Emotions mediate nonlinear phenomena production in the vocalizations of two ape species

References

• 1.
  Darwin C. 1872 The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London, UK: John Murray. (doi:10.1037/10001-000) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 2.
  Hess U, Thibault P. 2009 Darwin and emotion expression. Am. Psychol. 64, 120–128. (doi:10.1037/a0013386) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 3.
  Ekman P. 1993 Facial expression and emotion. Am. Psychol. 48, 384–392. (doi:10.1037//0003-066x.48.4.384) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 4.
  Aviezer H, Trope Y, Todorov A. 2012 Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science 338, 1225–1229. (doi:10.1126/science.1224313) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 5.
  Scherer KR, Johnstone, T, Klasmeyer G. 2002 Vocal expression of emotion. In Handbook of affective sciences (eds Davidson RJ, Scherer KR, Hill Goldsmith H), pp. 433–456. New York: Oxford University Press. (doi:10.1093/oso/9780195126013.003.0023) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 6.
  Briefer EF. 2012 Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: mechanisms of production and evidence. J. Zool. 288, 1–20. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00920.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 7.
  Delplanque S, Coppin G, Sander D. 2017 Odor and emotion. In Springer handbook of odor (ed. Buettner A), pp. 101–102. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. (doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26932-0_40) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 8.
  Maurage P, Joassin F, Philippot P, Campanella S. 2007 A validated battery of vocal emotional expressions. Neuropsychological Trends 2, 63–74. (doi:10.7358/neur-2007-002-maur) Google Scholar
• 9.
  Bermejo M, Omedes A. 2000 Preliminary vocal repertoire and vocal communication of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Lilungu (Democratic Republic of Congo). Folia Primatol. 70, 328–357. (doi:10.1159/000021717) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 10.
  Crockford C. 2019 Why does the chimpanzee vocal repertoire remain poorly understood and what can be done about it? In The chimpanzees of the Taï forest (eds Boesch C, Wittig R, Crockford C, Vigilant L, Deschner T, Leendertz F), pp. 394–409. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (doi:10.1017/9781108674218.025) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 11.
  Tavernier C, Ahmed S, Houpt KA, Yeon SC. 2020 Feline vocal communication. J. Vet. Sci. 21, e18. (doi:10.4142/jvs.2020.21.e18) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 12.
  Clay Z, Zuberbühler K. 2011 Bonobos extract meaning from call sequences. PLoS One 6, e18786. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018786) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 13.
  Suzuki TN, Wheatcroft D, Griesser M. 2018 Call combinations in birds and the evolution of compositional syntax. PLoS Biol. 16, e2006532. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006532) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 14.
  Girard-Buttoz C, Zaccarella E, Bortolato T, Friederici AD, Wittig RM, Crockford C. 2022 Chimpanzees produce diverse vocal sequences with ordered and recombinatorial properties. Commun. Biol. 5, 410. (doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03350-8) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 15.
  Bortolato T, Friederici AD, Girard-Buttoz C, Wittig RM, Crockford C. 2023 Chimpanzees show the capacity to communicate about concomitant daily life events. iScience 26, 108090. (doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.108090) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 16.
  Scheumann M, Hasting AS, Kotz SA, Zimmermann E. 2014 The voice of emotion across species: how do human listeners recognize animals’ affective states? PLoS One 9, e91192. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091192) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 17.
  Filippi P et al.. 2017 Humans recognize emotional arousal in vocalizations across all classes of terrestrial vertebrates: evidence for acoustic universals. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20170990. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.0990) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 18.
  Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL. 2003 Meaning and emotion in animal vocalizations. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1000, 32–55. (doi:10.1196/annals.1280.004) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 19.
  Gruber T, Grandjean D. 2017 A comparative neurological approach to emotional expressions in primate vocalizations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 73, 182–190. (doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.004) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 20.
  Helou LB, Jennings JR, Rosen CA, Wang W, Verdolini Abbott K. 2020 Intrinsic laryngeal muscle response to a public speech preparation stressor: personality and autonomic predictors. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 63, 2940–2951. (doi:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00402) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 21.
  Dietrich M. 2009 The effects of stress reactivity on extralaryngeal muscle tension in vocally normal participants as a function of personality. See http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/7203/ (accessed 4 March 2024). Google Scholar
• 22.
  Mendl M, Burman OHP, Paul ES. 2010 An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 2895–2904. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0303) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 23.
  Soltis J, Blowers TE, Savage A. 2011 Measuring positive and negative affect in the voiced sounds of African elephants (Loxodonta africana). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129, 1059–1066. (doi:10.1121/1.3531798) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 24.
  Yamaguchi C, Izumi A, Nakamura K. 2010 Time course of vocal modulation during isolation in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Am. J. Primatol. 72, 681–688. (doi:10.1002/ajp.20824) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 25.
  Yeon SC et al.. 2011 Differences between vocalization evoked by social stimuli in feral cats and house cats. Behav. Processes 87, 183–189. (doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2011.03.003) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 26.
  Fichtel C, Hammerschmidt K, Jürgens U. 2001 On the vocal expression of emotion. a multi-parametric analysis of different states of aversion in the squirrel monkey. Behaviour 138, 97–116. (doi:10.1163/15685390151067094) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 27.
  Yin S, McCowan B. 2004 Barking in domestic dogs: context specificity and individual identification. Anim. Behav. 68, 343–355. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.07.016) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 28.
  Taylor AM, Reby D, McComb K. 2009 Context‐related variation in the vocal growling behaviour of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Ethology 115, 905–915. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01681.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 29.
  Marx A, Lenkei R, Pérez Fraga P, Bakos V, Kubinyi E, Faragó T. 2021 Occurrences of non-linear phenomena and vocal harshness in dog whines as indicators of stress and ageing. Sci. Rep. 11, 4468. (doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83614-1) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 30.
  Amaya JP, Zufiaurre E, Areta JI, Abba AM. 2019 The weeping vocalization of the screaming hairy armadillo (Chaetophractus vellerosus), a distress call. J. Mammal. 100, 1427–1435. (doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyz108) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 31.
  Massenet M, Anikin A, Pisanski K, Reynaud K, Mathevon N, Reby D. 2022 Nonlinear vocal phenomena affect human perceptions of distress, size and dominance in puppy whines. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20220429. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2022.0429) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 32.
  Volodin I, Volodina E, Filatova O. 2005 Structure, occurrence and functional significance of nonlinear phenomena in sounds of terrestrial mammals. Zhurnal Obshchei Biol. 66, 346–362. PubMed, Google Scholar
• 33.
  Fitch WT. 2025 Applying nonlinear dynamics to the voice: a historical perspective. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 380, 20240024. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0024) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 34.
  Wilden I, Herzel H, Peters G, Tembrock G. 1998 Subharmonics, biphonation, and deterministic chaos in mammal vocalization. Bioacoustics 9, 171–196. (doi:10.1080/09524622.1998.9753394) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 35.
  Fitch WT, Neubauer J, Herzel H. 2002 Calls out of chaos: the adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production. Anim. Behav. 63, 407–418. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1912) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 36.
  Borch DZ, Sundberg J, Lindestad PÅ, Thalén M. 2004 Vocal fold vibration and voice source aperiodicity in ‘dist’ tones: a study of a timbral ornament in rock singing. Logoped. Phoniatr. Vocol. 29, 147–153. (doi:10.1080/14015430410016073) Crossref, PubMed, Google Scholar
• 37.
  Neubauer J, Edgerton M, Herzel H. 2004 Nonlinear phenomena in contemporary vocal music. J. Voice 18, 1–12. (doi:10.1016/S0892-1997(03)00073-0) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 38.
  Anikin A. 2020 The perceptual effects of manipulating nonlinear phenomena in synthetic nonverbal vocalizations. Bioacoustics 29, 226–247. (doi:10.1080/09524622.2019.1581839) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 39.
  Riede T, Wilden I, Tembrock G. 1997 Subharmonics, biphonations, and frequency jumps—common components of mammalian vocalization or indicators for disorders? Mamm. Biol. Z. Für Säugetierkd 62, 198–203. Google Scholar
• 40.
  Blumstein DT et al.. 2011 Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 758–767. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01993.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 41.
  Karp D, Manser MB, Wiley EM, Townsend SW. 2014 Nonlinearities in meerkat alarm calls prevent receivers from habituating. Ethology 120, 189–196. (doi:10.1111/eth.12195) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 42.
  Townsend SW, Manser MB. 2011 The function of nonlinear phenomena in meerkat alarm calls. Biol. Lett. 7, 47–49. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0537) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 43.
  Koutseff A, Reby D, Martin O, Levrero F, Patural H, Mathevon N. 2018 The acoustic space of pain: cries as indicators of distress recovering dynamics in pre-verbal infants. Bioacoustics 27, 313–325. (doi:10.1080/09524622.2017.1344931) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 44.
  Anikin A, Pisanski K, Massenet M, Reby D. 2021 Harsh is large: nonlinear vocal phenomena lower voice pitch and exaggerate body size. Proc. R. Soc. B 288, 20210872. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.0872) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 45.
  Abitbol J, Abitbol P, Abitbol B. 1999 Sex hormones and the female voice. J. Voice 13, 424–446. (doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(99)80048-4) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 46.
  Volodina EV, Volodin IA, Isaeva IV, Unck C. 2006 Biphonation may function to enhance individual recognition in the dhole, Cuon alpinus. Ethology 112, 815–825. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01231.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 47.
  Sportelli JJ, Jones BL, Ridgway SH. 2023 Non-linear phenomena: a common acoustic feature of bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) signature whistles. Bioacoustics 32, 241–260. (doi:10.1080/09524622.2022.2106306) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 48.
  Riede T, Arcadi AC, Owren MJ. 2007 Nonlinear acoustics in the pant hoots of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): vocalizing at the edge. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 1758–1767. (doi:10.1121/1.2427115) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 49.
  Blumstein DT, Récapet C. 2009 The sound of arousal: the addition of novel non‐linearities increases responsiveness in marmot alarm calls. Ethology 115, 1074–1081. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01691.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 50.
  Anikin A, Pisanski K, Reby D. 2020 Do nonlinear vocal phenomena signal negative valence or high emotion intensity? R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 201306. (doi:10.1098/rsos.201306) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 51.
  Riede T, Owren MJ, Arcadi AC. 2004 Nonlinear acoustics in pant hoots of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): frequency jumps, subharmonics, biphonation, and deterministic chaos. Am. J. Primatol. 64, 277–291. (doi:10.1002/ajp.20078) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 52.
  Slocombe KE, Zuberbühler K. 2007 Chimpanzees modify recruitment screams as a function of audience composition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 17228–17233. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0706741104) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 53.
  Keenan S, Mathevon N, Stevens JMG, Nicolè F, Zuberbühler K, Guéry JP, Levréro F. 2020 The reliability of individual vocal signature varies across the bonobo’s graded repertoire. Anim. Behav. 169, 9–21. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.08.024) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 54.
  Gruber T, Clay Z. 2016 A comparison between bonobos and chimpanzees: a review and update. Evol. Anthropol. 25, 239–252. (doi:10.1002/evan.21501) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 55.
  Pisor AC, Surbeck M. 2019 The evolution of intergroup tolerance in nonhuman primates and humans. Evol. Anthropol. 28, 210–223. (doi:10.1002/evan.21793) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 56.
  Mitani JC. 2009 Male chimpanzees form enduring and equitable social bonds. Anim. Behav. 77, 633–640. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.11.021) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 57.
  Crockford C, Wittig RM, Langergraber K, Ziegler TE, Zuberbühler K, Deschner T. 2013 Urinary oxytocin and social bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20122765. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2765) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 58.
  Gilby IC, Brent LJN, Wroblewski EE, Rudicell RS, Hahn BH, Goodall J, Pusey AE. 2013 Fitness benefits of coalitionary aggression in male chimpanzees. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67, 373–381. (doi:10.1007/s00265-012-1457-6) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 59.
  Langergraber KE, Mitani JC, Vigilant L. 2007 The limited impact of kinship on cooperation in wild chimpanzees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7786–7790. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0611449104) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 60.
  Surbeck M, Boesch C, Girard-Buttoz C, Crockford C, Hohmann G, Wittig RM. 2017 Comparison of male conflict behavior in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), with specific regard to coalition and post-conflict behavior. Am. J. Primatol. 79, e22641. (doi:10.1002/ajp.22641) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 61.
  Wittig RM, Crockford C, Langergraber KE, Zuberbühler K. 2014 Triadic social interactions operate across time: a field experiment with wild chimpanzees. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20133155. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.3155) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 62.
  Mielke A, Preis A, Samuni L, Gogarten JF, Wittig RM, Crockford C. 2018 Flexible decision-making in grooming partner choice in sooty mangabeys and chimpanzees. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 172143. (doi:10.1098/rsos.172143) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 63.
  Moscovice LR, Douglas PH, Martinez-Iñigo L, Surbeck M, Vigilant L, Hohmann G. 2017 Stable and fluctuating social preferences and implications for cooperation among female bonobos at LuiKotale, Salonga National Park, DRC. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 163, 158–172. (doi:10.1002/ajpa.23197) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 64.
  Wittig RM, Boesch C. 2003 Food competition and linear dominance hierarchy among female chimpanzees of the Taï National Park. Int. J. Primatol. 24, 847–867. (doi:10.1023/A:1024632923180) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 65.
  Surbeck M, Hohmann G. 2013 Intersexual dominance relationships and the influence of leverage on the outcome of conflicts in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67, 1767–1780. (doi:10.1007/s00265-013-1584-8) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 66.
  Kappeler PM et al.. 2022 Sex and dominance: how to assess and interpret intersexual dominance relationships in mammalian societies. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, 918773. (doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.918773) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 67.
  Behringer V, Stevens JMG, Kivell TL, Neufuss J, Boesch C, Hohmann G. 2016 Within arm’s reach: measuring forearm length to assess growth patterns in captive bonobos and chimpanzees. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 161, 37–43. (doi:10.1002/ajpa.23004) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 68.
  Grawunder S, Crockford C, Clay Z, Kalan AK, Stevens JMG, Stoessel A, Hohmann G. 2018 Higher fundamental frequency in bonobos is explained by larynx morphology. Curr. Biol. 28, R1188–R1189. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.030) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 69.
  Van Elsacker L, Vervaecke H, Verheyen RF. 1995 A review of terminology on aggregation patterns in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Int. J. Primatol. 16, 37–52. (doi:10.1007/BF02700152) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 70.
  Wittig RM. 2018 40 years of research at the Taï chimpanzee project. Pan Afr. News 25, 16–18. (doi:10.5134/236289) Crossref, Google Scholar
• 71.
  Altmann J. 1974 Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49, 227–267. (doi:10.1163/156853974x00534) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 72.
  Keenan S. 2016 Identity information in bonobo vocal communication: from sender to receiver. These de doctorat, Lyon. https://www.theses.fr/2016LYSES038. Google Scholar
• 73.
  Bortolato T, Mundry R, Wittig RM, Girard-Buttoz C, Crockford C. 2023 Slow development of vocal sequences through ontogeny in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus). Dev. Sci. 26, e13350. (doi:10.1111/desc.13350) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 74.
  Root-Gutteridge H, Cusano DA, Shiu Y, Nowacek DP, Van Parijs SM, Parks SE. 2018 A lifetime of changing calls: North Atlantic right whales, Eubalaena glacialis, refine call production as they age. Anim. Behav. 137, 21–34. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.12.016) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 75.
  Stoeger AS, Baotic A, Li D, Charlton BD. 2012 Acoustic features indicate arousal in infant giant panda vocalisations. Ethology 118, 896–905. (doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2012.02080.x) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 76.
  De Gregorio C. 2025 Singing out of tune: sexual and developmental differences in the occurrence of nonlinear phenomena in primate songs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 380, 20240021. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0021) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 77.
  Linossier J, Charrier I, Mathevon N, Casey C, Reichmuth C. Non-linear phenomena in pinnipeds: a preliminary investigation in the contact calls of northern elephant seal pups. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 380, 20240016. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0016) Link, Google Scholar
• 78.
  Massenet M, Pisanski K, Reynaud K, Mathevon N, Reby D, Anikin A. 2025 Acoustic context and dynamics of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian calls: the case of puppy whines. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 380, 29240022. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0022) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 79.
  Preis A, Samuni L, Deschner T, Crockford C, Wittig RM. 2019 Urinary cortisol, aggression, dominance and competition in wild, West African male chimpanzees. Front. Ecol. Evol 7, 107. (doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00107) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 80.
  Mitchell HF, Kenny DT. 2010 Change in vibrato rate and extent during tertiary training in classical singing students. J. Voice 24, 427–434. (doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.12.003) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 81.
  Boersma P, Weenink D. 2001 PRAAT, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int. 5, 341–345. Google Scholar
• 82.
  Bürkner PC. 2017 brms: an R package for bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Softw. 80, 01. (doi:10.18637/jss.v080.i01) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 83.
  Maciej P, Fischer J, Hammerschmidt K. 2011 Transmission characteristics of primate vocalizations: implications for acoustic analyses. PLoS One 6, e23015. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023015) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 84.
  Palagi E. 2006 Social play in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): implications for natural social systems and interindividual relationships. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 129, 418–426. (doi:10.1002/ajpa.20289) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 85.
  Palagi E, Paoli T. 2007 Play in adult bonobos (Pan paniscus): modality and potential meaning. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 134, 219–225. (doi:10.1002/ajpa.20657) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 86.
  Stoeger AS, Charlton BD, Kratochvil H, Fitch WT. 2011 Vocal cues indicate level of arousal in infant African elephant roars. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 1700–1710. (doi:10.1121/1.3605538) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 87.
  Corvin S, Massenet M, Hardy A, Patural H, Peyron R, Fauchon C, Mathevon N. 2025 Nonlinear acoustic phenomena affect the perception of pain in human baby cries. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 380, 20240023. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0023) Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 88.
  Moscovice LR, Surbeck M, Fruth B, Hohmann G, Jaeggi AV, Deschner T. 2019 The cooperative sex: sexual interactions among female bonobos are linked to increases in oxytocin, proximity and coalitions. Horm. Behav. 116, 104581. (doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104581) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 89.
  Tokuyama N, Furuichi T. 2016 Do friends help each other? Patterns of female coalition formation in wild bonobos at Wamba. Anim. Behav. 119, 27–35. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.06.021) Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 90.
  Pusey AE. 2022 Warlike chimpanzees and peacemaking bonobos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2208865119. (doi:10.1073/pnas.2208865119) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 91.
  Herrmann E, Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M. 2010 Differences in the cognitive skills of bonobos and chimpanzees. PLoS One 5, e12438. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012438) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 92.
  Cordoni G, Palagi E. 2015 Being a victim or an aggressor: different functions of triadic post-conflict interactions in wolves (Canis lupus lupus). Aggress. Behav. 41, 526–536. (doi:10.1002/ab.21590) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 93.
  Nurmi NO, Hohmann G, Goldstone LG, Deschner T, Schülke O. 2018 The ‘tolerant chimpanzee’—towards the costs and benefits of sociality in female bonobos. Behav. Ecol. 29, 1325–1339. (doi:10.1093/beheco/ary118) Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 94.
  Samuni L, Surbeck M. 2023 Cooperation across social borders in bonobos. Science 382, 805–809. (doi:10.1126/science.adg0844) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 95.
  Inoue N, Shimada M. 2020 Comparisons of activity budgets, interactions, and social structures in captive and wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animals 10, 1063. (doi:10.3390/ani10061063) Crossref, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar
• 96.
  Anonymous. 2024 NLP_Chimps_Bonobos. Zenodo. (doi:10.5281/zenodo.11403109) Google Scholar
• 97.
  Fournier F, Perrier L, Girard-Buttoz C, Keenan S, Bortolato T, Wittig RM et al.. 2025 Supplementary material from: Emotions mediate non-linear phenomena production in the vocalisations of two ape species. Figshare. (doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7700911) Google Scholar