Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Open AccessResearch articles

Giant lizards occupied herbivorous mammalian ecospace during the Paleogene greenhouse in Southeast Asia

    Abstract

    Mammals dominate modern terrestrial herbivore ecosystems, whereas extant herbivorous reptiles are limited in diversity and body size. The evolution of reptile herbivory and its relationship to mammalian diversification is poorly understood with respect to climate and the roles of predation pressure and competition for food resources. Here, we describe a giant fossil acrodontan lizard recovered with a diverse mammal assemblage from the late middle Eocene Pondaung Formation of Myanmar, which provides a historical test of factors controlling body size in herbivorous squamates. We infer a predominately herbivorous feeding ecology for the new acrodontan based on dental anatomy, phylogenetic relationships and body size. Ranking body masses for Pondaung Formation vertebrates indicates that the lizard occupied a size niche among the larger herbivores and was larger than most carnivorous mammals. Paleotemperature estimates of Pondaung Formation environments based on the body size of the new lizard are approximately 2–5°C higher than modern. These results indicate that competitive exclusion and predation by mammals did not restrict body size evolution in these herbivorous squamates, and elevated temperatures relative to modern climates during the Paleogene greenhouse may have resulted in the evolution of gigantism through elevated poikilothermic metabolic rates and in response to increases in floral productivity.

    1. Introduction

    Modern terrestrial herbivore ecosystems are dominated by mammal faunas that originated with the evolution of ungulate folivores during the middle Eocene [1]. Conversely, herbivory is comparatively rare among extant squamates [2]. Squamates do not efficiently metabolize plant matter compared with mammals [3], and digestion requires elevated body temperatures which are correlated to large body size [2,46] and restriction to tropical climates for most taxa [7].

    The relative roles of physiology and ecological pressures from mammals as constraints on upper body size limits of herbivorous lizards are unknown, however. Direct and indirect interactions with ungulates and carnivorans are known to limit distribution and densities of carnivorous squamates [810] and the largest extant herbivorous reptiles only occur in insular, mammal-free habitats [3,11], suggesting competitive exclusion or predation pressure may limit maximum body sizes. Conversely, squamate body size can be affected by ambient temperature and food resources [3,12], and maximum body sizes of extant taxa may be limited by Holocene climatic maxima.

    Fossil squamates generally demonstrate similar size and diversity patterns as extant herbivores during the Cenozoic, but the squamate fossil record is poorly sampled and generally restricted to the mid and high latitudes of North America and Europe [1316]. The relative paucity and geographical restriction of the squamate fossil record confounds efforts to examine the historical relationship between body size and environment relative to faunal competition, climate and historical contingency in poikilothermic herbivores.

    Here, we describe a giant acrodontan lizard from the rich, low-latitude vertebrate fossil record of the late middle Eocene Pondaung Formation of central Myanmar that includes a diversity of eutherian mammals, turtles, squamates and crocodylians recovered from siliciclastic sediments representing fluvial depositional environments [1721]. Analysis of the new acrodontan's inferred diet and estimated body mass in the context of the co-occurring fauna and in comparison to modern vertebrate communities allows us test the relative influences of mammalian competition versus climate regime as a regulating mechanism of herbivorous reptile body size by examining herbivore community structure in past and present vertebrate ecosystems and by estimating minimum paleotemperatures necessary to support a giant poikilothermic herbivore based on the mass-specific metabolic relationship between body size and climate in living herbivorous lizards.

    2. Systematic paleontology

    Squamata Oppel 1811

    Iguania Cuvier 1817

    Acrodonta Cope 1864 sensu Estes et al. 1988

    Barbaturex morrisoni gen. et sp. nov.

    (a) Etymology

    Barbatus (L) ‘bearded’ + rex, ‘king’, referring to the presence of ventral ridges along the mandible and giant size of the taxon. Species nomen honors Jim Morrison, vocalist and lizard king.

    (b) Holotype

    UCMP 142227 (University of California Museum of Paleontology), partial right dentary (figure 1a–d).

    Figure 1.

    Figure 1. Barbaturex morrisoni gen. et sp. nov. (a–d) Holotype (UCMP 142227), right dentary in medial (a), dorsal (b), lateral (c) and ventral (d) views; (e–h) NMMP-KU 1923, left dentary (retrodeformed cast) in lateral (e), dorsal (f), medial (g) and ventral (h) views; (i–j) NMMP-KU 1925, right dentary (cast) in lateral (i) and medial (j) views; (k) UCMP 130290, posterior dentary tooth, in labial view; (l–m) UCMP 130292, parietal, in (l) dorsal, ventral (m) views; (n–p) UCMP 170491, left anterior dentary in lateral (n), dorsal (o) and medial (p) views. Abbreviations: Caf, articular facet for coronoid; Iaf, inferior alveolar foramen; Mg, Meckelian groove; Pd, pleurodont dentition; Pp, parietal process of frontal; Spl, splenial; Vr, ventral ridges; Wf, wear facets.

    (c) Referred specimens

    UCMP 128388, anterior dentary; UCMP 128410, 130290, 130291, partial left dentaries; UCMP 130292, fused frontals assigned to the taxon on the basis of size; NMMP-KU 0092, partial left dentary; NMMP-KU 1923, partial left dentary; NMMP-KU 1924–1926, partial right dentaries [20] (figure 1e–p).

    (d) Locality and horizon

    The type locality is UCMP V96009, a locality number used to designate a stratigraphically low purple mudstone underlying red beds at Thandaung kyitchaung [18,22], Pondaung Formation, northwest of Mogaung village, Sagaing District, Myanmar. Fossil-bearing beds of the Pondaung Formation near the village of Bahin have been dated to 37.2 ± 1.3 Ma. [23]. Referred specimen localities are UCMP V96009, V78090, PGN1, Kdw-42 (Kyawdaw area, [21]), Mgg-53A, B (Mogaung area, [21]), Tmk-35, Pondaung Formation, Sagaing District, Myanmar.

    (e) Diagnosis and description

    Large bodied acrodontan lizard (approx. 100 cm snout-vent length = SVL) with a mandibular dental formula of two anterior pleurodont teeth and more than 10 mid- and posterior acrodont teeth. Posterior teeth are triangular with continuous wear facets, and lack accessory cusps (figure 1e,k). Wide, tall, anteromedially oriented ridges are present on the ventral margin of the anterior mandible (figure 1a–j), the dentary possesses a deep ventral extension below the Meckelian groove (figure 1a,g,j), the angular is fused to the dentary (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S1), the inferior alveolar foramen is formed by the dentary dorsally and splenial ventrally (figure 1j), the posterior mylohyoid foramen is absent, the Mecklian groove passes ventrally beneath the posterior margin of the mandibular symphysis, the anterior margin of the coronoid articular facet is just posterior to last tooth position (figure 1a,g,j), the parietal processes of the frontal are reduced and contribute less than 50 per cent of the posterior orbital margin (figure 1l,m). Additional descriptions are provided in the electronic supplementary material.

    3. Material and methods

    (a) Phylogenetic analysis

    Molecular and morphological data provide disparate hypotheses of the interrelationships of acrodontans, which limit the ability to resolve the phylogenetic status of fossil taxa [24]. To determine the interrelationships of Barbaturex to extant acrodontans sensu [25], we coded all preserved characters for the only extensive morphological phylogenetic analysis of constituent taxa [26]. Because Barbaturex remains preserve only a small fraction of described characters (5/122), we estimated the phylogenetic position of the taxon by optimizing character distributions onto tree topologies derived from combined morphological and molecular sequence data [2,27] (figure 2) and only molecular sequence data [33,34] (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S2). Phylogenetic position of Barbaturex was estimated by optimizing character distributions using Mesquite v. 2.75 [35]. Character codings for Barbaturex based on the matrix of [26] are as follows: 57(1), 58(0), 59(0), 65(2), 66(0).

    Figure 2.

    Figure 2. Temporally calibrated phylogenetic interrelationships of Barbaturex morrisoni relative to extant agamids based on morphological and molecular data [2,27]. Interrelationships of Chamaeleonidae is based on [25]. Thick vertical lines indicate known stratigraphic ranges. Name shades for extant taxa indicate feeding ecology: grey, predominately insectivory/carnivory; black, omnivory; bold, herbivory. First stratigraphic occurrence for agamines is from [28], Physignathus from [29], Chamaeleonidae from [30] and Uromastycinae from [31]. Divergence timing for the agamid total clade is from [32], Leiolepis is from [24].

    (b) Body size estimation

    We estimated maximum body size measured as SVL in mm for Barbaturex by reduced major axis linear regression of natural log transformed measurements of SVL onto natural log transformed dentary lengths measured in a straight line from the anterior tip of the element to the posterior margin of the lateral coronoid process in mm for extant acrodontans (see the electronic supplementary material, table S1) using PAST v. 2.16 [36]. The resultant equation (LN SVL = 1.115*LN dentary length + 1.34, R2 = 0.89) was used to estimate body mass based on the general lizard SVL-mass equation of BM = 0.031*SVL2.98 [4].

    (c) Body mass comparisons

    To examine the status of Barbaturex within the Pondaung vertebrate fauna, we ranked body masses of terrestrial herbivores, omnivores and carnivores and compared them to ranked masses for extant faunas that include the largest extant herbivorous squamates. Body masses were obtained from literature references (see the electronic supplementary material, tables S2–S5). Taxonomic and geographical range data for all extant mammals for comparisons with living herbivorous squamates is from [37], and body masses are from [38]. Maximum body mass reports and estimates for the largest extant herbivorous squamates, as well as Pondaung Formation mammalian body masses, are listed in the electronic supplementary material. Island endemic squamates [39,40] from faunas lacking folivorous mammals could not be compared with the Pondaung fauna, and completely arboreal, nocturnal and granivorous mammal taxa were not included in this analysis as their ecologies are not directly comparable to the examined squamates.

    (d) Paleotemperature estimation

    Body size scales predictably with environmental temperature for a given mass-specific metabolic rate in poikilotherms [41,42]. We derived paleotemperatures as minimum mean annual temperature (MAT) for the Pondaung Formation from body size estimates of Barbaturex based on the relationship between SVL and minimum MAT for the largest living herbivorous squamates (see the electronic supplementary material, table S6) using the metabolic scaling equation from [42]:

    Display Formula
    where MAPT is mean annual paleotemperature, SVLB is SVL for Barbaturex, SVLC is SVL for Cyclura nubila, MAT is minimum mean annual temperature within the geographical range of C. nubila (24.6°C), α is the metabolic scaling exponent of 0.33 [41], and Q10 is a mass-specific metabolic rate of 2–3 for reptiles [43]. We use C. nubila because it is the largest extant herbivorous lizard [5,7] and scaling the size-temperature model on it best fits the size-temperature distributions for other herbivorous taxa (figure 4).

    4. Results and discussion

    We assign Barbaturex to crown Acrodonta relative to priscagamines and more fragmentary stem taxa based on the character combination of reduced numbers of pleurodont anterior teeth, acrodont cheek dentition with deep, continuous interdental grooves and reduction of the splenial to the posterior region of the dentary [25,26,4446]. Character optimization results in monophyly of Barbaturex + Uromastycinae for both morphological and molecular topologies, with tree lengths one to two steps shorter than all other alternate topologies based on the morphological + molecular scaffold (figure 2) and two to four steps shorter on the molecular scaffold (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S2). Character support for this hypothesis includes the absence of the posterior mylohyoid foramen and the ventral orientation of the Meckelian groove at the anterior tip of the dentary (figure 1p). The presence of two pleurodont dentary teeth [32] and a shortened parietal process of the frontal are additionally shared by the clade consisting of Uromastycinae, Barbaturex, and Leiolepis (figure 2).

    The stratigraphic occurrence of Barbaturex is consistent with our hypothesis of interrelationships (figure 2). The oldest fossil records of unambiguous crown acrodontans consist of uromastycines from the early Eocene of Europe and Asia [31,47], Barbaturex in the late middle Eocene of Asia and possibly the lineage including extant Leiolepis from the late Eocene of North America [24]. The first occurrence of the clade including agamines, draconines and amphibolurines may be early middle Eocene [32], but the late middle Eocene age of the Pondaung record precedes the first occurrences of crown members of this clade, which are early Neogene in age, consistent with molecular divergence estimates [48].

    We estimate a SVL of 981 mm ± 107 mm, and a mean body mass of 26.7 kg (range of 36.9–18.9 kg) for Barbaturex based on the relationship of dentary length to body size in extant taxa. Barbaturex was over twice as long as the largest extant agamid [7], and estimated body sizes are larger than all extant and known fossil terrestrial lizards with the exception of extant Varanus komodoensis [49] and extinct V. priscus and Chianghsia nankangensis [5053].

    Body size, dental morphology and phylogenetic relationships of Barbaturex allow for inference of feeding ecology. Large body size is correlated to herbivory in squamates [5,54], except for the largest varanids, which are carnivores [10,55,56]. Barbaturex lacks dental adaptations for carnivory including recurved, serrated and laterally compressed teeth [57]. Instead, it possesses an acrodont dentition with precise shearing occlusion as indicated by continuous wear facets on mandibular dentition (figure 1). The same occlusal mechanism facilitates herbivory in extant agamids [58,59], and tooth crown morphology in Barbaturex is most similar to herbivorous adult Hydrosaurus. Herbivorous agamids will consume animal protein [60], and omnivorous agamids consume both plants and insects [61]. It is probable that Barbaturex would have opportunistically preyed on invertebrates; however, prey size scales with body size in carnivorous lizards, including iguanians [62] and large body size in Barbaturex probably precluded insectivory as a major component of feeding ecology, at least in mature individuals. The phylogenetic interrelationships of Barbaturex relative to crown agamids are also consistent with herbivorous feeding habits. Optimization of feeding habits on crown acrodontan phylogeny demonstrates that Barbaturex is nested within an omnivorous to herbivorous clade as the sister taxon to fully herbivorous Uromastycinae and bracketed by omnivorous Leiolepis (see figure 3 and electronic supplementary material, figure S2).

    Figure 3.

    Figure 3. Ranked body masses of Pondaung Formation vertebrates compared with ranked masses of modern faunas that include the largest extant herbivorous squamates. (a) Barbaturex morrisoni, Pondaung Formation, Myanmar; (b) Uromastyx aegypticus, North Africa and Middle East; (c) Hydrosaurus amboinensis, Philippines; (d) Ctenosaura similis, Central America. Colours are: black, ungulates; grey, carnivorous mammals; green, squamates; white, insectivores and non-ungulate herbivores.

    Body mass of Barbaturex falls approximately in the middle of size ranges for the Pondaung ungulate guild (figure 3a), and is larger than estimated body masses [63] for the smaller perissodactyls and most artiodactyls. The position of Barbaturex within the body mass distribution of the Pondaung vertebrate fauna is unique relative to extant herbivorous squamates. In all three examined modern faunas, there is no overlap in body mass between ungulate herbivores and squamates. Instead, squamate body masses are far smaller and fall within a range of carnivorous mammals, omnivores and non-ruminant herbivores for all modern faunas, including those from open, xeric environments (figure 3b), and both dry and wet forested environments (figure 3c,d). Difference in body size of Barbaturex relative to extant lizards cannot be explained by differences in ungulate body mass because Pondaung ungulates are both larger and smaller than extant taxa. Instead, body mass overlap between Barbaturex and Pondaung Formation mammals indicates that direct competitive exclusion or predation pressure did not restrict body size of these herbivorous squamates, despite differences in metabolic rate and dietary efficiency between poikilothermic and homeothermic herbivores. Similarly, indirect depression of biomass and diversity in extant squamates by environmental modification of ungulates does not appear to have been present in the Pondaung ecosystem based on both size and numbers of recovered specimens of Barbaturex.

    Based on the relationship of maximum body size to minimum MAT in extant herbivorous squamates, Barbaturex at 981 mm SVL would require minimum MATs of 27.0–28.4°C (range = 26.0–29.9°C for SVL range of 874–1088 mm) to maintain efficient metabolism (figure 4). The late middle Eocene was an interval of cooling from the Middle Eocene climatic optimum [64], but included ice-free poles and extremely warm sea surface temperatures (SSTs) of 22.4–20.5°C at 65°S [65] during the temporal interval spanning the radiometric age estimates of the Pondaung Formation [23]. Model latitudinal SST gradients for the middle Eocene indicate higher SSTs by 6°C relative to modern at a paleolatitude of 13° N [65, figure 3], consistent with MAT differences of approximately 2–5°C for Myanmar in the region of locality UCMP V96009 between the late middle Eocene and modern [66].

    Figure 4.

    Figure 4. Minimum mean annual temperature (MAT) estimation of Pondaung Formation environments based on metabolic scaling of body size and environmental temperatures for modern herbivorous lizards and Barbaturex morrisoni. Model SVL-MAT scaling relationship (dashed areas) are based on maximum SVL and minimum MAT for Cyclura nubila (C) at Q10 values of 2 and 3. Solid red area represents temperature estimates for a snout vent length (SVL) of 981 mm for Barbaturex morrisoni (B). Dashed lines represent temperature values for SVL minima and maxima. Solid black dots represent SVL-MAT coordinate values for extant herbivorous lizards (see the electronic supplementary material, table S6). Inset, skull size of Barbaturex morrisoni compared with the largest extant agamid, Uromastyx aegypticus. Shaded regions represent known elements. Missing skull morphology based in part on Hydrosaurus amboinensis, size is derived from a dentary length of 14.5 cm based on UCMP 128388, NMMP-KU 0092, NMMP-KU 1923 and NMMP-KU 1925.

    Elevated middle Eocene MATs would have allowed for the evolution of large body sizes for a given mass-specific metabolic rate, as inferred for other giant early Paleogene squamates [42], and would have resulted in greater floral productivity than modern ecosystems at low latitudes [67]. Larger body sizes produce increased thermal inertia and may have resulted in elevated temperature-dependent metabolic processes, including digestive efficiency and nutrient uptake [68]. Increased plant productivity affects body size in extant herbivorous iguanians [69], and the comparatively wider range of Pondaung Formation ungulate body mass relative to modern faunas also suggests high primary productivity (figure 3).

    Convergent gigantism in Barbaturex and other Cenozoic squamates [42,53] as components of diverse vertebrate ecosystems demonstrates a greater past ecological breadth and diversity than expected from surveying extant herpetofaunas. These discoveries indicate that hypotheses of competitive advantage in extant mammals due to elevated metabolic processes are probably artefacts of modern climate and should not be used as models for inferring historical patterns of diversification and dominance in non-analogue deep time climates.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank the National Museum in Yangon, Myanmar for access to fossils, David Blackburn, Jens Vindum (CAS), Kevin Seymour (ROM), James Mead (ETSU) and Chris Bell (TMM) for access to comparative specimens. Chris Bell additionally provided access to obscure literature. Greg Brown (University of Nebraska State Museum) expertly cast, molded, and retrodeformed NMMP-KU specimens. K. Lindsay Eaves read and improved the manuscript. We acknowledge the late Donald E. Savage for the discovery of the first specimen of Barbaturex morrisoni and thank Jack Conrad and an anonymous reviewer for formal review. Funding for fieldwork in Myanmar was provided by the Smithsonian Foreign Currency Program, the LS.B. Leakey Foundation and the University of California Museum of Paleontology. J.J.H. was funded by a NSERC Discovery Grant and a Layman Award (UNL).

    Footnotes

    © 2013 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

    References

    • 1
      Janis CM. 2000Patterns in the evolution of herbivory in large terrestrial mammals: the Paleogene of North America. Evolution of herbivory in terrestrial vertebrates. Perspectives from the fossil record (ed. & Sues H-D), pp. 168–222. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 2
      Cooper WE& Vitt LJ. 2002Distribution, extent, and evolution of plant consumption by lizards. J. Zool. London 257, 487–517.doi:10.1017/S0952836902001085 (doi:10.1017/S0952836902001085). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 3
      Zimmerman LC& Tracy CR. 1989Interactions between the environment and ectothermy and herbivory in reptiles. Physiol. Zool. 62, 374–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 4
      Pough H. 1973Lizard energetics and diet. Ecology 54, 837–844.doi:10.2307/1935678 (doi:10.2307/1935678). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 5
      Meiri S. 2008Evolution and ecology of lizard body sizes. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 724–734.doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00414.x (doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00414.x). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 6
      Franz R, Hummel J, Müller DWH, Bauert M, Hatt J-M& Clauss M. 2011Herbivorous reptiles and body mass: effects on food intake, digesta retention, digestibility and gut capacity, and a comparison with mammals. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 158, 94–101.doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.09.007 (doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.09.007). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 7
      Espinoza RE, Wiens JJ& Tracy CR. 2004Recurrent evolution of herbivory in small, cold-climate lizards: Breaking the ecophysiological rules of reptilian herbivory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16 819–16 824.doi:10.1073/pnas.0401226101 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0401226101). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 8
      Janzen DH. 1976The depression of reptile biomass by large herbivores. Am. Nat. 100, 371–400.doi:10.1086/283074 (doi:10.1086/283074). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 9
      Pringle RM, Young TP, Rubenstein DI& McCauley DJ. 2007Herbivore-initiated interaction cascades and their modulation by productivity in an African savanna. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 193–197.doi:10.1073/pnas.0609840104 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0609840104). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 10
      Sutherland DR, Glen AS& de Tores PJ. 2011Could controlling mammalian carnivores lead to mesopredator release of carnivorous reptiles?Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 641–678.doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2103 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2103). Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 11
      Pregill GK& Worthy TH. 2003A new iguanid lizard (Squamata, Iguanidae) from the late Quaternary of Fiji, Southwest Pacific. Herpetologica 2003, 57–67.doi:10.1655/0018-0831(2003)059[0057:ANILSI]2.0.CO;2 (doi:10.1655/0018-0831(2003)059[0057:ANILSI]2.0.CO;2). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 12
      Case TJ. 1976Seasonal aspects of thermoregulatory behavior in the chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus [Reptilia, Lacertilia, Iguanidae]. J. Herpl. 10, 85–95.doi:10.2307/1562788 (doi:10.2307/1562788). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 13
      Estes R. 1983Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology, part 10, Sauria terrestria, Amphisbaenia. New York, NY: Gustav Fischer. Google Scholar
    • 14
      Augé M. 2005Évolution des Lézards du Paléogène en Europe. Mèm. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat. 192, 1–399. Google Scholar
    • 15
      Smith KT. 2009A new lizard assemblage from the earliest Eocene (zone Wa0) of the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, USA: biogeography during the warmest interval of the Cenozoic. J. Syst. Palaeo. 7, 299–358.doi:10.1017/S1477201909002752 (doi:10.1017/S1477201909002752). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 16
      Smith KT. 2011The evolution of mid-latitude faunas during the Eocene: late Eocene lizards of the Medicine Pole Hills reconsidered. Bull. Peab. Mus. Nat. Hist. 52, 3–105.doi:10.3374/014.052.0101 (doi:10.3374/014.052.0101). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 17
      Tsubamoto T, Egi N, Takai M, Shigehara N, Aung AK, Thein T, Soe AN& Tun ST. 2000A preliminary report on the Eocene mammals of the Pondaung fauna, Myanmar. Asian Paleoprimatol. 1, 29–101. Google Scholar
    • 18
      Hutchison JH, Holroyd PA& Ciochon RL. 2004A preliminary report on Southeast Asia's oldest Cenozoic turtle fauna from the late middle Eocene Pondaung formation, Myanmar. Asiatic Herp. Res. 10, 38–52. Google Scholar
    • 19
      Head JJ, Holroyd PA, Hutchison JH& Ciochon RL. 2005First report of snakes (Serpentes) from the late middle Eocene Pondaung formation, Myanmar. J. Vert. Paleontol. 25, 246–250.doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0246:FROSSF]2.0.CO;2 (doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2005)025[0246:FROSSF]2.0.CO;2). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 20
      Tsubamoto T, Egi N& Takai M. 2006Notes of fish, reptilian, and several fragmentary mammalian dental fossils from the Pondaung Formation. Asian Paleoprimatol. 4, 98–110. Google Scholar
    • 21
      Tsubamoto T, et al.2006A summary of the Pondaung fossil expeditions. Asian Paleoprimatol. 4, 1–66. Google Scholar
    • 22
      Gunnell GF, Ciochon RL, Gingerich PD& Holroyd PA. 2002New assessment of Pondaungia and Amphipithecus (Primates) from the late middle Eocene of Myanmar, with a comment on ‘Amphipithecidae.’. Contrib. Mus. Paleo. Univ. Mich. 30, 337–372. Google Scholar
    • 23
      Tsubamoto T, Takai M, Shigehara N, Egi N, Soe Thura T, Aung AK, Maung M, Dahhara T& Suzuki H. 2002Fission-track zircon age of the Eocene Pondaung Formation, Myanmar. J. Hum. Evol. 42, 361–369.doi:10.1006/jhev.2001.0543 (doi:10.1006/jhev.2001.0543). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 24
      Smith KT. 2011On the phylogenetic affinity of the extinct acrodontan lizard Tinosaurus. Tropical vertebrates in a changing world (ed. & Schuchmann K-L), pp. 9–27. Bonn, Germany: Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koening. Google Scholar
    • 25
      Gauthier JA, Kearney M, Maisano JA, Rieppel O& Behlke ADB. 2012Assembling the squamate tree of life: perspectives from the phenotype and the fossil record. Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. 53, 3–308.doi:10.3374/014.053.0101 (doi:10.3374/014.053.0101). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 26
      Moody SM. 1980Phylogenetic and historical biogeographical relationships of the genera in the family Agamidae (Reptilia: Lacertilia) [dissertation]. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. Google Scholar
    • 27
      Honda M, Ota H, Kobayashi M, Nabhitabhata J, Yong H-S, Sengoku S& Hikida T. 2000Phylogenetic relationships of the family Agamidae (Reptilia: Iguania) inferred from Mitochondrial DNA sequences. Zool. Sci. 17, 527–537. ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 28
      Pickford M& Andrews P. 1981The Tinderet Miocene sequence in Kenya. J. Hum. Evol. 10, 11–33.doi:10.1016/S0047-2484(81)80023-1 (doi:10.1016/S0047-2484(81)80023-1). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 29
      Covacevich J, Couper P, Molnar RE, Witten G& Young W. 1990Miocene dragons from Riversleigh: new data on the history of the family Agamidae (Reptilia: Squamata) in Australia. Mem. Queens. Mus. 29, 339–360. Google Scholar
    • 30
      Černaňksý A. 2010A revision of chamaeleonids from the lower Miocene of the Czech Republic with description of a new species of Chamaeleo (Squamata, Chamaeleonidae). Geobios 43, 605–613.doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2010.04.001 (doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2010.04.001). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 31
      Averianov A& Danilov I. 1996Agamid lizards (Reptilia, Sauria, Agamidae) from the early Eocene of Kyrgyzstan. N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Mh. 12, 739–750. Google Scholar
    • 32
      Smith KT, Schaal SFK, Wei S& Chun-Tian L. 2011Acrodont iguanians (Squamata) from the middle Eocene of the Huadian Basin of Jilin Province, China, with a critique of the taxon ‘Tinosaurus.’. Vert. PalAs. 49, 69–84. Google Scholar
    • 33
      Macey JR, Schulte JA, Larson A, Ananjeva NB, Wang Y, Pethiyagoda R, Rastegar-Pouyani N& Papenfuss TJ. 2000Evaluating trans-Tethys migration: an example using acrodont lizard phylogenetics. Sys. Biol. 49, 233–256.doi:10.1093/sysbio/49.2.233 (doi:10.1093/sysbio/49.2.233). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 34
      Okajima Y& Kumazawa Y. 2010Mitochondrial genomes of acrodont lizards: timing of gene rearrangements and phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 141.doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-141 (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-141). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 35
      Maddison WP& Maddison DR. 2011Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.75. See http://mesquiteproject.org. Google Scholar
    • 36
      Hammer Ø, Harper DAT& Ryan PD. 2001PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeo. Elect. 4, 9. Google Scholar
    • 37
      Wilson DE& Reeder DM (eds). 2005Mammal species of the world. A taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edn. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar
    • 38
      Smith FA, Lyons SK, Morgan Ernest SK, Jones KE, Kauffman DM, Dayan T, Marquet PA, Brown JH& Haskell JP. 2003Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology 84, 3403.doi:10.1890/02-9003 (doi:10.1890/02-9003). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 39
      Malone CL, Wheeler T, Tayler JF& Davis SK. 2000Phylogeography of the Caribbean Rock Iguana (Cyclura): implications for conservation and insights on the biogeographic history of the West Indies. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 17, 269–279.doi:10.1006/mpev.2000.0836 (doi:10.1006/mpev.2000.0836). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 40
      Lemm JM& Alberts AC. 2012Cyclura: Natural history, husbandry, and conservation of West Indian rock iguanas. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press. Google Scholar
    • 41
      Makarieva AM, Gorshkov VG& Li B-L. 2005Temperature-associated upper limits to body size in terrestrial poikilotherms. Oikos 111, 425–436.doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2005.14095.x (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2005.14095.x). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 42
      Head JJ, Bloch JI, Hastings AK, Bourque JR, Cadena EA, Herrera FA, Polly PD& Jaramillo CA. 2009Giant boid snake from the Palaeocene neotropics reveals hotter past equatorial temperatures. Nature 457, 715–717.doi:10.1038/nature07671 (doi:10.1038/nature07671). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 43
      Bennett AF& Dawson WR. 1976Metabolism. Biology of the reptilia, vol. 5, (eds , Gans C& Dawson WR), pp. 127–223. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar
    • 44
      Borsuk-Bialynicka B& Moody SM. 1984Priscagaminae, a new subfamily of the Agamidae (Sauria) from the late Cretaceous of the Gobi Desert. Acta Palaeont. Polonica 29, 51–81. Google Scholar
    • 45
      Gao K& Norell MA. 2000Taxonomic compositions and systematics of Late Cretaceous lizard assemblages from Ukhaa Tolgod and adjacent localities, Mongolian Gobi Desert. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 249, 1–118.doi:10.1206/0003-0090(2000)249<0001:TCASOL>2.0.CO;2 (doi:10.1206/0003-0090(2000)249<0001:TCASOL>2.0.CO;2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 46
      Conrad J. 2008Phylogeny and systematics of Squamata (Reptilia) based on morphology. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 310, 1–182.doi:10.1206/310.1 (doi:10.1206/310.1). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 47
      Hoffstetter R. 1955Squamates du type modern (ed. J. Piveteau). Traité de Paleo. 5, 606–662. Google Scholar
    • 48
      Macey JR, Schulte JA, Fong JI, Das I& Papenfuss TJ. 2006The complete mitochondrial genome of an agamid lizard from the Afro-Asian subfamily Agaminae and the phylogenetic position of Bufoniceps and Xenagama. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 39, 881–886.doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.08.020 (doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.08.020). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 49
      Pianka ER, King DR& King RA. (eds) 2004Varanoid lizards of the world. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 50
      Wroe S. 2002A review of terrestrial mammalian and reptilian carnivore ecology in Australian fossil faunas, and factors influencing their diversity: the myth of reptilian domination and its broader ramifications. Aust. J. Zool. 50, 1–24.doi:10.1071/ZO01053 (doi:10.1071/ZO01053). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 51
      Head JJ, Barrett PM& Rayfield EJ. 2009Neurocranial osteology and systematic relationships of Varanus (Megalania) prisca Owen (Squamata, Varanidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 155, 445–457.doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00448.x (doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00448.x). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 52
      Mo JY, Xu X& Evans SE. 2012A large predatory lizard (Platynota, Squamata) from the Late Cretaceous of South China. J. Syst. Palaeo. 10, 33–339. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 53
      Conrad J, Balcarcel AM& Mehling CM. 2012Earliest example of a giant monitor lizard (Varanus, Varanidae, Squamata). PLoS ONE 7, e41767.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041767 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041767). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 54
      Pough H. 1980The advantages of ectothermy for tetrapods. Am. Nat. 115, 92–112.doi:10.1086/283547 (doi:10.1086/283547). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 55
      Losos JB& Greene HW. 1988Ecological and evolutionary implications of diet in monitor lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 35, 379–407.doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1988.tb00477.x (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1988.tb00477.x). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 56
      Struck U, Altenbach AV, Gaulke M& Glaw F. 2002Tracing the diet of the monitor lizard Varanus mabitang by stable isotope analyses [δ15N, δ13C]. Naturwissenschaften 89, 470–473.doi:10.1007/s00114-002-0361-8 (doi:10.1007/s00114-002-0361-8). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 57
      D'Amore DC& Blumenschine RJ. 2009Komodo monitor (Varanus komodoensis) feeding behavior and dental function reflected through tooth marks on bone surfaces and the application to ziphodont paleobiology. Paleobiology 35, 525–552.doi:10.1666/0094-8373-35.4.525 (doi:10.1666/0094-8373-35.4.525). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 58
      Cooper JS& Poole DFG. 1973The dentition and dental tissues of the agamid lizard, Uromastyx. J. Zool. Lond. 169, 85–100.doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1973.tb04654.x (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1973.tb04654.x). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 59
      Herrel A. 2007Herbivory and foraging mode in lizards. Lizard ecology—the evolutionary consequences of foraging mode (eds , Reilly SM, McBrayer LD& Miles DB), pp. 209–236. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • 60
      Castilla AM, Richer R, Herrel A, Conkey AAT, Tribuna J& Al-Thani M. 2011First evidence of scavenging behavior in the herbivorous lizard Uromastyx aegyptia microlepis. J. Arid Environ. 75, 671–673.doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.02.005 (doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.02.005). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 61
      Cooper WE. 2003Food chemical discrimination by the omnivorous lizard Leiolepis belliana. J. Herp. 37, 189–190.doi:10.1670/0022-1511(2003)037[0189:FCDBTO]2.0.CO;2 (doi:10.1670/0022-1511(2003)037[0189:FCDBTO]2.0.CO;2). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 62
      Vitt LJ& Pianka ER. 2007Feeding ecology in the natural world. Lizard ecology—the evolutionary consequences of foraging mode (eds , Reilly SM, McBrayer LD& Miles DB), pp. 140–172. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • 63
      Egi N, Tsubamoto T, Nishimura T& Shigehara N. 2006Postcranial remains of Pondaung mammals (middle Eocene, Myanmar). Asian Paleoprimatol. 4, 111–136. Google Scholar
    • 64
      Bijl PK, Houben AJP, Schouten S, Bohaty SM, Sluijs A, Reichart G-J, Damsté JSS& Brinkhuis H. 2010Transient middle Eocene atmospheric CO2 and temperature variations. Science 330, 819–821.doi:10.1126/science.1193654 (doi:10.1126/science.1193654). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 65
      Bijl PK, Schouten S, Sluijs A, Reichard G-J, Zachos JC& Brinkhuis H. 2009Early Palaeogene temperature evolution of the southwest Pacific Ocean. Nature 461, 776–779.doi:10.1038/nature08399 (doi:10.1038/nature08399). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 66
      Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG& Jarvis A. 2005Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Clim. 25, 1965–1978.doi:10.1002/joc.1276 (doi:10.1002/joc.1276). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 67
      Jaramillo C, Rueda MJ& Mora G. 2006Cenozoic plant diversity in the Neotropics. Science 311, 1893–1896.doi:10.1126/science.1121380 (doi:10.1126/science.1121380). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 68
      Kasarov WH, Petrossian E, Rosenberg L& Diamond JM. 1986How do food passage rate and assimilation differ between herbivorous lizards and nonruminant mammals?J. Comp. Physiol. B 156, 599–609.doi:10.1007/BF00691047 (doi:10.1007/BF00691047). Crossref, PubMed, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 69
      Wikelski M, Carrillo V& Trillmich F. 1997Energy limits to body size in a grazing reptile, the Galapagos marine iguana. Ecology 78, 2204–2217.doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2204:ELTBSI]2.0.CO;2 (doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2204:ELTBSI]2.0.CO;2). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar