.. 2011Lobopodian phylogeny reanalysed. Nature 476, E2–E3.doi:10.1038/nature10267 (doi:10.1038/nature10267). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 4
      Briggs D. E. G., Erwin D. H.& Collier F. J.. 1994The fossils of the Burgess Shale. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. Google Scholar
    • 5
      Hou X. G., Aldridge R. J., Bergström J., Siveter D. J., Siveter D. J.& Feng X. H.. 2004The Cambrian fossils of Chengjiang, China: the flowering of early animal life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Google Scholar
    • 6
      Collins D.. 1996The ‘evolution’ of Anomalocaris and its classification in the arthropod class Dinocarida (nov.) and order Radiodonta (nov.). J. Paleontol. 70, 280–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 7
      Daley A. C., Budd G. E., Caron J.-B., Edgecombe G. D.& Collins D.. 2009The Burgess Shale anomalocaridid Hurdia and its significance for early euarthropod evolution. Science 323, 1597–1600.doi:10.1126/science.1169514 (doi:10.1126/science.1169514). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 8
      Budd G. E.. 2002A palaeontological solution to the arthropod head problem. Nature 417, 271–275.doi:10.1038/417271a (doi:10.1038/417271a). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 9
      Kühl G., Briggs D. E. G.& Rust J.. 2009A great-appendage arthropod with a radial mouth from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate, Germany. Science 323, 771–773.doi:10.1126/science.1166586 (doi:10.1126/science.1166586). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar
    • 10
      Bergström J., Hou X.-G., Zhang X.& Clausen S.. 2008A new view of the Cambrian arthropod Fuxianhuia. GFF 130, 189–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 11
      Hou X.-G.& Bergström J.. 1997Arthropods of the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang fauna, southwest China. Fossils and Strata 45, 1–116. Google Scholar
    • 12
      Waloszek D., Chen J.-Y., Maas A.& Wang X.-Q.. 2005Early Cambrian arthropods—new insights into arthropod head and structural evolution. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 34, 189–205.doi:10.1016/j.asd.2005.01.005 (doi:10.1016/j.asd.2005.01.005). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 13
      Bousfield E. L.. 1995A contribution to the natural classification of Lower and Middle Cambrian arthropods: food-gathering and feeding mechanisms. Amphipacifica 2, 3–34. Google Scholar
    • 14
      Rota-Stabelli O., et al.2011A congruent solution to arthropod phylogeny: phylogenomics, microRNAs and morphology support Mandibulata. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 298–306.doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0590 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0590). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 15
      Goloboff P. A., Farris J. S.& Nixon K. C.. 2008TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24, 774–786.doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x (doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 16
      Goloboff P. A.. 1993Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9, 83–91.doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.tb00209.x (doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.tb00209.x). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 17
      Nixon K. C.. 1999The Parsimony Ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15, 407–414.doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00277.x (doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00277.x). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 18
      Goloboff P. A.. 1999Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 15, 415–428.doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00278.x (doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00278.x). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 19
      Fletcher T. P.& Collins D.. 1998The Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale and its relationship to the Stephen Formation in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains. Can. J. Earth Sci. 35, 413–436.doi:10.1139/e97-120 (doi:10.1139/e97-120). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 20
      O'Brien L. J.& Caron J.-B.. 2012A new stalked filter-feeder from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale, British Columbia, Canada. PLoS ONE 7, 1–21.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029233 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029233). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 21
      Briggs D. E. G.. 1981The arthropod Odaraia alata Walcott, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 291, 541–582.doi:10.1098/rstb.1981.0007 (doi:10.1098/rstb.1981.0007). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 22
      Fu D.& Zhang X.. 2011A new arthropod Jugatacaris agilis n. gen. n. sp. from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang Biota, South China. J. Paleontol. 85, 567–586.doi:10.1666/09-173.1 (doi:10.1666/09-173.1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 23
      Hou X.-G., Bergström J.& Xu G.-H.. 2004The Lower Cambrian crustacean Pectocaris from the Chengjiang Biota, Yunnan, China. J. Paleontol. 78, 700–708.doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2004)078<0700:TLCCPF>2.0.CO;2 (doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2004)078<0700:TLCCPF>2.0.CO;2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 24
      Briggs D. E. G.. 1977Bivalved arthropods from the Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia. Palaeontology 20, 595–621. Google Scholar
    • 25
      Briggs D. E. G.. 1978The morphology, mode of life, and affinities of Canadaspis perfecta (Crustacea: Phyllocarida), Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 281, 439–487.doi:10.1098/rstb.1978.0005 (doi:10.1098/rstb.1978.0005). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 26
      Wills M. A., Briggs D. E. G., Fortey R. A., Wilkinson M.& Sneath P. H. A.. 1998An arthropod phylogeny based on fossil and Recent taxa. In Arthropod fossils and phylogeny (ed. & Edgecombe G. D.), pp. 33–105. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
    • 27
      Budd G. E.. 2001Ecology of nontrilobite arthropods and lobopods in the Cambrian. The ecology of the Cambrian radiation (eds , Zhuravlev A. Yu.& Riding R.), pp. 404–427. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
    • 28
      Butterfield N. J.. 2002Leanchoilia guts and the interpretation of three-dimensional structures in Burgess Shale-type fossils. Paleobiology 28, 155–171.doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2002)028<0155:LGATIO>2.0.CO;2 (doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2002)028<0155:LGATIO>2.0.CO;2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 29
      Zhu M.-Y., Vannier J., Van Iten H.& Zhao Y.-L.. 2004Direct evidence for predation on trilobites in the Cambrian. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B   271, S277–S280.doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0194 (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0194). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 30
      Budd G. E.. 2001Why are arthropods segmented?Evol. Dev. 3, 332–342.doi:10.1046/j.1525-142X.2001.01041.x (doi:10.1046/j.1525-142X.2001.01041.x). Crossref, PubMedGoogle Scholar