Where and what? Frugivory is associated with more efficient foraging in three semi-free ranging primate species

References

• 1.
  Loarie SR, Aarde RJV, Pimm SL. 2009 Fences and artificial water affect African savannah elephant movement patterns. Biol. Conserv. 142, 3086-3098. (doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.08.008) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 2.
  Rutz C, Bijlsma RG. 2006 Food-limitation in a generalist predator. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2069-2076. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3507) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 3.
  Barange M, Coetzee J, Twatwa N. 2005 Strategies of space occupation by anchovy and sardine in the southern Benguela: the role of stock size and intra-species competition. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62, 645-654. (doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.12.019) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 4.
  Marvin GA. 1998 Interspecific aggression and spatial relationships in the salamanders Plethodon kentucki and Plethodon glutinosus: evidence of interspecific interference competition. Can. J. Zool. 76, 94-103. (doi:10.1139/z97-158) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 5.
  Stephens DW, Krebs JR. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
• 6.
  Heithaus ER, Fleming TH, Opler PA. 1975 Foraging patterns and resource utilization in seven species of bats in a seasonal tropical forest. Ecology 56, 841-854. (doi:10.2307/1936295) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 7.
  van Schaik CP, Brockman DK. 2005 Seasonally in primate ecology, reproduction, and life history: an overview. In Seasonality in primates: studies of living and extinct human and non-human primates (eds Brockman DK, van Schaik CP), pp. 3-20. New York: Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
• 8.
  Lührs ML, Dammhahn M, Kappeler PM, Fichtel C. 2009 Spatial memory in the grey mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). Anim. Cogn. 12, 599-609. (doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0219-y) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 9.
  Milton K. 1981 Distribution patterns of tropical plant foods as an evolutionary stimulus to primate mental development. Am. Anthropol. 83, 534-548. (doi:10.1525/aa.1981.83.3.02a00020) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 10.
  Garber PA, Bicca-Marques JC, Azevedo-Lopes MA de O. 2009 South American primates, developments in primatology: progress and prospects (ed. Tuttle RH). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media. Crossref, Google Scholar
• 11.
  Fagan WF et al. 2013 Spatial memory and animal movement. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1316-1329. (doi:10.1111/ele.12165) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 12.
  MacDonald SE, Agnes MM. 1999 Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) spatial memory and behavior in a foraging task. J. Comp. Psychol. 113, 213-217. (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.113.2.213) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 13.
  Rosati AG. 2017 Foraging cognition: reviving the ecological intelligence hypothesis. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 691-702. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.011) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 14.
  Mace GM, Harvey PH, Clutton-Brock TH. 2009 Brain size and ecology in small mammals. J. Zool. 193, 333-354. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1981.tb03449.x) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 15.
  Armstrong E. 1983 Relative brain size and metabolism in mammals. Science 220, 1302-1304. (doi:10.1126/science.6407108) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 16.
  Barton RA, Harvey PH. 2000 Mosaic evolution of brain structure in mammals. Nature 405, 1055-1058. (doi:10.1038/35016580) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 17.
  DeCasien AR, Williams SA, Higham JP. 2017 Primate brain size is predicted by diet but not sociality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0112. (doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0112) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 18.
  Chapman CA, White FJ, Wrangham RW. 1994 Party size in chimpanzees and bonobos: a reevaluation of theory based on two similarly forested sites. In Chimpanzee cultures (eds Wrangham RW, McGrew WC, de Waal FBM), pp. 41-58. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• 19.
  Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Wrangham RW. 1995 Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36, 59-70. (doi:10.1007/BF00175729) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 20.
  Rosati AG, Rodriguez K, Hare B. 2014 The ecology of spatial memory in four lemur species. Anim. Cogn. 17, 947-961. (doi:10.1007/s10071-014-0727-2) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 21.
  Trapanese C, Meunier H, Masi S. 2018 What, where and when: spatial foraging decisions in primates. Biol. Rev. 94, 483-502. (doi.org/10.1111/brv.12462) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 22.
  Stoinski TS, Perdue B, Breuer T, Hoff MP. 2013 Variability in the developmental life history of the genus Gorilla. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 152, 165-172. (doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22301) PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 23.
  Barks SK et al. 2014 Brain organization of gorillas reflects species differences in ecology. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 156, 252-262. (doi:10.1002/ajpa.22646) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 24.
  Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH. 1980 Primates, brains and ecology. J. Zool. 207, 151-169. Google Scholar
• 25.
  Dunbar RIM. 1998 The social brain hypothesis. Evol. Anthropol. 6, 178-190. (doi:10.1002/ajpa.22646)(doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1998)6:5<178::AID-EVAN5>3.3.CO;2-P) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 26.
  Tomasello M, Call J. 1997 Primate cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• 27.
  Devaine M, San-Galli A, Trapanese C, Bardino G, Hano C, Saint Jalme M, Bouret S, Masi S, Daunizeau J. 2017 Reading wild minds: a computational assay of theory of mind sophistication across seven primate species. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005833. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005833) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 28.
  Janson CH, Byrne R. 2007 What wild primates know about resources: opening up the black box. Anim. Cogn. 10, 357-367. (doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0080-9) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 29.
  Janson CH. 2016 Capuchins, space, time and memory: an experimental test of what-where-when memory in wild monkeys. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20161432. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.1432) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 30.
  Janmaat KRL, Ban SD, Boesch C. 2013 Taï chimpanzees use botanical skills to discover fruit: what we can learn from their mistakes. Anim. Cogn. 16, 851-860. (doi:10.1007/s10071-013-0617-z) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 31.
  Janmaat KRL, Ban SD, Boesch C. 2013 Chimpanzees use long-term spatial memory to monitor large fruit trees and remember feeding experiences across seasons. Anim. Behav. 86, 1183-1205. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.021) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 32.
  Janmaat KRL, Polansky L, Ban SD, Boesch C. 2014 Wild chimpanzees plan their breakfast time, type, and location. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16 343-16 348. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1407524111) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 33.
  Andrews MW. 1988 Selection of food sites by Callicebus moloch and Saimiri sciureus under spatially and temporally varying food distribution. Learn. Motiv. 19, 254-268. (doi:10.1016/0023-9690(88)90004-5) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 34.
  MacDonald SE, Wilkie DM. 1990 Yellow-nosed monkeys’ (Cercopithecus ascanius whitesidei) spatial memory in a simulated foraging environment. J. Comp. Psychol. 104, 382-387. (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.104.4.382) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 35.
  Riley E. 2007 Flexibility in diet and activity patterns of Macaca tonkeana in response to anthropogenic habitat alteration. Int. J. Primatol. 28, 107-133. (doi:10.1007/s10764-006-9104-6) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 36.
  Thierry B. 2007 Unity in diversity: lessons from macaque societies. Evol. Anthropol. 16, 224-238. (doi:10.1002/evan.20147) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 37.
  Yeager CP. 1996 Feeding ecology of the long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis) in Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia. Int. J. Primatol. 17, 51-62. (doi:10.1007/BF02696158) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 38.
  Galetti M, Pedroni F. 1994 Seasonal diet of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in a semideciduous forest in south-east Brazil. J. Trop. Ecol. 10, 27-39. (doi:10.1017/S0266467400007689) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 39.
  Ottoni EB, Izar P. 2008 Capuchin monkey tool use: overview and implications. Evol. Anthropol. 17, 171-178. (doi:10.1002/evan.20185) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 40.
  Waterman PG. 1984 Food acquisition and processing as a function of plant chemistry. In Food acquisition and processing in primates (eds Chivers DJ, Wood A, Bilsborough A), pp. 177-211. New York, NY: Plenum Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
• 41.
  Milton K. 1988 Foraging behaviour and the evolution of primate intelligence. In Machiavellian intelligence (eds Byrne R, Whiten A.), pp. 285-305. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
• 42.
  Ban SD, Boesch C, N'Guessan A, N'Goran EK, Tako A, Janmaat KRL. 2016 Taï chimpanzees change their travel direction for rare feeding trees providing fatty fruits. Anim. Behav. 118, 135-147. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.05.014) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 43.
  Altmann J. 1974 Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49, 227-266. (doi:10.1163/156853974(00534) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 44.
  Trapanese C, Robira B, Tonachella G, di Gristina S, Meunier H, Masi S. 2019 Data from: Where and what? Frugivory is associated with more efficient foraging in three semi-free ranging primate species. Dryad Digital Repository. (doi:10.5061/dryad.fk334rr) Google Scholar
• 45.
  Hopkins WD. 1999 On the other hand: statistical issues in the assessment and interpretation of hand preference data in nonhuman primates. Int. J. Primatol. 20, 851-866. (doi:10.1023/A:1020822401195) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 46.
  Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. 2009 Zero-truncated and zero-inflated models for count data. In Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R (eds Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM), pp. 1-33. New York, NY: Springer. Crossref, Google Scholar
• 47.
  McCullagh P, Nelder JA. 1989 Generalized linear models, vol. 37. London, UK: Chapman and Hall. Crossref, Google Scholar
• 48.
  Van Schaik CP, Van Noordwijk MA. 1988 Scramble and contest in feeding competition among female long-tailed macaques (M. fascicularis). Behaviour 105, 77-98. (doi:10.1163/156853988X00502) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 49.
  Janson C. 1985 Aggressive competition and individual food consumption in wild brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, 125-138. (doi:10.1007/BF00299041) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 50.
  Schielzeth H, Forstmeier W. 2008 Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models. Behav. Ecol. 20, 416-420. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arn145) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 51.
  Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ. 2013 Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lang. 68, 255-278. (doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 52.
  Enqgvist L. 2005 The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Anim. Behav. 70, 967-971. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.016) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 53.
  Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. 2014 Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. (arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823). Google Scholar
• 54.
  Field A. 2005 Exploratory factor analysis. In Discovering statistics using SPSS (ed. Wright DB), pp. 619-680. London, UK: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar
• 55.
  Fox J, Weisberg S. 2011 An R companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
• 56.
  Schielzeth H. 2010 Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 103-113. (doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00012.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 57.
  Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H. 2010 Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 47-55. (doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1038-5) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 58.
  Dobson AJ, Barnett AG. 2008 Poisson regression and log-linear models. In An introduction to GLMs, 3rd edn, pp. 165-171. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC. Google Scholar
• 59.
  Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, Kafkafi N, Golani I. 2001 Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav. Brain Res. 125, 279-284. (doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00297-2) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 60.
  Uller C, Urquhart C, Lewis J, Berntsen M. 2013 Ten-month-old infants’ reaching choices for ‘more’: the relationship between inter-stimulus distance and number. Front. Psychol. 4, 84. (doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00084) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 61.
  Parrish AE, James BT, Beran MJ. 2017 Exploring whether nonhuman primates show a bias to overestimate dense quantities. J. Comp. Psychol. 131, 59-68. (doi:10.1037/com0000058) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 62.
  Stevens JR, Wood JN, Hauser MD. 2007 When quantity trumps number: discrimination experiments in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Anim. Cogn. 10, 429-437. (doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0081-8) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 63.
  Allïk J, Tuulmets T. 1991 Occupancy model of perceived numerosity. Percept. Psychophys. 49, 303-314. (doi:10.3758/bf03205986) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
• 64.
  Allik J, Tuulmets T. 1993 Perceived numerosity of spatiotemporal events. Percept. Psychophys. 53, 450-459. (doi:10.3758/bf03206789) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
• 65.
  Hamilton WD. 1971 Geometry for the selfish herd. J. Theor. Biol. 31, 295-311. (doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 66.
  Lyon BE. 2003 Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature 422, 495-499. (doi:10.1038/nature01505) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 67.
  De Lillo C, Visalberghi E, Aversano M. 1997 The organization of exhaustive searches in a patchy space by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J. Comp. Psychol. 111, 82-90. (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.111.1.82) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 68.
  Janson CH. 2007 Experimental evidence for route integration and strategic planning in wild capuchin monkeys. Anim. Cogn. 10, 341-356. (doi.org/10.1007/s10071-007-0079-2) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 69.
  Padoa-Schioppa C, Jandolo L, Visalberghi E. 2006 Multi-stage mental process for economic choice in capuchins. Cognition 99, B1-B13. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.04.008) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 70.
  Genty E, Roeder JJ. 2007 Transfer of self-control in black (Eulemur macaco) and brown (Eulemur fulvus) lemurs: choice of a less preferred food item under a reverse-reward contingency. J. Comp. Psychol. 121, 354-362. (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.354) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 71.
  Chapman CA, Chapman LJ. 1999 Implications of small scale variation in ecological conditions for the diet and density of red colobus monkeys. Primates 40, 215-231. (doi:10.1007/BF02557712) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 72.
  Simmen B, Charlot S. 2003 A comparison of taste thresholds for sweet and astringent-tasting compounds in great apes. C. R. Biol. 326, 449-455. (doi:10.1016/S1631-0691(03)00122-7) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 73.
  Masi S, Breuer T. 2018 Dialium seed coprophagy in wild western gorillas: multiple nutritional benefits and toxicity reduction hypotheses. Am. J. Primatol. 80, e22752. (doi:10.1002/ajp.22752) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 74.
  Salem H, Smith T. 2008 Feeding strategies to increase small ruminant production in dry environments. Small Rumin. Res. 77, 174-194. (doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.03.008) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 75.
  Eisenberg JF, Wilson DE. 1978 Relative brain size and feeding strategies in the Chiroptera. Evolution 32, 740-751. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1978.tb04627.x) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 76.
  Parrish AE, Brosnan SF, Beran MJ. 2015 Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Learn. Cogn. 41, 395-405. (doi:10.1037/xan0000078) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 77.
  Di Bitetti MS. 2001 Home-range use by the tufted capuchin monkey (Cebus apella nigritus) in a subtropical rainforest of Argentina. J. Zool. 253, 33-45. (doi:10.1017/S0952836901000048) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 78.
  Fragaszy DM, Visalberghi E, Fedigan LM. 2004 The complete capuchin: the biology of the genus Cebus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• 79.
  Teichroeb JA, Vining AQ. 2019 Navigation strategies in three nocturnal lemur species: diet predicts heuristic use and degree of exploratory behaviour. Anim. Cogn. 22, 343-354. (doi:10.1007/s10071-019-01247-4) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 80.
  Cai ZG, Connell L. 2015 Space–time interdependence: evidence against asymmetric mapping between time and space. Cognition 136, 268-281. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.039) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 81.
  Brannon EM, Merritt DJ. 2011 Evolutionary foundations of the approximate number system. In Space, time and number in the brain: searching for the foundations of mathematical thought (eds Dehaene S, Brannon EM), pp. 207-224. London, UK: Elsevier. Crossref, Google Scholar
• 82.
  Beran MJ, Parrish AE, Evans TA. 2015 Numerical cognition and quantitative abilities in nonhuman primates. In Evolutionary origins and early development of number processing (eds Geary D, Berch D, Mann Koepke K), pp. 91-119. London, UK: Elsevier. Google Scholar
• 83.
  Pravosudov VV, Roth TC. 2013 Cognitive ecology of food hoarding: the evolution of spatial memory and the hippocampus. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 173-193. (doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135904) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 84.
  Sol D, Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Lefebvre L. 2005 Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5460-5465. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0408145102) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 85.
  Benson-Amram S, Dantzer B, Stricker G, Swanson EM, Holekamp KE. 2016 Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2532-2537. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1505913113) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 86.
  Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH. 1977 Primate ecology and social organization. J. Zool. 183, 1-39. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1977.tb04171.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 87.
  Masi S, Asselain N, Robelin L, Bourgeois A, Hano C, Dousseau G, Saint Jalme M, Krief S. 2013 Response to bitter substances in primates: roles of diet tendency and weaning age. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 13, 916-929. (doi:10.3758/s13415-013-0171-9) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 88.
  Malenky RK, Wrangham R, Chapman CA, Vineberg EO. 1993 Measuring chimpanzee food abundance. Tropics 2, 231-244. (doi:10.3759/tropics.2.231) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 89.
  Simmen B, Pasquet P, Masi S, Koppert GJA, Wells JCK, Hladik CM. 2017 Primate energy input and the evolutionary transition to energy-dense diets in humans. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20170577. (doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0577) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 90.
  Pagel M. 1999 Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877-884. (doi:10.1038/44766) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar