Abstract
Strong global solvability is difficult to prove for high-dimensional hydrodynamic systems because of the complex interplay between nonlinearity and scale invariance. We define the Ladyzhenskaya–Lions exponent αl(n)=(2+n)/4 for Navier–Stokes equations with dissipation −(−Δ)α in
, for all n≥2. We review the proof of strong global solvability when α≥αl(n), given smooth initial data. If the corresponding Euler equations for n>2 were to allow uncontrolled growth of the enstrophy
, then no globally controlled coercive quantity is currently known to exist that can regularize solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations for α<αl(n). The energy is critical under scale transformations only for α=αl(n).
References
- 1
Galaktionov V. A., Mitidierib E.& Pohozaevcx S. I. . 2009On global solutions and blow-up for Kuramoto–Sivashinsky-type models, and well-posed Burnett equations. Nonlinear Anal. 70, 2930-2952doi:10.1016/j.na.2008.12.020 (doi:10.1016/j.na.2008.12.020). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 2
Ladyzhenskaya O. . 1969The mathematical theory of viscous incompressible flowsNew York, NYGordon and Breach. Google Scholar - 3
Ladyzhenskaya O. . 1975Mathematical analysis of Navier–Stokes equations for incompressible liquids. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 7, 249-272doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.07.010175.001341 (doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.07.010175.001341). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 4
Lions J.-L. . 1959Quelques résultats d’existence dans des équations aux dérivées partielles non linéaires. Bull. Soc. Math. France 87, 245-273. Crossref, Google Scholar - 5
Lions J.-L. . 1969Quelques méthodes de résolution des problèmes aux limites non linéaires. Paris, France:DunodParis, FranceDunod. Google Scholar - 6
Guermond J.-L.& Prudhomme S. . 2003Mathematical analysis of a spectral hyperviscosity LES model for the simulation of turbulent flows. ESAIM: M2AN 37, 893-908doi:10.1051/m2an:2003060 (doi:10.1051/m2an:2003060). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 7
Katz N. H.& Pavlović N. . 2002A cheap Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg inequality for the Navier–Stokes equation with hyper-dissipation. Geom. Funct. Anal. 12, 355-379doi:10.1007/s00039-002-8250-z (doi:10.1007/s00039-002-8250-z). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 8
Mattingly J.& Sinai Y. . 1999An elementary proof of the existence and uniqueness theorem for the Navier–Stokes equation. Commun. Contemp. Math. 1, 497-516doi:10.1142/S0219199799000183 (doi:10.1142/S0219199799000183). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 9
Viswanathan G. M.& Viswanathan T. M. . 2008Spontaneous symmetry breaking and finite-time singularities in d-dimensional incompressible flows with fractional dissipation. EPL 84, 50006 doi:10.1209/0295-5075/84/50006 (doi:10.1209/0295-5075/84/50006). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 10
Berezansky Y. M., Sheftel Z. G.& Us G. F. . 1996Functional analysis vol. 2Berlin, GermanyBirkhäuser. Google Scholar - 11
Radons G., Klages R.& Sokolov I. M. . 2008Anomalous transportBerlin, GermanyWiley-VCH. Google Scholar - 12
Tao T. . 2007A quantitative formulation of the global regularity problem for the periodic Navier–Stokes equation. Dyn. Partial Diff. Equat. 4, 293-302. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 13
Tao T. . 2007Why global regularity for Navier–Stokes is hard. See http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2007/03/18. Google Scholar - 14
Gibbon J. D. . 2008The three-dimensional Euler equations:where do we stand?Physica D 237, 1894-1904doi:10.1016/j.physd.2007.10.014 (doi:10.1016/j.physd.2007.10.014). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 15
Constantin P. . 2007On the Euler equations of incompressible fluids. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 44, 603-621doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-07-01184-6 (doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-07-01184-6). Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar - 16
Constantin P., Fefferman C.& Majda A. . 1996Geometric constraints on potentially singular solutions for the 3D Euler equation. Comm. Partial Differ. Equ. 21, 559-571. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar


