Biphonation in animal vocalizations: insights into communicative functions and production mechanisms

References

• 1.
  Fant G. 1960 Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton. Google Scholar
• 2.
  Taylor AM, Reby D. 2010 The contribution of source–filter theory to mammal vocal communication research. J. Zool. 280, 221–236. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00661.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 3.
  Taylor AM, Charlton BD, Reby D. 2016 Vocal production by terrestrial mammals: source, filter, and function. In Vertebrate sound production and acoustic communication (eds Suthers R, Fitch W, Fay R, Popper A), pp. 229–259. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. (doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27721-9_8) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 4.
  Wilden I, Herzel H, Peters G, Tembrock G. 1998 Subharmonics, biphonation, and deterministic chaos in mammal vocalization. Bioacoustics 9, 171–196. (doi:10.1080/09524622.1998.9753394) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 5.
  Anikin A, Herbst C. 2025 How to analyse and manipulate nonlinear phenomena in voice recordings. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 380, 20240003. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0003) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 6.
  Herzel H, Reuter R. 1996 Biphonation in voice signals. AIP Conf. Proc. 375, 644–657. (doi:10.1063/1.51002) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 7.
  Herzel H, Reuter R. 1997 Whistle Register and Biphonation in a Child’s Voice. Folia Phoniatr. Logop. 49, 216–224. (doi:10.1159/000266458) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 8.
  Riede T, Wilden I, Tembrock G. 1997 Subharmonics, biphonations, and frequency jumps - common components of mammal vocalization or indicators for disorders? Z. Säugetierk. 62, 198–203. Google Scholar
• 9.
  Volodina EV, Volodin IA, Filatova OA. 2006 The occurrence of nonlinear vocal phenomena in frustration whines of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Razpr. IV Razreda SAZU 47, 257–270. Google Scholar
• 10.
  Sibiryakova OV, Volodin IA, Volodina EV. 2021 Polyphony of domestic dog whines and vocal cues to body size. Curr. Zool. 67, 165–176. (doi:10.1093/cz/zoaa042) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 11.
  Riede T, Stolle-Malorny A. 1999 The vocal change of a kitten with craniocerebellar trauma—a case study. Bioacoustics 10, 131–141. (doi:10.1080/09524622.1999.9753426) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 12.
  Fitch WT, Neubauer J, Herzel H. 2002 Calls out of chaos: the adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production. Anim. Behav. 63, 407–418. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1912) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 13.
  Miller PJO, Samarra FIP, Perthuison AD. 2007 Caller sex and orientation influence spectral characteristics of “two-voice” stereotyped calls produced by free-ranging killer whales. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 3932–3937. (doi:10.1121/1.2722056) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 14.
  Filatova OA. 2020 Independent acoustic variation of the higher- and lower-frequency components of biphonic calls can facilitate call recognition and social affiliation in killer whales. PLoS One 15, e0236749. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236749) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 15.
  Papale E, Buffa G, Filiciotto F, Maccarrone V, Mazzola S, Ceraulo M, Giacoma C, Buscaino G. 2015 Biphonic calls as signature whistles in a free-ranging bottlenose dolphin. Bioacoustics 24, 223–231. (doi:10.1080/09524622.2015.1041158) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 16.
  Volodin IA, Volodina EV. 2002 Biphonation as a prominent feature of dhole Cuon alpinus sounds. Bioacoustics 13, 105–120. (doi:10.1080/09524622.2002.9753490) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 17.
  Riede T, Arcadi AC, Owren MJ. 2007 Nonlinear acoustics in the pant hoots of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): vocalizing at the edge. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 1758–1767. (doi:10.1121/1.2427115) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 18.
  Reby D, Wyman MT, Frey R, Passilongo D, Gilbert J, Locatelli Y, Charlton BD. 2016 Evidence of biphonation and source–filter interactions in the bugles of male North American wapiti (Cervus canadensis). J. Exp. Biol. 219, 1224–1236. (doi:10.1242/jeb.131219) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 19.
  Briefer EF, Maigrot AL, Mandel R, Briefer Freymond S, Bachmann I, Hillmann E. 2018 Erratum: Segregation of information about emotional arousal and valence in horse whinnies. Scient. Rep. 8, 46956. (doi:10.1038/srep46956) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
• 20.
  Aubin T, Jouventin P, Hildebrand C. 2000 Penguins use the two-voice system to recognize each other. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 1081–1087. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1112) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 21.
  Zollinger SA, Riede T, Suthers RA. 2008 Two-voice complexity from a single side of the syrinx in northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos vocalizations. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 1978–1991. (doi:10.1242/jeb.014092) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 22.
  Zhang F, Zhao J, Feng AS. 2017 Vocalizations of female frogs contain nonlinear characteristics and individual signatures. PLoS One 12, e0174815. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174815) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 23.
  Volodina EV, Volodin IA, Isaeva IV, Unck C. 2006 Biphonation may function to enhance individual recognition in the dhole, Cuon alpinus. Ethology 112, 815–825. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01231.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 24.
  Robisson P, Aubin T, Bremond J. 1993 Individuality in the voice of the emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri: adaptation to a noisy environment. Ethology 94, 279–290. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1993.tb00445.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 25.
  Kriesell HJ, Elwen SH, Nastasi A, Gridley T. 2014 Identification and characteristics of signature whistles in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) from Namibia. PLoS One 9, e106317. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106317) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 26.
  Quick N, Callahan H, Read AJ. 2018 Two‐component calls in short‐finned pilot whales (Globicephala macrorhynchus). Mar. Mammal Sci. 34, 155–168. (doi:10.1111/mms.12452) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 27.
  Tyson RB, Nowacek DP, Miller PJO. 2007 Nonlinear phenomena in the vocalizations of North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) and killer whales (Orcinus orca). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 1365–1373. (doi:10.1121/1.2756263) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 28.
  Filatova OA, Fedutin ID, Nagaylik MM, Burdin AM, Hoyt E. 2009 Usage of monophonic and biphonic calls by free-ranging resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Kamchatka, Russian Far East. Acta Ethol. 12, 37–44. (doi:10.1007/s10211-009-0056-7) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 29.
  Rice AN, Land BR, Bass AH. 2011 Nonlinear acoustic complexity in a fish ‘two-voice’ system. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 3762–3768. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0656) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 30.
  Miller P. 2002 Mixed-directionality of killer whale stereotyped calls: a direction of movement cue? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52, 262–270. (doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0508-9) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 31.
  Volodin IA, Nagaylik MM, Voldin EV. 2006 Cues to orientation of a caller to a listener in biphonic and non-biphonic close range contact calls in the dhole (Cuon alpinus). Razpr. IV Razreda SAZU 47, 245–255. Google Scholar
• 32.
  McComb K, Reby D, Baker L, Moss C, Sayialel S. 2003 Long-distance communication of acoustic cues to social identity in African elephants. Anim. Behav. 65, 317–329. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2047) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 33.
  Ramsier MA, Cunningham AJ, Moritz GL, Finneran JJ, Williams CV, Ong PS, Gursky-Doyen SL, Dominy NJ. 2012 Primate communication in the pure ultrasound. Biol. Lett. 8, 508–511. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.1149) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 34.
  Garcia M, Herbst CT, Bowling DL, Dunn JC, Fitch WT. 2017 Acoustic allometry revisited: morphological determinants of fundamental frequency in primate vocal production. Scient. Rep. 7, 10450. (doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11000-x) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 35.
  Titze IR. 2011 Vocal fold mass is not a useful quantity for describing F0 in vocalization. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res 54, 520–522. (doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0284) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 36.
  Feighny JA, Williamson KE, Clarke JA. 2006 North American elk bugle vocalizations: male and female bugle call structure and context. J. Mammal. 87, 1072–1077. (doi:10.1644/06-mamm-a-079r2.1) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 37.
  Lemasson A, Boutin A, Boivin S, Blois-Heulin C, Hausberger M. 2009 Horse (Equus caballus) whinnies: a source of social information. Anim. Cogn. 12, 693–704. (doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0229-9) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 38.
  Feng AS, Riede T, Arch VS, Yu Z, Xu Z, Yu X, Shen J. 2009 Diversity of the vocal signals of concave‐eared torrent frogs (Odorrana tormota): evidence for individual signatures. Ethology 115, 1015–1028. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01692.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 39.
  Goller F. 2022 The syrinx. Curr. Biol. 32, R1095–R1100. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.034) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 40.
  Lengagne T, Lauga J, Aubin T. 2001 Intra-syllabic acoustic signatures used by the king penguin in parent–chick recognition: an experimental approach. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 663–672. (doi:10.1242/jeb.204.4.663) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 41.
  Aubin T, Jouventin P. 2002 How to vocally identify kin in a crowd: the penguin model. Adv. Stud. Behav 243–277. (doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(02)80010-9) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 42.
  Caldwell MC, Caldwell DK, Tyack PL. 1990 Review of the signature-whistle hypothesis for the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin. In The bottlenose dolphin (eds Leatherhead S, Reeves RR), pp. 199–234. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. (doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-440280-5.50014-7) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 43.
  Smolker RA, Mann J, Smuts BB. 1993 Use of signature whistles during separations and reunions by wild bottlenose dolphin mothers and infants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. (Print) 33, 393–402. (doi:10.1007/BF00170254) Google Scholar
• 44.
  Ford JKB. 1989 Acoustic behaviour of resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) off Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 67, 727–745. (doi:10.1139/z89-105) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 45.
  Miller PJO. 2006 Diversity in sound pressure levels and estimated active space of resident killer whale vocalizations. J. Comp. Physiol. 192, 449–459. (doi:10.1007/s00359-005-0085-2) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 46.
  Urick RJ. 1975 Principles of underwater sound. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Google Scholar
• 47.
  Neubauer J, Mergell P, Eysholdt U, Herzel H. 2001 Spatio-temporal analysis of irregular vocal fold oscillations: biphonation due to desynchronization of spatial modes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 3179–3192. (doi:10.1121/1.1406498) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 48.
  Zhang Z. 2010 Vibration in a self-oscillating vocal fold model with left-right asymmetry in body-layer stiffness. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, EL279–EL285. (doi:10.1121/1.3492798) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 49.
  Tao C, Jiang JJ. 2006 Anterior-posterior biphonation in a finite element model of vocal fold vibration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 1570–1577. (doi:10.1121/1.2221546) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 50.
  Solomon NP, Luschei ES, Liu K. 1995 Fundamental frequency and tracheal pressure during three types of vocalizations elicited from anesthetized dogs. J. Voice 9, 403–412. (doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80202-4) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
• 51.
  Frey R, Volodin IA, Fritsch G, Volodina EV. 2016 Potential sources of high frequency and biphonic vocalization in the dhole (Cuon alpinus). PLoS One 11, e0146330. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146330) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
• 52.
  Neubauer J, Edgerton M, Herzel H. 2004 Nonlinear phenomena in contemporary vocal music. J. Voice 18, 1–12. (doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(03)00073-0) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 53.
  Brown CH, Cannito MP. 1995 Modes of vocal variation in Sykes’s monkey (Cercopithecus albogularis) squeals. J. Comp. Psychol. 109, 398–415. (doi:10.1037/0735-7036.109.4.398) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
• 54.
  Beeck VC, Heilmann G, Kerscher M, Stoeger AS. 2021 A novel theory of Asian elephant high-frequency squeak production. BMC Biol. 19, 121. (doi:10.1186/s12915-021-01026-z) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 55.
  Madsen PT, Siebert U, Elemans CPH. 2023 Toothed whales use distinct vocal registers for echolocation and communication. Science 379, 928–933. (doi:10.1126/science.adc9570) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 56.
  Elemans CPH et al.. 2015 Universal mechanisms of sound production and control in birds and mammals. Nat. Commun. 6, 8978. (doi:10.1038/ncomms9978) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 57.
  Van den Berg JW. 1957 Subglottic pressures and vibrations of the vocal folds. Folia Phoniatr. Logopaed. 9, 65–71. (doi:10.1159/000262761) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 58.
  Titze IR. 1988 A framework for the study of vocal registers. J. Voice 2, 183–194. (doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(88)80075-4) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 59.
  Beecher MD. 1988 Spectrographic analysis of animal vocalizations: implications of the ‘uncertainty principle’. Bioacoustics 1, 187–208. (doi:10.1080/09524622.1988.9753091) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 60.
  Briefer EF, Vizier E, Gygax L, Hillmann E. 2019 Expression of emotional valence in pig closed-mouth grunts: involvement of both source- and filter-related parameters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 145, 2895–2908. (doi:10.1121/1.5100612) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 61.
  Bergé P, Pomeau Y, Vidal C. 1987 Order within chaos: towards a deterministic approach to turbulence. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
• 62.
  Lucero JC, Schoentgen J, Haas J, Luizard P, Pelorson X. 2015 Self-entrainment of the right and left vocal fold oscillators. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 137, 2036–2046. (doi:10.1121/1.4916601) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar